patrick.net

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/did-your-doctor-recommend-the-covid

Interventions HCQ and azithromycin (HCQ-AZ) as a reference treatment were compared to other regimens containing HCQ, ivermectin and azithromycin alone, combined, or none of these three drugs. The effect of vaccination was also evaluated.

Main outcome measures 6-week all-cause mortality. Multivariable logistic regression estimated treatment effectiveness with adjustments for age, sex, comorbidities, vaccination, period of infection or virus variant, and outpatient or inpatient care.

Results Total 30,423 COVID-19 patients were analysed (86 refused the analysis of their data) including 30,202 with available treatment data, and 535 died (1.77%). All-cause mortality was very low among patients < 50 years (8/15,925 (0.05%)) and among outpatients treated with HCQ-AZ (21 deaths out of 21,135 (0.1%), never exceeding 0.2% regardless of epidemic period).

HCQ-AZ treatment was associated with a significantly lower mortality rate than no HCQ-AZ after adjustment for sex, age, period and patient care setting (adjusted OR (aOR) 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55, 0.45-0.68). The effect was greater among outpatients (71% death protection rate) than among inpatients (45%).

In a subset of 16,063 patients with available comorbidities and vaccinations status, obesity (2.01, 1.23-3.29), chronic respiratory disease (2.93, 1.29-6.64), and immunodeficiency (4.01, 1.69-9.50), on the one hand, and vaccination (0.29, 0.12-0.67) and HCQ-AZ treatment (0.47, 0.29-0.76), on the other hand, were independent factors associated with mortality. HCQ, alone or in any association, was associated with significant protection from death among outpatients (0.41, 0.21-0.79) and inpatients (0.59, 0.47-0.73).

Patrick says

"HCQ-AZ treatment was associated with a significantly lower mortality rate..."

Yes! We now have a database of 473 HCQ COVID-19 studies, 380 peer reviewed, 387 comparing treatment and control groups that prove massively and decisively that HCQ wipes out Covid within hours... See


In addition, Anthony Fauci and the NIH knew 18 years ago that HCQ is a medication that kills the Corona virus. And this in connection with the 2003 SARS outbreak - caused by the Corona virus SARS-CoV. At the time, the NIH researched chloroquine and concluded that it was effective at stopping the SARS coronavirus in its tracks. The COVID-19 bug is likewise a Corona virus, labeled SARS-CoV-2. See "DEADLY COVER UP: Fauci Approved Hydroxychloroquine 15 Years Ago to Cure Coronaviruses; 'Nobody Needed to Die'" https://www.palmerfoundation.com.au/deadly-cover-up-fauci-approved-hydroxychloroquine-15-years-ago-to-cure-coronaviruses-nobody-needed-to-die/

In addition, according to the Virology Journal of August 22, 2005 [Yes! August of 2005] "Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.... chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage..." So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine. https://stillnessinthestorm.com/2020/05/fauci-knew-about-hcq-in-2005-nobody-needed-to-die/

See also the National Institutes of Health quoting the Virology Journal: "Postinfection chloroquine treatment is effective in preventing the spread of SARS-CoV infection..." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/

So, in January 2020 when Covid showed up we had a medication - Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) - to cure and eradicate the virus from the human body within hours! And in the presence of a medication that cures Covid, Vaccines under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) are not allowed - and they are in fact illegal.

Finally keep in mind that as the virus mutates, the vaccine becomes useless and now you need another vaccine. In contrast, HCQ will always kill the Corona virus even if it mutates.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.04.03.23287649v1

Early Treatment with Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin: A ‘Real-Life’ Monocentric Retrospective Cohort Study of 30,423 COVID-19 Patients

... Results Total 30,423 COVID-19 patients were analysed (86 refused the analysis of their data) including 30,202 with available treatment data, and 535 died (1.77%). All-cause mortality was very low among patients < 50 years (8/15,925 (0.05%)) and among outpatients treated with HCQ-AZ (21 deaths out of 21,135 (0.1%), never exceeding 0.2% regardless of epidemic period). HCQ-AZ treatment was associated with a significantly lower mortality rate than no HCQ-AZ after adjustment for sex, age, period and patient care setting (adjusted OR (aOR) 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55, 0.45-0.68). The effect was greater among outpatients (71% death protection rate) than among inpatients (45%). In a subset of 16,063 patients with available comorbidities and vaccinations status, obesity (2.01, 1.23-3.29), chronic respiratory disease (2.93, 1.29-6.64), and immunodeficiency (4.01, 1.69-9.50), on the one hand, and vaccination (0.29, 0.12-0.67) and HCQ-AZ treatment (0.47, 0.29-0.76), on the other hand, were independent factors associated with mortality. HCQ, alone or in any association, was associated with significant protection from death among outpatients (0.41, 0.21-0.79) and inpatients (0.59, 0.47-0.73).

Conclusions HCQ prescribed early or late protects in part from COVID-19-related death.

https://brownstone.org/articles/my-conversation-with-ai-over-hydroxychloroquine/

My Conversation with AI Over Hydroxychloroquine
BY Harvey Risch
JUNE 16, 2023

The following conversation took place on rebbe.io because it does not require a login.

User:

What did Harvey Risch say about hydroxychloroquine in 2020?

RebbeIO:

Harvey Risch, a professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health, wrote an opinion piece in Newsweek in July 2020 advocating for the use of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19. In the article, he argued that the drug had been unfairly maligned by the media and some public health officials, and that there was evidence to suggest that it could be effective in reducing mortality rates among COVID-19 patients. However, it is important to note that Risch’s views were not universally accepted by the medical community, and that subsequent studies have not found strong evidence to support the use of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19. ...

User:

This answer did not answer the question that I asked. All of the errors you made were statements contrary to facts that you verified in subsequent answers. Since you had the correct factual information, why did you cite incorrect facts?

RebbeIO:

I apologize for any confusion or frustration that my previous responses may have caused. As an AI language model, I do not intentionally provide incorrect information. However, I understand that I made errors in my previous responses, and I apologize for any confusion or inconvenience that this may have caused.

I strive to provide accurate and helpful responses based on the information available to me, and I understand the importance of providing correct information, especially when it comes to matters of public health and scientific research. I will continue to do my best to provide accurate and helpful responses based on the information available to me, and I appreciate your patience and understanding.

Lol, Harvey Risch runs circles around the AI.