patrick.net

How can you be so sure the vax has 0 benefit?

NuttBoxer says

simpler, more logical explanation for why there has been such a huge push to inject people with shots that have no medical benefit whatsoever?

there may be no medical benefit, or even there may be negative medical "benefits", but there are benefits to Pfizer and Blackrock coffers

I'm pretty sure the vaxx has negative net benefits. That is, it probably does reduce symptoms for the alpha version, because it primes the immune system to recognize that particular spike protein. On the other hand, it is clearly causing a wave of blood clots, myocarditis, and other fatal problems, as is coming out in the insurance statistics along with VAERS and much anecdotal evidence.

I believe the motive was primarily money. Fauci has been experimenting with gain-of-function research for a long time, deliberately creating viruses so that he can then sell vaccines against them for the profit of Pfizer etc, his benefactors. He just did it once again on a far larger scale.

Anyone who has read a decent mystery novel will see the means, motive, and opportunity were all there. It's obvious in retrospect.

I don't believe that tiny circuits could circulate in your blood without causing blood clots, but then, hey, there have been an awful lot of blood clots lately.

WineHorror1 says

How can you be so sure the vax has 0 benefit?

I've done the research, have you?