patrick.net

https://slaynews.com/news/covid-deaths-triple-vaccinated-government-data-shows/

92% Covid Deaths Are Triple Vaccinated, Government Data Shows

Patrick says

" https://slaynews.com/news/covid-deaths-triple-vaccinated-government-data-shows/ "

From the link:
"The data shows that the fully vaccinated population – three or more shots – accounted for 92% of Covid deaths in England throughout the entirety of 2022."

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371342838_Simpson's_Paradox_in_the_correlations_between_excess_mortality_and_COVID-19_injections_a_case_study_of_iatrogenic_pandemic_for_elderly_Australians

Simpson's Paradox in the correlations between excess mortality and COVID-19 injections: a case study of iatrogenic pandemic for elderly Australians
June 2023

... A strong statistical signal (2.5 standard deviations) is shown in this paper in the mortality of elderly Australians, who suffered the greatest relative harm from the injections, even when adjusted for age-dependent high expected mortality. Conclusions: Earlier epidemiological evidence that COVID injections reduce illness and death is now methodologically invalidated, and the claim that the injections are beneficial for the vulnerable is refuted. The injections explain the mystery of significant numbers of non-COVID excess deaths. The Australian pandemic is shown to be iatrogenic particularly for the elderly, who have suffered disproportionate harm. Deliberately ignoring this clear evidence is tantamount to iatrogenic geronticide.

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/in-case-you-thought-getting-more

A new preprint is out entitled: “Risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) among Those Up-to-Date and Not Up-to-Date on COVID-19 Vaccination”1 and it concludes from a multivariate analysis of 48,344 individuals (Employees of Cleveland Clinic) that ‘those not “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination had a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “up-to-date”’.

https://drpanda.substack.com/p/new-study-shakes-vaccination-paradigm

New Study Shakes Vaccination Paradigm: Less Boosters, Lower COVID-19 Risk!
People Who Skipped Boosters LESS LIKELY to get COVID according to new Cleveland Clinic study

https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/cdc-admits-bivalent-boosters-worse

CDC Admits Bivalent Boosters Worse Than Useless

Harmful, actually. In short 4-5 months, more "negative efficacy" than monovalent jabs a year or more earlier.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/distractions-saturday-june-17-2023?publication_id=463409&post_id=129016195&isFreemail=true

A new Cleveland Clinic preprint study published this week, titled “Risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) among Those Up-to-Date and Not Up-to-Date on COVID-19 Vaccination.”

That title seems oddly-worded, but according to the study, the CDC defines people as being “up to date” on their vaccines if they have had at least one dose of the new “bivalent” vaccines, which are the ones the so-called “health agency” has been pushing lately. These are the new and improved jabs including both the original Wuhan-style spike protein as well as the new Omicron flavor.

It’s double the fun. Two spikes in one! And it’s worth every penny you pay for it, too.

Anyway, the hardworking Cleveland Clinic researchers, bless them, looked at 50,000 of the hospital systems’ own employees and compared bivalent jab uptake with covid positive status. Here’s what they found:

Among 48,344 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, those not “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination had a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “up-to-date”.

Huh. To be clear: People who take the bivalent shot get MORE covid.




Bwahahaha! It would be tragic if it weren’t so hilarious. The media convinced a lot of gullible people the worst thing that could ever happen to them was catching covid. And now, their magic shots appear to actually INCREASE the chances they will catch the dreaded disease.

I can hear the desperate rejoinder already. “But, but, but,” they’ll stammer, “the bivalent shot decreases risk of hospitalization and death!” Well, maybe, maybe not. Opinions on that vary. But either way, the person who DOESN’T GET COVID has the LOWEST risk of serious illness and hospitalization, since they never encounter the risks to start with.

In other words, even if it’s a lower relative risk, by getting covid more often, the boosted have INFINITELY higher risk of serious illness and death than the unboosted who don’t catch the virus in the first place.

Not to mention what the phenomenon suggests might be going on in boosted people’s immune systems.

There’s another point. The Bivalent shot works backwards. It’s almost like the shot was never designed to prevent covid in the first place.

So.

https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/90667.html

SHAWN BUCKLEY: Right. And so when you use the word immunotoxic you're meaning basically, that it harms the immune system, rather than helps.

DR. CHRIS SHOEMAKER: Yes. And if I could give you a picture of it, everyone, we all understand transplants, we understand if someone's kidney is put into you, or someone's heart is put into you, your own natural immune system would attack the heck out of that transplanted kidney, or attack the heck out of that transplanted heart if the surgeons and the internists didn't give a great degree of immune suppression, very heavy drugs that would make your immune system basically go to sleep so that that new heart or that new kidney could settle into your body.

Here's the problem with spike protein. When spike protein goes into your body the 30 thousand, sorry, 30,000 billion cells in your body, you've got 40,000 billion mRNAs, they have enough to go into every cell of your body, so they're all going in and they're all creating a flag. They are all creating the fact that your body recognizes your heart, is no longer your heart, it's a transplanted heart. Your kidney is no longer your kidney, it's a transplanted kidney, the body thinks, and that's why the body goes after it. And that's why the attacks are so varied. That's why one person could be suffering massively from a hepatitic or a kidney ailment, and another person will have a dissection in the aorta because the aorta is being inflamed by the attack. Or the heart. The typical one is myocarditis in children. Young adolescents, male and female getting pain and troponin elevations* and all the features of myocarditis and it's because your immune system, it's not the spike itself that's harming you, it's your immune system going after the spike that has changed the genetic image of your heart. And your body thinks it's not your heart and that's why it attacks the heck out it.

This is basic immunologic science. The makers of this immunotoxic vaccine knew this. They knew this for a purpose. You can't make this something this damaging to humanity without doing it on purpose. And that is actually my major message of my talk today, is I accuse someone, I can't name them right now, but I accuse some entity of highly purposely making things in the fashion that they did because it would not be as toxic as it is, it would not be so able to highjack your immune system to kill you slowly or quickly if it was not done purposely. It has been done purposely. ...

One terribly important thing to add, and this is probably the best thing, time to mention it, in the last 3 to 4 weeks it has been spoken of extensively by Canada's PhD Dr. Jessica Rose and Sasha Latypova* from the United States, they have made extremely clear that actually it's one third DNA that's in the weight of the shots and two thirds RNA. So fine, two thirds RNA is only 27 trillion. Meanwhile there's 13 trillion actual DNA capsids. DNA. Deoxyribonucleic acid. The kind of stuff that can get into the nucleus of your cell and change that part of you. So now, not just the flag from the
RNA is on the surface, there's actually changed DNA physically inside the nucleus of your many, many cells.

The reason that's there is ostensibly it's poor design. Poor manufacturing. The Department of Defense in the United States which assisted in manufacturing this didn't care that it didn't meet vaccine standards. In fact they did paperwork that specifically describes the injection as a, as a — I don't want to use the wrong word here. A, a, a military countermeasure. A military countermeasure. They didn't call it a bioweapon, huh, but they did call it a military countermeasure, and they specifically didn't call it a vaccine. And the reason was, if you call it a vaccine, it has to be made to vaccine standards, proper world standards for vaccines. By calling it what they did, saying that there was an urgency to it, we'll just call it a military countermeasure, the standards can be dropped. And so what if there's one third as much DNA in this as there in RNA. And this happens when they stir the soup when they make this stuff in great big kettles and cauldrons, it's going to be sludge, it's going to be the original DNA with inside of a bacteria that's helped to make the RNA, but it was allowed to have inefficient and painfully, painfully almost soiled what's going into you is one third DNA, two thirds RNA and that is the truth from Dr. Jessica Rose and Dr. Latypova** if I have the name correct. Horrible.

https://brownstone.org/articles/16-studies-on-vaccine-efficacy/

Here I summarize studies and reports that shed light on vaccine induced immunity against Covid. They highlight the problems with vaccine mandates that are currently threatening the jobs of millions of people. They also raise doubts about the arguments for vaccinating children.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/media-meltdown-tuesday-june-27-2023?publication_id=463409&post_id=131401181&isFreemail=true

🔬 A new jab-cancer study quietly published in Frontiers in Oncology last month:




The researchers injected 14 five-week-old mice with the Pfizer jab, in order to investigate vaccine-induced myocarditis. To their surprise, the day before they ‘harvested’ the mice, one of the cute little rodents died, suddenly and unexpectedly. It had been eating and running around fine the whole time and then — gaaack. There was no sign; it even weighed the same as its mousy peers. No symptoms.

Well, no symptoms till the bitter end, that is.

When the curious scientists opened the little guy up, they found it packed with enlarged organs and lots of cancer. The poor little guy practically burst open. ...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183601/

Among other things, the mouse’s heart tissue showed some very unusual cells growing on the outer cardiac tissues. The odd cells had distinct features, such as “a large polygonal nuclei” and signs of cell division. Many of these cells were dying, and were present along with immune cells that seemed to have been attacking them. Similar atypical cells were found in the rodent’s liver and kidneys, causing changes to those organs, as well as in many other soft tissues.

I noted this interesting sentence from the abstract: “Our [mouse] case adds to previous clinical reports on malignant lymphoma development following novel mRNA COVID-19 vaccination[.]”

So I did a little — very little — digging. Sure enough! The new Frontiers study joined a steady drip of similar studies published. Here are a few recent ones:

More about the above:

https://ashmedai.substack.com/p/pfizer-cancer-triple-jabbed-mouse

Patrick says

"Vaccinated Australian woman Marion had Covid ten times "

That is because the mRNA vaccine destroyed her immune system, gave her AIDS and made her an easy Covid target.

https://twitter.com/ClownWorld/status/1684319730218459142

https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/94326.html

SENATOR GERARD RENNICK: Oh well, well, here we are the end of 2022 and we've had over 10 million cases of covid. The Australian Health Department of course stopped counting around September sometime because I think it was getting too embarrassing to admit that despite with over 20 million people being vaccinated over half the country had caught covid.

Whatever happened to protecting you? Whatever happened to protecting you? But we don't want to talk about that anymore we'll just pull it off the website and not discuss it. We'll not discuss it. ...

And then we've got the excess deaths that Senator Babet talked about before. We had 8,706 extra deaths last year despite the fact that New South Wales were locked down for three months. So in theory the deaths should have been lower like they were in 2020. But let's not count 2021 in the ABS, ABS [Australian Bureau of Statistics] figures or sorry, 2020 they're not counting, let's pretend nothing happened there.

Almost 140,000 jab injuries, more than all the injuries reported from vaccines since 1971, more than all the injuries put together. You've got a injury rate that's three times higher and yet the TGA don't want to look at the signal. ...

There was not one skerrick of evidence that showed that that vaccine was effective. But did anyone in this chamber right here right now actually read that report? I bet you not. But you all went out there and said it was safe and effective, where you didn't have a clue what you were talking about.

And shame on you. Because the law in this country, the law in this country, in the Australian immunization register says you cannot be coerced into taking a vaccine, number one, and number two, is that you need to be properly informed about what is in the vaccine. ...

You know what they did? They stopped the trial. They stopped the trial, and they went and told everyone that it just stays at the site of injection. Well that was a blatant lie. If you want to talk about misinformation, go and check out page 44 of the Pfizer non-clinical trial report. It was released on the TGA FOIA disclosure log 239-6. I've read it numerous times. ...

And then we've got Professor Kelly, of course he came out and made the bold statement that it stops transmission. Well he was lying, because the FDA came out in December '20 and said that there was no evidence that the vaccine stopped transmission. And when I pressed him on it, there's no trials to show that there's any IgA in the mucosal system. OK, you don't have to take my word for it. Go and speak to Robert Clancy, Australia's foremost immunologist and vaccinologist. OK? He's retired you can trust this guy, he's not on the take from Big Pharma or the big universities that aren't actually interested in research, they're just interested in lining their own pockets. ...

And then of course we've got the vaccine injury scheme, which is just a joke. And today and last night and day after day for the last 15 months I get contacted by people who have had their lives destroyed by this vaccine, a vaccine that the government said was safe and effective.

And if that isn't bad enough that they these people, and I'm looking at you people in this chamber here today, didn't read the documents that took over someone else's body because it suited your narrative, your command and control narrative, you showed no humanity. No humanity.

There are people out there that have not only injured, they have lost their jobs and they cannot get medical support to help them. There are husbands and wives of injured couples who've had to quit their jobs...

I've literally just had three messages in the last hour about people who are losing their jobs, not in the health sector, but in sectors that are outdoors, nothing to do. It is absurd. It is absurd and it needs to stop because the state of emergency, even at the state government level, has been retracted. And yet these people here today do not want to grant people their autonomous right to control what goes in their body.

https://palexander.substack.com/p/vaccinated-persons-side-effects-eg

Vaccinated persons side effects e.g. hospitilization, death etc. were counted as occurring in the UNVACCINATED (by CDC, FDA etc.) for as much as 21/28 days after being vaccinated, lying to you, scaring you to be vaccinated & vaccinate your child, putting deaths in the UNVACCINATED bucket knowing they were already VACCINATED! Walensky, Fauci are criminals for this! ...

The ‘cheap trick’ is simple: categorise those who are vaccinated as unvaccinated up until some arbitrarily defined time period after vaccination takes place. The time period might be 7, 14 or 21 days. The supposed justification for this practice being that the benefits of the vaccine do not accrue until it has had time to ‘kick in’. And before it becomes effective on day seven, fourteen, or whatever, the recipient is considered to be unvaccinated.

At the time of our original work, we were not at all sure how globally widespread this selection bias was. Recently the Dark Horse podcast covered the issue and shortly after Bret Weinstein asked me if there was a comprehensive list of studies that had deliberately committed this cheap trick.

This article is our first attempt to provide such a list. It contains a mix of observational and other studies that have employed the cheap trick when assessing vaccine effectiveness for either infection, hospitalisation or death.

https://twitter.com/zauberberg188/status/1686354312442630144

Patrick says

I know I'm being a bitch about this but provide links:

https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/1797735/covid-cases-uk-latest-symptoms

Your job, and my job, was enabling communication. I'm being an asshole because 30 years ago we created hyperlinks. Why does nobody use them?

I can create a bullshit screenshot in a day. Let's pin them in their lies.

The vaxx is worse than the disease it is supposed to help prevent.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/two-waves-of-illness-injury-disability

https://slaynews.com/news/92-covid-deaths-2022-were-triple-vaxxed/

92% of Covid Deaths in 2022 Were Triple+ Vaxxed

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/airborne-thursday-august-10-2023

💉 The Epoch Times ran a story yesterday headlined, “Biden Admin Concedes No Evidence Behind Recommendation for 6 COVID Booster Shots a Year.”

Last November, Biden’s diverse Secretary of Health, a lawyer with no health background, Xavier Becerra, wrote in a social media post that people should get vaccinated whenever “it’s been over 2 months since your last dose.” The next day, he wrote “An updated COVID vaccine can help protect you from the worst outcomes of COVID. If it’s been over 2 months since your last dose, make a plan to get one now.” Becerra then posted several more items along the same lines.

So the Functional Government Initiative (FGI) filed a Freedom of Information Act request for documents supporting the statements, including all “scientific support” for the statement and internal communications related to the post.

Predictably, the Biden Administration stonewalled the request, so FGI sued.

In its latest response, the government admitted it had no evidence to support Mr. Becerra's recommendation. That’s Science! Specifically, Alesia Williams, an HHS official, said, "The department reviewed 1,263 pages of potentially responsive records captured in the agency’s search for this FOIA request. After a careful review of these records, I determined the 1,263 pages were not relevant to your request.”

But to be fair, there is evidence that those boosters make a LOT of money for Pfizer.

The all seeing eye of Christine:







https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/115173

https://usawatchdog.com/cv19-vax-humanitarian-catastrophe-being-turbocharged-without-treatment-dr-pierre-kory/

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/us/exclusive-vaccinated-outbreak-at-cdc-conference-bigger-than-reported-5461213?src_src=Goodevening&src_cmp=gv-2023-08-12&utm_source=share-btn-copylink

Vaccinated Outbreak at CDC Conference Bigger Than Reported

The COVID-19 outbreak among vaccinated people that broke out at a conference held by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was bigger than disclosed, according to files obtained by The Epoch Times.

After the outbreak took place in April, the CDC reported results from surveys sent to attendees.

The CDC said that 181 respondents reported testing positive for COVID-19.

But that number was actually 183, according to the newly obtained files.

The public health agency also failed to disclose that hundreds of attendees didn’t get tested; some 601 attendees who responded to the survey said they didn’t get tested for COVID-19, the files show, including 34 who reported experiencing COVID-like symptoms, being ill, or both.

The CDC didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Vaccinated Person Went to Emergency Room
In a statement on the outbreak, which affected only vaccinated people, the CDC emphasized that no attendee reported being hospitalized.

“None of the 181 people who reported testing positive were hospitalized,” the agency said.

The agency didn’t mention that one of the vaccinated people suffered such severe symptoms that they went to the emergency room, according to the newly obtained files.

The agency had claimed that, despite the outbreak, the survey results emphasize “the importance of vaccination for protecting individuals against severe illness and death related to COVID-19.” ...

The failure to report the emergency room visit and note that hundreds of attendees did not get tested fits the CDC’s pattern of misleading on so-called breakthrough cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, or metrics among the vaccinated.

The CDC’s now-former director, for instance, falsely said on television in the spring of 2021 that vaccinated people would not get sick or transmit COVID-19. The agency has acknowledged that data didn’t support those claims.

Lol, the CDC is a complete fraud. Why was no one punished for those false claims?

Remember when they screamed over and over that everyone must get the toxxine because it would prevent transmission?

I remember.

According to Reuters, the fact that : "most people dying from Covid-19 are vaccinated does not mean vaccines do not work."

That is exactly what it means. Otherwise why bother getting vaccinated?

The problem with the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines is that they do not offer immunity against Covid, meaning, they are useless.

So, a person is better off relying on Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine - medications that cure Covid with an efficacy of 99%. People who get vaccinated risk death and injury from myocarditis in addition to death from Covid.

Patrick says

The_Deplorable says

So, a person is better off relying on Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine - medications that cure Covid with an efficacy of 99%.

I'm a little torn on this issue. Do we really know that these medicines have an "efficacy of 99%" when we are talking about a disease that has a survival rate of 99.8xxx% ? This is a serious question. I have ivermectin and I know people who have used it to "kick covids' ass" but I'm semi-skeptical that we need to take ANYTHING to beat what, to me, is basically another seasonal variation of the flu.

If you have a reasonably effective immune system, do you really need anything?

stfu says

"If you have a reasonably effective immune system, do you really need anything?"

I think so yes, because we know how the human immune system works to defeat the Covid virus and it is up to you to give your immune system a boost.

• Hydroxychloroquine is an Ionophore with an affinity for zinc - meaning Hydroxychloroquine and Zinc are always together. The Zinc prevents the Covid virus from replicating and this gives time to the immune system to kill the virus.

• Big pharma wants to prevent We The People from using Hydroxychloroquine because the entire cure against the Covid virus using HCQ costs less than $1.00 and they cannot make billion$ of dollars by forcing all of us to get vaccinated.

• Hydroxychloroquine not only cures the Covid-19 virus, it also offers long term immunity against the virus because HCQ stays in the human body for a long time. The half-life of HCQ in the human body is about 50 days and can be detected in the body one year after you take a single pill. As a result, Hydroxychloroquine offers long term immunity against Covid-19 , which is something the toxin vaccines cannot do.

• MUST-WATCH: Texas Doctor Ivette Lozano PRAISES President Trump For His Advice On How To Treat COVID-19 Patients... https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/05/must-watch-texas-doctor-ivette-lozano-praises-president-trump-advice-treat-covid-19-patients/ -- From the 3:55 to the 6:30 minute - "...Except YouTube took this video down! "

• But you can watch Doctor Ivette's Lozano videos on BITChute [1]

• Here is Dr. Lozano with Laura Ingraham

original link
less than 5:30 minutes.

• And remember, Hydroxychloroquine is very inexpensive it's been on the market for about 60 years, it is safer than Aspirin and it is currently used to fight Malaria, Lupus and Rheumatoid Arthritis.

[1] https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=ivette+lozano&kind=video

stfu says

I'm a little torn on this issue. Do we really know that these medicines have an "efficacy of 99%" when we are talking about a disease that has a survival rate of 99.8xxx% ?

@stfu We do know that HCQ and ivermectin reduce death from Wuhan Virus by a lot, and that's the important point.

That invalidates the EUA which was and is being to shield Pfizer and Moderna from liability.

It also means that Pfauci, Collins, Walensky, etc deliberately caused the deaths of a large number of people by preventing doctors from using those drugs.

That's two sets of mass murderers who gained by lying about HCQ and ivermectin.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/stormy-weather-tuesday-august-29

💉 The Epoch Times ran another fascinating jab story yesterday, headlined “First COVID Deaths Were Fully Jabbed, Australian State Records Reveal.”

Remember — Australia arrived quite late to the covid party. Before cases started, the island nation locked down early and hard, and was widely and often touted by Establishment Media as a lockdown success story. That is, it was a success story until the “pandemic” Down Under began — after its vaccination campaign had already kicked off.

A group of doctors suing the Australian government finally received some data in discovery. And guess what? It showed that the very first deaths from covid in Australia were almost all in fully vaccinated people. ...

Think about this: Australia ordered some of the most draconian and punitive vaccine mandates in the world outside of China and North Korea. But at the time they ordered Ozzies to get jabbed or get fired and then go into house arrest, this data shows the Australian government already knew the jabs didn’t stop people from getting covid and dying from covid.

So … what then could possibly justify the strict jab mandates, the mandates relentlessly pushed on all Australian networks by all those white-coated scientists and doctors as the “only way out of the pandemic?”

Hmm?

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/a-10-point-primer-on-why-the-mrna

A 10-point primer on why the mRNA Covid shots are different from and riskier than other vaccines...

1: mRNAs are not vaccines in any traditional sense. They work in a very different way.

2: Before 2020 mRNA biotechnology was - at best - several years from use outside clinical trials. The scientists working on it were struggling with the risks of repeated dosing.

3: The two large clinical trials in 2020 from Pfizer and Moderna that led to the approval of the mRNAs did NOT show that they reduced deaths from Covid, or from other causes.

4: mRNAs were not proven to work better or to be safer than - or even as safe as - traditional vaccines. They were not and have never been tested head-to-head against traditional vaccines.

5: The clinical trials showed the mRNAs caused more and more severe side effects than most traditional vaccines, especially flu shots. Real-world experience confirmed the trial findings.

6: The major clinical trials were effectively stopped in early 2021, and as a result we do not have long-term placebo-controlled safety data on the mRNAs.

7: We also do not have long-term controlled data on their effectiveness. This gap matters less, though, since everyone now agrees that - at best - they worked against Covid infection or transmission for a few months in 2021.

8: The evidence health authorities offer for their claims that the shots work against severe disease and death - even after they fail against infection - comes from “observational” studies. Those are hopelessly untrustworthy. The reason is that people are generally not vaccinated if they are on or near their deathbeds - and terminally ill people are obviously at very high risk of death from all causes, including Covid.

In essence, the people who receive vaccinations cannot be compared to those who do not. Health authorities are well aware of this issue, but they ignore it, because it enables them to claim the vaccines work.

9: The mRNAs appear to have zero or negative effectiveness against Omicron infection. Negative effectiveness means they may actually increase the risk of infection. Some studies show that the infection risk RISES with each additional dose.

10: Data from many countries that used mRNAs shows the booster campaigns in early 2022 and late 2022/early 2023 coincided with increases in all-cause deaths. This correlation is particularly striking in the second campaign, because it cannot be attributed to Covid.

https://twitter.com/PickingPeaches1/status/1698819869691535463

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/literal-chaos-wednesday-september?r=6gdz

💉 A new pre-print study published yesterday, titled “Forensic Analysis of the 38 Subject Deaths in the 6-Month Interim Report of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trial.” It had thirteen authors.

The first six deaths from Pfizer’s trial. Notice any pattern?




The authors described their new study as being the first analysis of the original data from the main Pfizer vaccine clinical trial (44,000 participants) to be conducted by a group unaffiliated with Pfizer. Their analysis was enabled by the court-ordered release of Pfizer’s internal test data, which the FDA infamously tried to suppress for 75 years.

What they found, unsurprisingly, and what was missed by federal regulators and the vaccine approval committee, was a significantly-higher rate of death in the vaccine group compared to the placebo:

Our analysis revealed inconsistencies between the subject data listed in the 6-Month Interim Report and publications authored by Pfizer trial site administrators. Most importantly, we found evidence of an over 3.7-fold increase in number of deaths due to cardiovascular events in BNT162b2 vaccinated subjects compared to Placebo controls. This significant adverse event signal was not reported by Pfizer.

The authors reviewed each of the 38 deaths, and found Pfizer hijinx all over. Here’s one example (edited for brevity):

Subject 11621327 was found dead shortly after receiving Dose 1 of the Pfizer vaccine on September 10th. His body was found at home (with lividity) on the 13th of September when the police performed a welfare check. “According to the medical examiner, the probable cause of death was progression of atherosclerotic disease.” The cause of death listed in the 6-Month Interim Report is “Arteriosclerosis”… autopsy results were not provided or available. Based only on the medical documentation in the CRF, there is no basis for ascribing the subject’s death to advanced atherosclerosis or concluding that the death was unrelated to the vaccine… It is likely that the subject died within a day or two of vaccination. This was a clear indication that his death could have been related to the Pfizer vaccine and this should not have been ruled out without a more rigorous investigation. In our opinion, this diagnosis was premature and an egregious misjudgment of the evidence at hand.

An “egregious misjudgment” is one way of putting it.

After noting the unusually low overall number of deaths in the overall trial, which itself raises suspicion, and the very high (5%) number of “discontinued” patients, the authors dropped the biggest bomb: the Pfizer trial data does not show that any lives were saved by the “safe and effective” jabs:

To state that vaccine saved lives, Pfizer should have shown a reduction in all-cause mortality due to a decrease in COVID-19 mortality in the vaccinated arm of the trial. Figure 1 does not support any such claim for Weeks 1 – 20 and, in fact, speaks against this conclusion in the weeks following Week 20 in which the Placebo cumulative plot is distinctly below that of the BNT162b2 vaccinated.

In other words, fewer people should have died in the injection group than in the placebo group, but the exact opposite happened. How the vaccine committee missed this is anybody’s guess. Well, we have some pretty good guesses.

Here’s the link to the study.

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202309.0131/v1

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202309.0131/v1