patrick.net

Pfizer hit an intraday 52 week low on Friday.

The novel’s plot was reminiscent of a controversial drug trial performed by Pfizer in Kano, Nigeria in 1996 during a meningococcal outbreak. For the trial of its new antibiotic, trovafloxacin, Pfizer gave 100 children this new drug. The control group of 100 other children received the standard anti-meningitis treatment at the time—a drug called ceftriaxone. However, for the control group, Pfizer administered a substantially lower dose of ceftriaxone than the drug’s FDA-approved standard.

When the reduced dosing in the control group was discovered, it raised the suspicion that Pfizer did this in order to skew the trial in favor of its new drug. Five of the children who received trovafloxacin died, while six who received the reduced dose of ceftriaxone died. Other children apparently suffered grave injuries from the administration of the experimental antibiotic without their informed consent. The investigation and litigation that ensued was the stuff of a thriller, involving private investigators, bribery, blackmail attempts, and disappearing records. Thirteen years later, in 2009, Pfizer settled out of court with the plaintiffs. ...

In 2009, the same year that Pfizer settled with the trovafloxacin plaintiffs, the New York Times reported that a U.S. federal judge assessed Pfizer with the “largest health care fraud settlement and the largest criminal fine of any kind ever” for its illegal marketing of Bextra and three other drugs. The U.S. Department of Justice was unequivocal in characterizing Pfizer’s officers as guilty of grave criminal conduct at the expense of the American public.

As I have long known all of the above, I wasn’t surprised by the gross criminal conduct revealed in The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity, edited by Naomi Wolf with Amy Kelly and a Foreword by Stephen K. Bannon. ...

The book strikes me as one of the most impressive works of investigative scholarship in history. As Dr. Peter McCullough described it in his Praise (printed on the book’s first page):

"This is a comprehensive, organized, and compelling presentation of vaccine safety data that has accumulated after mass and indiscriminate administration of the Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Sadly, a large group of vaccine recipients have become injured, disabled, and many have died after the ill-advised injections. The data with histopathological evaluation at necropsy and autopsy with expert analysis is presented so you can evaluate it for yourself. Never before has there been a class of products with this wide range and extended duration of injury to the recipient."

Pfizer operates like a criminal enterprise. Their own documents reveal they were aware of 1,223 deaths within three months of the COVID-19 'vaccine' rollout and did absolutely nothing about it. This far exceeds past vaccine recall thresholds, such as the Cutter Polio Vaccine of 1955 (10 deaths), the Swine Flu Vaccine debacle of 1976 (53 deaths), and the Rotashield vaccine of 1998 (15 cases of bowel obstruction):

Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer has been ordered to pay almost $60 million in fines over a kickback scheme that paid doctors to push drugs onto their patients.

The fines are a resolution to accusations a company Pfizer acquired paid doctors to prescribe a migraine medication.

The medication is marketed as Nurtec ODT, also known as Rimegepant.

The drug was endorsed in television commercials by the celebrities Whoopi Goldberg and Lady Gaga.

"Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer has been ordered to pay almost $60 million
in fines over a kickback scheme that paid doctors to push drugs onto their patients."

TRUTH IS COMING.

Kansas is the first state of many who is suing Pfizer for misleading information given to Kansas consumers.

Pfizer marketed the vaccine was safe for pregnant - However, in 2016 they had possession of a study that showed more than 1/2 of the pregnant women who took the vax had an adverse event - more than 10% reported a miscarriage.

Safety relating to heart conditions like myocarditis and the CEO said they had not seen a single signal which was not true - They knew the vax cause myocarditis.

Pfizer said the vax protected against the variants but at the time data showed the vax was effective less than half the time.

About transmission - Pfizer urged Americans to get the vax indicating that getting the vax stopped the transmission of Covid - Pfizer later admitted that they never even studied transmission.

Pfizer also engaged in censorship attempts with social media.

Kansas is the first of 5 states to file lawsuits.

NEW STUDY — Pfizer Recipients Face 37% Higher Risk of Death Than Moderna Recipients

Study of 1.47 million Florida adults by MIT’s Retsef Levi and Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo finds significantly higher all-cause, cardiovascular, and COVID-19 mortality after Pfizer vaccination.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.04.25.25326460v1

Conclusion Florida adults who received BNT162b2 had significantly higher risk of 12-month all-cause, cardiovascular, COVID-19, and non-COVID-19 mortality compared to matched mRNA-1273 recipients. These findings are suggestive of differential non-specific effects of the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines, and potential concerning adverse effects on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

People who received two doses of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine were more likely to die within a year from cardiac arrest, COVID-19 and all other causes than those who received two doses of Moderna’s vaccine, according to the author of a study published April 29 on the preprint server medRxiv.

Retsef Levi, Ph.D., the study’s first author, told The Defender, “The Pfizer vaccinees had significantly higher all-cause, cardiovascular, COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 mortality over 12 months post dose two.”

Researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the Florida Department of Health conducted the study, using data from the Florida Department of Health.

Florida Surgeon General Joseph Lapado, also an author of the study, said in an X post, “It has become painfully obvious that as a result of Big Pharma-driven vaccine ideology, these products do not receive the safety scrutiny they should.”

The study authors compared the mortality outcomes for 735,050 noninstitutionalized adults in Florida who received two doses of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine to the mortality outcomes for 735,050 adults who received the Moderna vaccine.

Before comparing the two groups, the authors carefully matched group members by sex, age (within five years), ethnicity, residential neighborhood, month and site of vaccination, such as a private pharmacy or hospital.

Speaking of people about to endure an investigative ordeal, yesterday Reuters ran a terrific story headlined, “US House panel seeks information from Pfizer over alleged COVID vaccine delay.” Surprisingly, it’s not about medical malpractice. The investigation is about the worst crime in the entire deplorable catalogue of human misconduct: election interference.

Philip R. Dormitzer is a prominent virologist and mRNA vaccine researcher who was Pfizer’s Global Head of Vaccine Research & Development during the pandemic. In 2021, he left Pfizer for another plum job at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). He now finds himself at the molten center of a congressional firestorm.

Of course, Reuters buried the lede. The article’s second-to-last sentence was this bombshell: “The Wall Street Journal said that GSK had reported Dormitzer's alleged comments to federal prosecutors in New York.” Federal prosecutors means there’s an open federal investigation and Mr. Dormitzer is involved in it somehow. He could be the defendant, or they could be after bigger fish.

The latest developments could have been the plot of a legal thriller on Hulu. The only reasonable way to interpret the facts is that Dormitzer’s new boss, GSK, is throwing him under the corporate bus. And now the backup lights are on. Beep, beep, beep.

First, Dormitzer knew this was coming. The article told readers that GSK volunteered to prosecutors that, after Trump was elected in November, Mr. Dormitzer became “visibly upset” and requested immediate reassignment to Canada because of, get this, fear of being investigated. It is the legal equivalent of terrified cockroaches scurrying away when the kitchen lights switch on.

According to GSK, its HR person asked Dormitzer why he was so afraid of being investigated for his role in developing the covid shots. He said, and I am not making this up, “Let’s just say it wasn’t a coincidence, the timing of the vaccine.”

In our legal system, evidence of knowledge of a future investigation is also circumstantial evidence of consciousness of guilt. If the former Pfizer VP destroyed evidence, like by deleting his emails or trying to tell other witnesses what to say, it gets even more compelling.

But that wasn’t close to all. GSK also told the House Investigative Committee that Dormitzer repeatedly bragged to his GSK co-workers that “the three most senior” Pfizer executives decided to “slow-walk” trial results— so that the vaccine would not become available until after the 2020 elections, specifically to hurt Trump’s electoral chances.

Consistent with that testimony, Pfizer first shared its trial results on November 9, 2020 — four days after Biden won the presidential election.

The story made news this week because yesterday, House Committee Chair Jim Jordan fired off a two-page letter to Pfizer President Albert Bourla that could become historic in scope and scale. The allegations aren’t new, but they are now supported by witness statements from a credible insider (Dormitzer) and corroborating third-party testimony (GSK). This new evidence justifies deeper digging, and deeper digging is just what the House intends to do.

But maybe most encouraging was the story’s brief mention of the ongoing federal investigation out of the Southern District of New York. It could be much bigger than Dormitzer; it could be a criminal investigation of Pfizer itself. At this point, we don’t (and can’t) know; but the fact the investigation exists at all is huge.

Pfizer is a corporate juggernaut with vast and deep pockets, lobbyists, and pocketed politicians from both parties. It’s as politically well-connected as anyone, and in a case that is inherently political, is as well-protected as a Russian nuclear storage facility. Which explains why Trump’s DOJ must proceed extremely carefully, in order to build a case that could stick.

Still, despite Pfizer’s political armor and its history of surviving many other criminal prosecutions, this feels different. I couldn’t find any historical examples (at least, not from the U.S.) of big companies illegally influencing presidential elections. There’s probably a reason nobody has tried it before.

Pfizer’s woes are only just beginning. This election interference angle could be easier to prove and ultimately more damaging than Pfizer’s crimes related to the awful shots, since Pfizer lacks legal immunity for political misconduct. For anyone who wondered if there would ever be accountability, the news of multiple open investigations should be very encouraging.

A Smoking Gun?

The World's Least Interesting Conspiracy Theory just got more interesting as new evidence emerged about Pfizer's mysterious shutdown of its vax clinical trial until the day after the 2020 election.

The House Judiciary Committee released today what might be smoking gun evidence that, as I’ve been arguing for most of this decade, Pfizer shut down work on its massively important clinical trial of its covid vax until the day after the 2020 election for political reasons.

https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/new-information-suggests-senior-pfizer-executives-conspired-delay-covid-19

"New Information Suggests Senior Pfizer Executives Conspired to Delay COVID-19 Vaccine Clinical Testing to Influence 2020 Election"

If Trump had been able to crow about the success of his vaccine strategy for the last 24 hours of his 2020 campaign, that might well have flipped the fraction of one percent of the vote needed to get Trump to a 269-269 tied in the Electoral College, after which he likely would have been re-elected by the House voting as states.

As I may have mentioned once or twice over the last five years, Pfizer senior vice president William Gruber publicly admitted to reporter Matthew Herper of StatNews on November 9, 2020 that, stunningly, Pfizer had put all work on their crucial clinical trial of their vaccine on ice from late October 2020 until the day after the election:

In their announcement of the results, Pfizer and BioNTech revealed a surprise. The companies said they had decided not to conduct the 32-case analysis “after a discussion with the FDA.”

These FDA-confidential files, shared with the FDA, expose a chilling cover-up.

Here’s what Pfizer knew—and when:

1. Vaccine Failure Known Early: Just ONE MONTH after the November 2020 rollout, Pfizer’s internal records confirmed the vaccines didn’t stop COVID. Shockingly, the third most common side effect reported? COVID itself. While media and influencers pushed the jab, Pfizer knew it was failing.

2. Flood of Adverse Events: Within weeks, Pfizer was overwhelmed by reports of severe side effects. They planned to hire 2,400 full-time staff just to process the paperwork for the flood of adverse events they knew was coming. The public? Kept in the dark.

3. Heart Damage in Teens: By May 2021, Pfizer knew the vaccine caused heart damage in 35 minors within a week of injection. Yet, the FDA and U.S. government delayed warning parents until August 2021—four months later. During that time, young adults faced relentless propaganda: “Do it for grandma.” No mention of the elevated heart risks.

4. Toxic Biodistribution: The CDC claimed the vaccine’s materials (lipid nanoparticles, mRNA, spike protein) stayed at the injection site. False. Pfizer’s own data showed these materials biodistribute across the body within 48 hours, accumulating in the brain, liver, spleen, adrenals, and—most alarmingly—in women’s ovaries. These industrial fats, coated in polyethylene glycol, have no known mechanism for leaving the ovaries, building up with each dose.

Dr. Robert Chandler, a respected pathologist, confirmed these materials persist in organs over time, with no clear way for the body to expel them. For women, this raises profound concerns about long-term health impacts.