patrick.net

The 2011 movie "Contagion" is also disturbingly similar to the 2020 plandemic.

An internal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) memo obtained by The Epoch Times reveals that career scientists in the agency’s vaccine-safety offices have identified “no fewer than 10” child deaths they consider related to COVID-19 vaccination.

The Nov. 28 memo, written by Dr. Vinay Prasad, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), marks what Prasad calls the first acknowledgment inside the agency that the vaccines have caused fatal harm in children.

I am writing to report that OBPV career staff have found that at least 10 children have died afterand because of receiving COVID-19 vaccination. These deaths are related to vaccination(likely/probable/possible attribution made by staff). That number is certainly an underestimatedue to underreporting, and inherent bias in attribution. This safety signal has far reachingimplications for Americans, the US pandemic response, and the agency itself, which I wish todiscuss here. I also want to address some frequent objections.

Prior to joining the US FDA, the FDA Commissioner closely followed reports of vaccine-induced myocarditis. Unlike the COVID virus, which has a steep age gradient-- being at least 1000 times more likely to kill an 80 year old than an 8 year old-- myocarditis appeared to have the opposite pattern. Young, healthy boys and men-- those least likely to experience bad covid outcomes--bore the greatest risk. The risk was as high as ~200-330 per million doses given in the highest risk demographic groups. Notably, the US FDA and CDC were not the first to recognize the safety signal-- instead the Israelis were-- and worse in May of 2021, then CDC director Rochelle Walensky stated, "We have not seen a signal and we've actually looked intentionally for the signal in the over 200 million doses we've given," Many felt this statement was dishonest and manipulative.

The Commissioner, senior advisor Tracy Beth Hoeg MD PhD, myself and colleagues demonstrated that COVID-19 boosters, and the accompanying mandates by colleges, were on balance harmful to young men in a widely discussed, peer reviewed paper in 2022. Like many academic physicians, we felt the FDA and CDC abdicated their duty to the American people. ...

Having said this, I remain open to vigorous discussions and debate on these topics, as I have always been. I am open minded to modifications or alterations. As you can imagine, I believe these debates should be private, internal to FDA, until they are ready to be made public. I don't endorse selective reporting of our meetings and documents. Some staff may not agree with these core principles and operating principles. Please submit your resignation letters to your supervisor and CC my deputy Katherine Szarama. For those who choose to remain in CBER, I look forward to working with you, learning from you, discussing with you, and interacting with you on our shared mission: to elevate vaccine science to 21st century evidence based medicine.

Vinay Prasad MD MPH

On Friday, Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH, Director of FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, circulated an internal memo concluding `no fewer than 10` child deaths were linked to COVID-19 vaccination.

After analyzing 96 reported deaths, the FDA team recommended a randomized studies requirement following Prasad's conclusion that at least 10 deaths in VAERS were vaccine related, aligning with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Health Secretary’s policy.

Dr. Soon-Shiong marveled at the explosion of cancers in children that, until very recently, were universally the domain of senior citizens. But never mind; it’s probably that 4-year-olds aren’t taking care of themselves like they used to. Chillingly, the researcher said that tumor biopsies in these patients have tested positive for covid spike protein. This announcement caused the Scientific Establishment™ to suddenly remember an appointment with its hairdresser and vanish. (No comment.)

The doctor did not go so far as to drop the “v” word, but it is reasonable to draw that conclusion. Soon-Shiong could have said his team was detecting “covid virus” in the biopsies, but he said “spike protein.” We can assume he is speaking carefully and precisely. After all, only the vaccines deliver bare spike protein, which is just a part of the complete virus.

But, probably because he has a nice newspaper and a research company and doesn’t want anything bad to happen to them, he did not mention the needles. Either way, though, whether delivered by the virus or the vaccine, he was saying the spike is no bueno.

Vaccine nucleic acid detected over 200 days out in blood and placenta

Sperm and seminal fluid also positive

https://www.gavinpublishers.com/assets/articles_pdf/Detection-of-Pfizer-BioNTech-Messenger-RNA-COVID-19-Vaccine-in-Human-Blood-Placenta-and-Semen.pdf

This study examines the persistence of synthetic mRNA from the COVID-19 vaccine Comirnaty in the blood, placenta, sperm, and seminal fluid of both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Samples were collected from 34 participants, including 22 pregnant women, four male patients from a fertility clinic (providing eight samples), and eight additional individuals. RNA was extracted and analyzed using nested PCR, and the resulting amplicons were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Vaccine mRNA was detected in most samples from vaccinated individuals including their blood, placenta tissue, sperm and seminal fluid samples. Notably, vaccine mRNA remained detectable in approximately half of the samples collected more than 200 days after vaccination, indicating prolonged persistence in the body.

British sports host Laura Woods gave viewers a major scare on Tuesday after suddenly collapsing during a live ITV/TNT Sports TV broadcast.

The unexpected incident prompted her co-hosts to physically catch Woods as she fell forward, live on air.

Woods, 38, was covering the international friendly between England and Ghana’s women’s teams when the alarming moment unfolded.

Fellow host and former soccer star Ian Wright and analyst Anita Asante reacted instantly.

They were forced to grab Woods before she hit the ground.

The broadcast immediately cut to black and then switched to a shot of the field.

“States with higher vaccination rates exhibited significantly larger increases in excess mortality… even after adjusting for confounders.” Last month, two German researchers published the actuarial equivalent of a mass grave uncovered by international investigators— and I’ll give you one guess what correlated with the huge spike in excess deaths. It was titled Study: Regional Patterns of Excess Mortality in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic and published in Royal Society Open Science.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12607721/

The two German statisticians did something rare (these days): they cut through the political fog by performing a clean, actuarially rigorous analysis of excess mortality across all sixteen German states. No “modeling” wizardry, no “assumptions,” no “estimates,” no “adjustments.” They simply asked: How many people should have died versus how many actually did?

The result was a tragedy in three acts. In Act I (2020), excess deaths barely budged. In Act II (2021), after the jabs rolled out, covid deaths fell sharply, but excess mortality mysteriously increased. In Act III (2022–23), a year into the jabs, covid deaths fell to the floor, but all-cause excess mortality kept on inexporably climbing.

In other words, everything twisted; all regional patterns reversed. States that saw low covid mortality during the first two years suddenly climbed the death charts, and vice versa. A mysterious new driver had obviously entered the arena.

And that driver, whatever it was, strongly correlated with exactly one thing. No points for guessing; it’s too easy.

Unsurprisingly, the data crunching showed that, during the first two years of the pandemic, excess mortality correlated tightly with reported covid deaths (r = 0.96 and r = 0.89). (But even that came with a catch: covid labeled deaths wildly exceeded actual excess deaths— by factors of 3.5x and 2x. In other words, Germany had a “pandemic of re-labeling.” Fake covid deaths. But never mind.)

By year three, something collapsed. Covid deaths dropped, covid cases dropped, but excess mortality exploded anyway. A mystery! Schnell!

Bewildered, not realizing what they were looking at, the baffled researchers rechecked their calculations and tried to find something that could explain why, after covid ended and the vaccines were widespread, people were dying from other causes faster than ever. They thought … maybe long covid? Nope—states with higher infection rates in 2021 had lower excess mortality later. Hmm. What about lockdowns? No association. Age? Poverty? GDP? Care home prevalence? It was all just random noise.

Then the researchers, having run out of ideas, and probably feeling very queasy at this point, like they’d eaten a bad bratwurst, turned to vaccination rates.

💉 After they came to, they realized they were looking at an extremely tight correlation. States with higher vaccination rates had significantly higher excess mortality. They also had smaller declines in covid deaths, smaller declines in case fatality rates, and in some cases, covid death rates rose rather than fell.

When they adjusted the data for prior mortality levels and time-invariant confounders, the association between jabs and excess deaths did not disappear. It got even stronger. One line from the study damns the entire sordid enterprise: “Excess mortality increased most in the states with the highest vaccination rates.”

It wasn’t just one correlation. It was a stack of them — all pointing in the same direction.

Oh, the games governments play with numbers and statistics. But excess deaths are the most difficult data to conceal, since they are derived directly from population data. Population figures can be delayed, a little, but are not easily tampered with. Political forces much more powerful than the desire to conceal defective jab products are inextricably intertwined with census data, which directly relates to local funding, voting district sizes, and ultimately the control of parliaments and chambers of Congress.

Next, since local vaccination rates were published — trumpeted — every single day throughout the pandemic, those data are also undeniable and easily accessible. This study shows that those two data points —jab rates and excess deaths— are enough to prove how deadly the jabs were. ...

💉 Meanwhile, this peer-reviewed blowtorch was published in the Royal Society Open Science, a solid, respectable, mid-tier journal. Don’t get me wrong; corporate media will ignore this study, same as every other study evidencing jab risks and previous studies tying excess deaths to vaccine rates. The sold-out experts will wave it off, just like always.

After all, what’s a little excess mortality among friends, when the mission is to protect the narrative at all costs?

But this study climbs onto a tower of previous studies and case reports proving problems with the mRNA shots. It’s a pile of paper thousands of reams deep and a mile wide. It is all being held back by a crumbling dam of denial, a vast ocean of truth temporarily restrained by a thin veneer of concretized arrogance.

But wait. There’s more.

💉 💉 💉

“Vaccine mRNA remained detectable in approximately half of samples collected more than 200 days after vaccination…and was detected in sperm and seminal fluid.” Just when you thought COVID science couldn’t get any weirder, here comes a completely separate peer-reviewed bombshell from Israel, showing more mRNA wandering into places the experts swore it would never go, including, at long last, the family jewels. In October, a study published in the Annals of Case Reports, titled “Detection of Pfizer BioNTech Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Human Blood, Placenta and Semen.”

The researchers tested fertility clinic blood, placentas, sperm, and seminal fluid* from 30 participants, including 22 pregnant women. (* The study was silent about how the sperm and seminal fluid were collected. But we can guess. “Sir, we’re conducting a groundbreaking study on mRNA persistence. Here’s your cup.”)

More than 200 days post-injection, about half the subjects still had detectable synthetic vaccine mRNA bobbing around, lounging in the bloodstream like it had rented a room. They found it in the placentas. They found it in the sperm. They found it in the seminal fluid. In other words: they found persistent mRNA everywhere they looked, through the reproductive systems of half of those tested.

And they found it long after it should have gone. “We detected vaccine mRNA in the blood, placenta, and semen of some subjects over 200 days post-immunization,” they wrote.

Three of the four men in the study had detectable mRNA in their sperm. The fourth man slipped through the net only because he didn’t produce any sperm. But they still found the mRNA in his seminal fluid anyway. In other words: 100% of the men tested had persistent mRNA in their reproductive fluids.

There’s an ironic element here. The researchers detected the lingering mRNA by using a very sensitive PCR test — the same type of test they used to find covid everywhere during the pandemic. Now, ha ha, the ultra-long Q-tip is in the other nostril. Or words to that effect. In any case, the authors speculated that other studies claiming not to have found persistent mRNA probably used a less sensitive test (qPCR) instead.

💉 Remember how the experts promised —promised, they swore up and down— that the mRNA would stay in the arm? “Stable at the injection site,” they vowed. “Does not travel,” they certified. “Impossible,” they assured us. “It’s too delicate to migrate,” they sputtered lamely.

Meanwhile, this paper calmly reported that the synthetic mRNA shows up in blood at least half a year later, crosses into placental tissue, and loiters in the reproductive system like a peeping tom at an adult video store.

That’s how you know it’s working!

The studies are mounting up. This was yet another peer-reviewed study confirming prolonged, tissue-level persistence of synthetic COVID vaccine mRNA —in blood, in placentas, and in reproductive fluids— long after manufacturers claimed it should have vanished.

In other words, old-fashioned science directly contradicted years of official assurances, pharma talking points, and media’s arrogant smirking. It did so using Sanger sequencing, nested PCR, and basic, in-the-field biological sampling— the kind of work that should have been done, and could have been done before the mass rollout, but wasn’t.