patrick.net

https://www.aussie17.com/p/pfizer-event-staffer-admits-to-avoiding

Pfizer Event Staffer Admits to Avoiding mRNA Jab during a Pfizer Vaccination campaign.

(Leaked Audio) Pfizer Event Rep : "Honestly, I took Sinovac! hehehe"

There's this whole charade about "Making a Pledge," as if you're swearing into knighthood rather than just rolling up your sleeve for a shot. Pfizer is here using a psychological play straight out of a textbook; it's not merely a vaccination, it's your solemn oath to humanity, your solemn promise to do your bit in some grander global scheme.

This maneuver taps into a primal need for belonging and purpose, packaging a medical decision as a moral high ground. However, dressing up a health choice with the emotional weight of a pledge blurs the lines between personal health autonomy and social coercion.

The moment Pfizer's "Project Vax" came into my view, it was like flipping a switch, dragging me back to my Pharma days. Back then, I learned the cardinal rule that you just don't see Pharma companies hawking their products directly to the unsuspecting public. That's a big no-no. The official playbook says you market to the medical professionals, not the patients — except, of course, in the US and New Zealand, where direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertisements are part of the landscape.

But here's Pfizer, strutting across the stage with "Project Vax," acting like they've got the run of the place. And why wouldn't they? Their ties with regulators and political bigwigs seem to give them a sense of invincibility, a belief that they can bend the rules without consequence.

Typically, Pharma's approach to boosting drug sales is more covert, wrapping their intentions in “Disease Awareness Campaigns”. They'd rather create fear educate you on the horrors of cancer or the risks of heart disease than mention their products outright. But if you attend an event or visit their site, suddenly you're on a path straight to their "partnered" doctors, who unsurprisingly, lean towards prescribing their drugs over any competitors'. That's Pharma marketing 101 – indirect, insidious, and incredibly effective.

Thankfully, people are finally opening their eyes to Pfizer's manipulative tactics, as they're met with a wave of outraged citizens shining a light on the dark corners of Pfizer’s so-called experimental vaccines - tainted with e.coli DNA and peppered with undisclosed SV40 promoters. . But wait, the plot thickens when Pfizer's very own carnival barkers, I mean, event reps, with a straight face, assure us that their glittering "Project Vax" extravaganza isn't about vaccinations at all. How utterly preposterous!

Stick around until the end of the video, and you'll catch a moment of pure comedic gold – a Pfizer event rep confesses they opted for the Chinese vaccine rather than their own brand of experimental mRNA wizardry. Talk about the punchline of the century!

https://twitter.com/thehealthb0t/status/1780120480290148737

The_Deplorable says

https://twitter.com/thehealthb0t/status/1780120480290148737

Just embedding it:

"Well, of course, there are the placebos so our various apparatchiks can virtue signal and preach the vax religion unharmed. We also need the placebos to compare the toxic batches for our research.

The medium toxic batches are, well, because we like to watch people suffer slowly with stealth maiming. We can also chart the vulnerable genetics by speed of death and the various emergent pathologies. Also, they will allow us to judge how well nanobots and self assembling entities, subject to EMP, operate. They can't all be dead for that part. At least not yet.

The most toxic batches are also controls to see the efficacy, speed and efficiency of maximum poisoning, immune system destruction, and induction of turbo cancers."

https://nypost.com/2024/05/08/business/pfizer-to-settle-over-10k-lawsuits-linking-zantac-to-cancer/

Pfizer agrees to settle over 10K lawsuits linking Zantac to cancer
By Social Links forAriel Zilber
Published May 8, 2024, 11:57 a.m. ET

Pfizer has agreed to settle more than 10,000 lawsuits which alleged that the company failed to warn patients about possible cancer risks caused by the anti-heartburn medication Zantac.

The lawsuits were filed in state courts across the country, but the agreements don’t completely resolve Pfizer’s exposure to the claims linking Zantac and cancer, according to Bloomberg News.

Terms of the settlements were not disclosed.

https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/teenage-boy-and-a-toddler-die-in-b8b

Teenage Boy and a Toddler Die in Ongoing Pfizer Gene Therapy Trial

Pfizer issued an official statement yesterday extending their condolences for the sudden cardiac death of toddler who was enrolled in their adenovirus gene-editing trial.

May 7, 2024: Yesterday I republished a video and article entitled, “What Happened to Their Babies,” describing the lack of ethics and grossly inhumane experimentation that Pfizer conducted on babies and toddlers with their COVID-19 mRNA gene-editing injections.

Just a few hours ago, multiple industry outlets began breaking this official statement from Pfizer that a toddler died of a cardiac arrest in an investigational trial of boys, aged 2 to 4 year olds, to treat a rare form of muscular dystrophy with a recombinant adenovirus gene editing technology.

There Was No Placebo in This Study Either

Just like in Pfizer’s COVID-19 gene-editing trial in babies and toddlers there was no placebo, there was no placebo group in this trial. ...

Teenage Boy Dies in 2021 in Phase 1 Trial for Same Gene Editing Technology

In December of 2021, Pfizer reported that a young patient died in their Phase 1 trial for this same gene-editing treatment for a rare form of genetically induced muscular dystrophy. ...

Criminal Charges Can Be Brought Against Pfizer’s Board and Executives

Pfizer’s board and executive management team are responsible for all of their human clinical trial data under Sarbanes-Oxley. CEO Albert Bourla can not plead ignorance to not knowing that the babies and toddlers in the ‘placebo group’ in Pfizer’s COVID-19 study were criminally experimented on when they were injected with the mRNA gene editing technology after the researchers had recorded an unprecedented incidence of disease, disabilities and death in the treatment group.

Patrick says

Criminal Charges Can Be Brought Against Pfizer’s Board and Executives

That will happen right after Hunter gets convicted and RichWicks buys a TV.

https://x.com/DiedSuddenly%20/status/1790346670800035847

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/the-outlaw-saturday-june-1-2024-c

💉💉 First up, for comic relief, behold the latest news on the Pfizer cancer shot. Yesterday’s over-enthusiastic headline from Futurism Magazine broadcast:




No thanks! I would rather inject myself with bleach. Into my eyeball. With a bent needle I found on the sidewalk in downtown San Fransisco.

So much to mock, so little time. The cowardly jab maniacs at Pfizer are conducting their mRNA trials in unaware England — which mostly missed out on the bizarre mRNA bonanza, since for most of the early years the English used a mad formula cooked up in Great Britain and now recalled.

Patrick says

Pfizer already has a cancer shot. Oh, you are thinking of a cancer prevention shot.

https://babylonbee.com/cleanArticle/pfizer-assures-public-they-are-preparing-for-next-pandemic-by-developing-an-all-new-ineffective-vaccine-with-fatal-side-effects

U.S. — Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla addressed public concerns over a new pandemic by holding a press conference in which he explained how the pharmaceutical company is already hard at work developing a new ineffective vaccine with fatal side effects.

"The thought of a new pandemic is scary, especially one that presents as a common cold and makes you really tired," said Bourla. "That's why we're working double time to prepare a new vaccine that won't cure you, but will possibly kill you."

"We have top scientists working around the clock to ensure it doesn't work before we release it to the public."

Later, he agreed to appear on CNN This Morning for what he originally assumed was a softball interview. Host Kasie Hunt was quick to point out the obvious concern with Pfizer's business model. "But sir, how can you possibly prepare an ineffective vaccine in advance of an unknown pandemic? You don't know what the virus will be."

In response, Bourla appeared to side-eye the camera before awkwardly fidgeting in his seat and changing the subject. "We make lots of money," he said. "Would you like some?"

Just saw my internist for annual check. Rockefeller Allopathic profit and democide Kaiser AI commanding through his Medi-Prompter made him reel off five vaccines due, though he kind of blurted them out as fast as he could and seemed relieved that his duty cycle was laid to rest. He knows that we will not go for it, but says that he HAS to remind us according to the rank and file commands.

Otherwise, he said all was good on outpost Ceffer. Didn't even mention the statin gateway drug this time.

I suppose someday they will have a mini 5G to wave over us and see if it can make the hairs stand on end and the flesh magnetize.

https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/1855558059860386185

Pfizer hit an intraday 52 week low on Friday.

Booger says

Pfizer hit an intraday 52 week low on Friday.

Buying opportunity?

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/the-pfizer-papers

The novel’s plot was reminiscent of a controversial drug trial performed by Pfizer in Kano, Nigeria in 1996 during a meningococcal outbreak. For the trial of its new antibiotic, trovafloxacin, Pfizer gave 100 children this new drug. The control group of 100 other children received the standard anti-meningitis treatment at the time—a drug called ceftriaxone. However, for the control group, Pfizer administered a substantially lower dose of ceftriaxone than the drug’s FDA-approved standard.

When the reduced dosing in the control group was discovered, it raised the suspicion that Pfizer did this in order to skew the trial in favor of its new drug. Five of the children who received trovafloxacin died, while six who received the reduced dose of ceftriaxone died. Other children apparently suffered grave injuries from the administration of the experimental antibiotic without their informed consent. The investigation and litigation that ensued was the stuff of a thriller, involving private investigators, bribery, blackmail attempts, and disappearing records. Thirteen years later, in 2009, Pfizer settled out of court with the plaintiffs. ...

In 2009, the same year that Pfizer settled with the trovafloxacin plaintiffs, the New York Times reported that a U.S. federal judge assessed Pfizer with the “largest health care fraud settlement and the largest criminal fine of any kind ever” for its illegal marketing of Bextra and three other drugs. The U.S. Department of Justice was unequivocal in characterizing Pfizer’s officers as guilty of grave criminal conduct at the expense of the American public.

As I have long known all of the above, I wasn’t surprised by the gross criminal conduct revealed in The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity, edited by Naomi Wolf with Amy Kelly and a Foreword by Stephen K. Bannon. ...

The book strikes me as one of the most impressive works of investigative scholarship in history. As Dr. Peter McCullough described it in his Praise (printed on the book’s first page):

"This is a comprehensive, organized, and compelling presentation of vaccine safety data that has accumulated after mass and indiscriminate administration of the Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Sadly, a large group of vaccine recipients have become injured, disabled, and many have died after the ill-advised injections. The data with histopathological evaluation at necropsy and autopsy with expert analysis is presented so you can evaluate it for yourself. Never before has there been a class of products with this wide range and extended duration of injury to the recipient."