patrick.net

https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/thinking-points-march-4-2024

The PREP Act creates the perverse incentive for the U.S. biowarfare industrial complex to unleash endless bioengineered pathogens on the U.S. population because the law requires that there shall be no consequences, only profits.

Geroge W. Bush, BTW, was “president" in 2005.

The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the Secretary) to issue a Declaration to provide liability immunity to certain individuals and entities (Covered Persons) against any claim of loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the manufacture, distribution, administration, or use of medical countermeasures (Covered Countermeasures), except for claims involving “willful misconduct” as defined in the PREP Act. This Declaration is subject to amendment as circumstances warrant.

The PREP Act was enacted on December 30, 2005, as Public Law 109–148, Division C, Section 2. It amended the Public Health Service (PHS) Act, adding Section 319F–3, which addresses liability immunity, and Section 319F–4, which creates a compensation program. These sections are codified at 42 U.S.C. 247d-6d and 42 U.S.C. 247d–6e, respectively.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/03/17/2020-05484/declaration-under-the-public-readiness-and-emergency-preparedness-act-for-medical-countermeasures

Definition

Medical countermeasures, or MCMs, are FDA-regulated products (biologics, drugs, devices) that may be used in the event of a potential public health emergency stemming from a terrorist attack with a biological, chemical, or radiological/nuclear material, or a naturally occurring emerging disease.

MCMs can be used to diagnose, prevent, protect from, or treat conditions associated with chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) threats, or emerging infectious diseases.

MCMs can include:

Biologic products, such as vaccines, blood products and antibodies
Drugs, such as antimicrobial or antiviral drugs
Devices, including diagnostic tests to identify threat agents, and personal protective equipment (PPE), such as gloves, respirators (certain face masks), and ventilators

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-a-new-court-ruling-shows-the

A new court ruling shows the insane overreach of the PREP Act, which effectively bars ALL suits over the Covid jabs (not just against Pfizer/Moderna, against anyone)

The PREP Act should be called the Goodfellas Act, because its guiding principle comes straight from the mob: F--- you, can't sue.

On Aug. 20, 2021, as his stepfather waited outside, a 14-year-old boy named Tanner Smith walked into a North Carolina high school for a Covid test.

But the testing area doubled as a vaccination center, and once Tanner arrived, he was told he needed a Pfizer mRNA Covid shot. He told the vaccinators he had come for a test, not a jab. They called Tanner’s mom. She didn’t answer. They made no effort to contact Tanner’s stepfather at all.

“Give it to him anyway,” one of the vaccinators said. So they did.

Almost exactly one year later, on Aug. 19, 2022, Tanner and his mother Emily Happel sued the county board of education and the medical group that had given him the shot for battery and violating their state and federal constitutional rights.

It seemed like an open-and-shut case.

And it was.

On Feb. 27, 2023, North Carolina state court Judge Lora C. Cubbage dismissed the case with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled under any circumstances. Last week, a three-judge panel of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the state’s second highest-court, unanimously upheld Cubbage’s ruling.

The reason?

The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act - a December 2005 federal law known as the PREP Act - barred Tanner’s claims, the appeals court found. ...

The North Carolina appeals court is not alone in viewing the PREP Act as a get-out-of-jail free card for anyone connected with the Covid shots.

In December 2022, a federal court in Oklahoma tossed a suit from a woman who “alleged that she visited a Walgreens store for a flu vaccination but that a Walgreens employee administered a COVID-19 vaccination to the plaintiff without her knowledge.”

And in April 2023, a Kansas appellate court ruled a plaintiff could not sue Walmart “after one of its pharmacists administered a COVID-19 vaccine to her minor child without her consent.”

By all accounts, the PREP Act appears to be an airtight shield against lawsuits. ...

In any case, the CICP program does not offer payouts for cases like Tanner Smith’s, where people sue because they or their kids received a Covid shot they didn’t want at all, or were forced to take it by their employer or university, or were otherwise pressured or bribed to take it.

When the laws are made by criminals to protect the profits of criminals, the entire government is illegitimate and must not be obeyed.

https://slaynews.com/news/appeals-court-backs-forced-vaccination-children-without-parental-consent/

The mother of the boy sued the Guilford County school board and Old North State Medical Society over her teenage son’s forced COVID-19 vaccination in 2021.

However, appellate judges agreed that a federal law protected both defendants from legal liability.

The court ruled that the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) protected the clinic and its staff.

Additionally, the court concluded that the Guilford Board of Education, which hosted the clinic, was also covered by the PREP Act. ...

Despite calling the act of forcing a child to get a COVID-19 shot against his will and without his parent’s consent, “egregious,” the court unanimously concluded that the PREP Act preempted state law.

The judges declared that the PREP Act protected the defendants from being held liable for battery, violation of Tanner’s mother’s constitutional liberty and parental rights, and violation of Tanner’s bodily autonomy and plaintiffs’ federal constitutional rights.

Everyone who participated in forcing this kid to take the shot and upheld the vile anti-human "PREP Act" must be hanged.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/the-dam-breaks-saturday-may-4-2024

💉 Now let’s talk about the PREP Act, the 2015 federal law providing vaccine manufacturers with complete immunity and offering injured folks a pretend claims process. I have some hopefully big news. To preserve my clients’ privacy, and for obvious strategic reasons, I have not mentioned it before, but my firm is preparing to file a significant lawsuit against the federal government asking the courts to declare the PREP Act is unconstitutional.

People don’t stand a chance under PREP. It’s worse than useless. Here’s how the Times article described the Act’s Orwellian claims adjudication process:

Claims regarding Covid vaccines go to the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program. Intended for public health emergencies, this program has narrow criteria to pay out and sets a limit of $50,000, with stringent standards of proof.
It requires applicants to prove within a year of the injury that it was “the direct result” of getting the Covid vaccine, based on “compelling, reliable, valid, medical, and scientific evidence.”
The program had only four staff members at the beginning of the pandemic, and now has 35 people evaluating claims. Still, it has reviewed only a fraction of the 13,000 claims filed, and has paid out only a dozen.

Not only that, but the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program is unfunded. It has no permanent budget and is only funded through emergency allocation requests. Last year it received a one-time grant of $15 million dollars, which is being quickly consumed by its administrative costs, and is obviously not being used to pay claims, which are limited to $50,000 anyway.

I believe that, by creating a statutory claims process that excludes access to real courts, the PREP Act is an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers. Article III provides citizens access to courts to resolve their claims, not some unfunded Article I administrative agency. Our lawsuit is drafted, ready to file, and is currently being reviewed by constitutional experts. We hope to file it next week. I’ll have a lot more to say about it soon.