« First « Previous Comments 3,648 - 3,687 of 4,262 Next » Last » Search these comments
Russia occupies less Ukrainian territory today than they did at the start of 2022.
richwicks says
Money and blood well spent, I guess.
You are talking about Russia - right?
All the Russia fluffers have been CONFIDENTALY predicting a total Russian victory since the start of the war. Doesn't matter that they can't define what a victory looks like. But 3 years later with hundreds of thousands of dead and wounded Russians - Russia occupies less Ukrainian territory today than they did at the start of 2022. Russia's navy, helicopter and jet fleet is a fraction of what it once was. Not to mention the loss of so many senior Russian officers.
As for Ukraine, it is the most human thing in the world to defend one's homeland from being invaded by a hostile neighbor. Despite being outnumbered and outspent, Ukraine has basically frozen Russia's invasion into a bloody stalemate. Who would have predicted that 3 years ago?
How many Russians do you think died? And why would you believe the numbers?
He will never answer this.
All we get is autistic screeching "It's a land war!" "Ukraine is fucked!" "Nuland!" "Global homo Nazis!"
See? 'Land war' is a perfect example. By pointing that obvious out, he looks like a idiot. And he can't counter it, either. And you would think he'd stop bringing up The Great Battles of the Black Sea bullshit he constantly posts as a result. But now...Ukey Nazi Fluffers have to gotta fluff, after all!
A significant portion of Ukraine's economy is tied up with agriculture providing nearly half of Ukraine's export income. Majority of the grain is shipped through the Black Sea.
How many Russians do you think died? And why would you believe the numbers?
I don't care about Ukraine. This should have been easy for Russia.
They've lost major naval vessels in the Black Sea in a war that had nothing to do with water. Russia has been stopped, no advanced and were embarrassed at the beginning of this whole ordeal. This isn't even a discussion.
Do I side with a anyone? Nope. I'm pointing out actually facts. Russia has likely lost as many troops and mercenaries as Ukraine. Otherwise they'd have gained ground. They haven't. This is WWI type trench warfare. Russians are dying as much as Ukrainians. So let me know who's winning? Russia looks weak.
Grain exports are not going to save Ukraine. WTF?
Right - as if Ukraine maintaining one of its biggest export corridors and source of income during a war of survival is no big deal to Russian fluffers? Forgot - "ITS A LAND WAR!"
Why did Russia lose it's Black Fleet Navy and embarrass itself to the whole world trying to blockade Ukraine's grain exports if it doesn't matter?
Wasn't the whole point of Russia invading Crimea to give it better access to the Black Sea?
Laughable watching how far you guys are willing to move the goal posts to rosy up Russia's massive military embarrassment.
Jesus fucking christ!
richwicks says
Money and blood well spent, I guess.
You are talking about Russia - right?
All the Russia fluffers have been CONFIDENTALY predicting a total Russian victory since the start of the war.
Who cares. The cabal that runs the United States is just killing all of us with these stupid wars. Russia will fight a war of attrition and just allow the US to continue to bankrupt the entire nation for something 99.99% of the US population has no stake in. The Middle East has been doing this for 2 decades now.
I bet if it came to war in Ukraine, Russia wouldn't even cut off their energy exports to Europe although the US might sabotage these pipelines and then attempt to blame Russia.
The United States is causing this conflict, not Russia. It's just another example of the insanity that runs this nation. The US has bombed 7 nations over the last 20 years - has this in any way benefited this nation?
Funny - as you appear to be the most emotionally Patneter invested in Russia "winning".
Not only were you guys spectacularly wrong about Russia succeeding
there are still plenty of Ukrainians willing to defend their country from Russian invaders.
How long do you think Putin can keep feeding the Russian meat grinder for a losing cause before his rule is at risk?
Nominally independent countries with Russian military bases in them to keep them in line, like Hungary in 1956 and Czechoslavakia in 1968.
I bet the US would not allow them to do that no matter what, proving that they are mere vassal states even now.
I'm just asking whether Japan and Germany would be allowed to remove US bases.
I'm guessing they have no choice and are thus not really independent countries.
Patrick says
I'm just asking whether Japan and Germany would be allowed to remove US bases.
I'm guessing they have no choice and are thus not really independent countries.
They can. In the end those bases can only exist there with native support.
It appears that the Ministry of Propaganda has grown tired of 'reporting' on the Ukraine/Russian war.
It appears that the Ministry of Propaganda has grown tired of 'reporting' on the Ukraine/Russian war.
I don't seem to see any more of those Ukraine flags flying everywhere,
I don't seem to see any more of those Ukraine flags flying everywhere, but maybe that's just in my area. What about where you live?
RayAmerica says
I don't seem to see any more of those Ukraine flags flying everywhere, but maybe that's just in my area. What about where you live?
RayAmerica I don't see them in my area either, except maybe on a random house that still has its BLM decorations up too.
The Economist ran a screamer today - claiming, two years in, that the Russians are going to run out of artillery gun barrels any day now because of tube wear, because some idiot told them they only produce one new barrel per week - so let's run the numbers.
Artillery barrel wear is measured in "Effective Full Charges" - basically the amount of wear on the barrel that you can expect if you fire a standard round at full charge. Firing at a reduced charge would decrease it, while firing at a "super" charge will increase it. Cannon barrels are generally good for around 2000 EFCs before they wear out of spec.
Assuming that all rounds fired in theater are fired at full charge, and that the Russians fire 20,000 rounds per day on average, this breaks down to a requirement for ten new gun barrels daily. According to, uh... the Economist's own article, the Russians have at least two artillery barrel foundries, so meeting this requirement would seem to me to be trivial - although I know it might surprise some of my readers in the West to learn that a Soviet gigafactory can in fact produce multiple pieces of a given steel product daily.
Except the Economist's case actually gets worse because artillery barrels often don't need to be replaced completely, they just need to be bored out and relined - a process that's considerably less resource-intensive than manufacturing a new barrel.
There's this ridiculous analytical cottage industry of taking some production figure for Russian war materiel gleaned at the bottom of the 1990s, assuming it's unchanged under wartime conditions in 2024, and using it to say This Is How Ukraine Can Still Win.
For lack of a better term, it's cope.
Russia have detained the terrorists.
They are singing like canaries. They claim they were recruited on Telegram to commit the attack in exchange for money.
Putin himself claims that Ukraine tried to assist the terrorists into Ukraine after the attack.
It’s clear some organized entity used patsies as proxy to carry out the attack. Textbook CIA behavior. Combined with Ukraine trying to assist the terrorist in their escape… the evidence would strongly suggest this attack was organized by Western Intelligence.
Whether that be Ukraine, CIA, MI6, Mossad, or some other Western entity, they all serve the same globalist masters, and share the same goal of defeating Russia by any means necessary.
Regardless of what the truth is, Putin is going to have a response. He claims Ukraine, and all those who assisted, will pay a heavy price.
The Economist ran a screamer today
Regardless of what the truth is, Putin is going to have a response. He claims Ukraine, and all those who assisted, will pay a heavy price.
Patrick seems to be wobbling between believing that radical Islam is a fundamentalist retrograde force facing humanity that needs to be countered - then slides back to its all the work of the Jews and the CIA!
Why do you think this is a dichotomy, that it has to be one or the other?
I do also think there is a lot of Jewish hatred for Russia, and this goes back a long way. For example, Jacob Schiff financed Japan in the Russo-Japanese war.
Jacob Schiff financed Japan in the Russo-Japanese war.
« First « Previous Comments 3,648 - 3,687 of 4,262 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://twitter.com/HinchaPenta/status/1496700652084473857?s=20&t=T1inEM5Hv6ahmrL4nzNirQ&source=patrick.net