Comments 1 - 16 of 16 Search these comments
I'm extremely pessimistic about the "mainstream" EVER admitting what is actually happening.
I suspect that most democrats are getting their 'news' from Late Nite Unfunny Men.
richwicks saysWho trusts our "mainstream media" at this point?
Most Democrats.
I thought only people who are 60 or older get shingles, so I didn’t think it was possible for me to get it at 48.
I suspect that most democrats are getting their 'news' from Late Nite Unfunny Men.
I reckon I should look into the Shingrix vaccine given my advanced years.
(I can't help but feel vaccine...ugh, these days...)
“In the late 1960’s, government bioweapons labs started injecting ticks with exotic diseases. Soon, people nearby began to get those diseases. Now, tick-borne Lyme is endemic. Naturally, the government has admitted nothing.”
I have some fools around me that try to tell me some shit that Trevor Noah said last nite. Or one of the other buffoons.
I don't know how I deal.
https://sashastone.substack.com/p/tucker-the-true-origins-of-lyme-disease
“In the late 1960’s, government bioweapons labs started injecting ticks with exotic diseases. Soon, people nearby began to get those diseases. Now, tick-borne Lyme is endemic. Naturally, the government has admitted nothing.”
When the mRNA vaccinations started, it was obvious, off the bat, that the jab floors the immune systems of the thankful, or not so thankful, “vaccine” recipients. The rash of reactivated dormant herpes incidents, a.k.a. the shingles, was but one of the manifestations thereof. Fast forward 3 years, and we get the official confirmation of this fact. “Herpes Zoster Reactivation After mRNA and Adenovirus-Vectored Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination: Analysis of National Health Insurance Database” (J Infect Dis. 2023 Nov. 11)...
As well, it was obvious that the “vaccination” into the pandemic made the recipients much more prone to catching Covid within two weeks after the jab, where they were considered to be “unprotected” and, “technically”, unvaccinated. Which was used to push the jabs even harder, as this circumstance was sold as the “pandemic of the unvaccinated”. ...
But I want to point to this new gruesome development, which may well be another shoe to be falling with a thump as we write. “‘Flesh-eating bacteria’ disease spreads in Japan, killing some in 2 days” (2024.06.17):
A deadly outbreak of a "flesh-eating bacteria" is spreading rapidly across Japan, alarming health officials with how quickly it can lead to death. Close to 1,000 cases of Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS) have been reported in the Asian country this year, and doctors warn symptoms can be fatal within 48 hours. ...
If you think Japan is a fluke, you are wrong. As “Risk Assessment for Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome (STSS) in Japan” from March 29, 2024 states:
An increase in iGAS (invasive GAS) infections was reported in the UK, France, Ireland, the Netherlands, and Sweden in late 2022 and early 2023, particularly in children under 10 years of age.
In the U.S., STSS is further tabulated separately among iGAS infections. iGAS infections in children increased in December 2022, as in Europe.
In Canada, although there are no reports of a national outbreak, British Columbia has reported an increase in iGAS infections among those under 20 years of age since December 2023.
In Australia, iGAS infections have not been designated as a surveillance disease until 2021, but the number of reported cases has been gradually increasing since the start of the surveillance; as of March 21, 2024, the number of reported cases is at the same level as that of 2023.
In Argentina, while there was no increase in the number of reported cases at the end of 2022, there was an increase in the number of reported cases and deaths from iGAS infections in 2023 mainly in children.
One thing in common among the named above countries? All are highly mRNA-jabbed populations.
Or we can blame Climate Change.
Excerpt: "I think this red bump is getting bigger.” That’s what I told my husband after growing concerned about the strange-looking rash that appeared on my face four days earlier. I read online that most rashes are not serious, so I thought a trip to the doctor was unnecessary.
“What if you have Lyme disease?” he asked me. That question prompted me to be evaluated, but I was concerned that the doctor would tell me it was only a pimple. I was shocked to learn that I had shingles.
I’m only 48 and even though it was only a small rash on my face, I was shocked to learn that if the rash had spread to my eye — it was very close to it — I could have gone blind. Fortunately, my doctor was able to prescribe an anti-viral medication. Within a week after my doctor’s visit, the painful rash was gone.
Shingles (also known as herpes zoster) is caused by the same virus as chickenpox — the varicella zoster virus (VZV). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), shingles rates have been increasing in the United States for unknown reasons. In fact, 1 in 3 people will contract the disease at some point in their lifetime.
That said, there are a lot of myths about shingles out there. So what do you need to know?
Myth 1: Only older people get shingles
Fact: You can get shingles at any age if you already had chickenpox since the virus lies dormant in your body and then reactivates as shingles; even children can get it, although that’s rare.
People usually get shingles because their immune system is weakened, so it can happen if a person experiences stress or other issues that decrease immunity. I thought only people who are 60 or older get shingles, so I didn’t think it was possible for me to get it at 48.
“Years ago, herpes zoster (shingles) occurred almost exclusively in older people. But today it occurs in younger age individuals, including people in their 20s and 30s,” says Dr. Robin Evans, a dermatologist at Southern Connecticut Dermatology in Stamford, Conn."