A married Michigan couple who were fully-vaccinated against COVID-19 both died of the virus just one minute apart. Cal Dunham, 59, and wife Linda, 66, ‘gained their angel wings’ Sunday despite taking precautions against the virus and being inoculated against it, relatives said.The couple, who had undisclosed underlying health conditions, fell ill earlier this month during a family camping trip, the couple's grieving daughter Sarah Dunham said.
« First « Previous Comments 1,058 - 1,097 of 1,157 Next » Last » Search these comments
💉 A new pre-print study published yesterday, titled “Forensic Analysis of the 38 Subject Deaths in the 6-Month Interim Report of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trial.” It had thirteen authors.The first six deaths from Pfizer’s trial. Notice any pattern?The authors described their new study as being the first analysis of the original data from the main Pfizer vaccine clinical trial (44,000 participants) to be conducted by a group unaffiliated with Pfizer. Their analysis was enabled by the court-ordered release of Pfizer’s internal test data, which the FDA infamously tried to suppress for 75 years.What they found, unsurprisingly, and what was missed by federal regulators and the vaccine approval committee, was a significantly-higher rate of death in the vaccine group compared to the placebo:Our analysis revealed inconsistencies between the subject data listed in the 6-Month Interim Report and publications authored by Pfizer trial site administrators. Most importantly, we found evidence of an over 3.7-fold increase in number of deaths due to cardiovascular events in BNT162b2 vaccinated subjects compared to Placebo controls. This significant adverse event signal was not reported by Pfizer.The authors reviewed each of the 38 deaths, and found Pfizer hijinx all over. Here’s one example (edited for brevity):Subject 11621327 was found dead shortly after receiving Dose 1 of the Pfizer vaccine on September 10th. His body was found at home (with lividity) on the 13th of September when the police performed a welfare check. “According to the medical examiner, the probable cause of death was progression of atherosclerotic disease.” The cause of death listed in the 6-Month Interim Report is “Arteriosclerosis”… autopsy results were not provided or available. Based only on the medical documentation in the CRF, there is no basis for ascribing the subject’s death to advanced atherosclerosis or concluding that the death was unrelated to the vaccine… It is likely that the subject died within a day or two of vaccination. This was a clear indication that his death could have been related to the Pfizer vaccine and this should not have been ruled out without a more rigorous investigation. In our opinion, this diagnosis was premature and an egregious misjudgment of the evidence at hand.An “egregious misjudgment” is one way of putting it.After noting the unusually low overall number of deaths in the overall trial, which itself raises suspicion, and the very high (5%) number of “discontinued” patients, the authors dropped the biggest bomb: the Pfizer trial data does not show that any lives were saved by the “safe and effective” jabs:To state that vaccine saved lives, Pfizer should have shown a reduction in all-cause mortality due to a decrease in COVID-19 mortality in the vaccinated arm of the trial. Figure 1 does not support any such claim for Weeks 1 – 20 and, in fact, speaks against this conclusion in the weeks following Week 20 in which the Placebo cumulative plot is distinctly below that of the BNT162b2 vaccinated.In other words, fewer people should have died in the injection group than in the placebo group, but the exact opposite happened. How the vaccine committee missed this is anybody’s guess. Well, we have some pretty good guesses.Here’s the link to the study.https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202309.0131/v1
“There’s a new mRNA covid-19 vaccine coming… there’s essentially no evidence for it… Not only that, there are a lot of red flags. So something you don’t hear much about, but we’ll be talking more about, is there are multiple studies now from around the world — Brazil, Australia, United States — that show that over time these vaccines, these mRNA covid-19 products, actually INCREASE your chances of contracting COVID-19.That’s not normal.”
The probability of reinfection increased with time from the initial infection (odds ratio of 18 months vs 3 months, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.18-2.08) (Figure) and was higher among persons who had received 2 or more doses compared with 1 dose or less of vaccine
That is completely boring, and I wouldn’t have covered it except for an odd little nugget of interesting information buried halfway down the story. You see, last year’s jab innovation turned out not to have been so much of an innovation after all. It looks less like dynamite and more like a wet noodle:Unlike the bivalent shots from last fall, the latest mRNA vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna are monovalent, meaning they are designed to protect against just one variant: XBB.1.5… Initial data from preprint studies has suggested that the bivalent formula from last year was no more effective against BA.4 and BA.5 than the original vaccine it replaced because of so-called “immune imprinting” bias.“Our immune system, when we have seen something, is biased to seeing that again,” Dr. Ho said. “So if you include the original components, the immune system will react mostly to the original component and not to the new version of the virus.”Ho, ho, Dr. Ho! We fooled ‘em again! Suckers.But there it was, in 12-point type, straight from the New York Times’s own ghastly orifice: The Bivalent experiment failed. It’s back to the monovalent drawing board. And, how do you like that, they do know about “immune imprinting” after all. When they want to. ...Anyway, you should be able to get injected with Big Pharma’s latest lab experiment later this week, if for some insane reason you actually want the awful thing, which offers tons of risk and no benefit.
It is possible that a degree of 'herd immunity' has been achieved. Yet, using p<0.05 as the threshold for statistical significance, the bivalent-vaccinated group had a slightly but statistically significantly higher infection rate than the unvaccinated group in the statewide category and the age ≥50 years category. However, in the older age category (≥65 years), there was no significant difference in infection rates between the two groups.
So people under 50 were more like to get infected if they took the death jab.And it made no difference for people over 50.
"Is it weird that only a screenshot was captured instead of the entire article? https://archive.ph/C8KvZ
"You're taking your life into your own hands."
"You're taking your life into your own hands."That's a much better plan than putting it in the hands of the those who tried to murder you.
Shattering Analysis Of All Cause Death in 17 Southern Hemisphere Countries Reveals Dramatic Rise In Deaths With Each Vaccine/Booster Push—NO Excess Deaths Before "Vaccine Rollout."Epoch Times' Muted Headline About Rancourt et al Bombshell Paper Reads "No Lives Were Saved." ...
So, exactly who is getting covid so frequently? Carefully observe the following paragraph from NBC’s article and see if you can spot any common denominators. Take your time:“I’ve seen a few patients with five infections,” said Dr. Grace McComsey, vice dean for clinical and translational research at Case Western University. “Sadly, they were immunized and they still got Covid five times.”Sadly! So, did you find it? What do all these repeat covid customers have in common? Hmmm? What baffling, mysterious agent could be at work in all these cases?The tragicomedy continued as the article began to describe individual cases, packed with nuggets of amusement. One was Brenda Keele, 38, who in addition to covid infections is also having some other health problems:
Repeat infectee Makenzie Boyle, 28, is also having more health problems than just her recurring covid infections, they are now “manifold”:
Diabetes, you say? Weird, I remember reading something about that… oh yeah!Or, how about her new chronic kidney disease? (Note: nephropathy is kidney disease.)Oh well. I tried. I’ve been doing this for two years now and the jabbers never read my stuff anyways. Good luck, covid magnets. We are praying for you and watching to see how your grand experiment turns out.
"Shattering Analysis Of All Cause Death in 17 Southern Hemisphere Countries Reveals Dramatic Rise In Deaths With Each Vaccine/Booster Push—NO Excess Deaths Before "Vaccine Rollout.""
UK Government: Office for National Statistics recently published an update on deaths by vaccination status in England and it has shockingly revealed that the vaccinated population accounted for 95% of COVID deaths in the 12 months between 1st June 2022 and 31st May 2023, and 94% of those deaths were among either the triple or quadruple vaccinated population. But media refuses to cover this data!
I read that comedian Stephen Colbert, the host of “The Late Show,” now has Covid … again.According to this story, this is now at least the third time Colbert has contracted Covid.This is the same Stephen Colbert who almost every night took great joy in making fun of people like myself, the national vermin who never got one shot. But the joke is on Stephen Colbert. I’ve never had Covid and I’ve never gotten one jab.
But the joke is on Stephen Colbert.
mRNA boosters: even more useless than you thought. A new study shows one in five people who received one got Covid within two monthsYeah, you read that right. THREE THINGS AT ONCE! Get the shot, get side effects, get Covid. Added bonus: The study is from PFIZER. Remind me why regulators keep these worthless jabs on the market.Pfizer and other mRNA jab companies have quit doing much Covid shot research.No shock. Sales have collapsed, despite massive ad campaigns. Worse, if new clinical trials find side effects, the companies will be legally required to tell regulators.All downside, no upside, except the truth. Who needs that? The safest research is none at all.But in 2022, Pfizer still had hope for its mRNA cash cow. So it ran a trial meant to determine if flu shots and its jab could be given simultaneously. (Yes, this is the scientific foundation for the infamous “two things at once” Travis Kelce ad campaign.)Pfizer’s researchers quietly published their findings in the journal Infectious Diseases and Therapy last month. The results are intriguing. Though not for the reasons the company intended.The paper’s design provides a unique placebo-controlled glimpse into the safety and efficacy of mRNA jabs in the Omicron era. Spoiler alert: they are bad. Very bad.(paywall)
« First « Previous Comments 1,058 - 1,097 of 1,157 Next » Last » Search these comments