Comments 1 - 39 of 39 Search these comments
How Amish Communities Achieved “Herd Immunity” Without Higher Death Rates, Lockdowns, Masks, Or Vaccines
The Facts:
Amish communities of thousands in Lancaster, PA chose to not lockdown and instead went on with life in 2020.
Their communities were infected by COVID but death rates were not any higher than other places.
They lived life normally, did not wear masks and stuck to their values and culture. ...
What is clear is, there is no evidence that there was any more death amongst the Amish than in any place that shut down their economies, wore masks, and were vaccinated. The Amish took an approach they thought of, felt good about, and that aligned with the community – an approach grounded in self reliance and self responsibility. This as opposed to taking orders from government.
The good news for the Amish in this community is that natural immunity has been shown to be very robust time and time again. With the latest data indicating it is the best protection against re-infection and severe disease.
Amish farm under threat from U.S. federal govt for refusal to abandon traditional farming practices
Amos Miller, the farm's owner, contends that he’s preparing food the way God intended — but the United States government doesn’t see things that way.
What is clear is, there is no evidence that there was any more death amongst the Amish than in any place that shut down their economies, wore masks, and were vaccinated.
Patrick says
What is clear is, there is no evidence that there was any more death amongst the Amish than in any place that shut down their economies, wore masks, and were vaccinated.
As time goes on, I think it will become clear that among the Amish, they will have done better than any place that shut down their economies, wore masks, and were vaccinated.
richwicks says
Patrick says
What is clear is, there is no evidence that there was any more death amongst the Amish than in any place that shut down their economies, wore masks, and were vaccinated.
As time goes on, I think it will become clear that among the Amish, they will have done better than any place that shut down their economies, wore masks, and were vaccinated.
Don't even have to be Amish. Get the flying fuck out of cities would and has been my tip. Preferably some place with 5k or less population if you still want some basic amenities, but non-big box amenities like a Walmart or Target. Those are best 20-30 minutes away one way. Pain for some, and I know users here dislike Amazon, but it's amazing in the country/rural. Actually 2k or under would be better population w...
You guys in urban areas need to get rural. You will thank me.
Hey, if you like beer, Germany really does have the best in the world. And some great mountains in the south.
The problem is I drink shitty beer.
Mediterranean countries maybe. Greece for sure, maybe Spain. I generally don't like people, but most Europeans, from Europeans I've encountered are pure shit and ass holes.
The problem is I drink shitty beer.
Real Ale, not Lagers.
You should really do something about that.
He actually through this found out he can't drink he favorite beer. Wheat/glutton or whatever allergy.
I only say shitty beer too because people are snobs about it. I also need to stick with light beer in all honesty. I can have 3-4 of those and feel fine the next day, but heavy beers I feel like shit, even if I like the taste.
Don't have to go to Germany to get German beer.
Amish communities rejected Covid vaccines, refused to wear masks, and went about their normal daily activities while the rest of America was turned upside-down.
According to the CDC and mainstream media, the Amish were set to suffer from excess death due to Covid. In reality, the exact opposite happened.
The mainstream media will not touch this story because it completely dismantles the entire establishment narrative. It shows that all the COVID interventions were completely unnecessary.
While mainstream America was suffering through lockdowns, school closures and mask-related madness, the Amish returned to normal in May 2020. Read that again.
The Amish achieved herd immunity before the vaccines were even available.
Even if the vaccine worked and was safe, there was simply no reason for them to take the vaccine because 90% had already been infected in 2020. Taking a vaccine after you’ve already got natural immunity is nonsensical and counterproductive. However, in the US, we were told to get the vaccine even if we recovered from COVID. Many people lost their livelihoods if they did not comply. ...
This all happened because voices of reason were silenced. Free speech, debate, etc. was tossed out the window. Any doctor who stood against the “consensus” was crushed into oblivion.
The leaders of America need to stop listening to the people they trusted, and start listening to the people they labeled “misinformation spreaders.” They got it completely backwards.
You should never trust the CDC, mainstream media, or members of Congress again until they admit their mistakes, vow never to support censorship again, and always listen to people on both sides of an issue before making a decision.
Obligatory:
Unrated scene from the movie "Sex Drive" - not in the normal version of this movie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vz40dXTASDA
The answer is obvious though. It is clear that the Amish are behind COVID and the vaccine. Their depopulation and Amishification plan is full speed ahead.
1999 was the last good year.
So, you look at the Amish. I did the calculation. Let’s say there were five Amish people — because people say, I think there were maybe a few, or maybe there were five Amish people. And then I asked them, okay, can you name them? And nobody can name them.
But let’s say that we could name them — and there were five Amish people who died. That means the Amish died at a rate 90 times lower than the infection fatality rate of the United States of America. The Amish died at 90 times lower rate from COVID than America — than the rest of America.
Now, how is that possible? It’s possible because the Amish aren’t vaccinated. And because the Amish didn’t follow a single guideline of the CDC. They did not lock down. They did not mask. They did not social distance, They did not vaccinate, and there were no mandates in the Amish community to get vaccinated. They basically ignored every single guideline that the CDC gave us. Ignoring those guidelines meant a death rate 90 times lower than the rest of America.
So you talk about taking guidance from the WHO? Why don’t we copy what works? In fact, wouldn’t it be great to say in the next pandemic that Pennsylvania will take guidance from the Amish instead of the WHO? And you will be much, much better off.
The U.S. Supreme Court today reversed a lower court decision against a group of Amish parents and school leaders who challenged the state of New York’s vaccine mandates for schools, ruling that the appeals court must reconsider the case.
Today’s ruling is a win for health and religious freedom advocates — one that could have implications for other states that don’t allow religious exemptions from school vaccine mandates, attorneys said.
Attorney Sujata Gibson told The Defender today’s Supreme Court decision is “checkmate” for states that refuse to accept religious exemptions. “It means we’re almost certainly getting the religious exemption back, not only in New York, but across the country,” Gibson said.
Today’s decision stems from a lawsuit filed on June 2, 2023, against the New York State Department of Health and New York State Education Department, alleging they violated the U.S. Constitution by preventing the plaintiffs from exercising their religion.
Attorney Aaron Siri filed the suit on June 2, 2023, seeking injunctive relief.
💉 Yesterday, far-left Slate Magazine ran a story with the distraught headline, “The Supreme Court Just Gave Anti-Vax Parents an Alarming Win. For everyone who’s been waiting impatiently for the Supreme Court to weigh in on vaccines— well, it’s beginning. ...
Slate called the Court’s terse, procedural order —which didn’t actually rule onanything— “incredibly alarming,” “reckless,” “dangerous,” “a public health catastrophe,” and literally ten thousand times worse than Hitler on his grumpiest day.
The case before the Court on Monday was Miller v. McDonald, a lawsuit brought by parents of several New York schoolchildren and three Amish schools. It challenged a 2019 New York law that deleted all religious exemptions to school vaccine requirements, which in New York extend to private and parochial schools as well as public schools. (Recently, New York fined the Amish schools about $40,000 each for a single day’s defiance of the vaccine mandates.)
The plaintiffs, unsurprisingly, argued that the state’s non-exemptible vaccine mandates violated their First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion.
💉 The federal district court denied the plaintiffs’ claims, finding that the state did not trample their religious freedoms, and the mandates were necessary to achieve “herd immunity” (which, by the way, is a utilitarian synonym for “net benefit;” see above). The Second Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the district court, and the plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court.
On Monday, the Supreme Court issued a two-sentence order, written by Justice Alito, that vacated the Second Circuit’s decision and sent the case back down to the original district court along with an instruction to re-consider the New York law in light of an earlier decision: a terrific case that issued only a few months ago in June, captioned Mahmoud v. Taylor. ...
💉 The Mahmoud case —also written by Justice Alito (for the majority)— held that public school parents have a constitutional right to exempt their children from exposure to LGBTQ+ and trans materials. ...
Slate —not at all prone to hysterical overreaction— complained the Mahmoud decision was “destabilizing” to public education because it “gave” religious parents “veto power” over offensive curriculum that “they disliked.” But Justice Alito took an extremely broad view of parents’ freedom “to direct the religious upbringing of their children.”
So you can imagine how spooked Slate that Justice Alito told the lower court to apply Mahmoud to the vaccine case. “If Mahmoud applies to immunization mandates,” Slate wailed, “as the court implied it does—then parents may have a constitutional right to send their children to any school, public or private, without having them vaccinated.”
Oh, no! Not that! Not personal choice about medical interventions!
It’s a jab-apocalypse.
💉 Forty-six states offer some degree of religious exemption to school vaccine mandates, with varying levels of requirements to qualify. In Florida, for instance, parents just check a box on a form, which is available online. (They need only do it once per child, forever.) Only four states, including New York and California, ban religious exemptions entirely, and life is flat miserable for many parents and children in those states.
Two painful types of vaccine mandates survived the pandemic. One is this school mandate, especially in the four defiant states. The other is the healthcare mandate, which requires hospital and nursing home staff to get annual flu and covid shots.
Well, guess what?
Also on Monday, the Supreme Court asked the DOJ to weigh in on a case brought by nurses challenging New York’s similar covid jab requirement for healthcare workers, which also lacks any religious exemption.
It appears the Supreme Court is considering all vaccine mandates, not just school ones.
There are more 9-0 Supreme Court decisions that uphold the First Amendment right to free exercise of religion than any other issue; maybe even more than all the other 9-0 decisions combined.
So, in one week, we have:
The FDA is investigating covid jab deaths in kids and adults, shocking the media;
The CDER is pressuring makers of RSV shots designed for infants for more safety data, which is apparently difficult for them to easily provide; and
The Supreme Court is signaling it will likely confirm religious-based vaccine exemptions for both kids and adults throughout the country.
Look how far we’ve come! Not so long ago, the Supreme Court would have, like Justice Jackson cried, deferred to “credentialled experts” in the so-called sciences. But they’re not deferring now, Jack.
The pseudo-scientific jab defenders —the white-coat pretenders— and their pharma allies are finally being swamped by a tsunami of reason and common sense.
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,352,013 comments by 15,725 users - KgK one, Maga_Chaos_Monkey, mell, Tenpoundbass, zzyzzx online now