patrick.net

The evidence for COVID-19 vaccine negative efficacy/effectiveness, and also the IgG4 class switch which may help explain it, continues to pile in. A Spanish study published by legit academic publisher Elsevier (Pérez et al.) found that IgG4 levels “increase markedly after the third mRNA dose against SARS-CoV-2”, and this in turn is associated “with an increased risk of infections”. The authors are even relatively honest in this article, stating that the “higher risk of breakthrough infection” warrants “further investigation into vaccination strategies”.

https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(25)00067-2/fulltext

You don’t say! I myself would generally try and figure out if something is safe before effectively forcing it on billions of people, just one of the ‘silly things’ this ‘conspiracy theorist’ picked up while at pharmacy school. Of course, our betters still want us to rush out and get a booster shot, from as young as 6 months old: https://www.cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/stay-up-to-date.html

Omicron Mutated to XEC and LP.8.1 Leaving Booster Program Rudderless

Mass Vaccination into Widely Prevalent Pandemic Always a Mistake

Vaccinologists were salivating at the specter of “eradicating SARS-CoV-2” with the largest, most comprehensive, and certainly the most expensive vaccine program in the history of mankind. Now in its fifth year, no claim of eradication is being made.

Repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations increase SARS-CoV-2 IgG4 antibodies, indicating extensive IgG class switching following the first booster dose. This shift in IgG subclasses raises concerns due to the limited ability of IgG4 to mediate Fc-dependent effector functions. ...

These findings suggest a potential association between IgG4 induction by mRNA vaccination and a higher risk of breakthrough infection, warranting further investigation into vaccination strategies to ensure sustained protection.

27% 'Higher Risk of Influenza' Among Vaccinated: Cleveland Clinic

Study of 53,402 participants.

Conclusions This study found that influenza vaccination of working-aged adults was associated with a higher risk of influenza during the 2024-2025 respiratory viral season, suggesting that the vaccine has not been effective in preventing influenza this season.

Summary Among 53402 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, we were unable to find that the influenza vaccine has been effective in preventing infection during the 2024-2025 respiratory viral season.

Emory Study Shows No Vaccine Effect on SARS-CoV-2 Nor Reduction in Crude Severity or Death

Nearly Half of 2021-2022 Cases Immunized, Hardly a "Pandemic of the Unvaccinated"

Our public health agencies continue to promote COVID-19 vaccination making the false drug claim of reductions in disease severity and death. No randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial has found reductions in hospitalization or death as a primary endpoint with COVID-19 vaccination. In 2021, Atlanta-based US CDC and its state actor, CNN falsely reported that COVID-19 cases represented a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.”

The true Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness and safety profile is masked by the large artifacts, and vaccine protection against ACM is likely considerably lower than previously described.

Worse, anyone infected in the first two weeks was counted as “unvaccinated”. And this statistical trick inflated infection rates in the “unvaccinated” group while keeping the early vaccinated infections off the books. This simple statistical slight of hand created the illusion of vaccine effectiveness when none actually existed. Later, when vaccinated individuals fell ill in future waves, they called it “waning immunity”. But it wasn’t waning. It was the washing out of a statistical illusion.

This period of immune suppression did not just cause earlier infections in the susceptible. It had real consequences. It caused people to die.

Peter Rossiter was a healthy 39-year-old, a pianist, a son, a life ahead of him. Four days after his second dose he fell ill with covid. His immune system was obliterated. His mother testified, “His white blood count was almost zero. He fell very seriously ill very quickly”. And Pfizer’s response to this was, “He wasn’t fully protected yet.” They knew this period was dangerous, but instead of admitting it they used cases like Peter’s to prop up the illusion of vaccine benefit.

The extra deaths in young people — some still labelled as “unvaccinated” — were used to claim that the virus had become more deadly, and that the vaccines were therefore working. And this was coupled with fantasy models which assumed vaccines prevented 90% of deaths. So of course they “proved” that millions of lives were saved.