patrick.net

LIZ GUNN: And in your notes you said, I was a huge pro-mask, pro-vaccine and pro-science, left-leaning supporter. So you were a big supporter of Jacinda Ardern.

ANTHONY MO: Yeah, yeah. I was pretty fond of her. Yeah, I always felt like, I always thought she was very charismatic and I always felt like she did the right thing. And I feel like everything went wrong after vaccine roll out. Even, even during the, before the vaccine roll out
I feel like she did quite a good job at just managing the, managing covid and, and the infection. But yeah, after vaccine showed up I feel like everything went wrong and just feels like it kept going south, like, for example the traffic light system. It just feels ridiculous.

LIZ GUNN: And we'll investigate that, and many of us are feeling exactly what you are feeling.
Up to September the 13th when you trusted her words that it was safe and effective and you went to get your jab, you were a very different man, weren't you? And we have some footage of you. Tell us what your life was like up until that point.

ANTHONY MO: I was really not working pretty much since all the lockdowns started. And I pretty much enjoyed staying home and making music and making artwork and trying to sell them if they're good enough. And just working out, weight-lifting, doing cardio and boxing. Because, you know, the gym they all closed when the lockdown happened. And occasionally playing games, yeah, on the X-Box. ...

LIZ GUNN: And when did you first start to experience something that was odd in your body?

ANTHONY MO: The third day.

LIZ GUNN: On the third day. And what was that, Anthony?

10:54
ANTHONY MO: At first I felt like I, I couldn't remember the details, but I can't remember if the headache and the tinnitus came together, but they were the first things that showed up. There was this overwhelming pressure inside my head, at the top of my head and also at the forehead. Feels like there's a balloon inside. But it's, it's, even now I feel like there's pressure in my head. But in the beginning it was, it was, the worst. Yeah, the pressure at the top of my head and at the front of my forehead. And suddenly I had this muffled feeling, it's almost like I'm under water. But I didn't think about it too much. And, yeah. And I think after a few hours of that, this high-pitched tinnitus, this screeching tinnitus showed up, this ringing in my ear that is still happening today. ...

ANTHONY MO: Yeah, that is one of the biggest things that is making me want to end myself because all the other symptoms, it feels like they, they wax and wane, they, it's on and off. I, I can deal with a little bit of blurry vision, I can deal with a lot of dark spots or floaters in my vision, but I cannot deal with this, this sound in my ear or in my head. Like, I, yeah. I can't remember the sound of silence anymore. And, and alongside the tinnitus and the headache—

ANTHONY MO: Which, I, I suddenly wake up with my heart just pumping and feels like it's going to beat out of my chest. The only thing that's sort of toned this reaction down was taking beta blockers like [inaudible] or [inaudible] which is not good for the heart long-term.

26:26
LIZ GUNN: Before, you said when I came in, before all of this, you didn't even speak in the way you're speaking now, did you?

ANTHONY MO: Yeah. I, before the vaccination I, I, I spoke really fast. My mind was very sharp, my mind was very clear. I didn't speak in this flat tone. I almost feel robotic right now, because the tone I'm speaking in. My voice isn't dry and hoarse, and I never get lost in my thoughts or try to struggle really hard to find the words I want to say. I now, now constantly stutter and even some sort of slurring of speech going on, which is quite worrying because that is one sign of stroke or brain damage.

On Tuesday, I got a very bad feeling reading Governor DeSantis’ X announcement that, 18 months later, the Grand Jury had finally issued its long-awaited final report on the covid shots. It worried me that DeSantis didn’t link the report. And he noncomittally said, “we are still reading through the report.” Uh oh. My worries were confirmed yesterday when I saw the Florida Pheonix’s triumphant headline, “ Statewide grand jury investigating COVID-19 vaccines finds no evidence of crimes.”



Well, that lack of crimes will come as a terrific relief to Joe Biden’s last five brain cells, desperately clinging to life in his cabbage-like cranium, forced to consider difficult questions like that posed Monday in USA Today’s headline, “Biden’s preemptive pardons could include Fauci, Cheney.” If there isn’t any evidence of crimes, then presumably the human cockroach and Benedicta Cheney have nothing to worry about.

Ah, but the truth is never quite so straightforward, is it? The Florida Phoenix’s headline was a lie by grotesque omission. It might be literally true —the Grand Jury could not find a fitting crime against anyone not legally protected— but nevertheless, it was a monstrous distortion of the Jury’s findings and was a classic case of what media just loves to call misinformation when other people do it. ...



... The authors might disagree with this summary, but here is my attempt to boil down the book-length report:

The real criminals were in the U.S. government, and so, unfortunately, are protected from state prosecution.

Pfizer and Moderna protected themselves by disclosing everything to the FDA, which was and is running interference for them.

There is no reliable evidence that the vaccines are safe or effective, especially at this point.

The problem was and is that many corners were cut, facilitated by regulatory agencies, and we now may never know the full scale of the disaster.

The data that could really answer questions of safety and efficacy have never been, and probably never will be, disclosed to the public. ...

The bottom line is the Grand Jury, having reviewed all the evidence, concluded the FDA erred by approving the jabs for anyone but the most at risk. “Unlike the FDA,” the Grand Jury concluded, “we do not believe that the COVID-19 ‘emergency’ necessarily applied to everyone; the EUA should only have been granted as to the elderly and comorbid populations most at risk from SARS-Co V-2 complications.” (The italicized and bold-faced type was theirs, not mine.) ...

Like the Florida Phoenix, if it mentions this report at all, the media will surely leverage the lack of any criminal findings as some sort of vindication for mRNA technology. But that’s not what the Grand Jury found at all.

Even if they couldn’t find any prosecutable crimes against the exposed (non-government) defendants, the Jurors didn’t exactly stamp their approval on anything. To the contrary, the Grand Jurors found a “pattern of deceptive and obfuscatory behavior” with both the drug makers and the government officials:

"While we did not find criminal activity, we did find a pattern of deceptive and obfuscatory behavior on the part of sponsors and regulators that often straddled the line between ethical and unethical conduct. More importantly, however, not finding any indictable criminal activity does not mean we did not find any problems. On the contrary, there are profound and serious issues involving the process of vaccine development and safety surveillance in the United States. Some of those are acute, COVID-19-era problems that are unlikely to occur outside the context of another once-in-a-hundred-year pandemic. Others, however, are systemic; they will occur over and over until someone fixes them." ...



The Grand Jury’s scope of work was limited in three significant ways. The first major limitation they faced was that, unbelievably, government officials ignored their subpoenas. “Most notably,” the Report explained, “a significant number of current or former federal officials refused to testify to us. Federal law prohibits us from compelling those officials to appear.”

On the other hand, Pfizer and Moderna responded to the subpoenas to a certain extent and they sent representatives to testify. But the very same taxpayer-funded FDA officials who throughout the pandemic repeatedly demanded the public’s trust flatly refused to provide many documents or any witnesses to the Grand Jury.

It is unjustifiable, inexcusable, and a disgusting, treasonous dereliction of duty. I hope Robert Kennedy guts the FDA with a rusty fishknife. ...



... "Regarding the clinical trials and pharmacovigilance of MRNA-1273 and BNTl 62b2, it was genuinely striking to us just how many of the problems we found occurred at either the direction or acquiescence of the FDA, CDC and other federal regulators. Nearly every time we found an issue with MRNA-1273 or BNT162b2, the fingerprints of these agencies were all over the scene, advising that the flagship and surrogate clinical trials be performed in specific ways, authorizing dose after dose and formulation after formulation based on out-of-date immunogenicity comparisons and observational results, and even running interference for sponsors by misleading the American public about validated safety signals." ...













The Grand Jurors were given a solemn duty precluding them from speculating. But I can speculate a little. From my near-daily study over the last four years, my view is that these shots with their bioweapons-lab-designed spike protein have dozens and dozens of mechanisms of rare injury, as the various pictures included in today’s post show. Myocarditis may be officially recognized but is only one ‘rare’ injury type of many.

As far as I know, the wide variety of rare injuries is unique to mRNA vaccines.

The FDA has never considered the cumulative risk of all the rare adverse events, when you add up them up. While the risk of encountering a particular rare adverse event is low, is the combined risk of encountering any of the various adverse events still rare? I think not. I think the combined risk of encountering some kind of adverse event sooner or later is around 20%—25%.