patrick.net

https://palexander.substack.com/p/a-summary-of-the-evidence-against

https://brownstone.org/articles/16-studies-on-vaccine-efficacy/

Example of studies below:

1) Gazit et alshowed that “SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees had a 13-fold (95% CI, 8-21) increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected.” When adjusting for the time of disease/vaccine, there was a 27-fold increased risk (95% CI, 13-57).

2) Acharya et al.Ignoring the risk of infection, given that someone was infected, Acharya et al. found “no significant difference in cycle threshold values between vaccinated and unvaccinated, asymptomatic and symptomatic groups infected with SARS-CoV-2 Delta.”

3) Riemersma et al.found “no difference in viral loads when comparing unvaccinated individuals to those who have vaccine “breakthrough” infections. Furthermore, individuals with vaccine breakthrough infections frequently test positive with viral loads consistent with the ability to shed infectious viruses.” Results indicate that “if vaccinated individuals become infected with the delta variant, they may be sources of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to others.” They reported “low Ct values (<25) in 212 of 310 fully vaccinated (68%) and 246 of 389 (63%) unvaccinated individuals. Testing a subset of these low-Ct samples revealed infectious SARS-CoV-2 in 15 of 17 specimens (88%) from unvaccinated individuals and 37 of 39 (95%) from vaccinated people.”

4) Chemaitelly et al.In a study from Qatar, Chemaitelly et al. reported vaccine efficacy (Pfizer) against severe and fatal disease, with efficacy in the 85-95% range at least until 24 weeks after the second dose. As a contrast, the efficacy against infection waned down to around 30% at 15-19 weeks after the second dose.

5) Riemersma et al.From Wisconsin, Riemersma et al. reported that vaccinated individuals who get infected with the Delta variant can transmit SARS-CoV-2 to others. They found an elevated viral load in the unvaccinated and vaccinated symptomatic persons (68% and 69% respectively, 158/232 and 156/225). Moreover, in the asymptomatic persons, they uncovered elevated viral loads (29% and 82% respectively) in the unvaccinated and the vaccinated respectively. This suggests that the vaccinated can be infected, harbor, cultivate, and transmit the virus readily and unknowingly.

6) SubramanianSubramanian reported that “at the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases.” When comparing 2947 counties in the United States, there were slightly less cases in more vaccinated locations. In other words, there is no clear discernable relationship .

7) Chau et al.looked at transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant among vaccinated healthcare workers in Vietnams. Of 69 healthcare workers that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 62 participated in the clinical study, all of whom recovered. For 23 of them, complete-genome sequences were obtained, and all belonged to the Delta variant. “Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020”.

8) Brown et al.In Barnstable, Massachusetts, Brown et al. found that among 469 cases of COVID-19, 74% were fully vaccinated, and that “the vaccinated had on average more virus in their nose than the unvaccinated who were infected.”

9) Hetemäli et al.Reporting on a nosocomial hospital outbreak in Finland, Hetemäli et al. observed that “both symptomatic and asymptomatic infections were found among vaccinated health care workers, and secondary transmission occurred from those with symptomatic infections despite use of personal protective equipment.”

10) Shitrit et al.In a hospital outbreak investigation in Israel, Shitrit et al. observed “high transmissibility of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant among twice vaccinated and masked individuals.” They added that “this suggests some waning of immunity, albeit still providing protection for individuals without comorbidities.”

11) UK COVID-19 vaccine Surveillance Report for week #42In the UK COVID-19 vaccine Surveillance Report for week #42, it was noted that there is “waning of the N antibody response over time” and “that N antibody levels appear to be lower in individuals who acquire infection following 2 doses of vaccination.” The same report (Table 2, page 13), shows the in the older age groups above 30, the double vaccinated persons have greater infection risk than the unvaccinated, presumably because the latter group include more people with stronger natural immunity from prior Covid disease. As a contrast, the vaccinated people had a lower risk of death than the unvaccinated, across all age groups, indicating that vaccines provide more protection against death than against infection. See also UK PHE reports 43, 44, 45, 46 for similar data.

12) Levin et al.In Israel, Levin et al. “conducted a 6-month longitudinal prospective study involving vaccinated health care workers who were tested monthly for the presence of anti-spike IgG and neutralizing antibodies”. They found that “six months after receipt of the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine, humoral response was substantially decreased, especially among men, among persons 65 years of age or older, and among persons with immunosuppression.”

13) Rosenberg et al.In a study from New York State, Rosenberg et al. reported that “During May 3–July 25, 2021, the overall age-adjusted vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization in New York was relatively stable 89.5%–95.1%). The overall age-adjusted vaccine effectiveness against infection for all New York adults declined from 91.8% to 75.0%.”

14) Suthar et al.Suthar et al. noted that “Our data demonstrate a substantial waning of antibody responses and T cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and its variants, at 6 months following the second immunization with the BNT162b2 vaccine.”

15) Nordström et al.In a study from Umeå University in Sweden, Nordström et al. observed that “vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 against infection waned progressively from 92% (95% CI, 92-93, P<0·001) at day 15-30 to 47% (95% CI, 39-55, P<0·001) at day 121-180, and from day 211 and onwards no effectiveness could be detected (23%; 95% CI, -2-41, P=0·07).”

16) Yahi et al.Yahi et al. have reported that “in the case of the Delta variant, neutralizing antibodies have a decreased affinity for the spike protein, whereas facilitating antibodies display a strikingly increased affinity. Thus, antibody dependent enhancement may be a concern for people receiving vaccines based on the original Wuhan strain spike sequence.”

17) Goldberg et al. (BNT162b2 Vaccine in Israel) reported that “immunity against the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 waned in all age groups a few months after receipt of the second dose of vaccine.”

18) Singanayagam et al.examined the transmission and viral load kinetics in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals with mild delta variant infection in the community. They found that (in 602 community contacts (identified via the UK contract-tracing system) of 471 UK COVID-19 index cases were recruited to the Assessment of Transmission and Contagiousness of COVID-19 in Contacts cohort study and contributed 8145 upper respiratory tract samples from daily sampling for up to 20 days) “vaccination reduces the risk of delta variant infection and accelerates viral clearance. Nonetheless, fully vaccinated individuals with breakthrough infections have peak viral load similar to unvaccinated cases and can efficiently transmit infection in household settings, including to fully vaccinated contacts.”

19) Keehner et al.in NEJM, has recently reported on the resurgence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a highly vaccinated health system workforce. Vaccination with mRNA vaccines began in mid-December 2020; by March, 76% of the workforce had been fully vaccinated, and by July, the percentage had risen to 87%. Infections had decreased dramatically by early February 2021…”coincident with the end of California’s mask mandate on June 15 and the rapid dominance of the B.1.617.2 (delta) variant that first emerged in mid-April and accounted for over 95% of UCSDH isolates by the end of July, infections increased rapidly, including cases among fully vaccinated persons…researchers reported that the “dramatic change in vaccine effectiveness from June to July is likely to be due to both the emergence of the delta variant and waning immunity over time.”

...

(goes on and on)

https://twitter.com/wideawake_media/status/1745802202508124334

How The Toxin mRNA Vaccines Kill.




https://twitter.com/Risemelbourne/status/1746458766315565447

The_Deplorable says

I want one of these for all my small family.

Let The Truth Prevail

Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico just announced a Covid Inquiry that will investigate the vaccine,
excess deaths, the EU Pfizer deal and Big Pharma’s ability to control the Government.

"The Slovak public simply needs an answer. Needs an answer about vaccination, what it actually was.
Why people were vaccinated with various experimental vaccines. Why all sorts of drugs were pushed into
people." He accused the previous government not only of failing the people but having 21000 deaths on
their hands.

https://twitter.com/SaiKate108/status/1751552779045552521

https://www.arkmedic.info/p/the-new-eugenics-movement-part-1

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/weekend-at-zelenskys-wednesday-february/comment/49039122

Fager

In July of 2021, The Lancet produced a study that included absolute risk reduction figures for the various jabs. The BioNtech relative risk reduction was publicly claimed to be 95.03%; the absolute risk reduction was .84%--and for obvious reasons that one was never reported by the pushers of the jabs. Moderna was 94.08% vs. 1.24%; Janssen was 66.62% vs. 1.19%; and AstraZeneca was 66.84% vs. 1.28%.

The once and future pharma employees at the FDA know damned well that to meaningfully evaluate a drug's benefits, one needs to know both relative and absolute risk reduction. It knows damned well that leaving ARR out of what's reported to doctors and patients is completely misleading; it knows damned well that most doctors don't notice the absence or ascribe any importance to that absence. Yet, impelled by even a little skepticism about the TrueNarrative™, in 2021 even a layman could find that information, understand its significance, and realize the implications of it being deliberately omitted from all the wonder-drug headlines.

https://palexander.substack.com/p/potus-trump-45-they-are-not-telling

There is not one, no, none, not one study, no RCT, no credible study, none of the proper duration, sample size, outcome number, patient-important outcomes, research methods etc., with proper controls for residual confounding, anywhere, in the entire world, for 4 years now, showing any mRNA COVID vaccine, not one, worked to reduce hospitilizations or ICU or severe outcomes or deaths. Not one!

I am urging POTUS Trump to stop now. His statements on lockdowns and vaccine are not contemporary with the science, does not match the reality, as to what has accumulated for 4 years and what we know just based on our own personal experiences of the catastrophic effects of the lockdowns, school closures, business closures, and the deadly mRNA technology mRNA gene injections.

POTUS Trump must cease stating that the lockdowns worked (there is NO evidence of this) or the COVID mRNA vaccines (brought by Malone, Bourla, Bancel, Weissman, Kariko, Sahin, Moncef et al. re MODERNA, Pfizer, BioNTech etc.) worked (there is no evidence of this).

Patrick says

"POTUS Trump must cease stating that the lockdowns worked (there is NO evidence of this) or the COVID mRNA vaccines (brought by Malone, Bourla, Bancel, Weissman, Kariko, Sahin, Moncef et al. re MODERNA, Pfizer, BioNTech etc.) worked (there is no evidence of this)."

The vaccine was not released when Trump was President.

In addition, in 2020 he did not have the information that we have now and having Covid come out of a China lab looked like a bioweapon.

To his credit, President Trump announced in May 2020 that he was taking Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as a prophylactic against Covid. And HCQ proved to be a therapeutic medication against Covid. HCQ wipes out Covid from the human body within a couple of days.

The_Deplorable says

Patrick says

"POTUS Trump must cease stating that the lockdowns worked (there is NO evidence of this) or the COVID mRNA vaccines (brought by Malone, Bourla, Bancel, Weissman, Kariko, Sahin, Moncef et al. re MODERNA, Pfizer, BioNTech etc.) worked (there is no evidence of this)."

The vaccine was not released when Trump was President.

In addition, in 2020 he did not have the information that we have now and having Covid come out of a China lab looked like a bioweapon.

To his credit, President Trump announced in May 2020 that he was taking Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as a prophylactic against Covid. And HCQ proved to be a therapeutic medication against Covid. HCQ wipes out Covid from the human body within a couple of days.

I hate to say it, but it WAS released while Trump was president. December 11th 2020 the PfizerBioNtech FDA EUA was signed. First injections were actually given out week of December 14th. It's not hard to find this information.

ForcedTQ says

"I hate to say it, but it WAS released while Trump was president. December 11th 2020 the PfizerBioNtech FDA EUA was signed."

That was the last few days of Trump's presidency and back then we did not have the information we have now. And the main issue back then was the "stolen election" - recall the January 6 events a few days later. You cannot blame Trump for the toxic vaccine.

The virus created chaos for Trump, wether it was deliberate or not we will probably never know. He handled the presented emergency very well. The solution to the problem was presented as the vaccine which made perfect sense at that time. Trump implemented warp speed which turned out to be a con by the Pharma and the people that orchestrated the Plandemic; that doesn't make Trump be the responsible one for creating the vaccine. And again, any politician (especially Trump) can't ever admit wrongdoing, it's political suicide.

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/on-the-ohio-state-study-showing-vaccinated

On the Ohio State study showing vaccinated Covid patients had a HIGHER risk of death than the unvaccinated

https://twitter.com/VigilantFox/status/1762265806002352386

https://twitter.com/bfcarlson/status/1762126578073337943

https://c19early.org/sartini.html

https://vigilantnews.com/post/tucker-carlson-poses-an-unexpected-covid-vaccine-question/

“No lives were saved” by the COVID-19 injections, researcher and scientist Denis Rancourt told The Epoch Times in an email.

Rancourt and his fellow scientists conducted an in-depth, post-vaccine analysis, looking at over a dozen countries. What they found is that that all-cause mortality increased every time the COVID-19 shots were deployed. ...

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) February 17, 2024
For every 800 injections administered, Rancourt and his colleagues concluded in their 180-page paper that one vaccine-related death occurred.

This 1-in-800 number becomes even more alarming when you consider how many doses were given.

At the time of Rancourt and colleagues’ report, 13.5 billion COVID-19 injections were administered.

Divide that number by 800, and you end up with approximately 17 million COVID-19 vaccine-related deaths.

https://patrick.net/post/1378505/2023-02-09-more-evidence-that-the-toxxine-kills

https://palexander.substack.com/p/why-did-adhikari-et-als-research

Why did Adhikari et al.'s research published in Frontiers in Immunology (needless to say most if not all academic research publishing is scientific garbage today owned by pharma) find that mortality rates in COVID patients vaccinated versus unvaccinated was 70% versus 37%?

Patrick says

https://palexander.substack.com/p/why-did-adhikari-et-als-research

Why did Adhikari et al.'s research published in Frontiers in Immunology (needless to say most if not all academic research publishing is scientific garbage today owned by pharma) find that mortality rates in COVID patients vaccinated versus unvaccinated was 70% versus 37%?

Could it be because the average age is higher in the jabbed vs. the unjabbed? Just playing devil's advocate here.

Patrick says

" https://palexander.substack.com/p/why-did-adhikari-et-als-research Why did Adhikari et al.'s research published in Frontiers in Immunology... find that mortality rates in COVID patients vaccinated versus unvaccinated was 70% versus 37%?"

Because that was what the data said. Don't forget, in science we follow the data.