« First « Previous Comments 896 - 935 of 1,168 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://palexander.substack.com/p/how-did-we-get-here-edward-bernays
He worked for dozens of major American corporations, including Procter & Gamble and General Electric, and for government agencies, politicians, and nonprofit organizations. His uncle was psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud.
His argument is that the masses will be controlled regardless, so people may as well take up the mantle and control them - but ethically - in that book.
richwicks says
His argument is that the masses will be controlled regardless, so people may as well take up the mantle and control them - but ethically - in that book.
Ethical control is an oxymoron. Only people with god complexes talk like that.
Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation is suing the Tides Foundation, a progressive nonprofit, for $33 million.
Apparently, Tides - a Los Angeles-San Francisco-based nonprofit - has been dishing out cash to anti-Israel protest groups on campuses, but they're getting called out for some other shady business.
The lawsuit, which is a whopping 285 pages, alleges that Tides held onto over $33 million in donations meant for the radical BLM breakaway group run by anti-police activist Melina Abdullah and is accused of straight-up fraud.
Why is there always fraud wherever and whenever BLM is involved?
The lawsuit was filed on Monday at the California Superior Court, Los Angeles County. ...
Infamous billionaires George Soros and his son Alex have pumped almost $14 million from their Open Society Foundations into Tides. Tides then uses this money to back activist groups like the pro-Palestinian Adalah Justice Project and others that are stirring up protests on college campuses.
According to the lawsuit, Tides has over $1.4 billion in assets and supposedly operates like a bank, except it's not held to banking regulations.
Toby Rogers
uTobian
Imagine that you have $10,000 to invest. You put it into savings or the stock market and hope for the best.
But what if you have $100,000,000,000 to invest? You already own the banks and you already own the best companies listed on the stock exchange. You also already own the politicians. You’ve squeezed as much profit as you can from this system but you still want larger rates of return. So you go looking for insane grifts — pandemics, chronic disease, vaccines, wars/rebuilding, and climate.
That’s the essence of the problem right there.
Chatham House, the name commonly given to The Royal Institute of International Affairs, is an extremely influential “think tank” based in London.
It has enjoyed the patronage of the British monarchy for a century now, with Charles III recently joining the list of royal backers. ...
Readers of the “insider” US historian Professor Carroll Quigley will know that he identified Chatham House as the most important vehicle for the public-private Anglo-American Establishment that he saw dominating the corridors of power on both sides of the Atlantic.
It was formally established in 1920, gaining its Royal charter in 1926, and a sister organisation, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), was set up in the USA. ...
Quigley refers to the movers and shakers behind these organisations as the “Milner Group”, because of the key role of journalist turned civil servant Alfred Milner (pictured), which seems to have begun after a dinner with Lord Rothschild in 1891.
Quigley relates that Milner later found lucrative employment as “confidential adviser to certain international financiers in London’s financial district”.
He became a member of the board of the London Joint Stock Bank (later the Midland Bank), a director of the Mortgage Company of Egypt and of the Bank of British West Africa, and chairman of the Rothschilds’ Rio Tinto Co.
While Chatham House pretends to be “independent”, Quigley stresses that this is not at all so and warns of the sinister implications of its true function.
“The Milner Group controls the Institute. Once that is established, the picture changes. The influence of Chatham House appears in its true perspective, not as the influence of an autonomous body but as merely one of many instruments in the arsenal of another power.
“When the influence which the Institute wields is combined with that controlled by the Milner Group in other fields – in education, in administration, in newspapers and periodicals – a really terrifying picture begins to emerge…
“The picture is terrifying because such power, whatever the goals at which it may be directed, is too much to be entrusted safely to any group…
Manningham-Buller was also a member of the Board of Governors of the Wellcome Trust from 2008 to 2021 and chair of the Wellcome Trust’s Board of Governors from 2015 to 2021.
This British “charity” is closely linked to Big Pharma and its Covid “vaccines”.
Manningham-Buller was – needless to say! – an enthusiastic supporter of the full range of Covid-pretexted propaganda and restrictions.
She wrote the foreword to a 2022 report on the work of the Emergency, Preparedness and Response Health Protection Research Unit (EPR HPRU) at King’s College London, in partnership with the UK Health Security Agency, which focused on the use of “behavioural science” during the Covid period.
And she declared: “If anyone had any doubt about the critical importance of behavioural science, those doubts should have been roundly dispelled by the urgent and compelling need for it during the pandemic.
“When asked to chair the Advisory Board of the unit, I accepted at once, partly because of my own background in MI5 – where our in-house behavioural science unit had proved invaluable over many decades – and partly because of what I saw of the discipline during my dozen years at the Wellcome Trust”.
Manningham-Buller enthused: “In its work on Covid-19 the unit has demonstrated how important and necessary it is. ...
This is a deep dive into the possibility that similarities in the design of the genetic COVID vaccines that magically appeared overnight in February 2020 were more than coincidental.
The findings are significant because they imply collusion, not competition, between all the vaccine companies who shared a (yet to be determined) common goal. ...
So it seems that whichever way you slice this the CRISPR companies stand to make trillions of dollars on the back of the genetic therapy vaccine rollout because, should there happen to have been genomic integration, they now have access to:
Targeted gene editing - because a known gene sequence would now exist in your genome that ends in a CGG PAM and is unique enough that targeting it with CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing might not result in fragmenting your whole genome
A theoretically simple, quick, diagnostic test for the presence of the vaccine sequence in your blood in case somebody decided that that should be the marker of whether you were considered a “valid” in society, as depicted in GATTACA..
Now obviously nobody would do that would they? I mean, that would require collusion between a bunch of fluffy benevolent corporations who have no intention of providing a means to a digital-ID based on your genomic signature.
Since civil service has been completely corrupted
« First « Previous Comments 896 - 935 of 1,168 Next » Last » Search these comments
WTF?
How can global policy and media across the world be so coordinated?
Kind of makes one tempted to believe in "conspiracy theories".
I really do think there is a cabal of billionaires who own the media and the government and which shifts course when things start to get hot, like right now. They are not "the Jews" but a collection of billionaires from many countries. Many of them are Jewish, but many are not.
Can we identify them by name? Bezos and Gates for sure, but what are the other names? I would especially like to know the names of the ones that desperately want to remain hidden. Klaus Schwab? Top leaders in China like Xi Jinping?
https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/files/gilens_and_page_2014_-testing_theories_of_american_politics.doc.pdf?source=patrick.net