patrick.net

The statements I have read from Sotomayor display a subjective and not very intelligent perspective. It doesn't take a lawyer to see that pretty clearly. It seems she is lofted way above her highest level of incompetency. Roberts, of course, is merely Epsteined and doesn't rule from law, he takes dictation and wraps it in a legalese package for his owners.

It seems from those overheard tirades, Roberts is not above threatening and intimidating his fellow justices. He's also muscle for his owners.

There was a ruling or no? What was it?

Ceffer says

The statements I have read from Sotomayor display a subjective and not very intelligent perspective.

Did anyone expect a female, race based pick by Obama to be intelligent? Classic left move of not picking the best and the brightest for a lifetime job with rare job openings and judging on some of the most important cases for our country. And just like Roberts with the Republicans, at some point Democrats are going to regret her being there if she stays radical and stupid.

OK, this is not the kind of thing I follow or know much about, but I have seen things that indicate that the Dem’s would benefit GREATLY by an overturning of Roe. It would be the great rallying focus and would be the one thing that might pull their asses out of the fire come the mid-terms. Could the The Supremes be subject to this kind of rank political maneuvering? At the expense of the rest of their legitimacy, at least to 1/2 of the country.
All of our institutions are losing their legitimacy right in front of us.

WineHorror1 says

There was a ruling or no? What was it?

It upheld the enforcement of the Texas Abortion law for now. Did not render a final judgement.

Robert Sproul says

OK, this is not the kind of thing I follow or know much about, but I have seen things that indicate that the Dem’s would benefit GREATLY by an overturning of Roe. It would be the great rallying focus and would be the one thing that might pull their asses out of the fire come the mid-terms. Could the The Supremes be subject to this kind of rank political maneuvering? At the expense of the rest of their legitimacy, at least to 1/2 of the country.
All of our institutions are losing their legitimacy right in front of us.

Disagree here: It would be a huge WIN and BOON that finally a wickedness that imposed a Federal Level Right on the same level as 1A out of whole cloth was repealed. What folks don't understand is that Roe v. Wade claimed Abortion was to receive, alone among 10,000s of medical procedures, complete protection as a Natural Right.

States can and do have the right to regulate, for example, when death begins... 10 minutes after no heart beat for example. It would make determining death for medical/insurance/whatever purposes impossible without some kind of objective decree on this. Conversely, states should have a right to determine when life begins...

Sotomayor is an affirmative action college graduate.
She is now an affirmative action Supreme Court Judge.
Nobody takes advice from a fat, sweaty “wise Latina” in the real world, so why listen to her now?

clambo says

She is now an affirmative action Supreme Court Judge.

No different than my Senator Tammy Duckworth. The left found a crippled military vet, female and hispanic. The ultimate political trifecta for fucks sake. She is utterly stupid if you hear her ever speak.

WookieMan says

Did anyone expect a female, race based pick by Obama to be intelligent?

Every pick based on race or sex is not a pick based on competence.

This undermines all our institutions.

https://babylonbee.com/news/sotomayor-attends-supreme-court-oral-argument-remotely-to-protect-herself-from-exposure-to-constitution?source=patrick.net

This Wise Latina?

More like Stupid Sp*c

The laments that have been ringing down corridors for the last fifty odd years: "Fuck, here comes the diversity hire, duck."

What do they call diversity hires: 'Soros Rocket Launchers'.

Of course, who is worse, the pedo blackmailed Roberts or the SotoMoron?

Sotomayor may not be the worst anymore, not since the most recent diversity hire.

You don't actually have to be a lawyer or a legal scholar to be appointed to SCOTUS, they just found out it usually worked out better that way.

Sotomayor has just been replaced for worst by Jackson

Constitutional Ebonics for Dummies?

Worse to have somebody like Roberts who is blackmailed, or somebody who is ignorant but has a chance of making the right decision by accident?

Patrick says

"Sotomayor may not be the worst anymore, not since the most recent diversity hire."

This imbecile does not qualify to be a Supreme Court Justice. Can we get rid of her?

AmericanKulak says

Gorsuch writes the majority opinion on Page 18, excoriates Sotomayor for not explaining her ruling in light of precedence, calling her view "Radical"

This is the same context as how a woke jury works through jury nullification. Social justice rules supreme.

.

The_Deplorable says

This imbecile does not qualify to be a Supreme Court Justice. Can we get rid of her?

I've listened to her on TV boast about how she had low test scores yet still got into a very prestigious law school.

Same goes with the Castro brothers of Texas embellishing they got into Stanford with SAT scores of around 1200.

.

https://www.kunstler.com/p/you-wouldnt-want-to-be-him-on-that

The situation in our own country has grown particularly acute with the DC and other regional federal court judges lately arrogating the Article II executive powers of the president. You can see what the furthest strategic end-point is: the Democratic Party wants to induce President Trump to invoke a national emergency against this legal insurrection in order to force him to play the role of “fascist dictator.” Mr. Trump has been very careful to stay as much within-the-guardrails of the law as possible throughout this long campaign to destroy him and his MAGA movement to purge corruption from the government.

The hinge on the conflict now is the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS), which is led by Chief Justice John Roberts. A whole lot of troubling info about CJ Roberts has blown up in recent days, much of it not exactly new, but buried and ignored by the likes of The New York Times, and its kindred blob mouthpieces. You’ve read in this blog recently how CJ Roberts’s chief factotum at SCOTUS, Sheldon Snook, is married to Mary McCord, involved officially in every lawfare prank against Mr. Trump since RussiaGate, when she was U.S. Assistant Attorney-General for National Security — and who then went on as counsel for Jerrold Nadler’s House Committee Trump Impeachment No. 1, and the J-6 House Committee, both actions of stupendous bad faith.

Turns out that CJ Roberts has been “besties” with Lawfare field marshal Norm Eisen, and for quite a long time, as far back as 2005. Eisen was special counsel on Impeachment No. 1, and chief strategist behind the janky cases staged last year against Mr. Trump by New York AG Letitia James, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, and Fulton County (GA) DA Fani Willis. You can bet that Eisen was at least an unofficial strategic advisor in the Special Counsel Jack Smith prosecutions, too, along with Mary McCord and Andrew Weissmann of Mueller Commission infamy — Eisen, McCord, and Weissmann, the three Nosferatus of Lawfare. Eisen is coordinating most of the current lawsuit action against Mr. Trump in the federal courts.

Several alt-news outlets are reporting that CJ Roberts made two trips to visit Norm Eisen in Prague between 2011 and 2014 when Eisen was Barack Obama’s ambassador to the Czech Republic. The longest visit, a week, entailed a global conference on "American and European rule-of-law issues." Hmmmm. . . what could that possibly mean? Revolver News, Mike Benz on “X”, and a character styled as “The Researcher” on “X” have all reported on the Roberts-Eisen close friendship.

Also turns out that CJ Roberts is a club member at an elite, invite-only club for legal poohbahs called the Edward Bennett Williams Inn of Court, which is indirectly associated with an international Inns of Court network centered in London. (“Rule-of-law,” anyone?) Other members of the EBW Inn of Court in DC. include Judges James (“Jeb”) Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta, all of the DC District — all involved in current lawfare suits — and SCOTUS Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Do you suppose they have discussed any of these matters at their meet-ups, especially after the pass-around of legal beverages? Perhaps even strategized about them?

Doesn’t that make you a little queasy about CJ Roberts’s role presiding over cases coming any day before SCOTUS that have been designed and propelled by his good pal, Norm Eisen? Should CJ Roberts consider recusing himself from any of these pending cases on the SCOTUS docket?

Oh, yes, one other interesting sidelight: John Roberts has been found listed on the Jeffrey Epstein flight logs of the “Lolita Express” bound for Little St. James Island in the US Virgin Islands, Epstein’s supposed party shack for the celebrity elite. The allegation that the “John Roberts” listed in the flight log is the same as the Chief Justice is officially unsubstantiated. But here it is FWIW.

Of course, no flight log would be required for a jaunt to Epstein’s New York City townhouse, in case CJ Roberts ever ventured up there from our nation’s capital, an easy car trip. It is established fact that Epstein was busy recording the various doings in the many bedrooms of these establishments, arguably not merely for his private entertainment. Is CJ Roberts perhaps under blackmail for any such activity recorded? Lord only knows, just now.

But it’s possible that FBI Director Kash Patel and his Deputy Director Dan Bongino know the answer to this abiding mystery, since weeks ago they assigned a thousand agents in the New York City FBI office to sort out the thousands of pages and other articles of evidence that the office had been suppressing for years until US AG Pam Bondi fired the top agent there, James Dennehy, for withholding it so long. It’s been awfully quiet over at the FBI and DOJ home office in DC since then. Of course, if any referrals are being considered, or any grand jury bound cases being prepared, you wouldn’t want that to leak out, would you?

Patrick says

Oh, yes, one other interesting sidelight: John Roberts has been found listed on the Jeffrey Epstein flight logs of the “Lolita Express” bound for Little St. James Island in the US Virgin Islands, Epstein’s supposed party shack for the celebrity elite.

You fly to Saint Thomas, STT. You can't fly directly to the island. I like a good conspiracy, but kind of getting tired of comments and posts about stuff people know nothing about. I know this is a quote and linked, but this stuff needs to stop being spread around.

Unless there's video AND victims nothing will happen legally. The people listed won't be locked up.

Since the unlawful 1871 Corporation took over DC management, they also changed the Constitution to read 'for the People' rather than 'of the People' aka, administered by the foreign corporation on our 'behalf' (hoodwinked).

Roberts is as compromised as an old vomit streaked hooker smelling of gin and giving blowjobs in the bathroom. The seat of vampirism on the Republic is centered as usual in the City of London and its Inns of Court. The member of the bar fealty is to this secret handshake group, not the Republic or the people of the US.

I read that when Kennedy was assassinated, that a copy of the Magna Carta (or maybe the original) at the Inns of Court was placed in a cage. What exactly was that supposed to mean? That all human rights have been abrogated back to raw feudalism?

There is a difference between 'lawyers' and 'attorneys'. Our 'legal system' is 'legal' (a system of ordinances and procedures) but not 'lawful' (based on common law, equity or natural law). American attorneys and judges are not rightfully lawyers or judges. They are 'administrators' of a legal lawfare system that is not based on common law and is therefore 'unlawful'.

Esquire is the lowest conferred title of royal suasion. Any 'lawyer' who uses Esq. has essentially pledged absolute loyalty to the Inns of Court (City of London) and not our country. Its a secret handshake governance.

It means that petty decisions are allowed to 'resemble' law and equity, but the fulcrum 'big' decisions are always thrown in favor of the banksters, corporations, royals, Vatican and secret rulers etc.

https://nypost.com/2025/04/04/us-news/supreme-court-allows-trump-administration-to-cut-teacher-training-money-as-suit-plays-out/

The Supreme Court lifted a lower court order on Friday that blocked the Trump administration from cutting millions of dollars in grants for teacher trainings as part of the president’s efforts to terminate taxpayer-funded diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.

In a 5-4 decision, with Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the three liberal justices, the high court ruled that the Department of Education does not need to reinstate more than $65 million in grants that it terminated from a larger $600 million teacher preparation program as litigation plays out.

Roberts seems totally compromised by some video of him committing statutory rape on Epstein Island.

WHERE ARE THE VIDEOS?

"Sotomayor may not be the worst anymore, not since the most recent diversity hire."
She suffers from diabetes and autoimmune diseases, which can both cause forms of dementia. However, once on the treadmill, they can't get off, and somebody else clearly makes her decisions for her. However, they need to tell her to shut her pie hole, because everything she has said for a while displays an almost childish ignorance of the Constitution.

Ceffer says

Roberts is as compromised as an old vomit streaked hooker smelling of gin and giving blowjobs in the bathroom.

This is potentially a really big problem for MAGA. Whatever is the play, it has to be largely in the bag before the midterm elections. Indictments take months if not years, and this needs to be in the judicial pipeline within a year.

https://x.com/C_3C_3/status/1908666296104870090

In 2020 the SCOTUS ruled 5-4 that the US Census could not include the citizenship question.
So illegals were counted in the US Census.
This insane decision resulted in the Democrats getting more Congressional seats.
Do you know who the deciding vote was?
Justice John Roberts.