patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,260,169 comments by 15,050 users - DOGEWontAmountToShit, FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden, Tenpoundbass online now
Jacobson V. Massachusetts SCOTUS decision (from 1905)
invite response
2021 Oct 23, 12:28pm 517 views 3 comments
Comments 1 - 3 of 3 Search these comments
1
RWSGFY
2021 Oct 23, 4:39pm
RWSGFY
2021 Oct 23, 4:39pm
"Punish me according to the precedent set by Jacobson v. Massachusetts!"
2
AmericanKulak
2021 Oct 23, 9:36pm
AmericanKulak
2021 Oct 23, 9:36pm
Funny how a penumbra of privacy extends to baby killing, but not getting jabbed with an experimental medical treatment.
3
Reality
2021 Oct 23, 9:46pm
The SCOTUS let stand the MA vaccination law at the time only after noting the MA vaccination law allowed easy way out ($5 fine); the change in definition of "vaccine" and "vaccination" in recent years made that decision no longer valid precedence: what if "vaccine"/"vaccination" is redefined as speedy chunk of lead to the head? i.e. mandatory depopulation? Obviously that would no longer be a matter of state police power but contravene with basic constitutional guarantee of individual rights.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/197/11/
But this is actually NOT the case, its a clear attempt at disinformation. SCOTUS decided that the state gov't CAN order forced-vaccination OR the individual must pay a $5 fine ($155 in today's dollars) should he choose not to comply. I would rather the pay $155 penalty and left the fuck alone, never to hear of it ever again, not to lose my job, nor be segregated, nor be barred from places of public accommodation, etc. than to have to deal with the constant screeching BS peer-pressure campaign let alone take the jab.