patrick.net

What I really think about YouTube's new rules by Annette Bosworth, MD

💉 You’ll enjoy the latest mea culpa from a formerly pro-vaccine healthcare professional-slash-social media influencer. Annette Bosworth, MD, also known as “Dr. Boz,” has a popular YouTube channel (600,000 subscribers) and website focusing on the health benefits of keto dieting and intermittent fasting. It seems like a great channel and I subscribed. Dr. Boz normally covers wellness topics like shopping for a good blood glucose monitor, breaking carb addiction, comparing exercise to intermittent fasting, and things like that.

So it must have shocked many of her subscribers when three days ago she named her most recent YouTube stream, “The biggest crime in the history of medicine.”




https://www.youtube.com/live/v3N-uFfvU5s?si=0NmJn2SJZIWKmPCq

That’s quite a title for a pro-vaccine doctor. And it quickly became Dr. Boz’s highest-watched YouTube ever. But within 12 hours, YouTube de-monetized the show, which was a new experience for the influential advocate. Two days ago, she published a short follow-up video trying to figure out what YouTube terms she violated. She was astounded that discussing a peer-reviewed paper could get her punished at this stage of the pandemic.

But let’s focus on her original video. It began with a bang:

"I am really excited about tonight’s show. (Wryly) I have been putting this off. I have been wrong. And I have seen lots of you out there and I have personal friends out there that have been telling me I was wrong, and I would much rather avoid this conversation and not do this at all, but … you were right."

Dr. Boz explained that it was the relentless pressure of subscriber’s jab comments — comments she pretended to ignore but actually noticed — that kept her attention secretly on the science related to the vaccines.

Then she introduced Dr. McCullough’s (and five other authors including Jessica Rose and Steve Kirsch) latest 40-page, peer-reviewed article that published in the Cureus open-access journal on January 24th. The study was neutrally-titled, “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign.” Here’s how she described the study:

“This is a peer-reviewed article. If you’re like me, you’re not going to want to believe it. I don’t WANT to believe this. I’m so irritated by this article. This is a difficult thing for me to talk about. The dozen peers who reviewed this paper took two and a half months to cross-check and verify everything they said. I’m just going to point out a few things that made me sleepless. During the pandemic, we broke some of the rules to serve the public. One of the rules was this emergency use act.”

For regular C&C readers, there isn’t anything particularly surprising in the McCullough paper, which methodically and professionally walked through all the issues we currently know about, starting with the statistical tricks that Pfizer and Moderna employed in their early clinical trials to exaggerate the benefits and whitewash the risks, and then tackled thornier issues such as why the jabs are actually genetic therapies and are not actually vaccines. It was the carefully-documented way the authors addressed these problems that finally penetrated Dr. Boz’s cognitive defenses:

“I knew (the vaccine) came with some risks, but until this paper, I didn’t really appreciate it. The (biggest) problem with the vaccines is, there was no off-switch. This is a problem … when you trust the scientific process is being (properly) used, when there needs to be an exception to the rules (like EUA), you don’t just break every single rule there is… If you’re like me, when you get to the end of this article, you ask yourself: what did we say ‘yes’ to?”

Ultimately, the unyielding weight of McCullough’s data and logical analysis pressed Dr. Boz to self-reflect. She started by explaining how Pfizer and Moderna were able to conclude efficacy and safety only because they’d restricted it to healthy trial participants aged 18-55. Later she combined all these issues — the lack of a spike shut-off, the obviously faked trials, and Dr. McCullough’s carefully-documented findings of spike protein in the heart muscles of autopsied sudden-death patients — Dr. Boz took all of that and clearly experienced a painful change of heart:

Until you start looking at the autopsies and start wondering: what part in this did I play? And… first of all, how do ya say, I’m sorry to all of ya’ll who’ve been putting comments in my videos for like, a year, (saying), ‘hey take a look at this!’ And I just said (to myself), okay, they’re just chirpin’ again. But you were right.

And worse, the loss of trust! I was in a class (last year), and everybody was like, I don’t think we should take ANY shots anymore, and I was SHOCKED. Even for flu or shingles. They asked, but can we trust these OTHER vaccinations? And I said, of COURSE you can.

But now, it’s hard for me to say that. How long will it take before the World will trust – before I will trust — what they’re telling me. And … what was MY part in it? How could’ve I been more …. I mean, I had MY kids vaccinated. I had all of the people I loved vaccinated. And when you look back and say hey, look at what it did — especially to the kids … um … anyway (trails off).

When it comes down to it, I was wrong. I don’t know that it gets worse than telling all my patients, get the vaccination, get the vaccination, get the vaccination. (Sighs) Okay, let’s move on to something easier to talk about than my continued failures…

There’s plenty more in the video. To keep it a manageable length, I omitted several other interesting parts, like where Dr. Boz explained how trusted gatekeepers like herself were manipulated into towing the party line and not asking questions. As I said, you’ll enjoy hearing the thought process of a proud pro-vaccine doctor being convinced to humble herself and make a public apology.

What we don’t see though are all the doctors and health professionals who aren’t social media influencers like Dr. Boz, but who also have been convinced by Dr. McCullough’s careful, thoughtful, peer-reviewed article. Dr. McCullough is another one we should be grateful for. I’m not minimizing the contributions of the other authors, but Dr. McCullough was the most-published cardiologist in history. He knows a lot about how to get papers peer-reviewed and published, even regarding controversial topics.

In one of the most dramatic live U-Turns ever, Dr. Annette Bosworth, affectionately known by her legion of followers as Dr. Boz, has ventured into the point of no return concerning the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Through a video boldly titled “The biggest crime in the history of medicine,” Dr. Boz channels her inner whistleblower to dissect what she portrays as the many failings and misconceptions shrouding these vaccines gene therapies—a narrative that unfolds against the backdrop of a recently retracted (ahem… censored), yet initially peer-reviewed article.

Anyway, I condensed 8 key moments from the clip into a 4.5-minute video running at 1.5x speed so you don’t have to watch the whole 54 minutes or read a 40 page peer reviewed paper! Here are the important points (Full clip on youtube available here, and in case YouTube brings it down, I’m sharing the full one at the end of this article)

Gene Therapy in Disguise?
"And it really makes me nervous once you see what this...never have I seen bias play out like this at this degree...it should have been called gene therapy product." Dr. Boz doesn't mince her words here. She lays bare the misnomer that has potentially misled millions. By revealing the true nature of these so-called vaccines as gene therapy, she challenges the foundation upon which public acceptance was built.

There’s no Off Switch!
"The problem with what they were playing with is there is no off switch for this. In a vaccination, your immunity rises and then falls, and your body's done. With this, there's no mechanism built into our bodies that has the ability to turn it off." Dr. Boz articulates a fundamental flaw in the vaccine's design: it's a one-way ticket with no return journey. The unceasing nature of this genetic engagement raises pertinent questions about long-term health implications.

Contaminated DNA
"They found an enormous amount of DNA particles...What the hell is DNA doing in a vaccination that is supposed to be for the protein production to fight off this virus?...it disrupts the existing natural genetic sequence." Dr. Boz highlights the staggering discovery of contamination within the vaccine vials. This revelation not only casts a shadow over manufacturing processes but also introduces an element of genetic roulette with uncertain stakes.

Spike Proteins in Autopsies of Vaccinated Hearts
"The spike proteins are found in the cells of human heart...not supposed to be inside us at all." This stark disclosure by Dr. Boz uncovers the alarming presence of spike proteins in cardiac tissues of the vaccinated, a phenomenon that was neither intended nor expected. It's a testament to the unpredictable nature of these vaccines, stirring grave concerns about their safety profile.

Playing with Statistics
"They played games to have this bias towards the favorability of the vaccination." Here, Dr. Boz condemns the manipulation of clinical trial data, exposing how the framework of these studies was twisted to favor positive outcomes. This manipulation erodes the foundation of trust and calls into question the integrity of the scientific process.

Killing 27 people to “save” 2 people.
"52,000 vaccinations would be needed in order to prevent one Covid-19 death...yet we see that we have 27 deaths per 100,000 in the same batch of injections because of adverse events." Dr. Boz compellingly illustrates the disproportion between risk and reward, challenging the narrative that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the costs. This staggering statistic illuminates a grim picture of vaccine efficacy and safety.

Pregnancy and the Vaccine
"And they recommended it in pregnancy when they knew that absolutely not one single subject in the trial was pregnant...I think that's just egregious." The ethical implications of recommending the vaccine to pregnant women without solid trial data are profound. Dr. Boz's astonishment is palpable, echoing concerns about the lack of transparency and due diligence in these recommendations.

Regret and Call for Awareness
"I had all of my kids vaccinated. I had all of the people I loved vaccinated...look at what it did to especially the kids." Dr. Boz reflects on her own decisions to vaccinate her family and loved ones based on the information she had at the time. Her regret is a powerful testament to the complex and evolving nature of our understanding of the vaccines, underscoring the importance of ongoing critical review and honest discourse.

Oh, and finally, check out how she was demonetized by YouTube after her rant!

A leading cardiologist has raised the alarm over the devastating side effects of Covid mRNA shots, warning he has “never witnessed such harm from a therapeutic intervention.”

Dr. Dean Patterson is a world-renowned consultant cardiologist based in Guernsey.

Patterson is also a Fellow of the prestigious Royal College of Physicians.

After witnessing the shocking “harm” caused to his patients, the esteemed heart specialist has penned a letter to the CEO of the General Medical Council (GMC).

He is urging for an investigation into the unprecedented damages caused by the COVID-19 mRNA injections. ...

“In my 33 years of medical practice, I have never witnessed such harm from a therapeutic intervention.

“In the first year of the rollout, I diagnosed 20 patients with myocarditis and 15 cases of pericarditis, including one death (42-year-old) and another who required an ICD (79-year-old male),” he revealed.

In the 16 years prior to now, the doctor would typically diagnose 2-3 cases of myocarditis per year, with serious cases occurring only once every 3-4 years. ...

Meanwhile, mainstream cardiologists and scientists continue to blame Covid infection as the cause for the harm he is seeing.

However, Patterson says he did not diagnose a single case of post-Covid myocarditis prior to the vaccine rollout in Guernsey.

The warning from Patterson has emerged after Slay News recently reported on a disturbing secret report from the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The CDC report shows a staggering half a million American children and young adults have been killed by Covid shots.

Almost 500,000 Americans aged between 0 and 44 years old died from the dangerous side effects of the Covid mRNA injections between the start of the public rollout of the shots in early 2021 and October 9, 2022, the CDC report reveals.

However, the shocking revelations from the report have been completely ignored by the corporate media – the same outlets that told the public the vaccines were “safe and effective.”

A leading cardiologist has raised the alarm over the devastating side effects of Covid mRNA shots, warning he has “never witnessed such harm from a therapeutic intervention.”

Last week, Dr Dean Patterson wrote to the Chair of the Executive Board of the General Medical Council (GMC) in the UK, supporting Dr Aseem Malhotra’s calls for an investigation into unprecedented harms from the Covid-19 vaccines. ...

He believes that the medical establishment appears to be blind to the harm and is concerned that medical practice itself will be irreparably damaged by the fallout from the mishandling of the Covid vaccine side effects.

I am a, I'm a pediatric hospitalist. I worked for St. Luke Hospital network and I spoke on 69 News against this very mandate. And it aired at 6 o'clock news and 3 hours later I was told not to come back to the hospital ever again because I spoke up against the mandate.

During morning rounds in the hospital I was asked by my colleagues, are you really going to take a stand for this? Are you going to risk losing everything you worked for? You loved teaching medical students and residents, is that worth the risk? You're going to, are you going to die on this hill of a vaccine?

And at that time, right in our little nursery, during morning rounds, I said, no, I'm not willing to die on the hill of a vaccine, but I am willing to die on the hill of liberty.

THE DOCTORS ARE SPEAKING OUT!

original link

Mirror:
Ireland Doctors: The Dangers Of Injecting Children With COVID-19 Vaccines
https://rumble.com/vm3g8h-ireland-doctors-the-dangers-of-injecting-children-with-covid-19-vaccines.html

TRACEY O'MAHONEY, BARRISTER AT LAW: This video is sponsored by the Irish Council for Human Rights. In this presentation you will hear from prominent Irish doctors expressing their concerns about the potential dangers of administering this experimental vaccine to children. Please watch and listen carefully.

[cut]

TEXT ON SCREEN: Dr Michael McConville GP 39 years medical experience

DR. MICHAEL MCCONVILLE GP: Thousands of doctors and scientists worldwide have studied the mountains of data now currently available about covid 19. These professionals have sincere and grave concerns about the mainstream story of this disease. To follow the science, we need first to debate the science. We need to disagree and challenge each other with the evidence so that we might find the truth. Unfortunately, social media and mainstream media censor alternative interpretations of the evidence, so that you, the people, cannot participate in the debate, and are thus poorly informed.

[cut]

TEXT ON SCREEN: Dr Gerry Waters GP 44 years medical experience

DR. GERRY WATERS GP: At the start of the covid 19 vaccination campaign, Acting Chief Medical Officer Dr. Ronan Glynn [2] stated that they'd had no information to impart to those administering the vaccines regarding efficacy, transmission, length of protection, side effects, or need for boosters. The vaccinators in turn had no real information to pass on to the people they were vaccinating. There is no possibility of informed consent in the absence of information. Nine months later they have some information on the important elements of the vaccine and, as result of this information, in a world where reason, honesty, and medical ethics held sway, the vaccination campaign would be terminated immediately, never mind extended to children.

[cut]

TEXT ON SCREEN: Dr Pat Morrissey GP 22 years of medical experience

DR. PAT MORRISSEY: The recent publication of Technical Briefing Number Twenty by Public Health England showed that 65% of those that died from covid were fully vaccinated. This means that the vaccine strategy is failing as the virus continues to evolve. This fact is corroborated by data from other highly vaccinated countries such as Iceland and Israel. These countries are experiencing surges in covid hospitalizations and deaths among those who are fully vaccinated. We must stop using these failing vaccines and instead focus on early treatment that works on all variants.

[cut]

TEXT ON SCREEN: Dr Martin Feeley Vascular Surgeon 45 years medical experience

DR. MARTIN FEELEY VASCULAR SURGEON: From March 2020 we have consistently been told to do the right thing. And the right thing for parents has always been to protect their children. We know that giving your child the covid vaccine does not prevent them from catching the virus and does not stop them transmitting the virus to others. So, in other words, there's no benefit to your child or indeed to anybody else. On the other hand, these vaccines are not without risks, some of which are really serious. It is clear that in vaccinating your children there is no potential for doing good and huge potential for doing harm. So how can you as a parent say you are doing the right thing for your child?

[cut]

TEXT ON SCREEN: Dr Billy Ralph GP 27 years medical experience

DR. BILLY RALPH GP: There are no benefits to young, healthy people from this vaccine. There are only risks. The risk of death from the vaccine is at least 4 times that of covid. The vaccines will not protect you from contracting the virus, nor will it prevent you from transmitting it, so you will not be protecting others. If you were taking it so that you can take part in society, ask yourself, when was the last time you had to undergo a medical procedure to go to the pub with a friend?

[cut]

TEXT ON SCREEN: Dr Vincent Caroll GP 30 years medical experience

3:38 DR. VINCENT CAROLL GP: If you are considering vaccinating your child against covid, have you really thought it through? Or are you reacting to bullying and peer pressure? According to the Medicines and Health Care Product Regulatory Agency, MHRA in the UK, the risk to your child of an adverse event is 8,000 times greater than any benefit. The science tells us that covid poses little or no risk to young, healthy people. Are you really prepared to expose your child to all the risk while getting none of the benefit? Usually in life we weigh up risk versus benefit and we do things because of a perceived benefit. But here there is no benefit, only risk to your child. So think hard.

[cut]

TEXT ON SCREEN: Dr Anne McCloskey GP 39 years medical experience

DR. ANNE MCCLOSKEY GP: The possible side effects of these injections can be divided into 3 groups, short term, medium term, and long term. Since they've only been in use for 8 months, obviously only the short term side effects have been seen in humans. But believe me, they are real. Look at the American VAERS or British MHRA data bases where the problems are being reported, and we know that this may only be the tip of the iceberg. Short term recorded side effects include death, anaphylaxis, strokes, heart attacks, pregnancy loss, nerve damage, clots, blindness, seizures, rashes, fatigue, and many others. The medium and long term effects obviously can't be quantified since there's no data yet, but are based on what we know about what we know about mRNA vaccines from previous animal experiments and from in vitro observations, that is, events seen in the laboratories. These include all of the problems I've already mentioned, and in addition things like infertility, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's and other forms of dementia, Parkinson's Disease, increased risk of cancers and premature death. Why would you risk this for your children when this virus will not harm them?

Tucker Carlson Says Doctors Should APOLOGIZE for Wrongly Recommending the COVID Vax

“If you hurt someone unintentionally, you have to say, ‘I’m sorry.’”

“By the way,” Carlson added, “I would never go to a doctor who was still lying about COVID because that’s a dangerous person. That’s an immoral person and a dangerous person.”

“I can’t get past it,” Carlson continued.

“It’s like, ‘Oh, I’m great at my job. I killed a bunch of people, but I’m a great person.’ It’s like, no, it’s too big a sin to overlook. You have no credibility unless you apologize for that and explain how you reached that wrong conclusion.”

Tucker Carlson Says Doctors Should APOLOGIZE for Wrongly Recommending the COVID Vax

“If you hurt someone unintentionally, you have to say, ‘I’m sorry.’”

“By the way,” Carlson added, “I would never go to a doctor who was still lying about COVID because that’s a dangerous person. That’s an immoral person and a dangerous person.”

“I can’t get past it,” Carlson continued.

“It’s like, ‘Oh, I’m great at my job. I killed a bunch of people, but I’m a great person.’ It’s like, no, it’s too big a sin to overlook. You have no credibility unless you apologize for that and explain how you reached that wrong conclusion.”

Tucker Carlson Says Doctors Should APOLOGIZE for Wrongly Recommending the COVID Vax

“If you hurt someone unintentionally, you have to say, ‘I’m sorry.’”

“By the way,” Carlson added, “I would never go to a doctor who was still lying about COVID because that’s a dangerous person. That’s an immoral person and a dangerous person.”

“I can’t get past it,” Carlson continued.

“It’s like, ‘Oh, I’m great at my job. I killed a bunch of people, but I’m a great person.’ It’s like, no, it’s too big a sin to overlook. You have no credibility unless you apologize for that and explain how you reached that wrong conclusion.”

Not sure this is true, but would not be surprised if it is.

Doctors received approximately $12.1 billion from drug and device makers between 2013–2022, study reveals

Despite evidence that financial conflicts of interest may influence medical practice and research and may erode patient trust in medical professionals, these relationships remain pervasive. According to a new analysis of the Open Payments platform, a database that tracks payments between physicians and industry, a team led by a Penn State researcher found that doctors received approximately $12.1 billion from drug and device makers between 2013 and 2022.

Their findings were published in JAMA. It's one of the first studies to look at industry payments longitudinally and by specialty. ...

The analysis showed that more than half of physicians received at least one payment, and roughly 94% of payments were associated with one or more marketed medical products. A small percentage of physicians received the largest amounts, often exceeding $1 million. Orthopedic surgeons received the greatest sum of payments, while pediatric surgeons received the least amount.

Why Do Doctors Give Up On Patients?
Exploring the Psychology Behind the Greatest Medical Disaster in History.

•In medicine, doctors will often assume there is nothing that can be done for their patients and then shift the blame to the patient (e.g., sorry you should have gotten vaccinated).

•I believe this lack of creativity is a product of the training doctors receive and a need to reinforce the mythology Modern Medicine rests upon (that it is the medical savior of the world).

•Since many of the existing (for-profit) treatments are unsafe and ineffective, it hence is critical for the medical industry to prevent doctors from looking into better alternatives.

•All of this was laid bare during COVID-19, where we saw the medical profession refuse to go against the orthodoxy, not treat a fairly manageable condition, and instead persecute those who were able to provide safe and effective treatments for COVID-19 (which competed with the vaccines).

•In this article, we will provide some documented examples of this mentality, review the psychology that gives rise to that abhorrent behavior, and cover some of what I found to be the safest and most effective treatments for COVID-19 (most of which did not require a prescription or doctor to obtain).

@DrJ_surgeon
Feb 8, 2023
After 3 years of reading hundreds of Covid studies, here is what I believe to be most likely:

1. Covid exists as a respiratory virus that started from the Wuhan lab as an infectious clone. It was spreading worldwide as early as the summer of 2019.
2. This coincided with ongoing mRNA research and this was the planned response to establish this technology platform for all future vaccinations.
3. Pressure was exerted to suppress all viable treatments to advance this agenda and obtain the EUA.
4. HCQ and Ivermectin work well when given early and as a multi-drug regimen. IVM likely has some utility in later stages of disease. Vit D, Zinc and other supplements help in patients with deficiency, given early or prophylactically.
5. Many elderly people and people with comorbidities died, due to lack of early treatment. Many of the early nursing home deaths were the result of lockdowns, over medication, dehydration, isolation and deaths of despair.
6. The rollout of vaccines caused waves of infections and deaths immediately after each dose, due to the 2-3 weeks of immunosuppression and adverse effects of the technology. There was a large variation in batches due to degradation of the mRNA, LNP and poor mRNA integrity.
7. The leaky vaccines led to accelerated viral convergent evolution of evading variants. This has prolonged the pandemic, resulting in failure to ever achieve a degree of herd immunity.
8. The mRNA vaccines probably prevented some severe Covid disease early in the pandemic, but these gains were offset by deaths from resulting increased infections and myocardial disease and other adverse events. They were never needed for healthy people.
9. Currently, I believe excess deaths are occurring due to the mRNA vaccines causing an immunological change causing T-cell exhaustion, IgG4 response and possible ADE with Covid infections. This is leading to a devastating systemic vascular and cardiovascular response.
10. The initial 2 doses of vaccine may have given T-cell immunity that is broad and longer lasting and protects against variants, but subsequent doses do nothing more and cause further problems. Accumulating spike protein could be a major concern.
11. Natural immunity has always given better immunity and still gives long lasting protection in most against severe disease.
12. A biomedical security state has been an underlying goal, with the establishment of vaccine digital passports. The ultimate failure of the vaccines has severely set back that goal.

A biomedical security state has been an underlying goal, with the establishment of vaccine digital passports. The ultimate failure of the vaccines has severely set back that goal.

US Senator Ron Johnson Holds Expert Panel On Federal Vaccine Mandates - Nov 2 2021
https://rumble.com/vu8wa4-us-senator-ron-johnson-holds-expert-panel-on-federal-vaccine-mandates.html

Aaron Siri https://www.sirillp.com/aaron-siri/
Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/

AARON SIRI, ESQ: Thank you, Senator Johnson, and thank you everybody for sharing their stories. I know it cannot be easy to do so. My firm of over 20 professionals has represented individuals injured by vaccines for many years and so we're very familiar with these heartbreaking stories and I empathize with every one of you.

While we've been doing, while we've been representing people for vaccine injury for quite a while, it wasn't until the covid 19 vaccine that the, our phones, emails, form submissions have reached an avalanche of submissions. If we could actually sue the pharmaceutical companies for all those injuries it would actually be humanly impossible for my firm or I think the collective efforts of all attorneys around the country to handle vaccine injury cases, which is about 100 attorneys right now, to handle all of those matters.

As things stand right now, you can't sue Pfizer or J & J or Moderna for any of the injuries. You can't bring a claim in the vaccine injury compensation program either. You are relegated to a program called CICP[1] which has a standard of proof that makes it almost impossible to obtain compensation, and even if you do prevail the amount of compensation is, is, is de minimus for the most part.

Among the folks that have contacted our firm are many physicians from across the country who themselves have suffered vaccine injuries. I've spoken to many of them and while their stories vary, their injuries vary, there are three common themes that they all convey.

The first one is that, and, and we heard a lot of you express the same here today, is that after they suffered an injury, they went to the very medical establishment that they work in to go and get treatment, and even though they themselves were physicians, the initial reaction they often got was one of, we don't believe you. Often they were told it was psychological, referred to counseling instead of treating the injuries that were being presented. And these are physicians!

A lot of times they had to go and go to physicians that they went to medical school with or who they had worked with, those colleagues who would believe them.

The other common theme is that they, for the most part, report that they submitted a VAERS[2] report. That they had to do it and often their physicians didn't. And that, after submitting the VAERS reports, like many of you, they expected a phone call that never came. And a lot of them explained how they then would take the initiative to directly contact the CDC or the FDA[3] or public health authorities themselves. And again it was either silence or, after an exchange of some nature, the end result was typically the same. Don't worry. VAERS is not seeing this safety problem, so it's not an issue. Nothing to see here. Your issue is not an issue because it's not an issue in VAERS.

2:53:14
One of the things that I often ask physicians who contact the firm is, will you publicly, will you make public the failing of our public health agencies. And that often has the same reaction as well. And that is one of immense fear. The fear of retaliation from public health officials and the medical establishment if they come forward with even their own story of their own injury, is palpable.

No physician agreed to go forward until, as you pointed out, Senator, Dr. Patricia Lee,[4] who herself was not injured by a vaccine, but as a matter of conscience she simply could no longer sit idly by after seeing a series of extraordinarily serious injuries after covid vaccinations. She did what every other physician should do. She reported those series of cases to VAERS. She was expecting that somebody would contact her. And nobody did.

And not just any cases. A young woman who's pregnant became paraplegic, lived just long enough to have her baby and died a month later. Two other young women who lost most of their small intestines. Incredibly devastating injuries. She waited for the call never came. And when it didn't come, she did what many of you did. She wrote a letter directly to the CDC and the FDA. [Holds up document] This letter right here. She sent it on September 28, 2021. It's publicly available. You can read what she sent them.[5]

She waited one day, two days, seven days. No response. On the 8th day my firm sent a letter asking the FDA and CDC, are you really go to ignore this mainstream pediatrician trained at Harvard and Georgetown medical centers who is telling you about serious injuries from this product?

They did respond to her eventually. And they even actually had a meeting with her. And what did they tell her? Nothing to see. There's no safety signal in VAERS so everything is fine.

The most incredible part of that meeting is after Dr. Patricia Lee relayed the stories in detail that would bring tears to most folks' eyes, she asked Dr. Marks[6] and the other 5 representatives from the FDA and CDC, do you have any questions?

[Siri pauses]

Exactly. That's exactly what she got. The silence that you hear. Until eventually, Dr. Marks did begin to speak and explained to her, VAERS is a wonderful system, and we're not seeing safety signals, everything's fine.

The act of bravery by Dr. Patricia Lee resulted in other physicians, or at least was the catalyst in other physicians and others reaching out to our firm with similar stories and now wanting and agreeing to go public.

On October 27, 2021 [holds up document] we sent this letter to the FDA, CDC, and NIH. And in this letter we attach 11 declarations from physicians detailing similar catastrophic injuries from covid 19 vaccines as detailed by Dr. Lee.[7]

We got a response. [holds up document][8] It's right here, and we've made it publicly available, you can find it. Not a single question about the injuries from our health authorities. The same retort. Everything's fine. VAERS says it's safe. Nothing to see here.

What I'd like to also to point out about these declarations is that most of the physicians, despite not being able to work anymore, despite they themselves being catastrophically injured, still would not put their names out publicly. Their declarations have their names and identities
redacted because even though they can't engage in their normal medical practice, they still have that palpable fear of retaliation from the medical profession and from public health authorities.

For those who did put their names out there, hopefully it will encourage other physicians, and that snowball will hopefully lead to recognition and that is what is the first step to addressing the injuries everybody has described here today.

Until public health authorities acknowledge these injuries, you can't seek treatment. And I would add that it's also why everybody sitting here today, all of the physicians and the medical professionals, PhDs who are attending here today are putting, they know, we know, they're putting their careers on the line to come here and do this. And, and, and I'm sure that everybody's deeply appreciative that you guys are doing that.

It should not be that any physician should have to, quote unquote, risk it all just to advocate for their patients. Thank you.

A top doctor has spoken out to reveal how he was arrested by police and put in a psych ward over allegations that his views about treating COVID-19 constituted “misinformation.”

Honestly, IMO, all the lily-livered doctors, lawyers and other figures of alleged importance aren’t worthy of his efforts but, as the good doctor says, like giving up smoking, it’s never to late to start using your spine!

Please listen to his message. For the sake of your children even if you don’t care about your own health or freedom.

Now that Dr. Miller has stabilized his new life, he has begun trying to become an effective whistleblower who can bring attention to exactly what happened during COVID-19 so that it does not happen again and has been working behind the scenes to help spearhead lawsuits against the COVID cartel. Recently, he sent me a poignant affidavit of his experiences...

He then related to me inaccurate representations about this allegedly powerful antiviral, specifically about the functionality and effectiveness of what was understood to be remdesivir, which was given to the hospital as compassionate use directly from the CDC... . This appeared to be part of an effort by the hospital administration, due to their relationship with the federal health agencies, to incite physicians in leadership to have misunderstandings about COVID therapies and their effectiveness and to have us expecting/waiting for a "magic" medicine that had immediate efficacy from the government. In practice, remdesivir did not have the positive effects I was told and was instructed to anticipate. ...

When I alerted these individuals that they were committing fraud, they indicated that it was not an accident and they would not be stopping their behavior. I reported the fraud to local then federal authorities in compliance with CMS/medicare mandates. Following this, the hospital administrators attempted to fabricate grounds to fire me, take action against my state license, and remove me from the medical community because I would not stay silent when I observed criminal behavior that was unethical and violative of the oaths, practices, and policies of appropriate healthcare. ...

On or about March 17, 2020, our hospital reached its inflection point for the COVID-19 pandemic. Which meant the numbers of COVID positive patients dying and admitted to the hospital were declining after this date and there was no longer an emergency. This was not reported publicly, instead the hospital leadership participated in fear propagation, artificially inflating their publicized numbers of COVID patients and COVID-caused deaths, and erroneously collecting federal aid for a problem that was not actually there. ...

At one point during the shift, myself and multiple other providers and nursing staff were sitting and drinking coffee at the nurses station because we had completed al the work there was to do at that time and no patients needed assistance. Whilst we were sitting at the nurses station, a news article was seen that had been published in a local newspaper indicating that the hospital, specifically our ICU, was overrun with a flurry of COVID-19 patients which was causing difficulties for the hospital's function. This was obviously the opposite of the truth as we were currently sitting in the ICU and it was only approximately 30% full. ...

I attest that on or about early November 2020, I consulted with our own on call infectious disease team regarding a young healthy female patient who had early onset COVID-19 symptoms who had been in a car crash. Aside from her fractures she was healthy and expected to have a complete recovery. According to the CDC recommendations and hospital policies, this patient was a perfect candidate to be given remdesivir. However, when I brought this case to the infectious disease physician, he indicated that my patient "seemed like a nice girl" and to therefore not give her remdesivir. This indicated to me that our infectious disease physicians were well aware of the harmful effects of remdesivir from the beginning, and that to give it to a "nice" patient was to very likely inflict unnecessary harm upon them and that, at least the local infectious disease team, was not willing to hurt this patient - in distinction to how they provided "care" and "treatment" for less likeable patients.

Note: many now believe the primary reason remdesivir was given across America was because hospitals were paid a lot of money for doing so (to the point there were many cases of individuals who specifically requested not being given remdesivir then receiving it and dying).

I attest that on or about May 2021, I spoke to George Diaz, the head of Infectious Disease at my hospital. Diaz explained to me that he believed that any individual who is unvaccinated (to COVID) should not be permitted to engage in society or have a driver's license. He expressed support for the idea that unvaccinated people deserved less access to societal resources, including preventative medical care and transportation. When I informed him his disregard for human life, suffering, and civil rights was likely to incite a violent protest, he expressed approval and excitement at the prospect. He told me that he was working with the Washington State Governor's Office to enact these ideas. He was frequently on local news television at this time and was responsible for informing the public about COVID, infectious disease, and recommended health policy. ...

I asked him about patients being illegally denied appropriate healthcare due to COVID-19 vaccination status or requests for alternative treatment. Campbell explained that this was correct, and in his mind, is the only appropriate option for how a medical group should conduct itself in regards to the unvaccinated or those requesting alternative treatments. His logic was that it was necessary to "keep the staff safe', which is contrary to the oaths taken by him, and every other healthcare provider.

Note: it was known at this point that the vaccine did not prevent transmission and hence “did not keep the staff safe.” ...

I attest that the Washington State recording system, hospital administrators, and those who updated the hospital documentation software, worked to falsely inflate the number of people who were reported dead as a result of COVID-19.

I attest that when I would be assigned a death certificate for a patient, the default was for the death to be labeled as resulting from COVID. I further attest that this default was cumbersome to change to the accurate cause of death for my patients.

I attest that the death certificates were phrased and presented in such away that if there was a positive COVID-19 test result from a patient through the duration of their hospital visit, that their death was listed as a COVID death.

I attest that I observed patients who died from long-battled cancer, gunshot wounds, brain bleeds, etc. that their death certificates listed COVID-19 as the cause of death, instead of the actual cause of death.

For example, one of my patients was an elderly lady who had been in an institution, nursing home, for quite some time and was dialysis dependent due to her kidney failure. The patient fell and arrived at the hospital with a brain bleed and she initially tested negative for COVID. Then, the hospital repeatedly tested her for COVID-19 over multiple days until they obtained a COVID-19 positive result. She shortly thereafter passed away due to her brain bleed and her death was labeled a COVID death. When I attempted to rectify the false cause of death I was prevented from doing so. ...

I attest that some pharmacists at pharmacies in Washington State, refused to fill prescriptions issued by licensed physicians for certain drugs that were shown in the literature and practice to be effective in treatment and prevention of COVID-19 infection. I attest that these drugs included: ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and fluvoxamine. ...

I attest that the hospital also offered to pay me a greater amount in a lump sum buy out, if I would sign a gag order. I did not accept their offer for a higher payout in exchange for my silence and can freely make these attestations. ...

I attest that I know many physicians and nurses, many of whom were the most experienced and qualified practitioners, who left the practice of medicine due to moral outrage, because of the patient harm that was done in the hospitals according to the COVID-19 hospital and healthcare protocols, not "burnout" as the hospitals and media reported. This includes approximately 2/3 of the surgical ICU nursing staff from the Everet hospital. ...

57. I attest that it is my professional opinion that early treatment of COVID-19 with ivermectin has positive patient outcomes.

58. I attest that ti is my professional opinion that early treatment of COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine has positive patient outcomes.

59. I attest that it is my professional opinion that exposure to or supplementation of vitamin D, i.e. sunshine, in the treatment of those with COVID-19 has positive patient outcomes.

60. I attest that it in my professional opinion that early treatment of COVID-19 with Zinc and Quercetin has positive patient outcomes. ...

I further attest that it was understood that you would lose your job and/or license if you did not maintain compliance with the unscientific and constantly shifting federal health requirements.

Note: this is another critically important point to understand.

64. I attest that following the initiation of these daily to weekly new requirements from the federal health agencies, implemented by Jay Cook, the hospital's unanticipated mortality in indexed trauma surgery patients increased by more than 100% (doubled). I attest that the administration was confronted with this data and made no changes.

65. I attest that it is my professional opinion that masks were known to, and proven according to the scientific literature, to not be preventative for the spread of COVID-19, and other respiratory viruses long before mask mandates were initiated by state and federal officials and health agencies. ...

I attest that in my practice, as a primary care provider in Florida, I initially saw approximately two out of every twenty patients I provided care for daily had been injured by the COVID-19 vaccines and/or boosters. These injuries include myocarditis, neurodegenerative disorders, immunological disorders, among others. Many of my patients have been or are legally disabled and/or unable to continue performing their work duties following their receipt of, and injury from, COVID-19 vaccinations.

Note: these injuries are consistent with what other doctors have reported.

"The Explosive Interview with an Outcast Pharmacist from Darwin" [Australia]
Cafe Locked Ou, May 17, 2022
https://rumble.com/v15444z-the-explosive-pharmacist-from-darwin.html

... LI CHU: So that's the reason why I refuse over and over again, regardless of what they say, what they trying to put on, whatever, they can give a lot of excuses but the thing is, because the reason— also, one thing is because when I write to the company, actually, I was using my right in regards to religious exemption, which they did it pretty well in the US, you can use that as reason for that.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Yeah.

LI CHU: But I didn't know that momentarily they don't have such thing at all. They remove it. I think it was a year ago somewheres?

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Yeah.

LI CHU: When covid hits, they actually knew it so they remove it.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Yeah.

LI CHU: So you can't use that, so no excuse unless you get a letter exemption from the doctors.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Good luck with that.

LI CHU: Yeah exactly. I mean, even people getting the jab injured and then you still need to get a jab.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: I know. That's an interesting thing. Like, what it used to be, or, say you went to hospital and you had hepadine, you got an allergic reaction. They would put on your file, never give hepadine. And you would know—

LI CHU: [inaudible] all the time the prescription.

10:17
MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: And you would know that as a chemist. You would get those things.

LI CHU: Yes.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Now these people go, this virus, this thing almost k—one girl we interviewed she was in hospital with heart palpitations, she'd had a heart attack, and the nurse came in and said, are you ready for your second jab?

LI CHU: Oh. You going to kill the person definitely.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: You kidding me? I'm having a heart attack here!

LI CHU: Yeah. That's, that's called murder. That's very clear. Because you known causation of injuries and then you still, even if any drug reaction, even a suspected case, you already need to withdraw it. It's not even need to confirm. And this one you have evidence that you have the situation that you never have any problems, suddenly a heart attack, like kids as young as 7 and 9, you can get heart attack. Where in the world ever seen that? Ever, never. Something done differently has caused this to happen. I mean, if you have a brain, you should be able to think that. You don't need anyone, pharmacist, or any health profession tell you that, or not even experts tell you that. You have a brain, you should be able to think that.

My Board Certifications Have Been Revoked
By Pierre KoryPierre Kory August 22, 2024

Iwill just start by saying that I believe that the ABIM’s decision was 100% predetermined even before we first received their accusation in June 2022. There was no way they were going to declare us innocent of misinformation, even though a good portion of this country knows how effective and accurate our deeply evidence-based Covid treatment guidance was (and still is).

One of the reasons why they were never gonna let us off is that, if they declared us “innocent,” (i.e. accurate) that action would have immediately imperiled the decisions by medical boards across the country who persecuted hundreds of doctors for using ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine or for recommending against Covid-19 mRNA gene therapy products. More importantly, it could potentially launch hundreds of thousands of lawsuits by the families of patients who died due to lack of early treatments offered by clinics and hospitals or filled by pharmacies.

The above examples which led to the deaths of so many show the sheer power of mega-corporations that put their financial interests ahead of our health and our lives. Through their overwhelming influence over nearly every institution of society and Science (media, journals, health agencies, politicians, medical schools, physicians, etc), they literally succeeded in depriving a whole country (and world) of the most effective, inexpensive, safe, and widely available treatments for Covid. My biggest worry is that this crime against humanity may never enter the history books and thus will be eventually erased from memory. Which is looking probable.

Dr. Joseph Fraiman, MD: Closing the Curtain on Covid Theater
March 7, 2022
https://rumble.com/vwrd6z-dr.-joseph-fraiman-closing-the-curtain-on-covid-theater.html

From the conference hosted by Governor of Florida Ron DeSantis and Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo. See
https://flgov.com/2022/03/07/governor-desantis-closes-the-curtain-on-covid-theater/

DR. JOSEPH FRAIMAN: In contrast to actually a lot of the voices here, my perspective throughout the early parts of this pandemic were very different than theirs. You know but I think that sometimes maybe when you're similar to maybe like at a movie when you have the front row you don't necessarily, you can't necessarily see the whole picture. For example, in the first wave, my nurses and I, we were, we saw so many people dying from covid, it horrified us, it was more death than any of us had ever seen. Freezer trucks at our door holding the bodies that were left over, you know, from than our morgue could handle. At that time the only thing I could see was we needed more aggressive covid policies to get this plague under control, stop these deaths from happening. I was confident that all of the locations that didn't embrace this, like, aggressive covid policy, they were going to suffer tremendous deaths. And what we would see next, of course what would follow is they would see how much death they suffered and it would become so painfully obvious that they would adopt all the aggressive policies.

But I was wrong. I was, my views were wrong at that time. Because the states and nations that didn't take aggressive covid policies, they didn't do obviously worse.

You know, it took me a year into the pandemic before it became really clear that it wasn't obvious at all that any policy was strongly effective at reducing covid infections or death outside of within the island nations where clearly border control looked like it did have a pretty strong effect.

So the scientist in me had to take this emerging data that I was seeing and acknowledge my hypothesis had been falsified, I guess you can say, and the covid policies that I was so certain were necessary, they just didn't help the way that I would hope they had helped.

And then I realized something that I kind of ignored that much of the people here have discussed and brought up which is that these policies were harmful. Initially I was, I don't want to say I was ignorant but I was, it was irrelevant because there were lives on the line, I'm an emergency doctor, lives, there's lives, it's, like, no, we have to do it. But if the policies didn't make a big difference and they only cause harm, then you have to start rethinking what we're doing. You take the data that's clearly in front of us and if it is only causing harm and at best can only save few, we need to think about it because if at best, right, an aggressive lockdown policy, imagine it reduced hospitalizations, death by 20%, 20% of deaths hospitalizations reduced. If that was the case then maybe we could come here and debate, is the harms that are caused by those lockdowns worth that benefit? And how do we negotiate that benefit through you know not getting through our freedoms? But the reality is, hospitalizations and deaths were not reduced by 20% by any policies. And because if they were we would have had studies at this point that would have been able to consistently identify that and that just has not occurred at all.

So I think as a society we have to decide if we want to continue like a public policy that's obviously producing large harm and offering only a minimal benefit at best. It's currently unmeasurable.

Also, personally, I would like to apologize to the three other scientists sitting with me here on Zoom, the proponents of the Barrington Declaration[1] because initially I did think y'all were crazy. Or dumb. Or maybe you just didn't understand what I was seeing. But I now realize actually, I'm sorry, because I believe now, you guys were correct. And you were correct from the beginning. And I wish that more people including myself had realized that sooner. And I hope more people realize that soon enough.

A prominent Kenyan doctor has accused the globalist World Health Organization (WHO) of using the Covid “pandemic” to “force” mRNA “vaccines” onto the public.

Dr. Wahome Ngare, the director of the Kenya Christian Professionals Forum (KCPF), blasted the WHO and health officials around the world for using the public’s fear to advance their own sinister agenda

In a Tuesday interview with podcast host Lynn Ngugi, Dr. Wahome Ngare asserted that the WHO and global governments only want to force vaccination and “not deal with the disease.”

The doctor explains that because vaccination targets the healthy and not the sick, it entails greater risks.

He notes that this is the reason why vaccines are normally reserved for addressing conditions that are “dangerous” enough to run this risk of stimulating a person’s immune system through a virus, or a piece of a virus.

“So, if your vaccine has a problem, then you can threaten the whole community – that’s why vaccines become a national security issue, because if they’re not properly taken care of and you’re giving them to your whole population (who are) healthy, then you can cause a lot of damage,” Ngare said.

It is therefore “much better to treat those who are sick” than to target healthy people through vaccination, he notes.

He argues that the risk involved in mRNA injections was much greater than that of a typical vaccine.

This is in part because the full results of Phase One and Phase Two clinical trials, which are “supposed to tell us whether it is safe and effective,” were not released until December 2023 – three years after the outbreak of Covid.

“And the only reason this information was released is because somebody went to court and sued Pfizer in the U.S., and they were forced by the court to release this documentation,” Ngare noted.

He further explained that these trial results revealed many problems caused by the Covid mRNA injections, including serious injuries and death.

“What that tells me as a doctor is very simple: that as doctors we let the world down,” he told Ngugi.

“Because we shouldn’t have given any support for that injection without seeing the phase one and phase two clinical trial results.”