▲
11
0
▼

One doctor with integrity among so many who have none


 invite response                
2021 Oct 31, 9:36am   35,732 views  242 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (60)   💰tip   ignore  

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_morningbrief/i-had-to-stand-up-and-try-to-do-something-professor-of-medicine-on-suing-school-over-vaccine-mandate_4074750.html?utm_source=patrick.net&utm_medium=patrick.net&utm_campaign=patrick.net


‘I Had to Stand up and Try to Do Something:’ Professor of Medicine on Suing School Over Vaccine Mandate

BY JAN JEKIELEK AND ZACHARY STIEBER October 28, 2021

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty reacted to the COVID-19 pandemic like many other medical experts. He worked long hours as the United States tried to grapple with the new disease. He had too many conversations with family members whose loved ones were dying from it.

But as time wore on, he started noticing a pattern in public health decisions that seemed to diverge from traditional medical ethics, including an insistence that people at little risk from COVID-19 get a vaccine.

Kheriaty is now on suspension from the University of California, Irvine, (UCI) and challenging the school’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate in court.

“I had to stand up and try to do something about it,” the professor of psychiatry and director of the UCI Health’s Medical Ethics Program said on The Epoch Times’ “American Thought Leaders.”

"I knew that I would wake up in the morning & not have a clear conscience."

Deep-dive w/ medical ethics prof @akheriaty who filed a lawsuit challenging his university's #VaccineMandate. He was suspended & put on "investigatory leave."

🔴WATCH PART 1: https://t.co/gDuQ1J5jjn pic.twitter.com/E3ByL1pIWW

— Jan Jekielek (@JanJekielek) October 30, 2021

UCI spokespeople declined to comment for this story.

‘Liberating’

Kheriaty contracted COVID-19, the disease caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, in mid-2020. His infection was confirmed by two different tests from two independent labs. His five children and wife also contracted the disease. They all recovered, with none requiring hospital care.

“It was, for me, actually a very liberating experience afterward, because I didn’t have to worry about the illness anymore. I knew the science on natural immunity,” Kheriaty said.

Natural immunity refers to when people contract COVID-19 and recover. Dozens of studies have documented that these individuals enjoy strong immunity against CCP virus re-infection. Some of the studies suggest the immunity is superior to that provided by COVID-19 vaccines, particularly the Johnson & Johnson one.

“I knew that at that point, I was among the safest people to be around, I didn’t have to worry about transmitting the infection to my patients,” Kheriaty said.

He continued taking precautions, wearing personal protective equipment like masks as required at the hospital. But he was confident he didn’t pose a risk to others, which served as a relief.

That relief turned into disbelief when, around a year later, the University of California system, which includes UCI, imposed a COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

Opt-Out is Temporary

The mandate (pdf) included a natural immunity opt-out, but only temporarily. People who recovered from COVID-19 were told they would only be exempt from the mandate for up to 90 days after their diagnosis.

University officials cited the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which alleges that the antibody tests it has authorized “are not validated to evaluate specific immunity or protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection.”

SARS-CoV-2 is another name for the CCP virus.

“For this reason, individuals who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 or had an antibody test are not permanently exempt from vaccination,” officials said.

The mandate violated rights outlined in the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment, including equal protection and substantive due process, Kheriaty’s lawsuit asserts.

“Plaintiff is naturally immune to SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, plaintiff is at least as equally situated as those who are fully vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine, yet defendants deny plaintiff equal treatment and seek to burden Plaintiff with an unnecessary violation of bodily integrity to which plaintiff does not consent in order to be allowed to continue to work at UCI,” it states.

The situation creates two classes, vaccinated and unvaccinated, when a more reasonable division would be those who are immune and those who are not, Kheriaty believes.

“What kind of discriminatory policies do we have in place that are excluding someone like me from the workplace when I’m 99.8 percent protected against reinfection whereas someone who got the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, by the company’s own data that they submitted to the FDA, is 67 percent protective against COVID infection?” he said.

Whose Burden?

Kheriaty initially planned to get a COVID-19 vaccine. Now he’s working to change the narrative around mandates. ...

Most mandates across the country don’t have alternatives for people who had COVID-19 and recovered.

Kheriaty proposes putting the burden of proof on people who want to opt out.

“Just have them go get the testing on their own time. You don’t have to administer the T-cell test or the antibody test. You don’t have to go dig up their old medical record establishing that they’ve already had COVID,” he said.

“Just ask them to bring that in and sign off on that as a kind of immunity passport.”

Side Effects ...

Kheriaty worries about other research that seems to show vaccine recipients with natural immunity experience side effects at a higher frequency than those who are not immune who get a shot.

“There are now about five independent studies that strongly suggest that individuals that already have natural immunity, when you vaccinate them, the risk of vaccine adverse events or vaccine side effects is higher for that group,” the professor said. “They have higher risk of side effects from the vaccine. It’s not going to help the people around them because natural immunity already is sterilizing, [yet] we don’t yet have any COVID vaccines that offer sterilizing immunity.”

« First        Comments 235 - 242 of 242        Search these comments

238   Patrick   2024 Oct 27, 2:09pm  

https://slaynews.com/news/doctor-who-pandemic-force-vaccines-public-not-deal-disease/


A prominent Kenyan doctor has accused the globalist World Health Organization (WHO) of using the Covid “pandemic” to “force” mRNA “vaccines” onto the public.

Dr. Wahome Ngare, the director of the Kenya Christian Professionals Forum (KCPF), blasted the WHO and health officials around the world for using the public’s fear to advance their own sinister agenda

In a Tuesday interview with podcast host Lynn Ngugi, Dr. Wahome Ngare asserted that the WHO and global governments only want to force vaccination and “not deal with the disease.”

The doctor explains that because vaccination targets the healthy and not the sick, it entails greater risks.

He notes that this is the reason why vaccines are normally reserved for addressing conditions that are “dangerous” enough to run this risk of stimulating a person’s immune system through a virus, or a piece of a virus.

“So, if your vaccine has a problem, then you can threaten the whole community – that’s why vaccines become a national security issue, because if they’re not properly taken care of and you’re giving them to your whole population (who are) healthy, then you can cause a lot of damage,” Ngare said.

It is therefore “much better to treat those who are sick” than to target healthy people through vaccination, he notes.

He argues that the risk involved in mRNA injections was much greater than that of a typical vaccine.

This is in part because the full results of Phase One and Phase Two clinical trials, which are “supposed to tell us whether it is safe and effective,” were not released until December 2023 – three years after the outbreak of Covid.

“And the only reason this information was released is because somebody went to court and sued Pfizer in the U.S., and they were forced by the court to release this documentation,” Ngare noted.

He further explained that these trial results revealed many problems caused by the Covid mRNA injections, including serious injuries and death.

“What that tells me as a doctor is very simple: that as doctors we let the world down,” he told Ngugi.

“Because we shouldn’t have given any support for that injection without seeing the phase one and phase two clinical trial results.”
240   Patrick   2024 Nov 26, 11:34am  

https://lettersfromaustralia.substack.com/p/dna-contamination-woollahra-council


Thousands of doctors and scientists have called for the shots to be halted in the Hope Accord, on safety grounds.

The council meeting came the day after University of London Emeritus Oncology Professor Angus Dalgleish appeared on Sky News Outsiders, saying the products were “full of contaminants” and asking “why on earth” were they ever mandated (video here).

“The messenger RNA vaccines of Pfizer and Moderna have caused unbelievable problems and damage to people,” he told Outsiders on Sunday.

“The red flags are enormous,” he said.

“Why hasn’t the government banned these vaccines immediately. For a start, covid doesn’t exist anymore - or if it does, it doesn’t kill anybody anymore.

“So why are you using vaccines - boosters - that we now know increase the rate of cancer, and the cancers are appalling. They’re turbo cancers.”
241   Patrick   2025 Jan 20, 11:58am  

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/international-opposition-to-the-mrna


"I think the vaccines are shit mate, they’re absolute shit, they are killers. They destroy people’s DNA - and I’m telling you this Australia and the world as a registered doctor. This is coming from a registered Australian medical professional; the mRNA vaccines are poisonous. They are bad for you, they are not good for you. They are harming your children they are harming you. Everything you’ve heard has been there to deceive you. I have been vindicated in court today. To let you know the people of Australia that you have been lied to by the medical regulator. The medical regulator APHRA has lied to you."

https://www.drtrozzi.news/p/dear-canadian-politicians-and-bureaucrats
242   Patrick   2025 Jan 22, 6:00pm  

https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/this-is-unethical-and-this-is-madness


"This is unethical and this is madness" - NZ doctor Alison Goodwin on the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, 3 July 2021

Where were the doctors who should have been challenging the Covid madness from the beginning?

It seems most were silenced by their ‘regulators’, such as AHPRA in Australia, see for example:

Reckless disregard for voluntary informed consent - the AHPRA Position Statement 9 March 2021
Elizabeth Hart
December 15, 2024

But there were good doctors speaking out, if only more of their colleagues had joined them…

Consider for example general practitioner Alison Goodwin in New Zealand, speaking out in July 2021:




... TRANSCRIPT - ALISON GOODWIN GP, 3 JULY 2021

Hi, I'm Dr Alison Goodwin, a GP in New Zealand.

Today I just want to speak to you about the Pfizer vaccine rollout that's happening in New Zealand.

In my opinion, it's inappropriate and unethical to roll out a medical procedure to the whole population of New Zealand, particularly a medical procedure that's new, and is still in clinical trials.

It's also inappropriate and unethical to force a person to have a medical procedure against their wishes or under coercion.

I have a number of concerns about this vaccine rollout and, to be fully informed, I think you need to know the following things:

First of all, it's a new technology, hasn't been used before.

Secondly, it's still in clinical trials. It won't be finished until 2023.

It's only got provisional consent with 58 conditions.

Pfizer has no liability in case of the vaccine not working or having adverse effects.

There is no long-term safety data. We have no idea what will be the outcome in one year, two years, five years. And the same applies to the efficacy.

It's not been studied in pregnancy or in the frail elderly.

Overseas, there are treatments being used that can treat COVID-19.

And I do not think that the monitoring of adverse reactions is adequate at present.

We're not all at equal high risk of harm from catching COVID-19. Some of us are already immune.

Those of us who are under 60 and otherwise healthy are at minimal risk from catching COVID-19. And in this instance, the risks of the vaccine are likely to outweigh any benefits. ...

« First        Comments 235 - 242 of 242        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste