patrick.net

https://iceni.substack.com/p/declaration-of-sovereignty-pt-i

MITRE’s C19HCC was not “volunteer” work—it was proof-of-concept for:

Mass-scale data fusion from decentralized, fractured sources

Psychological compliance conditioning

Rapid-response narrative alignment via NLP tools

Medical AI governance pathways that bypass democratic consent

The goal was not care. It was control.

Not healing. Harvesting.

They used our breath, our hearts, our fears, our deaths—to train the machine.

Booger says

In other words, shit that happened long before 2019, since that would still be in the statute being only a few years ago.

Maybe the Jews can learn something from the Based Trad Pre-Vatican II Officials in the Archdiocese of Boston

Speaking of Trad Caths:

TradCath: "You have to accept the Immaculate Conception of Mary"
"That wasn't made official dogma until the late 19th Century."
TC: "You don't get to pick and choose, no cafeteria Catholicism!"
"So I guess you love Vatican II, one of the longest planned, longest meeting, widely, and well attended councils in Church History."
TC: "That's DIFFERENT!!! DAMMIT!"

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/harvard-poll-young-americans/2025/04/23/id/1208085/

https://iceni.substack.com/p/declaration-of-sovereignty-pt-i

During COVID-19, the Atlantic Council:

Coordinated with WHO and NATO media cells

Promoted strict messaging guidelines for platforms

Equated vaccine hesitancy with extremism

Developed “infodemic” frameworks to treat dissent as pathogenic

Integrated with MITRE, Gates, and EU regulators for narrative shaping

The pandemic was not just a health event.
It was a cultural weapon test.

And the Atlantic Council held the script.

The_Deplorable says

Yes, and people who lie to you have contempt for you. A pathological liar like Schiff has absolute contempt for the public that still votes for him.

HeadSet says

The_Deplorable says

Yes, and people who lie to you have contempt for you. A pathological liar like Schiff has absolute contempt for the public that still votes for him.

The older I get, the more lying to my face makes me angry. I might get irritated that someone doesn't agree with me or won't go along with what I want to do, but as long as it's up front, that's OK. But to lie to my face, then backstab me or gaslight me - fuck you.

It's politically incorrect to say so, but I think American Jews are usually strongly for unlimited immigration of everyone who is not white and Christian.

Two reasons:
1. Jews tend to conflate all white Christian people with "Nazis".
2. Jews feel safer with more minorities around. Helps to divide and control the voting public, and makes Jews blend in better.

But now that we have a lot of Muslims, I think Jews are in fact in much greater danger.

Patrick says

It's politically incorrect to say so, but I think American Jews are usually strongly for unlimited immigration of everyone who is not white and Christian.

Two reasons:
1. Jews tend to conflate all white Christian people with "Nazis".
2. Jews feel safer with more minorities around. Helps to divide and control the voting public, and makes Jews blend in better.

But now that we have a lot of Muslims, I think Jews are in fact in much greater danger.

The Jews were pissed off with Christians because we would always joke,"Why do Jews have sad eyes? Because they killed Christ." So they pushed for muslim rapefugees to break up the Christian "hegemony", but now these muslims have decided to kill and rape Jews instead of just hurt their feelings like the cruel Christians used to do. Be careful of what you wish for. FAFO.

stereotomy says

The Jews were pissed off with Christians because we would always joke,"Why do Jews have sad eyes? Because they killed Christ." So they pushed for muslim rapefugees to break up the Christian "hegemony", but now these muslims have decided to kill and rape Jews instead of just hurt their feelings like the cruel Christians used to do. Be careful of what you wish for. FAFO.

Every party and person like Tommy Robinson (who by the way, is still in jail) or Geert Wilders is generally pro-Israel in Europe.

Every party and person like Sadiq Khan or Sinn Fein that wants more Illegals is generally anti-Israel in Europe.

Also Pope Francis.

Patrick says

But now that we have a lot of Muslims, I think Jews are in fact in much greater danger.

Almost all Jews in Europe feel less safe with Muslims.

Bavarian Hotelliers realized they could fire the staff, rent to the Government, and not have to compete with Ibiza or the Greek Islands in a less-outdoorsy-hiking-hippy era. Ditto with landlords around Europe - and actually in the USA. Remember the mayor of that Ohio town knew in advance about the Haitans and created an LLC to buy up old shotgun shacks, kick out any tenants by jacking up the rent 50%, and then getting the rent paid by Refugee NGOs.

I'm leaning towards rent, rather than wages, as the primary driver. Esp. in Europe, the fakefugees and 'migrants' don't work.

Also Jew-critics studiously avoid discussing why the Church is so gung ho on migrants on both Continents. They'll mention HIAC but never LIRS or Catholic Charities or JRS.

They'll play 6 Degrees of Jew to prove that Jewish woman in Sweden "Caused" Muslim migration, when in reality 20 years before Sweden threw open it's doors to Palestinians, then Bosnians, than before she ever set foot in the country.

All the Jews I know are cheering Trump for booting out the 17 and 14 year degreeless, endless tuition paying Fatah-CAIR students. I've not heard anybody except hardcore Democrat Jews be pro-Muslim migration since 9/11 at least.

Well, the WW2 guys were 110% right. They pretty much said to photograph everything, because when the Greatest Witnesses were gone, it would start right back up. If you asked me a few years ago if this shit would happen again, I would have laughed in your face. It's probably on this board, too, somewhere.

My theory about internalized leftism is coming more and more true with each passing day.

@AmericanKulak

I'm not opposed to Israel, only to dual passports, AIPAC's uniquely tight control over almost all Congressmen, and to US funding for Israel.

Could you imagine US Congressmen with dual Russian passports, a Russian lobby which is untouchable, and massive US aid with no strings to Russia?

Americans should be Americans, Israelis should be Israelis, and there should be no ambiguity about it..

Patrick says

Could you imagine US Congressmen with dual Russian passports, a Russian lobby which is untouchable, and massive US aid with no strings to Russia?

Here's my beef: I think it's been discussed before how many US Congressmen have dual passports. A few in total have admitted it, and if I recall none or almost none of them were Israel.

For example, everywhere you go on Wokeright social media it's Bernie has an Israeli passport (he's officially denied this) or that Schumer has an Israeli passport, etc.

There's a famous meme with a US & Israel passport listing every Jewish elected to Congress claiming they are all Israeli citizens. Then the excuse is as Jews they COULD get Israeli citizenship. But that's BS because Greece, Poland, Spain, Mexico, etc. have similar laws guaranteeing citizenship to those who can prove an ancestor.

In reality it's a handful of Woke and RINO republicans are the only ones who clearly have them. I think Somalia and Columbia are two.

When I argued with Richwicks, he'd make claims, they'd be shown to have no evidence or actually evidence to the contrary, he'd say "I guess", and then a short while later make the same claims again. For example AIPAC isn't even in the top 40 for lobbying. As for "AIPAC has their own personal handler for every Congressman" is another claim. Finally, I've never seen any evidence that AIPAC gets money from outside the USA or Non-US citizens.

I TOTALLY agree that no Congressman, Senator, President, Judge OR Department Head/Cabinet Level Official should have a dual passport.

And I go further than Massie and say it should be disqualifying AND it should be illegal for any current OR FORMER Federal Elected official to have a trust or estate outside the United States, too. Like the Turks & Caicos Islands or (Old) Jersey. Sorry, Mittens!

By the way, I'd say the #1 group openly and publicly smeared without much if any criticism/pushback in the US isn't Jews, but in my entire life is...

Catholics.

Stolen from Ceffer.

"Ja, Ja, Helga. I will vote as you command, my Princess. 50,000 more Eritreans, yes mein frau.

Ja, he can sleep in our bed. I am sleeping in anutter Zimmer? Okay, do not hit me with the roller.

Why would Jews do this?"

ChatGPT:

As of May 2025, the Dual Citizenship Disclosure Act (H.R. 7484) remains pending in the U.S. House of Representatives.

The bill was introduced on February 29, 2024, by Representative Tim Burchett (R-TN) and referred to the House Committee on House Administration. It has not progressed beyond this initial step. No hearings, markups, or votes have been scheduled or conducted.

The proposed legislation would require Members of Congress who are foreign nationals to file a statement with the appropriate congressional ethics committee describing their status as a foreign national. Failure to comply could result in a fine of up to $2,500.

With no cosponsors and no scheduled committee action, the bill has little momentum at this time. For updates, you can monitor the official bill page on Congress.gov:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7484

How is this possibly not a law already?

Patrick says

How is this possibly not a law already?

Fear that it will be expanded to foreign trusts and holdings. Which IMHO is a bigger priority than the dual citizenship: Having an untouchable trust or estate overseas. "Well, it's burning down and I was part of it. Boy Voyage guys, I'm moving to Switzerland and living off my Lichtenstein Trust!

Hey, good idea!

Adding mandatory disclosure of foreign assets and trusts to my platform:

Require that all Congressmen publicly disclose any foreign passports, foreign assets, and trusts.

https://x.com/AMAZlNGNATURE/status/1918566321198948594

https://x.com/AlecStapp/status/1919193547783184789

I don't know exactly who to blame things on, but my
working hypothesis is some kind of lawyer-
adminstrator-journalist-academic-regulator axis.

Lawyers sue institutions every time they harm
someone (but not when they fail to benefit
someone). The institutions hire administrators to
create policies that will help avoid lawsuits, and the
administrators codify maximally strict rules meant to
protect the institution in the worst-case scenario.

Journalists ("if it bleeds, it leads") and academics
(who gain clout from discovering and calling out
new types of injustice), operating in conjunction
with these people, pull the culture towards
celebrating harm -avoidance as the greatest good,
and cast suspicion on anyone who tries to add
benefit-getting to the calculation. Finally, there are
calls for regulators to step in - always on the side of
ratcheting up severity.

https://x.com/WallStreetMav/status/1918972872988512416

https://www.stevesailer.net/p/jewish-vs-gentile-political-givers




Wow, Jews are by far the biggest Dem donors among the top 100.

Patrick says

Wow, Jews are by far the biggest Dem donors among the top 100.

Also massive shift to the GOP.

Patrick says

Wow, Jews are by far the biggest Dem donors among the top 100.

This surprise anyone? They go where they think the money is going. Always have. It's not a religion for most Jews, it's a manipulation club. No ill will to Jews, but they know what they're doing. It's a money and manipulation club.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEIjzSUNjIU