« First « Previous Comments 10 - 49 of 100 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://t.me/MrPooLDIGS/13647?source=patrick.net
https://t.me/MrPooLDIGS/13647?source=patrick.net
Vaccines don’t give aids, they do revive existing aids.
We are currently witnessing a major epidemic caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019- nCoV). The evolution of 2019-nCoV remains elusive. We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag. Interestingly, despite the inserts being discontinuous on the primary amino acid sequence, 3D-modelling of the 2019-nCoV suggests that they converge to constitute the receptor binding site. The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature. This work provides yet unknown insights on 2019-nCoV and sheds light on the evolution and pathogenicity of this virus with important implications for diagnosis of this virus.
@Al_Sharpton_for_President You seem to know more about this than I do.It is a question. IF the HIV inserts code for epitopes (discrete protein bits) that bind to cellular receptors, like CD4 and CCR5, and the body's immune system attacks the protein bound cells, either via innate immunity or via adaptive immunity caused by infection or immunization, then mucho problemas. CD4 is present o CD4 T cells, of course, as well as monocytes. CCR5 is also expressed on T cells and monocytes.
So are you saying that the spike protein could infect white blood cells via the CD4 receptor like HIV does?
Yes, Mell. We know that soluble spike protein binds to the ACE-2 receptor. And that the gene therapies do create soluble spike protein; the protein just doesn't stay localized at the site of gene therapy injection. So the spike protein that binds to ACE-2 receptors in cardiac tissue, for example, acts as a beacon for immune cells that have been instructed to recognize it via "vaccination", previous infection, or just via innate immunity. And the immune cells kill the protein bound cells.
Now if (underscore if) the referenced HIV sequences are present in the gene therapy produced spike protein, and if the sequences cause the soluble spike protein bind to CD4, the same thing will happen, that is, CD4 cells will be targeted and taken out. This is the "CD4+ cell depletion by inappropriate immune targeting" described in the last reference above. So while Gp120 enables HIV entry into the cell, it does this by first binding to CD4. The spike protein is not a virus, but it might be ab...
Thx makes sense, but that would also mean that for traditional protein based viruses such as novavax potential damage will be limited since s proteins are limited, similar to a covid infection. For mrna it will depend on how long it is active and what makes it worse is that the s proteins are generated within organs as opposed to a traditional protein based vaccine only containing harvested proteins.Yes, the nucleic acid gene therapies have the potential to be much worse than protein vaccines. But with regards to the Novavax immunogen, it appears to be a spike protein octamer. Now if the goose gets loose in the circulation or lymph system, and the octamer binds to endotheial cells, or cardiac cells, or intestine, ovaries, testes, etc., there are eight times the ACE-2 receptor binding capability, and eight times the inappropriate immune targeting (beacon) capability. Having an octameric immunogen attached to a healthy cell could create something like an immune complex formation, quite nasty and inflammatory. The tox risk is all hypothetical which is why its a good thing pharma has spent over a decade testing the vaccine. :>))
Using lots and lots of drugs, IV etc. and having sex with huge numbers of people could be bad for your health and wreck you immune system? Plausible.
You guys did read the DOD report that said the threat is the spike protein, not the corona virus right? Came out with a bunch of docs fairly recently. Basically what was engineered was the spike protein, and corona, which has and will be around forever, was just the virus it hitched a ride on to enter our systems. Explains why I continued to experience zinc depletion symptoms after recovery.
mell saysThx makes sense, but that would also mean that for traditional protein based viruses such as novavax potential damage will be limited since s proteins are limited, similar to a covid infection. For mrna it will depend on how long it is active and what makes it worse is that the s proteins are generated within organs as opposed to a traditional protein based vaccine only containing harvested proteins.Yes, the nucleic acid gene therapies have the potential to be much worse than protein vaccines. But with regards to the Novavax immunogen, it appears to be a spike protein octamer. Now if the goose gets loose in the circulation or lymph system, and the octamer binds to endotheial cells, or cardiac cells, or intestine, ovaries, testes, etc., there are eight times the ACE-2 receptor binding capability, and eight times the inappropriate immune targeting (beacon) capability. Having an octameric im...
(ideally always aspire)Right, so Kanesha with an almost completed Cosmetology AA degree adminstering jabs at CVS might not be the best way to go.
« First « Previous Comments 10 - 49 of 100 Next » Last » Search these comments
Been seeing a lot of talk about HIV/AIDS on a level I've not seen since the 90s.