patrick.net

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-10928-z?source=patrick.net

Using a unique dataset from Israel National Emergency Medical Services (EMS) from 2019 to 2021, the study aims to evaluate the association between the volume of cardiac arrest and acute coronary syndrome EMS calls in the 16–39-year-old population with potential factors including COVID-19 infection and vaccination rates. An increase of over 25% was detected in both call types during January–May 2021, compared with the years 2019–2020. Using Negative Binomial regression models, the weekly emergency call counts were significantly associated with the rates of 1st and 2nd vaccine doses administered to this age group but were not with COVID-19 infection rates.

https://gettr.com/user/EdwardDowd?source=patrick.net

Edward Dowd
@EdwardDowd
·
19h
The largest fraud ever is embodied in this simple phrase:

“Safe & Effective”

Patrick says

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-10928-z?source=patrick.net

Using a unique dataset from Israel National Emergency Medical Services (EMS) from 2019 to 2021, the study aims to evaluate the association between the volume of cardiac arrest and acute coronary syndrome EMS calls in the 16–39-year-old population with potential factors including COVID-19 infection and vaccination rates. An increase of over 25% was detected in both call types during January–May 2021, compared with the years 2019–2020. Using Negative Binomial regression models, the weekly emergency call counts were significantly associated with the rates of 1st and 2nd vaccine doses administered to this age group but were not with COVID-19 infection rates.

Sadly, just the tip of the iceberg.

Patrick says

So they obviously have been told what to say. I think the current choice of propaganda phrasing is very telling - by saying theyre "grateful" it makes no claim about effectiveness or safety, thus avoiding lawsuits and liabilities, while still encouraging it.

https://palexander.substack.com/p/hospital-ceos-and-senior-doctors?source=patrick.net

Let me be simple: some senior doctors/CEOs in hospital (s) in various State (s) in US, have come forward to us advising that they decided to find us and come to us to say they are ready to talk. Scared about safety and careers will be destroyed. They were offered vaccine cards (fake) when they told their hospitals that they do not want the vaccine when they were mandated to take it, and the hospital leaders advised this will ensure they will not be suspended or fired. So you and I will ask, why? How come? Is it due to the lack of safety that these people know about? Or only to not fire these valuable doctors? We are told it may be country wide. So this is very very troubling. ...

But we are working on it for this is something the nation needs to know for the underlying reasons may be as disturbing and catastrophic. It could bring this vaccine mandate nightmare to a halt.

But what was shared so far is very disturbing. Is it that they/you know the vax is harmful? Is this the reason? CEOs and senior doctors know this and you, and so agree to give fake cards to ‘keep’ you on strength. To not suspend or fire, so fake cards. So they don’t want to have to suspend you as you are too valuable? Or do you and they know the vaccine is harmful and has huge risks? This is insane for shakes and takes down the entire vaccine mandate insanity. CEOs of major hospitals? Senior doctors, ER etc.?

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/study-suggests-that-moderna-and-pfizer?s=r&source=patrick.net

Study Suggests That Moderna and Pfizer Vaccine Selection Triggered Disease Enhancement in Delta and Its Spread
Scientists are careful to hedge on the political ramifications of their findings, but publish anyway

https://gettr.com/user/arnie1974?source=patrick.net

@Arnie1974

1h

The Jabs Never Reduced Transmission or Hospitalization and Death: Dr. Peter McCullough

"The vaccines have never stopped transmission. In the randomized trials, they never reduced hospitalization and death. We have evidence across the world that the more countries have vaccinated, they've prolonged the pandemic. They've increased the number of cases and increased mortality, so the worldwide vaccine program has backfired. Now's a great time to drop all the mandates and actually pause the current vaccines on the market since they provide no credible coverage against Omicron."

https://thegoodcitizen.substack.com/p/girls-just-wanna-have-bombs?s=r&source=patrick.net

The following are a few of the more salient reasons why mandating recipient vaccination as a condition to remain eligible to receive a transplant, even assuming that transplant recipient vaccination are objectively beneficial as a purely scientific matter, is unjustifiable, destructive, and evil:

Breaks the Social Compact of Society:
Discriminates on the basis of a controversial political/social issue

Politicizes and undermines the trustworthiness of the medical community

Weaponizes the medical community / medical institutions in the “culture wars”

Drives the Balkanization of society

Is Intrinsically Immoral:
Such a mandate inflicts tremendous psychological torment upon people who are already suffering the stress and physical torment of a life-threatening disease

Erodes the ethics and character of medical professionals, so they regard some people as “inferior” and therefore undeserving of or not worth being treated

This is a policy that cannot be plausibly portrayed as being “in the best interests of patients”

Catch-all: Will cause considerable stress to the entire society

The Broader Context that Informs how People View Such a Mandate - The Medical Community no longer possesses the moral authority or credibility to make this sort of policy decision:
The already heavily damaged reputation and image of the medical community due to covid policies so far

A sizable minority today believes (if not outright majority) that hospitals and doctors are possibly complicit in the deaths of millions around the world and the unimaginable suffering of hundreds of millions more

Patrick says

Now's a great time to drop all the mandates and actually pause the current vaccines on the market since they provide no credible coverage against Omicron."

If you do that, Pfizer et all will lose $billions, and thus a corresponding decrease in political contributions and graft, plus a loss of ad revenue for various media. Doctors would also have to admit their complicity with the hoax.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-10778101/Downton-Abbey-star-Lesley-Nicol-left-heartbroken-warrior-husband-David-Heald-dies.html?source=patrick.net

Patrick says

Good. Couldn't happen to a better group of villains and scum.

https://brownstone.org/articles/on-what-basis-did-pfizer-claim-95/?source=patrick.net

https://voiceforscienceandsolidarity.substack.com/p/why-are-breakthrough-infections-with?s=r&source=patrick.net

In conclusion, poor neutralizing capacity of anti-S Abs in vaccinees not only enhances their susceptibility to breakthrough infection with Omicron but is also suspicious of delaying viral clearance, thereby promoting prolonged viral shedding and potentially predisposing vaccinees to long-haul Covid while causing them to exert sustained immune pressure on viral virulence [1]. The likelihood of breakthrough infections in C-19 vaccinees will even further increase upon their re-vaccination with an updated S(Omicron)-based C-19 vaccine during the pandemic. This is because re-vaccination will boost the infection-enhancing anti-S Abs and thereby further increase the susceptibility of vaccinees to breakthrough infection. This will result in an even higher capacity of the ACE2 receptor to outcompete broadly neutralizing anti-S(Omicron) Abs for binding to the S-RBM.

Wow, that is some serious science. I have NO IDEA what the heck it means. Besides, isn't Covid over now?

https://notthebee.com/article/a-peer-reviewed-study-out-of-mit-found-that-covid-vaccinations-in-younger-patients-were-associated-with-severe-heart-problems?source=patrick.net

WineHorror1 says

I have NO IDEA what the heck it means.

It means that the vaxxed are more likely to get infected, not less.

Patrick says

WineHorror1 says

I have NO IDEA what the heck it means.

It means that the vaxxed are more likely to get infected, not less.

But we don't give a damn about infections, correct? Are they more likely to be hospitalized and/or die? I'm just playing devil's advocate here.

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/04/28/deaths-in-iceland-jump-30-in-first-quarter-of-2022-just-as-vaccine-boosters-were-rolled-out/?source=patrick.net

https://www.cureus.com/articles/91317-mortality-in-cyprus-over-the-period-2016-2021?source=patrick.net

The substantial increase in mortality in Cyprus in 2021 is not entirely explained by COVID-19 deaths and is parallel to the concurrent vaccination campaign. This concerning observation should be comprehensively investigated by the National and European public health authorities to identify and address the underlying causes.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2791533?source=patrick.net

Incidence of Guillain-Barré Syndrome After COVID-19 Vaccination in the Vaccine Safety Datalink

Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of COVID-19 vaccines, the incidence of GBS was elevated after receiving the Ad.26.COV2.S vaccine. Surveillance is ongoing.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-10928-z?source=patrick.net

Using Negative Binomial regression models, the weekly emergency call counts were significantly associated with the rates of 1st and 2nd vaccine doses administered to this age group but were not with COVID-19 infection rates. While not establishing causal relationships, the findings raise concerns regarding vaccine-induced undetected severe cardiovascular side-effects and underscore the already established causal relationship between vaccines and myocarditis, a frequent cause of unexpected cardiac arrest in young individuals. Surveillance of potential vaccine side-effects and COVID-19 outcomes should incorporate EMS and other health data to identify public health trends (e.g., increased in EMS calls), and promptly investigate potential underlying causes.

https://www.ntd.com/fully-vaccinated-carnival-cruise-ship-hit-with-covid-19-outbreak_775672.html?source=patrick.net

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/two-tv-journalists-flip-out-as-dominique?s=r&source=patrick.net

Charlotte, The Baroness of Burnley 👠
@CharlotteEmmaUK
This 23 year old powerhouse @DominiqueTaegon walks all over Jab Nazi @NinaMyskow on the horror shown known as The Jeremy Vile Show. Absolute icon Dominique 👊🏼💕

The question NEVER should have been "Is the jab safe and effective". It should have been "Do I want to take it".

https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2022/04/scientists-attempting-to-design-self-spreading-vaccines-that-can-jump-from-vaccinated-to-unvaccinated-populations/?source=patrick.net

What could possibly go wrong?

Scientists Attempting To Design ‘Self-Spreading’ Vaccines That Can Jump From Vaccinated To Unvaccinated Populations

Isn't that what the omicron variant turned out to be?

https://brownstone.org/articles/have-people-been-given-the-wrong-vaccine/?source=patrick.net

Randomized controlled trials show all-cause mortality reduction from the Covid adenovirus-vector vaccines (RR=0.37, 95%CI: 0.19-0.70) but not from the mRNA vaccines (RR=1.03, 95%CI 0.63-1.71).

The information coming out of these Pfizer dumps shows that the side effects in the trials were far worse than even what we're seeing in the official rollout.

Makes me think they really are mixing placebos in with the shots the general public is getting.

Regarding that divisive propaganda article spread throughout Canada a few weeks ago that was geared to get people hating on the un-jabbed because they were somehow a threat to the jabbed, here's a response from Dr. Byram Bridle demonstrating in multiple ways how criminally dishonest that article was:

https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/fiction-disguised-as-science-to-promote?s=r&source=patrick.net

I would be willing to stand in a court to justify my opinion. I honestly believe that the authors need to be investigated, as does the editor who allowed the paper to be published; and it would be great if the names of the reviewers who supported its publication could be made public. And the legacy media outlets that are promoting this ‘scientific’ garbage should be ashamed. They could use some immunology expertise and a return to investigative journalism to separate themselves from being labeled as propaganda artists.

Karloff says

The information coming out of these Pfizer dumps shows that the side effects in the trials were far worse than even what we're seeing in the official rollout.

Makes me think they really are mixing placebos in with the shots the general public is getting.

Hoiw bad is my batch? See how many adverse reactions per batch number. The link below is for J&J, but they have the mRNA batches as well.

https://howbad.info/janssen.html?source=patrick.net

Karloff says

Makes me think they really are mixing placebos in with the shots the general public is getting.

Ya know...that would make a ton of sense actually.

They were supposed to compare the jab vs placebo group for 3+ years I think in the original trial right before they released it to the public, but they cut it short a few months or so into the study, and offered the placebo group the jab, effectively ending the study.

Reintroducing placebos via trickery & deception was probably a backdoor FDA approved idea to facilitate the continued study of its effects.

Also, it's just too odd that 5% of the batches cause 90% of the adverse reactions. Sounds like the public is an unknowing participant in experimentations.

Hircus says

it's just too odd that 5% of the batches cause 90% of the adverse reactions

If only 5% of the jabs have the real toxxine, then the real rate of adverse events is 20x higher than the currently reported rate, which is already horrendous.