patrick.net

on 19 October 2023 .. Spreicher et al. confirmed excessive synthetic DNA contamination in 27 vials of the Pfizer and Moderna products in Canada, 188-509 fold above WHO and FDA limits, which are the same limits meant to be observed by Australia's TGA

.. I can also confirm Japanese scientists have also confirmed excessive DNA contamination too .. details coming soon

on 12 October 2023 .. the Australian Federal Police without explanation declined to investigate the fact Pfizer and Moderna continue to commit serious criminal offenses in Australia for dealing with their products without first having applied for GMO licenses

.. had they applied for those licenses the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator would never have granted them GMO licenses, had the OGTR properly looked and found the gross DNA contamination

Australia Launches Official Inquiry in Soaring Excess Deaths

Wait, is this real? (Can't tell these days)

Prior to the COVID pandemic, Australia’s drug regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), was highly regarded internationally for its rigorous application of the most stringent international standards of drug quality, safety and efficacy.

However, in assessing the quality, safety and efficacy of data submitted in support of the gene-based COVID “vaccines”, these standards were seriously compromised in many fundamental and critically important ways. Given the serious quality, safety and efficacy problems now well-known and widely reported in relation to the COVID“ vaccines” – the evidence now suggests that these gene-based injections should never have been approved by the TGA because they have caused more harm than good. A detailed description of the TGA’s failures to properly evaluate the COVID “vaccines” will be described in this presentation.

I find it inconceivable that a future Premier, for example, might determine that people with red hair can't hold a job. I find that completely out of the realm of possibility. But you know what, two years ago I never contemplated that we would live in a world where someone who isn't vaccinated can't hold a job, can't go into a shop, can't go to an event. I never believed that we would come to a place as a state where we would say that. But here we are.

And these things don't happen overnight. They happen by degrees. Do I trust the Andrews Government and all future governments to exercise these powers responsibly? No I don't. And I think anyone who does is an absolute fool.

Because I had moderate-severe ‘covid symptoms’ while unvaccinated, according to the Australian hospital protocol, it is possible that if I had rung an ambulance or gone to a hospital in a panic, like so many around the world, they would have tested me using the fraudulent PCR, put me on a covid ward, separated me from my family, and killed me with remdesivir, sedation and dehydration and I would have been counted as a covid death.

I would have been ‘just another dead anti-vaxxer.’ ...

Over the past four years we have learned that the unvaccinated, elderly and those living with a disability were targeted for murder in Australian hospitals and hospitals around the world, which is democide. Of course, they do not call it democide. They call people in these groups ‘high risk’ and thus ‘deserving of special treatment.’ Then, they are recorded as covid deaths.

That ‘special treatment’ is aggressive, unnecessary and harmful hospital medical interventions in the form of inappropriate oxygen settings, intubation, sedation (e.g., fentanyl), remdesivir and midazolam for the ostensible reason of ‘treating covid.’ Many people in hospitals and care homes were also subjected to cruel and inhumane treatment such as restraint, dehydration, and isolation from loved ones.

Who Was Standing Up in '21? Fluoro Lay-Down in Perth, Australia: "Everyone's laying down their hi-vis on the steps of Parliament House"

Transcript of a video of a heavily censored protest of 2021

Bitchute page description [continuation of title] "firefighters, doctors, nurses and teachers laid down their work clothes in front of the Parliament. The Australian state suspended them because they did not get vaccinated."


original link


video from the fluoro lay-down in Perth. They are so hard to find online. There was so much censorship that most of them were wiped from the internet. This one was uploaded on the day Dec 1, 2021. I have no idea how it slipped through— probably because it was bitchute and from a very small account. This video was taken very early in the day before I got there— you can see that only a few shirts are actually on the steps relative to the photo in my article.

More screenshots from the video:

Pfizer committed systemic fraud during their clinical trials, with whistleblowers revealing only healthy adult participants were recruited for a stage II/III clinical trial of a vaccine that was intended for the sick and elderly; trial duration was grossly insufficient to capture medium-term and long-term side effects like myocarditis; to drown out the number of adverse events being recorded among real participants, fake participants were created who recorded zero side effects; patients who suffered serious side effects were removed from the study and never existed in the paperwork; and the COVID injection was not tested on pregnant women, and women who fell pregnant were removed from the study before childbirth. The COVID injection was then recommended for pregnant women. How could any human do this? This is inhuman, and it’s monsters that did it. Why did Pfizer think they could get away with the most crooked clinical trial in history? Could an answer to this question be found in testimony of a Pfizer executive to US Congress? They made a comment that Pfizer gave the US government the vaccine the government asked for and so claimed Pfizer is not liable for the adverse events.

The military appears to have been involved in the cover-up of COVID’s origins. It’s now clear that COVID was developed during gain-of-function research in China’s Wuhan Institute for Virology, connected with the Chinese military. Who funded this research in China? The United States National Institutes of Health, under Anthony Fauci. Canada and Australia were involved in this research. In 2020, the CSIRO put out a press release not only admitting their gain-of-function research but defending it. I’ve spoken on that previously. After a series of lab escapes involving pathogens at the headquarters of America’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention—the CDC—in Georgia, President Obama in 2014 suspended gain-of-function research. Anthony Fauci ignored the president’s order and moved the research offshore to Wuhan, China. ...

The military should not be used against law-abiding civilians or against healthy civilians for the purposes of forced injections to transfer wealth to big pharma. What we saw was forced injection of people after succumbing to the threat of deprivation of their family’s livelihood and their ability to feed children. Fear, intimidation, blackmail and threats of loss of income and home are elements of force—inhuman force.

I have repeatedly said that COVID-19 was severely mismanaged, because it was never about health. It was about control of people and wealth transfer using deceit—deceit that’s inhuman, monstrously inhuman. We must know whether our TGA, in waving through a vaccine countermeasure that would not have been approved under normal circumstances, bowed to higher powers. Was this a military pharmaceutical operation or a civilian health operation? These are matters ordinarily dealt with in a royal commission. The Albanese Labor government broke its pre-election promise to have a royal commission. If it continues to break its promise, it will be complicit in hiding truth from the people, truth that is slowly yet relentlessly and inevitably coming out. Call the bloody royal commission now.

This video delves into the alleged concealment of critical information regarding the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 mRNA injections, focusing on how regulatory bodies and authorities misled the Australian public. It claims that significant contamination of genetic material was found in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, far exceeding safety thresholds, with potential links to severe health risks like cancer and autoimmune diseases. Despite independent verification from multiple labs, global regulators, including Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), dismissed concerns, claiming there was no safety risk without conducting proper tests.

The video argues that the mRNA injections are in fact gene therapies rather than traditional vaccines, citing how these injections modify genetic material within cells to stimulate an immune response. It criticizes the lack of rigorous testing on the long-term effects of this genetic modification, accusing manufacturers and health authorities of withholding important information about the risks, such as the bio-distribution of modified RNA throughout the body and its potential to disrupt cellular functions.

Legal challenges against Pfizer and Moderna are outlined, notably the case of Dr. Julian Fidge, who accused the companies of bypassing Australia’s regulatory requirements for gene therapies. The lawsuit was dismissed due to a lack of legal standing, but the video highlights potential conflicts of interest, including Judge Helen Rofe’s undisclosed connections to Pfizer. This raises questions about the integrity of the judicial process, especially regarding the dismissal of critical evidence related to genetic contamination.

The video also condemns the narrative pushed by health authorities that the vaccines were “safe and effective,” arguing that data showed minimal absolute risk reduction and high infection rates among vaccinated individuals. It accuses authorities of fearmongering, particularly regarding children, and asserts that pregnant and breastfeeding women were given false assurances about the safety of the vaccines, despite being excluded from clinical trials.

Ultimately, the video calls for accountability and justice, emphasizing that millions of Australians were subjected to experimental gene-based treatments without adequate informed consent. It demands transparency, thorough investigations into regulatory failures, and reparations for those harmed. The script ends with a strong appeal to hold responsible parties accountable and to ensure that such breaches of public trust are never repeated.

The courage it took to continue streaming, while capturing the moment Vic Police, before a huge worldwide audience, lined up with their new weapons and passionately fired upon our country’s identity, cannot be underestimated.

The footage is hard to watch, not just because the police—dressed like stormtroopers and all masked up to protect their identities—are shooting fleeing protesters in the back, but because they take aim and fire repeatedly. They were enjoying themselves; getting off on it. It’s there, you just have to look.

One protester summed up the moment perfectly, by crying out during the stream, “This is Fucking Australia?”

In the morning, the streets of Melbourne were being patrolled by armoured cars called ‘BearCats’. Victorian Police Officers were hanging off these vehicles, many holding rubber bullet rifles and firing indiscriminately at those they assumed were protesters. ...

Not only were Vic Police shooting fleeing protesters, but they were shooting them as they were protesting on the Shrine of Remembrance—a building built to commemorate those who fought and died in the belief they were protecting our freedoms. ...

That’s why this wasn’t a protest; it was a battle. An assault on who we thought we were, by those who were willing to work for those in power, somewhere high above us, who had decided who we, as Australians, were going to become.

And to show their commitment to establishing this new identity, they ordered their officers—these Victorians—to shoot the stubborn ones who still believed that they could cling to the Australia we all thought we were, by simply standing up.

“Did anyone in this country accept orders from the United States military…?”

The CBRN PsyWar: Revisiting the question asked by Australia’s Senator Malcolm Roberts in August 2023 regarding the COVID Operation.

To set the scene, recall the early 2020 timeline in context…

Operation Warp Speed started on 13 January 2020, before the disease
Operation Warp Speed (OWS) kicked off the day the sequence for the NIH-Moderna-DARPA mRNA ‘vaccine’ product was completed: 13 January 2020.

This was a full week before the first ‘case’ was ‘detected’ in the United States.

On 20 January 2020 - the date the first U.S. ‘Covid case’ was announced - the key note address to 800 attendees at a joint Defense-and-Homeland-Security Industry Day on the future of “rapid response” medical countermeasures (MCMs) to ‘outbreaks' included this amazingly-prescient take by JPEO-CBRN Defense senior official, Dr Jason Roos.

"Right now if we want to develop a medical countermeasure, it's you're talking years to decades is the track record. […]

Let's get down to months and eventually work towards that target of weeks to days.

… And in this construct we have a lot of capabilities already developed throughout the federal government with industry."

It’s also worth remembering that…

President Trump was Commander-in-Chief of Operation Warp Speed



Related: The major “International MCM Stakeholders” - since before COVID - are US Government Defense and Health agencies.



Also noteworthy is the issue of so-called ‘emergency management’ — before the ‘vaccine solution’ arrived…

President Trump “gave the order” for Homeland Security to lead the “national coronavirus response” - in keeping with DoD joint military doctrine - on 18 March 2020

This Presidential decision - said to be a departure from all existing pandemic plans where HHS was Lead Federal Agency - was consistent with the Pentagon’s framework for Domestic Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Response. ...

In mid 2023, Senator Malcolm Roberts referred to COVID as “a military operation” and - after highlighting Australia’s membership in the US-led Chemical-Biological-Radiological Defense Cooperative Program since 2012 - remarked…

“Who knew we had a military-pharmaceutical apparatus linking the United States, Australia, Canada and the UK…?”

Senator Roberts described the American-led arrangement as “an AUKUS for pandemics” - (comparing the multinational military-industrial rackets for ‘vaccines’ and submarines) - and explicitly asked regarding the rollout of the “military-pharmaceutical plan”:

“Did anyone in this country [Australia] accept orders from the United States military…?”

The Senator detailed the various domestic military COVID operations run by members of the US defense-led medical countermeasures consortium including Canada and the UK as well as Australia - “locking people in their homes” - and said that all of this intentionally created…

“… a climate of fear and intimidation that facilitated acceptance of the COVID injection.”

"… the public health response was not a… was not about public health. It was about, it was a militarized and monetized response. It was a pretense for clamping down totalitarian controls.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr - May 2023 "

(Why has Trump’s pick for HHS Secretary gone quiet about totalitarianism??)

Senator Roberts expressed a similar view in his parliamentary speech a few months later, emphasizing…

“[COVID-19] was never about health. It was about control of people…”

Because it was never about health. It was about control of people and wealth transfer using deceit.

Deceit that’s inhuman. Monstrously inhuman.

Senator Malcolm Roberts - 8 August 2023 ...

Five years after the start of the COVID event, President Trump has returned to office.

There has been no refutation by him of ‘the COVID response’ in the US or elsewhere, and he continues to promote Operation Warp Speed as a success.

What we need is transparency from ‘the Leader of the Free World’ about the transnational totalitarian COVID operation that took place on his watch.

Australian Government Adopts Mandatory Sentences for Hate Crimes and Terror Offenses
Labor reverses stance under opposition pressure, introducing minimum penalties to address antisemitism and hate speech concerns.

Three years after it became universally acknowledged that Covid vaccines provide negligible protection against infection and transmission, the Australian Federal Police (AFP) has finally dropped its Covid vaccine mandate. ...

But though the mandates are now over, AFP employees pushed out of the job are still living with the effects. Former officers describe feeling “shunned” and “treated like a criminal” by the AFP, with the loss of their careers, livelihoods, and homes taking a devastating toll.

But though the mandates are now over, AFP employees pushed out of the job are still living with the effects. Former officers describe feeling “shunned” and “treated like a criminal” by the AFP, with the loss of their careers, livelihoods, and homes taking a devastating toll.

Australian Gov't Abused Human Rights During COVID-19 Pandemic: Australian Human Rights Commission

"Federal, state and territory governments did not adequately consider or protect people's human rights when implementing pandemic response measures."

Australia’s own Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has issued a damning verdict on the country’s pandemic response, confirming what many Australians already knew: government policies during COVID-19 caused catastrophic harm to human rights and disproportionately devastated the nation’s most vulnerable.

Regarding its new 260-page report Collateral Damage, the AHRC declares:

“Federal, state and territory governments did not adequately consider or protect people’s human rights when implementing pandemic response measures.”

The findings, based on over 5,000 personal stories and consultations, point to one conclusion: Australia’s pandemic response wasn’t just overreach—it was systemic abuse.

“The pandemic response saved lives, but it also came at a significant cost, with some Australians feeling they were overlooked in the nation’s push to contain COVID-19.”

If this is what Australia’s own Human Rights Commission admits, how many other governments around the world are guilty of committing the same—or even worse—abuses in the name of public health?

Australian Man Brutalized by Police For Not Wearing Mask During COVID Lockdown Has Died

An Australian man whose violent arrest during Melbourne’s COVID lockdowns drew international outrage has died—years after suffering traumatic injuries when police slammed his head into the pavement...

An Australian man whose violent arrest during Melbourne’s COVID lockdowns drew international outrage has died—years after suffering traumatic injuries when police slammed his head into the pavement because he wasn’t wearing a mask.

Daniel Peterson-English was thrown headfirst into the ground by a police officer at Flinders Street Station in 2021—an incident caught on video that sparked international outrage.

The disturbing footage showed Acting Sergeant Beau Barrett approaching Peterson-English from behind and slamming him to the pavement with brutal force.

Acting Sergeant Beau Barrett was charged with recklessly causing injury and assault following the 2021 incident, which occurred on the same day as a large anti-lockdown protest in Melbourne’s CBD. Despite the graphic nature of the footage, the case against Barrett was ultimately dismissed.

Now, three and a half years later, the man at the centre of that disturbing arrest—32-year-old Daniel Peterson-English—has died.

According to Sydney-based lawyer and filmmaker Mark Tarrant, Daniel’s mother, Margaret, confirmed her son passed away on March 15. She described him as a “fragile young man totally abused by the state,” whose life was irreversibly altered by the trauma he endured.

A coroner’s report will be released in June.

News.com.au report: In the disturbing footage of Mr Peterson-English’s arrest, the 32-year-old’s head could be heard hitting the hard floor and a pair of headphones were knocked off.

According to a caption written by the woman who initially posted the video, the man was knocked unconscious and there was “blood and urine everywhere”.

“This poor guy was calm, he was just talking to the police,” the caption said.

“You can see it in the video then he gets thrown to the ground. You can hear his face hit the tiles.”

The woman later told news.com.au the man was unconscious “for a while” and when he woke up was calling for his mother.

“We are all very disturbed by this and I’ve been inundated with people worldwide wanting to know if this man is all right,” she said.

“We understand the paramedics looked at him but not sure what happened after that.”

Before he was tackled to the ground, Mr Peterson-English was arrested, fined for not wearing a mask, and released, The Age reported. The tackle occurred after he returned to the area,the publication reported.

Australia quietly pivots on Covid-19 vaccine policy

It didn’t come with a press conference or a media blitz. In fact, there was no announcement at all.

But sometime around 2 May 2025, the Australian Department of Health quietly removed its recommendation for Covid-19 vaccination in healthy children and adolescents under 18.

The change was tucked into an online update to the Australian Immunisation Handbook—no headline, no ministerial statement, no media campaign to inform the public.

For the first time since the rollout began, Australian health authorities now say that unless a child has underlying medical conditions, he or she does not need the vaccine. ...

Denmark, meanwhile, was ahead of the curve.

It stopped recommending the vaccine for healthy children back in 2022, citing data showing that severe Covid in children was exceedingly rare and that the benefits of mass vaccination did not outweigh the harms.

Australia’s policy reversal might be late, but what makes it striking is how quietly it was done—and how much it implicitly concedes.

For years, anyone who questioned the need to vaccinate healthy children was dismissed as anti-science or dangerous. Now, the same authorities who widely promoted the shots are quietly walking it back.

And the adverse events that critics raised early on—myocarditis, pericarditis, and other post-vaccine complications—are no longer fringe concerns. They’re acknowledged in official risk assessments.

The shift also comes at a time when the legal and regulatory framework that enabled the rapid approval of mRNA vaccines is under growing scrutiny. ...

The argument that urgency justified shortcuts has worn thin.

The real emergency now is institutional—one of captured regulators, collapsing public trust, and a health system so entangled with the pharmaceutical industry it can no longer tell the difference between evidence and marketing.

In a major policy reversal, the Australian government has finally admitted that mRNA “vaccines” are more harmful to healthy young people than the COVID-19 virus itself.

In a quietly released but momentous update, the Australian government has officially reversed its Covid “vaccination” policy for children and teens.

The government is now stating that healthy individuals under 18 should not receive the mRNA injection, citing potential risks that outweigh any alleged benefit.

According to the Australian Department of Health, as of June 3, 2025:

“COVID-19 vaccine is not recommended for healthy infants, children, or adolescents who do not have medical conditions that increase their risk of severe illness.”

The advisory goes further, explaining that because of the “extremely low” risk of serious Covid illness in healthy children:

“The benefits of vaccination are not considered to outweigh the potential harms.”

Anti-immigration rallies held across Australia as clashes break out in Adelaide and Melbourne

Anti-immigration rallies have been held across the nation's capital cities, with counter-demonstrations also organised across the country.

Scuffles have broken out at rallies in Adelaide and Melbourne.

In Melbourne, anti-immigration protesters and attendees of a pro-Palestine rally clashed in the CBD.

The Australian government has started rolling out a new test for its integrated digital ID framework as the country pushes to expand its national identity systems.

Governments worldwide continue tightening their grip on citizens through expanding digital identity systems. ...

The federal government has launched a new digital ID trial in the rental sector at the same time officials prepare to impose national online age-verification requirements by the end of the year. ...

Combined with the new rental initiative, critics warn that Australia is building the foundation for a centralized digital identity system capable of authenticating and tracking users across multiple areas of life, from renting a home to banking to accessing content online.

The more interconnected these systems become, the easier it is for governments and corporations to monitor individuals, control access to services, and collect data across sectors.

The more interconnected these systems become, the easier it is for governments and corporations to monitor individuals, control access to services, and collect data across sectors.

On Wednesday, Australia implemented a world-first law banning under-16s from holding social media accounts, deactivating more than 1 million accounts across 10 platforms including Facebook and TikTok.

Citing child welfare concerns, Australian officials argued the law aims to protect children, with the Australian federal parliament passing the bill in last year, following a study on social media use.