2
0

Hospitals refuse to prescribe Ivermectin because it would remove their immunity under the "Prep Act"


 invite response                
2021 Aug 31, 11:45pm   345 views  5 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

https://nitter.database.red/RWMaloneMD/status/1432782568382939139#m


Robert W Malone, MD
@RWMaloneMD
11h
"It appears that the Prep Act had been amended such that private hospitals and entities were covered in their actions taken with c19 patients and relieved of all liability as long as they were prescribing 'Covered Countermeasures'. ie. NIH approved medications. "

John Pawlak
@JohnJanPawlak
11h
Replying to @RWMaloneMD
would explain the absolute lack of questioning, lack of creativity, and the absolute zombie-ism seen at hospitals.

me
@newyorker1213
11h
Replying to @RWMaloneMD
I think this info will be helpful in the global reckoning tribunals for crimes against humanity.

MrK001
@MrK00001
11h
Replying to @RWMaloneMD
"as long as they were prescribing 'Covered Countermeasures'."

Meaning they were liable if they prescribed Ivermectin or described the vaccines any other way than safe and effective?

What does that do for the level of underreporting of vaccine injury?

DrJohnnyBananas
@DrJohnBananasMD
11h
Replying to @RWMaloneMD
Oh I it, if I give a patient Ivermectin or an IV vitimin D, C, or CBD drip and they are one of the few that croaks on the road to natural immunuty I get sued, but if you take a Pfizer jab and you are one of the 1 in million ish who gets a serious side effect you can't sue Pfizer!

politica_errada
@politica_errada
11h
Replying to @RWMaloneMD
Corruption at its finest. Protecting the pharma industry $$ over the health of the nation.


So hospitals cannot do the right thing, they can do only what profits Pfizer and Moderna the most, killing people.

The criminal corrupt NIH gets to dictate to them what drugs they can use.

Comments 1 - 5 of 5        Search these comments

1   Patrick   2024 Mar 4, 9:54am  

https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/thinking-points-march-4-2024


The PREP Act creates the perverse incentive for the U.S. biowarfare industrial complex to unleash endless bioengineered pathogens on the U.S. population because the law requires that there shall be no consequences, only profits.
2   Al_Sharpton_for_President   2024 Mar 4, 10:21am  

Geroge W. Bush, BTW, was “president" in 2005.

The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the Secretary) to issue a Declaration to provide liability immunity to certain individuals and entities (Covered Persons) against any claim of loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the manufacture, distribution, administration, or use of medical countermeasures (Covered Countermeasures), except for claims involving “willful misconduct” as defined in the PREP Act. This Declaration is subject to amendment as circumstances warrant.

The PREP Act was enacted on December 30, 2005, as Public Law 109–148, Division C, Section 2. It amended the Public Health Service (PHS) Act, adding Section 319F–3, which addresses liability immunity, and Section 319F–4, which creates a compensation program. These sections are codified at 42 U.S.C. 247d-6d and 42 U.S.C. 247d–6e, respectively.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/03/17/2020-05484/declaration-under-the-public-readiness-and-emergency-preparedness-act-for-medical-countermeasures

Definition

Medical countermeasures, or MCMs, are FDA-regulated products (biologics, drugs, devices) that may be used in the event of a potential public health emergency stemming from a terrorist attack with a biological, chemical, or radiological/nuclear material, or a naturally occurring emerging disease.

MCMs can be used to diagnose, prevent, protect from, or treat conditions associated with chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) threats, or emerging infectious diseases.

MCMs can include:

Biologic products, such as vaccines, blood products and antibodies
Drugs, such as antimicrobial or antiviral drugs
Devices, including diagnostic tests to identify threat agents, and personal protective equipment (PPE), such as gloves, respirators (certain face masks), and ventilators
3   Patrick   2024 Mar 12, 11:02am  

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-a-new-court-ruling-shows-the


A new court ruling shows the insane overreach of the PREP Act, which effectively bars ALL suits over the Covid jabs (not just against Pfizer/Moderna, against anyone)

The PREP Act should be called the Goodfellas Act, because its guiding principle comes straight from the mob: F--- you, can't sue.

On Aug. 20, 2021, as his stepfather waited outside, a 14-year-old boy named Tanner Smith walked into a North Carolina high school for a Covid test.

But the testing area doubled as a vaccination center, and once Tanner arrived, he was told he needed a Pfizer mRNA Covid shot. He told the vaccinators he had come for a test, not a jab. They called Tanner’s mom. She didn’t answer. They made no effort to contact Tanner’s stepfather at all.

“Give it to him anyway,” one of the vaccinators said. So they did.

Almost exactly one year later, on Aug. 19, 2022, Tanner and his mother Emily Happel sued the county board of education and the medical group that had given him the shot for battery and violating their state and federal constitutional rights.

It seemed like an open-and-shut case.

And it was.

On Feb. 27, 2023, North Carolina state court Judge Lora C. Cubbage dismissed the case with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled under any circumstances. Last week, a three-judge panel of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the state’s second highest-court, unanimously upheld Cubbage’s ruling.

The reason?

The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act - a December 2005 federal law known as the PREP Act - barred Tanner’s claims, the appeals court found. ...

The North Carolina appeals court is not alone in viewing the PREP Act as a get-out-of-jail free card for anyone connected with the Covid shots.

In December 2022, a federal court in Oklahoma tossed a suit from a woman who “alleged that she visited a Walgreens store for a flu vaccination but that a Walgreens employee administered a COVID-19 vaccination to the plaintiff without her knowledge.”

And in April 2023, a Kansas appellate court ruled a plaintiff could not sue Walmart “after one of its pharmacists administered a COVID-19 vaccine to her minor child without her consent.”

By all accounts, the PREP Act appears to be an airtight shield against lawsuits. ...

In any case, the CICP program does not offer payouts for cases like Tanner Smith’s, where people sue because they or their kids received a Covid shot they didn’t want at all, or were forced to take it by their employer or university, or were otherwise pressured or bribed to take it.


When the laws are made by criminals to protect the profits of criminals, the entire government is illegitimate and must not be obeyed.


5   Patrick   2024 Apr 25, 3:20pm  

https://slaynews.com/news/appeals-court-backs-forced-vaccination-children-without-parental-consent/




The mother of the boy sued the Guilford County school board and Old North State Medical Society over her teenage son’s forced COVID-19 vaccination in 2021.

However, appellate judges agreed that a federal law protected both defendants from legal liability.

The court ruled that the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) protected the clinic and its staff.

Additionally, the court concluded that the Guilford Board of Education, which hosted the clinic, was also covered by the PREP Act. ...

Despite calling the act of forcing a child to get a COVID-19 shot against his will and without his parent’s consent, “egregious,” the court unanimously concluded that the PREP Act preempted state law.

The judges declared that the PREP Act protected the defendants from being held liable for battery, violation of Tanner’s mother’s constitutional liberty and parental rights, and violation of Tanner’s bodily autonomy and plaintiffs’ federal constitutional rights.


Everyone who participated in forcing this kid to take the shot and upheld the vile anti-human "PREP Act" must be hanged.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions