patrick.net

In a striking career pivot, Brad Parscale, once the digital mastermind behind President Donald Trump’s campaigns, has now registered as a foreign agent for the Israeli government.

Parscale signed a $6 million contract with Israel to lead a campaign seeking to combat anti-Semitism, The Hill reported.

In this role, Parscale’s company, Clocktower X LLC, will lead a U.S.-based digital campaign targeting Gen Z audiences on platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube.

In just the last 5 years, Jeff Bezos’s ex-wife MacKenzie Scott has poured nearly $20 billion into overwhelmingly woke causes.

By contrast, over the course of his entire life, stretching back to the 1970s, George Soros has donated $32 billion

... almost the same thing happened in 1953, when the House Republicans had a rare 2-year window of power and used it to do the unthinkable: investigate the great foundations. Norman Dodd, chief investigator of the Reece Committee, visited the Ford Foundation to interview its head, Rowan Gaither.

According to an interview Dodd gave shortly before his death, Gaither asked him, off the record, if he knew the purpose of the Ford Foundation. Dodd was indeed curious. “We shall use our grantmaking power,” said Gaither, “so as to alter life in the United States so that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.”

Imagine this in 1953. During the Korean War! “I nearly fell off my chair,” said Dodd, who did not fall of his chair, and managed to ask Gaither if he would say the same to the American people. “We would not think of doing any such thing,” replied Gaither.

From 2000.

A little-known consulting firm is quietly steering the policies and messaging of dozens of progressive prosecutors nationwide, according to a searing report exclusively obtained and reviewed by Fox News Digital.

The Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund (LELDF), a pro-police nonprofit based out of Virginia, is publishing a report Tuesday alleging that a liberal group focused on criminal justice reform called the Wren Collective has helped guide and shape the offices of at least 40 progressive prosecutors across 22 states on their "policies, public communications, and legal decisions," according to the report exclusively obtained by Fox Digital titled, "Outsourcing Justice."

The report outlines the influence — both direct and indirect — that the Wren Collective has allegedly had in both the campaigns and subsequent policy priorities for certain district attorneys, including at least 40, whom the report alleges held cozy relationships with the group, such as joining weekly meetings to talk communication strategy, heeding advice on specific policy issues or even signing a non-disclosure agreement over a DA's professional relationship with the group.

Iryna Zarutska is dead because of bad policy — bad policy that seemingly spread to every major city all at once.

Why, and how?

Obviously Soros DA’s play a huge role but there’s more.

There’s a group writing the policies for them, and @LELDF broke the full story today…

There is no legal mandate for governments to participate in poastocracy, and indeed there is massive resistance to this. Underneath all the issues of mass migration, race communism, Net Zero, and all the rest is an ancien régime who have grown accustomed to a one-way lecture style of discourse management, and who are happy to do what the people want so long as they get to tell the people what to think. The culture of the Internet is completely incompatible with that, and the first instinct of governing elites in Europe, Britain, Canada, and Blue America has been to do everything in their power to clamp down on the Internet. They close comments sections, turn off replies, censor misinformation, and arrest people for speech they hate. They treat the Internet as though it should be just another one of their tightly controlled one-to-many broadcast mediums, and they rely almost entirely on that broadcast media for their own messaging. In the near future they intend to role out social credit systems, digital ID, and central bank digital currencies, turning the Internet into a control grid and the planet into an open air concentration camp overseen by machines of loving grace. This is all very dystopian, but I think this is a losing battle, and that the unrest sweeping across Britain and Europe is a direct function of this refusal to adapt. People expect a high degree of responsiveness, and are turning their backs on political parties and bureaucratic systems that do not offer it, but instead continue to insist that the people will believe what they’re told to believe when they’re told to believe it. It is no accident that the nationalist right-wing parties that are rising across the West are, without exception, also the parties of the digital natives.

Doctors received kickbacks indirectly through Purdue Pharma, which was owned and controlled by the Sackler family. The U.S. Department of Justice alleged that Purdue paid doctors under the guise of educational talks and consulting, but in reality, these payments were intended to induce them to prescribe more OxyContin.

Additionally, Purdue engaged in a scheme with the electronic health records company Practice Fusion, where it paid a $1 million kickback in exchange for alerts in doctors’ software that prompted them to consider opioid prescriptions, thereby increasing sales of Purdue’s opioid products.

These actions were part of broader efforts by Purdue, with the knowledge and approval of Sackler family members, to boost opioid prescriptions despite knowing the risks of abuse and diversion.

Why would the medical profession prescribe addictive medications? What are they thinking?
But then at this point we don't have a medical profession, do we?

I'm sure that's all true, but it's hard to see how the vaxx was a Jewish conspiracy since the Israelis themselves were pushed to submit to the mRNA needle and had a higher vaxx rate than the US.

I do not mean to say that there is no such thing as “people power”, that ordinary people have no agency at all. I just mean that, unamplified by the powerful, your voice will be but a whisper and you will be punished just for whispering. The necessity of elite backing is a secret that has always been known to those who sought it out, only to pretend after the fact, whether to kid themselves or to dupe their admiring fans, that they succeeded without it.

We of the Alt-Right learned what Davies has not: political activism is useless until you have at least some backing from the powerful. It might be different in times of upheaval, but we are (for now at least) in a time of stability, insofar as an elite hold sway and those who defy them get punished - as we saw with Charlottesville, the Gilet Jaunes, Jan 6th, the Canadian trucker convoy and the Southport riots.

But what if someone three hundred times richer than either Bill Gates or Elon Musk promised every company, big and small, an endless stream of investment — pushing up share prices in the process — for maintaining progressive policies regardless of their impact on profitability? Unlike Bill or Elon, whose wealth can buy only part of Microsoft or Tesla, such a person could own the entirety of both companies, alongside the top twenty largest firms in the world. That’s a huge amount of money — about $30 trillion — enough to buy a quarter of the entire global stock market. What effect would this have?

The real goal of a company is not simply to maximise profit — it is to maximise the value of their capital (i.e., their stock price). Finding favour with this individual and incentivising their investment would achieve that goal without having to innovate on product or compete with other firms. Such a situation would result in exactly what we see today — a clamouring to replace vehicle fleets with electric cars regardless of the economics, endless promotion of diversity and inclusion — policies which would otherwise be dismissed as nonsense but which would be given credibility under these conditions. ...

And yet, go into any men’s bathroom in a corporate office in London, and you are still likely to see tampons on offer. Approximately 25% of schools still operate mixed-sex bathrooms. Affirmative action remains the norm across government and the private sector, and companies continue to press ahead with net zero despite a shift in public sentiment and, at least in the US, the changing stance of the government. It is of course true that shutting down western industry only to replace it with Chinese imports makes no sense environmentally. Discriminating against whites is indeed morally reprehensible, and celebrating non-traditional sexual proclivities is at best pointless — but the fact these arguments are obviously true only illustrates the point that debates about the issues themselves are entirely fruitless.

The continued implementation of progressive policies across business and society does not rely on people continuing to buy into progressive ideology, and it is impossible defeat that ideology by debating the logic of its values and thereby changing the public mind. You cannot end these policies by winning the argument - you must dismantle the legal infrastructure that enforces them, and the financial infrastructure that funds them.