patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,261,007 comments by 15,056 users - DOGEWontAmountToShit, FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden, Maga_Chaos_Monkey online now
Thread for vax deaths, maimings, and severe side effects
invite response
2021 Jul 28, 8:33pm 894,922 views 8,302 comments
« First « Previous Comments 1,824 - 1,863 of 8,302 Next » Last » Search these comments
1825
Patrick
2022 Jun 30, 9:56am
Patrick
2022 Jun 30, 9:56am
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441635/
The vaxx is so dangerous that it's not safe to get the organs of people who were killed by the vaxx.
Organ transplantation from deceased donors with vaccine‐induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia
Vaccine‐induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia (VITT) may follow immunization with the ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19 vaccine against SARS‐CoV‐2.1, 2 ...
There were seven major thrombotic or hemorrhagic postoperative complications (three bleeds and four venous or arterial allograft thromboses) in six recipients, resulting in the loss of three transplants as described above; these events occurred within 9 days of transplantation. Of the six recipients with bleeding or thrombotic events, two had received their second dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19 vaccine within 30 days before transplantation...
Further experience of organ transplantation from donors with VITT and longer term recipient follow‐up will help guide clinical decision‐making. In the meantime, transplantation of organs from these donors should only proceed after careful consideration of the methods for organ recovery and of the risks and benefits for a potential recipient, and an appropriate consent discussion.
The vaxx is so dangerous that it's not safe to get the organs of people who were killed by the vaxx.
1827
Patrick
2022 Jun 30, 1:23pm
Patrick
2022 Jun 30, 1:23pm
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/covid-vaccines-and-immune-suppression
Could be that vaxxed mothers give birth to immune-suppressed babies.
Could be that vaxxed mothers give birth to immune-suppressed babies.
1829
Ceffer
2022 Jul 1, 11:39pm
Ceffer
2022 Jul 1, 11:39pm
Guess he'll know firsthand the meaning of "Poison" after all.
https://t.me/gatewaypunditofficial/14751
https://t.me/gatewaypunditofficial/14751
1830
GNL
2022 Jul 2, 6:29am
GNL
2022 Jul 2, 6:29am
He is big time diabetic. He has had several past health issues. I am not sure this is true.
1831
richwicks
2022 Jul 2, 6:55am
richwicks
2022 Jul 2, 6:55am
Ceffer says
It wasn't the vaccine, she was already on her way out:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deborah_James_%28journalist%29&oldid=1087307989
That's an OLD wikipedia entry. She had bowel cancer.
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/65010
It wasn't the vaccine, she was already on her way out:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deborah_James_%28journalist%29&oldid=1087307989
That's an OLD wikipedia entry. She had bowel cancer.
1834
Ceffer
2022 Jul 2, 10:43am
Ceffer
2022 Jul 2, 10:43am
richwicks says
Coup de grace? Vaccine is cited for accelerating cancers. You have a contributory condition, the vax will fuck up your immune system and make it worse, a la AIDS type syndrome.
It wasn't the vaccine, she was already on her way out:
Coup de grace? Vaccine is cited for accelerating cancers. You have a contributory condition, the vax will fuck up your immune system and make it worse, a la AIDS type syndrome.
1835
Ceffer
2022 Jul 2, 11:19am
Ceffer
2022 Jul 2, 11:19am
L'il cancer and disease acceleration here, L'il sterilization there. Pretty soon, you're talking real morbidity.
https://t.me/drawandstrikechannel/47082
https://t.me/drawandstrikechannel/47082
1837
GNL
2022 Jul 2, 12:56pm
GNL
2022 Jul 2, 12:56pm
Ceffer says
This is insane talk. I wonder how much the change to the Smith Mundt Act that Obama changed, has to do with all of the propaganda on both sides of this Covid disaster.
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/65191
This is insane talk. I wonder how much the change to the Smith Mundt Act that Obama changed, has to do with all of the propaganda on both sides of this Covid disaster.
1844
Ceffer
2022 Jul 2, 7:38pm
Ceffer
2022 Jul 2, 7:38pm
WineHorror1 says
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/65251
We really need links for stuff like this. Do you have one @Ceffer?
1846
richwicks
2022 Jul 2, 8:35pm
richwicks
2022 Jul 2, 8:35pm
Ceffer says
@WineHorror1 and @Ceffer
THIS is the original article:
https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/health/chief-medical-officer-dr-tony-holohan-backs-plan-to-reduce-covid-tests-and-tracing-41776885.html
The relevant part is:
46+19+35=100%
But this "news" article is from The Independent which is mainstream bullshit, so take it with a grain of salt.
WineHorror1 says
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/65251
We really need links for stuff like this. Do you have one @Ceffer?
@WineHorror1 and @Ceffer
THIS is the original article:
https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/health/chief-medical-officer-dr-tony-holohan-backs-plan-to-reduce-covid-tests-and-tracing-41776885.html
The relevant part is:
His weekly report, compiled last Friday, said of those in hospital of all ages directly due to Covid at that point 46pc had received a booster vaccination, 19pc had completed primary vaccination and 35pc were partially vaccinated.
46+19+35=100%
But this "news" article is from The Independent which is mainstream bullshit, so take it with a grain of salt.
1847
Patrick
2022 Jul 2, 8:59pm
Patrick
2022 Jul 2, 8:59pm
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/how-many-people-all-around-the-world
Blink-182 drummer Travis Barker reportedly hospitalized for unknown reason in LA
https://abc7.com/travis-barker-hospitalized-kourtney-kardashians-reports/12003330/
Not sayin it was the vaxx, but...
Blink-182 drummer Travis Barker reportedly hospitalized for unknown reason in LA
https://abc7.com/travis-barker-hospitalized-kourtney-kardashians-reports/12003330/
Not sayin it was the vaxx, but...
1848
Patrick
2022 Jul 2, 10:13pm
Patrick
2022 Jul 2, 10:13pm
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/swedish-birth-rate-data-what-does
i think this makes the case that sweden is just experiencing normal variability look very weak and the the case for a vaccine driven effect look quite strong.
that is NOT what i was hoping to find. if this is what it looks like, this is very bad news.
1850
Al_Sharpton_for_President
2022 Jul 3, 5:50am
Al_Sharpton_for_President
2022 Jul 3, 5:50am
Patrick says
i think this makes the case that sweden is just experiencing normal variability look very weak and the the case for a vaccine driven effect look quite strong.
1851
Al_Sharpton_for_President
2022 Jul 3, 6:23am
Al_Sharpton_for_President
2022 Jul 3, 6:23am
Are the Covid mRNA Vaccines Safe?
A new scientific study entitled “Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA vaccination in randomized trials” provides the best evidence yet concerning the safety of the mRNA Covid vaccines. For most vaccines in common use, benefits far outweigh risks, but that may not be the case for the mRNA covid vaccines, according to this study by Joseph Fraiman and his colleagues. It depends on your age and medical history.
The randomized controlled clinical trial is the gold standard of scientific evidence. When regulators approved the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines for emergency use in December 2020, two randomized trials showed that the vaccines reduced symptomatic covid infection by over 90% during the first few months after the second dose.
Pfizer and Moderna did not design the trials to evaluate long-term efficacy or the more important outcomes of preventing hospitalization, death, or transmission.
The randomized trials did collect adverse event data, including the presence of mild symptoms (such as fever) and more serious events requiring hospitalization or leading to death. Most vaccines generate some mild adverse reactions in some people, and there were considerably more adverse such reactions after the mRNA vaccines compared to the placebo.
That is annoying but not a major issue. We care about severe health outcomes. The key question is whether the vaccine’s efficacy outweighs the risks of severe adverse reactions.
The Fraiman study uses data from the same Pfizer and Moderna-sponsored randomized trials presented to the FDA for vaccine approval, but with two innovations that provide additional information.
First, the study pools data from both mRNA vaccines to increase the sample size, which decreases the confidence intervals’ size and the uncertainty about the estimated harms.
Second, the study focuses only on the severe adverse events plausibly due to the vaccines. Serious adverse events such as gunshot wounds, suicide, animal bites, foot fractures, and back injury are unlikely to be due to a vaccine, and cancer is unlikely to be due to a vaccine within a few months after vaccination. By removing such random noise, the ability (statistical power) to detect genuine problems increases. If there is no excess risk, shorter confidence intervals bolster confidence in the safety of the vaccines.
Classifying adverse events into the two groups is not a trivial task, but Fraiman et al. do an excellent job to avoid bias. They rely on the pre-defined Brighton Collaboration definitions of adverse events of special interest (AESI). Founded in 2000, the Brighton Collaboration has two decades of experience using rigorous science to define clinical outcomes for vaccine safety studies.
Moreover, Fraiman and colleagues blinded the process where they classified the clinical events as AESIs. Adjudicators did not know whether the individual had received the vaccine or the placebo. Hence, any criticism of so-called p-hacking is unwarranted.
So, what are the results? There were 139 AESIs among the 33,986 people vaccinated, one for every 244 people. That may sound bad, but those numbers mean nothing without comparison against a control group. There were 97 AESIs among the 33,951 people who received a placebo. Combining these numbers implies 12.5 vaccine-induced AESIs for every 10,000 people vaccinated, with a 95% confidence interval of 2.1 to 22.9 per 10,000 people. To phrase it differently, there is one additional AESI for every 800 people vaccinated (95% CI: 437-4762).
That is very high for a vaccine. No other vaccine on the market comes close.
The numbers for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are 10 and 15 additional events per 10,000 people, respectively, so both vaccines contributed to the finding. The numbers are similar enough that we cannot confidently say that one is safer than the other. Most excess AESIs were coagulation disorders. For the Pfizer vaccine, there was also an excess of cardiovascular AESIs.
While these safety results are concerning, we must not forget the other side of the equation. Unfortunately, the study does not calculate composite estimates that also included the reduction in serious covid infections, but we have such estimates for mortality.
Dr. Christine Benn and her colleagues calculated a combined estimate of the effect of vaccination on all-cause mortality using the same randomized trial data as Fraiman et al. They did not find a mortality reduction for the mRNA vaccines (relative risk 1.03, 95% CI: 0.63-1.71).
One important limitation of both Fraiman’s and Benn’s studies is that they do not distinguish the adverse reactions by age, comorbidities, or medical history. That is not their fault. Pfizer and Moderna have not released that information, so outside researchers do not have access.
We know that the vaccine benefits are not equally distributed among people since covid mortality is more than a thousand times higher among the old. Thus, risk-benefit calculations must be done separately for different groups: with and without prior covid infection, by age, and for the first two doses versus boosters.
Covid-recovered people have natural immunity that is stronger than vaccine-induced immunity. So, the benefit of vaccination is – at best – minimal. If the risk of adverse reactions is the same as in the randomized trials, there is a negative risk-benefit difference. Why are we mandating people in this group to be vaccinated? It is both unethical and damaging to public health.
While everyone can get infected, children have a minuscule risk of covid mortality. There is very limited safety data from the trials on children. If the risk of adverse reactions is the same as for adults, the harms outweigh the risks. Children should not receive these vaccines.
Older people above 70 have a much higher risk of covid mortality than the population in the Fraiman study. If their risk of adverse reaction is the same, then the benefits outweigh the harms. Hence, older people who have never had covid and are not yet vaccinated may benefit from these vaccines. However, we do not know if they are better than the Johnson & Johnson and Astra-Zeneca vaccines.
It is unclear from the clinical trial data whether the benefits outweigh the risks for working-age adults who have not been vaccinated and who have not already had covid. This is true both historically, for the original covid variants, and currently for the newer ones.
The Fraiman study analyzes data after the first and second doses. Both risks and benefits may differ for booster shots, but no randomized trial has properly evaluated the trade-off.
These results concern only the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines. Fraiman et al. did not analyze data on the adenovirus-vector vaccines marketed by Johnson & Johnson and Astra-Zeneca. Benn et al. found that they reduced all-cause mortality (RR=0.37, 95% CI:0.19-0.70), but nobody has used trial data to analyze AESIs for these vaccines.
Critically, the Fraiman and Benn studies had a follow-up of only a few months after the second dose because Pfizer and Moderna, unfortunately, terminated their randomized trials a few months after receiving emergency use authorization. Of course, a longer-term benefit can provide a basis to tolerate negative or neutral short-term risk-benefit differences. However, that is unlikely since we know from observational studies that mRNA vaccine efficacy deteriorates a few months after the second dose.
There may also be long-term adverse reactions to the vaccine regarding which we do not yet know. Since the randomized trials ended early, we must look at observational data to answer that question. The publicly available data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System is of low quality, with both under- and over-reporting. The best observational data is from CDCs Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) and FDA’s Biologics and Effectiveness Safety System (BEST), but there have only been limited reports from these systems.
Fraiman and colleagues have produced the best evidence yet regarding the overall safety of the mRNA vaccines. The results are concerning. It is the responsibility of the manufacturers and FDA to ensure that benefits outweigh harms. They have failed to do so.
https://brownstone.org/articles/are-the-covid-mrna-vaccines-safe/
A new scientific study entitled “Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA vaccination in randomized trials” provides the best evidence yet concerning the safety of the mRNA Covid vaccines. For most vaccines in common use, benefits far outweigh risks, but that may not be the case for the mRNA covid vaccines, according to this study by Joseph Fraiman and his colleagues. It depends on your age and medical history.
The randomized controlled clinical trial is the gold standard of scientific evidence. When regulators approved the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines for emergency use in December 2020, two randomized trials showed that the vaccines reduced symptomatic covid infection by over 90% during the first few months after the second dose.
Pfizer and Moderna did not design the trials to evaluate long-term efficacy or the more important outcomes of preventing hospitalization, death, or transmission.
The randomized trials did collect adverse event data, including the presence of mild symptoms (such as fever) and more serious events requiring hospitalization or leading to death. Most vaccines generate some mild adverse reactions in some people, and there were considerably more adverse such reactions after the mRNA vaccines compared to the placebo.
That is annoying but not a major issue. We care about severe health outcomes. The key question is whether the vaccine’s efficacy outweighs the risks of severe adverse reactions.
The Fraiman study uses data from the same Pfizer and Moderna-sponsored randomized trials presented to the FDA for vaccine approval, but with two innovations that provide additional information.
First, the study pools data from both mRNA vaccines to increase the sample size, which decreases the confidence intervals’ size and the uncertainty about the estimated harms.
Second, the study focuses only on the severe adverse events plausibly due to the vaccines. Serious adverse events such as gunshot wounds, suicide, animal bites, foot fractures, and back injury are unlikely to be due to a vaccine, and cancer is unlikely to be due to a vaccine within a few months after vaccination. By removing such random noise, the ability (statistical power) to detect genuine problems increases. If there is no excess risk, shorter confidence intervals bolster confidence in the safety of the vaccines.
Classifying adverse events into the two groups is not a trivial task, but Fraiman et al. do an excellent job to avoid bias. They rely on the pre-defined Brighton Collaboration definitions of adverse events of special interest (AESI). Founded in 2000, the Brighton Collaboration has two decades of experience using rigorous science to define clinical outcomes for vaccine safety studies.
Moreover, Fraiman and colleagues blinded the process where they classified the clinical events as AESIs. Adjudicators did not know whether the individual had received the vaccine or the placebo. Hence, any criticism of so-called p-hacking is unwarranted.
So, what are the results? There were 139 AESIs among the 33,986 people vaccinated, one for every 244 people. That may sound bad, but those numbers mean nothing without comparison against a control group. There were 97 AESIs among the 33,951 people who received a placebo. Combining these numbers implies 12.5 vaccine-induced AESIs for every 10,000 people vaccinated, with a 95% confidence interval of 2.1 to 22.9 per 10,000 people. To phrase it differently, there is one additional AESI for every 800 people vaccinated (95% CI: 437-4762).
That is very high for a vaccine. No other vaccine on the market comes close.
The numbers for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are 10 and 15 additional events per 10,000 people, respectively, so both vaccines contributed to the finding. The numbers are similar enough that we cannot confidently say that one is safer than the other. Most excess AESIs were coagulation disorders. For the Pfizer vaccine, there was also an excess of cardiovascular AESIs.
While these safety results are concerning, we must not forget the other side of the equation. Unfortunately, the study does not calculate composite estimates that also included the reduction in serious covid infections, but we have such estimates for mortality.
Dr. Christine Benn and her colleagues calculated a combined estimate of the effect of vaccination on all-cause mortality using the same randomized trial data as Fraiman et al. They did not find a mortality reduction for the mRNA vaccines (relative risk 1.03, 95% CI: 0.63-1.71).
One important limitation of both Fraiman’s and Benn’s studies is that they do not distinguish the adverse reactions by age, comorbidities, or medical history. That is not their fault. Pfizer and Moderna have not released that information, so outside researchers do not have access.
We know that the vaccine benefits are not equally distributed among people since covid mortality is more than a thousand times higher among the old. Thus, risk-benefit calculations must be done separately for different groups: with and without prior covid infection, by age, and for the first two doses versus boosters.
Covid-recovered people have natural immunity that is stronger than vaccine-induced immunity. So, the benefit of vaccination is – at best – minimal. If the risk of adverse reactions is the same as in the randomized trials, there is a negative risk-benefit difference. Why are we mandating people in this group to be vaccinated? It is both unethical and damaging to public health.
While everyone can get infected, children have a minuscule risk of covid mortality. There is very limited safety data from the trials on children. If the risk of adverse reactions is the same as for adults, the harms outweigh the risks. Children should not receive these vaccines.
Older people above 70 have a much higher risk of covid mortality than the population in the Fraiman study. If their risk of adverse reaction is the same, then the benefits outweigh the harms. Hence, older people who have never had covid and are not yet vaccinated may benefit from these vaccines. However, we do not know if they are better than the Johnson & Johnson and Astra-Zeneca vaccines.
It is unclear from the clinical trial data whether the benefits outweigh the risks for working-age adults who have not been vaccinated and who have not already had covid. This is true both historically, for the original covid variants, and currently for the newer ones.
The Fraiman study analyzes data after the first and second doses. Both risks and benefits may differ for booster shots, but no randomized trial has properly evaluated the trade-off.
These results concern only the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines. Fraiman et al. did not analyze data on the adenovirus-vector vaccines marketed by Johnson & Johnson and Astra-Zeneca. Benn et al. found that they reduced all-cause mortality (RR=0.37, 95% CI:0.19-0.70), but nobody has used trial data to analyze AESIs for these vaccines.
Critically, the Fraiman and Benn studies had a follow-up of only a few months after the second dose because Pfizer and Moderna, unfortunately, terminated their randomized trials a few months after receiving emergency use authorization. Of course, a longer-term benefit can provide a basis to tolerate negative or neutral short-term risk-benefit differences. However, that is unlikely since we know from observational studies that mRNA vaccine efficacy deteriorates a few months after the second dose.
There may also be long-term adverse reactions to the vaccine regarding which we do not yet know. Since the randomized trials ended early, we must look at observational data to answer that question. The publicly available data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System is of low quality, with both under- and over-reporting. The best observational data is from CDCs Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) and FDA’s Biologics and Effectiveness Safety System (BEST), but there have only been limited reports from these systems.
Fraiman and colleagues have produced the best evidence yet regarding the overall safety of the mRNA vaccines. The results are concerning. It is the responsibility of the manufacturers and FDA to ensure that benefits outweigh harms. They have failed to do so.
https://brownstone.org/articles/are-the-covid-mrna-vaccines-safe/
1853
Patrick
2022 Jul 3, 11:17am
Patrick
2022 Jul 3, 11:17am
https://gettr.com/post/p1gujtue1dc
Arnie1974
@Arnie1974
·
22h
Population Control: The War Against Unborn Babies and Reproductive Health
A new study from Dr. James Thorp, covered by The Epoch Times, details an outrageously increased risk of reproductive and fetal abnormalities compared to the influenza vaccine.
His findings are listed below: (Credit - Epoch Times)
• Abnormal uterine bleeding (menstrual irregularity) is 1000-fold greater
• Miscarriages are 50-fold greater
• Fetal chromosomal abnormalities are 100-fold greater
• Fetal malformation is 50-fold greater
• Fetal cystic hygroma (a major malformation) is 90-fold greater
• Fetal cardiac disorders are 40-fold greater
• Fetal arrhythmia is 50-fold greater
• Fetal cardiac arrest is 200-fold greater
• Fetal vascular mal-perfusion is a 100-fold greater
1854
Patrick
2022 Jul 3, 11:22am
Patrick
2022 Jul 3, 11:22am
https://nitter.pussthecat.org/delbigtree/status/1543604190102134785#m
Del Bigtree
@delbigtree
3h
When you get food poisoning the obvious question is, “What did I eat last night?” If we all start dying in unprecedented numbers shouldn’t the question be, “What did we all inject into ourselves last year?”
1855
Patrick
2022 Jul 3, 11:24am
Patrick
2022 Jul 3, 11:24am
https://crossroadsreport.substack.com/p/breaking-fifth-largest-life-insurance?fs=e
Fifth largest life insurance company in the US paid out 163% more for deaths of working people ages 18-64 in 2021 - Total claims/benefits up $6 BILLION
Company cites "non-pandemic-related morbidity" and "unusual claims adjustments" in explanation of losses from group life insurance business: Stock falling, replaces CEO
1857
stereotomy
2022 Jul 3, 12:09pm
stereotomy
2022 Jul 3, 12:09pm
Ceffer says
Goddamn the people who pushed this shit to hell. I agree with @richwicks - we need to stamp out the seed of every single family who pushed this shit on the rest of the world. This ultra-toxic psychotic strain of human needs to be extirpated from the collective genome so that humanity can survive.
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/65280
Goddamn the people who pushed this shit to hell. I agree with @richwicks - we need to stamp out the seed of every single family who pushed this shit on the rest of the world. This ultra-toxic psychotic strain of human needs to be extirpated from the collective genome so that humanity can survive.
1858
Patrick
2022 Jul 3, 2:58pm
Patrick
2022 Jul 3, 2:58pm
from https://patriots.win/p/15HbbQFDqY/my-vaccine-posts--part-4/
7/2 - https://patriots.win/p/15IY3NcLMf/internal-health-stuff/
6/30 - https://patriots.win/p/15IXykKd2U/schadenfreude/
6/29 - https://patriots.win/p/15IXu9NZ2G/stupid/
6/29 - https://patriots.win/p/15IXu9NHeh/whores-be-itching/
6/29 - https://patriots.win/p/15IXu8CgkB/long-covid/
6/28 - https://patriots.win/p/15IXu2Y5eY/must-be-climate-change/
6/16 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEqcvQwb/hahahaha/
6/8 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEca1cNE/probably-just-brain-cancer/
6/8 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEca1cEy/get-your-boosters--/c/
6/8 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEcYvQJM/normal-life-with-booster/
6/5 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEXpxSro/feel-good-bedtime-story/
5/29 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEJlxzjU/not-luckiest-dumbest-/
5/29 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEJlxj1C/super-glad/
5/28 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEFC7wsD/fake-news-doctors-would-never-ad/
5/28 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEFC7gID/dummy/
5/22 - https://patriots.win/p/15HvPsjcX6/fuck-you-simon/
5/19 - https://patriots.win/p/15HvL7WWTT/mysterious-chronic-shingles/
5/19 - https://patriots.win/p/15HvL6QanN/oh-no-not-seabo/
5/18 - https://patriots.win/p/15HvL1qXo8/oh-noooo/
5/15 - https://patriots.win/p/15HvBkCaBN/was-it-slow-and-painful-i-kinda-/
5/15 - https://patriots.win/p/15HvBkCIjc/mysterious-lymphoma-/
5/15 - https://patriots.win/p/15HvBj66jv/oh-no-that-totally-sucks-anyway/
5/15 - https://patriots.win/p/15HvBgoDlm/mysterious-stroke/
5/11 - https://patriots.win/p/15Hv2O280W/lisa-can-fuck-off-and-die/
5/11 - https://patriots.win/p/15Hv2O1J7w/clotshot-certainly-stops-the-stu/
5/8 - https://patriots.win/p/15HuxbfGS9/oh-no-not-blr/
5/8 - https://patriots.win/p/15Hut44czR/what-its-very-normal-for-a-13-ye/
5/5 - https://patriots.win/p/15HuoMHXJ1/what-an-idiot/c/
5/4 - https://patriots.win/p/15HuoFTzjN/waiting-for-sweet-sweet-darwinis/c/
5/1 (not my find but really good :) ) - https://patriots.win/p/15Hc3dufY9/i-wonder-what-it-could-be/
5/1 - https://patriots.win/p/15Hc3cmYDA/its-probably-stress-related/
5/1 - https://patriots.win/p/15Hc3cljGS/vaids/
4/26 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbuEIIFw/its-a-mystery/c/
4/24 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbpVNu7D/myocarditis-due-to-long-stupid/
4/23 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbkvWULL/vaids/
4/22 - https://patriots.win/p/15Hbks5v0P/another-darwin-reference-/
4/22 - https://patriots.win/p/15Hbkohpm3/long-covid/
4/20 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbgBS33Y/testimonials/
4/18 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbbUndH1/dont-pray/c/
4/18 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbbUnMYc/a-pretty-stupid-guy/
4/17 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbbQFDmK/dumb-ass-magat/
4/17 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbWseaeI/please
4/15 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbWkie9c/scratchy-scratch/c/
7/2 - https://patriots.win/p/15IY3NcLMf/internal-health-stuff/
6/30 - https://patriots.win/p/15IXykKd2U/schadenfreude/
6/29 - https://patriots.win/p/15IXu9NZ2G/stupid/
6/29 - https://patriots.win/p/15IXu9NHeh/whores-be-itching/
6/29 - https://patriots.win/p/15IXu8CgkB/long-covid/
6/28 - https://patriots.win/p/15IXu2Y5eY/must-be-climate-change/
6/16 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEqcvQwb/hahahaha/
6/8 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEca1cNE/probably-just-brain-cancer/
6/8 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEca1cEy/get-your-boosters--/c/
6/8 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEcYvQJM/normal-life-with-booster/
6/5 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEXpxSro/feel-good-bedtime-story/
5/29 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEJlxzjU/not-luckiest-dumbest-/
5/29 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEJlxj1C/super-glad/
5/28 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEFC7wsD/fake-news-doctors-would-never-ad/
5/28 - https://patriots.win/p/15IEFC7gID/dummy/
5/22 - https://patriots.win/p/15HvPsjcX6/fuck-you-simon/
5/19 - https://patriots.win/p/15HvL7WWTT/mysterious-chronic-shingles/
5/19 - https://patriots.win/p/15HvL6QanN/oh-no-not-seabo/
5/18 - https://patriots.win/p/15HvL1qXo8/oh-noooo/
5/15 - https://patriots.win/p/15HvBkCaBN/was-it-slow-and-painful-i-kinda-/
5/15 - https://patriots.win/p/15HvBkCIjc/mysterious-lymphoma-/
5/15 - https://patriots.win/p/15HvBj66jv/oh-no-that-totally-sucks-anyway/
5/15 - https://patriots.win/p/15HvBgoDlm/mysterious-stroke/
5/11 - https://patriots.win/p/15Hv2O280W/lisa-can-fuck-off-and-die/
5/11 - https://patriots.win/p/15Hv2O1J7w/clotshot-certainly-stops-the-stu/
5/8 - https://patriots.win/p/15HuxbfGS9/oh-no-not-blr/
5/8 - https://patriots.win/p/15Hut44czR/what-its-very-normal-for-a-13-ye/
5/5 - https://patriots.win/p/15HuoMHXJ1/what-an-idiot/c/
5/4 - https://patriots.win/p/15HuoFTzjN/waiting-for-sweet-sweet-darwinis/c/
5/1 (not my find but really good :) ) - https://patriots.win/p/15Hc3dufY9/i-wonder-what-it-could-be/
5/1 - https://patriots.win/p/15Hc3cmYDA/its-probably-stress-related/
5/1 - https://patriots.win/p/15Hc3cljGS/vaids/
4/26 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbuEIIFw/its-a-mystery/c/
4/24 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbpVNu7D/myocarditis-due-to-long-stupid/
4/23 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbkvWULL/vaids/
4/22 - https://patriots.win/p/15Hbks5v0P/another-darwin-reference-/
4/22 - https://patriots.win/p/15Hbkohpm3/long-covid/
4/20 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbgBS33Y/testimonials/
4/18 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbbUndH1/dont-pray/c/
4/18 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbbUnMYc/a-pretty-stupid-guy/
4/17 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbbQFDmK/dumb-ass-magat/
4/17 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbWseaeI/please
4/15 - https://patriots.win/p/15HbWkie9c/scratchy-scratch/c/
1859
clambo
2022 Jul 3, 3:08pm
I posted elsewhere, but my friend died recently.
He was not overweight and the medical examiner didn’t notice liver or kidney defects.
He had an enlarged heart; the examiner thought he might have been killed by the J&J shot.
He was not overweight and the medical examiner didn’t notice liver or kidney defects.
He had an enlarged heart; the examiner thought he might have been killed by the J&J shot.
1863
Patrick
2022 Jul 4, 1:20pm
Patrick
2022 Jul 4, 1:20pm
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/ready-peer-reviewed-study-finds-young-moderna-jab-recipients-jaw-dropping-44x-higher-risk-developing-myocarditis-unvaccinated/
A peer-reviewed study from researchers in France has concluded that both the experimental Pfizer and Moderna vaccines significantly increase the risk of myocarditis compared to the unvaccinated.
While both mRNA therapies were found to be linked to the life-threatening heart condition, the Moderna jabs results were particularly shocking, especially among young adults, as researchers found the risk for myocarditis diagnosis following the Moderna jab was 44 times higher risk for individuals aged 18 to 24 years old.
« First « Previous Comments 1,824 - 1,863 of 8,302 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/better-call-saul-star-bob-odenkirk-collapses-on-set-after-receiving-experimental-covid-19-vaccine/