patrick.net

Vaccine nucleic acid detected over 200 days out in blood and placenta

Sperm and seminal fluid also positive

https://www.gavinpublishers.com/assets/articles_pdf/Detection-of-Pfizer-BioNTech-Messenger-RNA-COVID-19-Vaccine-in-Human-Blood-Placenta-and-Semen.pdf

This study examines the persistence of synthetic mRNA from the COVID-19 vaccine Comirnaty in the blood, placenta, sperm, and seminal fluid of both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Samples were collected from 34 participants, including 22 pregnant women, four male patients from a fertility clinic (providing eight samples), and eight additional individuals. RNA was extracted and analyzed using nested PCR, and the resulting amplicons were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Vaccine mRNA was detected in most samples from vaccinated individuals including their blood, placenta tissue, sperm and seminal fluid samples. Notably, vaccine mRNA remained detectable in approximately half of the samples collected more than 200 days after vaccination, indicating prolonged persistence in the body.

British sports host Laura Woods gave viewers a major scare on Tuesday after suddenly collapsing during a live ITV/TNT Sports TV broadcast.

The unexpected incident prompted her co-hosts to physically catch Woods as she fell forward, live on air.

Woods, 38, was covering the international friendly between England and Ghana’s women’s teams when the alarming moment unfolded.

Fellow host and former soccer star Ian Wright and analyst Anita Asante reacted instantly.

They were forced to grab Woods before she hit the ground.

The broadcast immediately cut to black and then switched to a shot of the field.

“States with higher vaccination rates exhibited significantly larger increases in excess mortality… even after adjusting for confounders.” Last month, two German researchers published the actuarial equivalent of a mass grave uncovered by international investigators— and I’ll give you one guess what correlated with the huge spike in excess deaths. It was titled Study: Regional Patterns of Excess Mortality in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic and published in Royal Society Open Science.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12607721/

The two German statisticians did something rare (these days): they cut through the political fog by performing a clean, actuarially rigorous analysis of excess mortality across all sixteen German states. No “modeling” wizardry, no “assumptions,” no “estimates,” no “adjustments.” They simply asked: How many people should have died versus how many actually did?

The result was a tragedy in three acts. In Act I (2020), excess deaths barely budged. In Act II (2021), after the jabs rolled out, covid deaths fell sharply, but excess mortality mysteriously increased. In Act III (2022–23), a year into the jabs, covid deaths fell to the floor, but all-cause excess mortality kept on inexporably climbing.

In other words, everything twisted; all regional patterns reversed. States that saw low covid mortality during the first two years suddenly climbed the death charts, and vice versa. A mysterious new driver had obviously entered the arena.

And that driver, whatever it was, strongly correlated with exactly one thing. No points for guessing; it’s too easy.

Unsurprisingly, the data crunching showed that, during the first two years of the pandemic, excess mortality correlated tightly with reported covid deaths (r = 0.96 and r = 0.89). (But even that came with a catch: covid labeled deaths wildly exceeded actual excess deaths— by factors of 3.5x and 2x. In other words, Germany had a “pandemic of re-labeling.” Fake covid deaths. But never mind.)

By year three, something collapsed. Covid deaths dropped, covid cases dropped, but excess mortality exploded anyway. A mystery! Schnell!

Bewildered, not realizing what they were looking at, the baffled researchers rechecked their calculations and tried to find something that could explain why, after covid ended and the vaccines were widespread, people were dying from other causes faster than ever. They thought … maybe long covid? Nope—states with higher infection rates in 2021 had lower excess mortality later. Hmm. What about lockdowns? No association. Age? Poverty? GDP? Care home prevalence? It was all just random noise.

Then the researchers, having run out of ideas, and probably feeling very queasy at this point, like they’d eaten a bad bratwurst, turned to vaccination rates.

💉 After they came to, they realized they were looking at an extremely tight correlation. States with higher vaccination rates had significantly higher excess mortality. They also had smaller declines in covid deaths, smaller declines in case fatality rates, and in some cases, covid death rates rose rather than fell.

When they adjusted the data for prior mortality levels and time-invariant confounders, the association between jabs and excess deaths did not disappear. It got even stronger. One line from the study damns the entire sordid enterprise: “Excess mortality increased most in the states with the highest vaccination rates.”

It wasn’t just one correlation. It was a stack of them — all pointing in the same direction.

Oh, the games governments play with numbers and statistics. But excess deaths are the most difficult data to conceal, since they are derived directly from population data. Population figures can be delayed, a little, but are not easily tampered with. Political forces much more powerful than the desire to conceal defective jab products are inextricably intertwined with census data, which directly relates to local funding, voting district sizes, and ultimately the control of parliaments and chambers of Congress.

Next, since local vaccination rates were published — trumpeted — every single day throughout the pandemic, those data are also undeniable and easily accessible. This study shows that those two data points —jab rates and excess deaths— are enough to prove how deadly the jabs were. ...

💉 Meanwhile, this peer-reviewed blowtorch was published in the Royal Society Open Science, a solid, respectable, mid-tier journal. Don’t get me wrong; corporate media will ignore this study, same as every other study evidencing jab risks and previous studies tying excess deaths to vaccine rates. The sold-out experts will wave it off, just like always.

After all, what’s a little excess mortality among friends, when the mission is to protect the narrative at all costs?

But this study climbs onto a tower of previous studies and case reports proving problems with the mRNA shots. It’s a pile of paper thousands of reams deep and a mile wide. It is all being held back by a crumbling dam of denial, a vast ocean of truth temporarily restrained by a thin veneer of concretized arrogance.

But wait. There’s more.

💉 💉 💉

“Vaccine mRNA remained detectable in approximately half of samples collected more than 200 days after vaccination…and was detected in sperm and seminal fluid.” Just when you thought COVID science couldn’t get any weirder, here comes a completely separate peer-reviewed bombshell from Israel, showing more mRNA wandering into places the experts swore it would never go, including, at long last, the family jewels. In October, a study published in the Annals of Case Reports, titled “Detection of Pfizer BioNTech Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Human Blood, Placenta and Semen.”

The researchers tested fertility clinic blood, placentas, sperm, and seminal fluid* from 30 participants, including 22 pregnant women. (* The study was silent about how the sperm and seminal fluid were collected. But we can guess. “Sir, we’re conducting a groundbreaking study on mRNA persistence. Here’s your cup.”)

More than 200 days post-injection, about half the subjects still had detectable synthetic vaccine mRNA bobbing around, lounging in the bloodstream like it had rented a room. They found it in the placentas. They found it in the sperm. They found it in the seminal fluid. In other words: they found persistent mRNA everywhere they looked, through the reproductive systems of half of those tested.

And they found it long after it should have gone. “We detected vaccine mRNA in the blood, placenta, and semen of some subjects over 200 days post-immunization,” they wrote.

Three of the four men in the study had detectable mRNA in their sperm. The fourth man slipped through the net only because he didn’t produce any sperm. But they still found the mRNA in his seminal fluid anyway. In other words: 100% of the men tested had persistent mRNA in their reproductive fluids.

There’s an ironic element here. The researchers detected the lingering mRNA by using a very sensitive PCR test — the same type of test they used to find covid everywhere during the pandemic. Now, ha ha, the ultra-long Q-tip is in the other nostril. Or words to that effect. In any case, the authors speculated that other studies claiming not to have found persistent mRNA probably used a less sensitive test (qPCR) instead.

💉 Remember how the experts promised —promised, they swore up and down— that the mRNA would stay in the arm? “Stable at the injection site,” they vowed. “Does not travel,” they certified. “Impossible,” they assured us. “It’s too delicate to migrate,” they sputtered lamely.

Meanwhile, this paper calmly reported that the synthetic mRNA shows up in blood at least half a year later, crosses into placental tissue, and loiters in the reproductive system like a peeping tom at an adult video store.

That’s how you know it’s working!

The studies are mounting up. This was yet another peer-reviewed study confirming prolonged, tissue-level persistence of synthetic COVID vaccine mRNA —in blood, in placentas, and in reproductive fluids— long after manufacturers claimed it should have vanished.

In other words, old-fashioned science directly contradicted years of official assurances, pharma talking points, and media’s arrogant smirking. It did so using Sanger sequencing, nested PCR, and basic, in-the-field biological sampling— the kind of work that should have been done, and could have been done before the mass rollout, but wasn’t.