« First « Previous Comments 41 - 53 of 53 Search these comments
I just learned that Decaf Coffee isn't just running water over the grinds to get most of the caffeine out, then quickly re-drying them.
This post is dedicated to my friend, who recently passed away from an extremely rapid and aggressive cancer. He was healthy and happy, planning to marry a woman he loved, until he foolishly accepted the mRNA injections. RIP Chris.
Katherine Watt published an article explaining how vaccines (biologics) have been a fake-regulated category of poisons, falsely presented as regulated pharmaceuticals to the consumers. She observed that the FDA is likely running a system of fronts, mailboxes for pharma companies to send “self-regulatory” statements to. I think I found one such box. ...
"A major challenge to the safety of vaccines manufactured in transformed/tumorigenic cell substrates is contamination with infectious agents. Problems include cancer-causing viruses and genetic material (DNA) that might encode infectious agents or small microRNAs (miRNA) that might trigger neoplastic activity in the vaccine recipient." ...
Not to worry, the FDA is studying the issue 3 years after billions of people got jabbed. They already know that less than a nanogram of plasmid DNA with the right kind of oncogenes is needed to start your turbo cancer with a beautiful mRNA shot! ...
Ok then. Less than a nanogram of DNA injected can cause cancer.
FDA “acceptable limit” of DNA impurity in any vaccine is 10 nanograms/shot!
The DNA actually found in the vials of Pfizer and Moderna in 2022 by Vanessa Schmidt-Kruger (first researcher to report it before Kevin McKernan confirmed this in early 2023) was up to 2000 nanograms/ dose!
US lags the world in recognizing what happened with mRNA
is this because we lead the world in pharma donations to politicians?
... the vast majority of excess deaths were caused first by absurd overreactions that prevented sound medical practice and societal behavior and later by a poorly tested and deeply dangerous “vaccine” rushed to market using a truly terrible and not only untested but previously failed modality (mRNA) that was not only unsuited to purpose but that rapidly made things far worse through a side effect profile that would have instantly had any other vaxx in history pulled off the market and an actual tendency to accelerate disease spread and patient mortality.
not only were such warnings ignored, they were vilified and attacked. they were also suppressed with the CDC itself deliberately breaking the reporting mechanisms used to assess such things and then outright refusing to apply their own standards. doctors were threatened with loss of licenses. safe medications were pulled off the market to make the way for dangerous ones.
the FDA vaccine heads quit in disgust rather than be a part of this. but the machine rolled on. rushed to market EMA drugs that were, quite literally, never tested because the ones made for the mass market used an entirely different production modality than those used in the (already deeply suspect in their own right) drug trials in a product area where “the process is the product.”
it became clear that no regulator even bothered to sequence the resulting compounds. that fell to fellow feline kevin mckernan who discovered that the products in the vials were nothing like what was advertised, had massive levels of impurities, and worse, actual plasmids (the chemical drug factories to make spike proteins) in them.
it just kept going from bad to worse as it became clear the jabbed were getting sick more and more seriously than the unjabbed and that their overall morality rates were soaring in real time even without the longer term issues like cancer.
“died of suddenly” became a meme and yet even trying to bring this up got you called an “antivaxxer” and kicked off the internet and out of polite society. the attacks on the people who would not get these shots were unlike anything i have ever seen or even imagined. you were filth, untouchable, and immoral. do you want grandma to die? how can you be so selfish?
i was having dinner in 2021 with some friends and one of their moms, a deep blue liberal woman from a deep blue liberal enclave. we got to talking about the vaxx and i let slip that i had refused to get the jab. this mom, who previously was a big fan of mine, physically recoiled. she actually jumped up from the table and refused to return even though we were sitting outdoors on a breezy rooftop deck. her mix of horror and terror really said it all.
that is the power of propaganda, trust, and relentless moral hectoring. like some sort of epidemiological dalit, i was now anathema for the heinous sin of “trying to help.”
she was far from the only one like that.
wild times.
and now things are starting to change, facts leak out around the edges and the moralizing flipping.
i lack the grounding in japanese politics to tell you how mainstream this former minister for internal affairs is, but the fact that he’s speaking like this at all is quite a thing.
https://x.com/politicalawake/status/1796817118488383973/video/2
he’s speaking to an anti-WHO protest, a protest against their ham handed interference and crony corporatism masquerading as trans national government and safety. he’s basically the BOJO anti-particle.
the evidence here has been stark for ages. from spikes in deaths to drops in fertility, from young people dropping dead playing sports to old people unable to clear viruses and massive excursions in cancer rates, it’s been all around us. because mRNA technology is neither safe nor effective. the whole thing is a terrible idea that basically could not work.
vaccines all but never work on diseases that are not “one and done.” if your body does not develop lasting immunity from exposure to a pathogen, a vaccine cannot train such immunity either. worse, if you try, it causes viral mutation to become vaccine advantaged and you get ADE and OAS.
this is massively accelerated by the fact that mRNA vaccines are non-sterilizing. (they do not stop infection, spread, or contagion) how could they be? they never show you the actual pathogen, just the effect it has on infected cells. you’ve trained the body’s watchmen to look for fires, but not to understand what an arsonist looks like and so guys with molotovs roam free and mutate around your defenses rapidly optimizing. they may even make a permanent home if your immune system flips to an igG4 style response more akin to allergy and tolerance than pathogen clearance. (it’s posited this may be the result of plasmids causing long, constant exposure, or of OAS/ADE causing inability to clear escape variant but i’m not sure this is conclusive and i don’t want to make any strong claims)
the abject debacle of these products would seem to be the equivalent of every canary on earth dropping dead at once in the pharma mines, but, alas, no. the jingoistic juggernaut churns on and, astonishing, new ones are being rushed through with all the same safety lapses. hell, it’s the same companies. the same ones that just paid $710mm in royalties to NIH and NIH scientists and some who NIH is suing because they were supposed to pay and welshed. ...
the hideous spectacle of tony fauci extolling the massive numbers of lives purportedly saved by these vexatious vaxx modalities to congress yesterday was bad enough. watching the congresscritters from both sides of the aisle pay fawning obeisance to that egregious misstatement of fact was far worse. ...
... as soon as you allow politicians to determine that which is bought and sold, the first thing bought and sold will always be politicians.
so long as this power exists, so too will its corruption. expecting a different outcome this time is like having french fries at the beach and expecting the seagulls to behave themselves.
these agencies and agents portray themselves as sources of safety, but they are nothing of the sort. past a point, they constitute a greater danger than any “free market” or “misinformation” ever could.
it’s time we gave up on governmental gold giving to fund, approve, license, and permit medicine. it always sounds like “supporting science” but it’s not. it’s subverting it.
like mRNA, it’s a broken modality pursued for profit, not for safety or well being.
It’s mRNA happy hour! It’s not for me, or anybody I know, but the useless, feckless, totally captured FDA vaccine committee yesterday recommended an ‘update’ to the covid booster. They want to tweak the formula to make it equally dangerous and ineffective against this year’s variant, so-called JN.1.
You may not recognize ‘JN.1’ by its technical moniker. This is the one they originally labeled “Pirola” (a reference David Pecker can relate to), and are now calling FLiRT. Soon it will have its own dating website.
So here’s your public service advisory: get ready to tell your helpful, FLiRTY pharmacist what to do with her new and improved, “free,” Fall season covid shot.
Top FDA official admits she refused the Covid-19 vaccine while pregnant
A senior regulator’s admission reveals uncomfortable truths about silence, ethics and trust inside the FDA.
One of the most powerful figures at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has admitted she refused the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine while pregnant—even as her agency promoted it as "safe and effective" for all pregnant women.
Dr Sara Brenner’s explosive disclosure, made on 15 May 2025 at the MAHA Institute Round Table in Washington DC, is as revealing as it is troubling.
A preventive medicine physician, Brenner has worked at the FDA since 2019. As the FDA’s Principal Deputy Commissioner—and briefly its Acting Commissioner—Brenner was at the centre of decision-making.
Prior to that she was Chief Medical Officer for diagnostics and was detailed to the White House to support the Biden administration’s Covid-19 response. She didn’t just participate in the pandemic response, she helped shape it from within.
"Knowing what I knew—not only about nanotechnology, about medicine, about the medical countermeasures—but also having a very strong and firm grounding in bioethics… there were many things that were not right," she told the audience.
That someone with her seniority and access to internal data privately rejected the vaccine, while her agency promoted it to millions of pregnant women, presents a profound ethical dilemma. ...
No mandate for Brenner?
It’s unclear how Brenner managed to avoid the vaccine mandate that applied to all federal employees at the time. She didn’t say. Perhaps she received a religious or medical exemption—but she left that part out.
What she did reveal was that she had concerns—deep enough not to take the vaccine during her pregnancy. Yet she said nothing publicly, while her agency told millions of other women it was safe.

Why Is the FDA Still Covering Up the Deadly Risks of mRNA Injections?
Dr. Carol Taccetta exposes how the FDA ignored clear evidence of lethal heart damage from mRNA shots—abandoning its duty to protect the public.
I sat down with Dr. Carol Taccetta—a physician with decades of experience in drug safety who contributed to the Surgeon General’s landmark report on smoking—to unpack why, despite overwhelming evidence of fatal myocarditis linked to the COVID-19 mRNA shots, the FDA continues to deny not only a market recall, but even the bare minimum: a black box warning.
Dr. Taccetta explains that a black box warning is the FDA’s most serious labeling requirement. It's reserved for risks that are fatal, life-threatening, or permanently disabling—and when proper warnings can reduce harm. The warning must be placed front and center on prescribing information, especially when the risk can be mitigated by monitoring, patient selection, or dose adjustment.
The question isn’t whether myocarditis qualifies—it clearly does—but why the FDA is refusing to act. ...
They ignored the 43,000+ serious adverse events she documented. They dismissed autopsy findings, CMR imaging studies showing persistent cardiac scarring, and even their own insurance claims data. The agency simply refused to act on the overwhelming body of evidence presented.
This is the same FDA that paused the Janssen vaccine for blood clots after just 54 cases. Yet now they claim no action is needed despite at least tens of thousands of serious heart injuries and deaths.
They admitted persistent cardiac injury in post-vaccine myocarditis cases. But they refused to include the terms death, heart failure, or arrhythmia risk—even though the study they cited links vaccine heart injury to sudden cardiac death...
Dr. Taccetta has spent countless hours trying to make a difference—submitting petitions, engaging the process, and writing directly to Dr. Peter Marks—all in an effort to fully inform the public about the risk of fatal heart damage.
But the FDA’s continued denial of black box warnings, even after confirming long-term cardiac injury, makes one thing clear: this agency has abandoned its duty to protect the public.
We don’t just need better labels—we need these shots off the market.
Reviewing more than 400 drug approvals between 2013 and 2022, the authors found the agency repeatedly ignored its own scientific standards.
One expert put it bluntly—the FDA’s threshold for evidence “can’t go any lower because it’s already in the dirt.”
A system built on weak evidence
The findings were damning—73% of drugs approved by the FDA during the study period failed to meet all four basic criteria for demonstrating “substantial evidence” of effectiveness.
Those four criteria—presence of a control group, replication in two well-conducted trials, blinding of participants and investigators, and the use of clinical endpoints like symptom relief or extended survival—are supposed to be the bedrock of drug evaluation.
Yet only 28% of drugs met all four criteria—40 drugs met none.
These aren’t obscure technicalities—they are the most basic safeguards to protect patients from ineffective or dangerous treatments.
But under political and industry pressure, the FDA has increasingly abandoned them in favour of speed and so-called “regulatory flexibility”.
FDA Commits Grave Betrayal: Fully Approves Deadly Genetic Injections for Infants
The FDA has committed a grave betrayal — putting millions of vulnerable infants, toddlers, and young children at risk of serious injury and death while cementing loss of trust.
With full approval, mRNA injections are now further embedded into our medical and public health systems — despite mounting evidence of catastrophic harm.
As detailed in our study, Review: Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify as Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits:
They ignored 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens.
They ignored 240 elected officials and 17 public health organizations.
They ignored excess mortality, negative efficacy, and confirmed DNA contamination.
There is still time for RFK Jr. to act in accordance with “MAHA” values and denounce this disastrous decision. With a mass casualty event still unfolding, the time for playing politics is over.
Leadership demands courage — not silence.
One of the most powerful figures at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has admitted she refused the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine while pregnant—even as her agency promoted it as “safe and effective” for all pregnant women.
Dr Sara Brenner’s explosive disclosure, made on 15 May 2025 at the MAHA Institute Round Table in Washington, DC, is as revealing as it is troubling.
A preventive medicine physician, Brenner has worked at the FDA since 2019. As the FDA’s Principal Deputy Commissioner—and briefly its Acting Commissioner—Brenner was at the centre of decision-making. ...
“Knowing what I knew—not only about nanotechnology, about medicine, about the medical countermeasures—but also having a very strong and firm grounding in bioethics…there were many things that were not right,” she told the audience.
That someone with her seniority and access to internal data privately rejected the vaccine, while her agency promoted it to millions of pregnant women, presents a profound ethical dilemma.
Brenner explained that her decision was driven by a lack of safety data, particularly around the biodistribution of the vaccine’s lipid nanoparticles (LNPs)—the tiny fat particles used to deliver the mRNA into cells.
“It was unknown at the time what the biodistribution patterns of those products were…That was my primary concern, and that exposure I was very concerned about,” said Brenner.
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 53 of 53 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,352,529 comments by 15,728 users - HANrongli online now