Every time I hear someone preface a rant with "Why is no one talking about..", "Something nobody want's to talk about" or "Something no one is talking about..." Why are they lamenting that no one is talking about it, when clearly they themselves are indeed talking about it. Why would you want to talk about something, that everyone else is talking about?
Most always it's a distraction, and not really a valid concern to anything in the current reality. Like bringing up a Whataboutism in referencing a Bush era event.
If you have something real to say that hasn't been said, you'll just say it. Otherwise, it's already been said. Somethings goes without saying, I'm just saying.
Other conversational peeves of mine, are people who start every statement with a "So!"
I first started noticing this during the Big Tech Congressional hearings. All of the CEO's would answer every question with a "So". Then proceed to not answer the question, but give a high-level explanation of how their software or service generally works under typical usage situations. Then the Fauci cabal started giving "So" followed by brief explanations of how their programs work, rather than answer the question. Now we're seeing it in OBiden's office, Psaki gives shitty "So" excuses for Biden's failures.
And another thing, nobody wants to talk about...
"And let me be clear..."
No I think I can get it, and infer what you mean on my own. Just give me the straight on how fucked up is fucked up. "Let me be clear", is the standard. "Of fuck you caught me in a lie, now let me be clear in my denial." followed by lies and half truths.
And finally "you've got to be careful", when you use any of these conversational peeves I have outlined here, or you run the risk of spreading misnomers and a false narrative. Well because you see, you might be careless and understand the truth wrong, if you're not careful. And let me be perfectly clear folks, I actually meant that they mean, you'll "Understand" the truth wrong. Not misunderstand. They want you to be careful because you do understand the truth, but they want you to be careful with the truth. It's a mere threat that legal, civil or administrative charges may follow if you don't unlearn, what you think you already know.
Like Fauci telling Trump, he has to be careful when he tells people HCQ is an effective Covid treatment. While Pence stood back stoic, thinking "mmmm that's it, make Trump your Bitch!"
If you use So, in an answer that actually answers the intent of the question, it doesn't bother me.
Q: Where are we going when we get there? A: So, I got us a Hotel on the beach, I figured we will check in first, then go get some drinks...
That's normal usage, and doesn't bother me. But for an administrative answer, that sounds like a 15 year old kid, trying to explain how a pack of cigarettes got in his pant pocket, is different.
Like
Reporter: With all of the reports of widespread Humanitarian abuses going on at the Border, why hasn't the Biden administration gone there yet?
Shit Stacki: So... The Biden administration has been clear from the start, they will be the most parent presidency ever, and we take pride in stance on the LBGQ+ Community and will welcome any dialog with the BLM on the matter.
Why are they lamenting that no one is talking about it, when clearly they themselves are indeed talking about it.
Why would you want to talk about something, that everyone else is talking about?
Most always it's a distraction, and not really a valid concern to anything in the current reality. Like bringing up a Whataboutism in referencing a Bush era event.
If you have something real to say that hasn't been said, you'll just say it. Otherwise, it's already been said.
Somethings goes without saying, I'm just saying.
Other conversational peeves of mine, are people who start every statement with a "So!"
I first started noticing this during the Big Tech Congressional hearings. All of the CEO's would answer every question with a "So".
Then proceed to not answer the question, but give a high-level explanation of how their software or service generally works under typical usage situations.
Then the Fauci cabal started giving "So" followed by brief explanations of how their programs work, rather than answer the question.
Now we're seeing it in OBiden's office, Psaki gives shitty "So" excuses for Biden's failures.
And another thing, nobody wants to talk about...
"And let me be clear..."
No I think I can get it, and infer what you mean on my own. Just give me the straight on how fucked up is fucked up. "Let me be clear", is the standard. "Of fuck you caught me in a lie, now let me be clear in my denial." followed by lies and half truths.
And finally "you've got to be careful", when you use any of these conversational peeves I have outlined here, or you run the risk of spreading misnomers and a false narrative.
Well because you see, you might be careless and understand the truth wrong, if you're not careful. And let me be perfectly clear folks, I actually meant that they mean, you'll "Understand" the truth wrong. Not misunderstand. They want you to be careful because you do understand the truth, but they want you to be careful with the truth. It's a mere threat that legal, civil or administrative charges may follow if you don't unlearn, what you think you already know.
Like Fauci telling Trump, he has to be careful when he tells people HCQ is an effective Covid treatment. While Pence stood back stoic, thinking "mmmm that's it, make Trump your Bitch!"