« First « Previous Comments 741 - 780 of 4,272 Next » Last » Search these comments
he's deep cover FSBIf he is, he should be demoted. Because he is doing great job spreading the word about civilian deaths, genocide, and other pleasantries which, as it looks, increase the influx of weaponry from West to Ukraine. He's hurting the Rashists where it matters. If he is FSB then they really should revisit their employment practices.
Show me whenever I've "run"You run from any challenge, usually by going to a next topic on the laundry list. As you are doing now.
mostly reader sayshe's deep cover FSBIf he is, he should be demoted. Because he is doing great job spreading the word about civilian deaths, genocide, and other pleasantries which, as it looks, increase the influx of weaponry from West to Ukraine. He's hurting the Rashists where it matters.
But you should be giving him A LOT of credibility if you believe that he's FSB.
richwicks saysShow me whenever I've "run"You run from any challenge,
You literally begged for a source.
So, what are your sources?
That's a start. Once you demonstrate that you actually follow him, I'll share more.
Why would you make conditions? For what purpose?
If you have sources, just blurt them out.
Propaganda doesn't make a difference in a war except for those directly fighting it.Exposing atrocities and war crimes - is it propaganda? Is that what you called it? If you did, you may be giving a new meaning to "low life".
What challenge specifically?
I see no rationale to only limit it to a single source. Explain.It's not enough for you to get spanked for not following one source. You really want to get spanked for not following two (because I know you won't be following either). Here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb2oej0JtxlnywlqoSiHHVQ/featured?source=patrick.net
richwicks saysPropaganda doesn't make a difference in a war except for those directly fighting it.Exposing atrocities and war crimes - is it propaganda?
richwicks saysWhat challenge specifically?
Shall we start with the one in which you pressed me to release materials which may have hurt other people, but then ran like a bitch when I suggested that you put some skin in the game?
richwicks saysI see no rationale to only limit it to a single source. Explain.It's not enough for you to get spanked for not following one source. You really want to get spanked for not following two (because I know you won't be following either). Here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb2oej0JtxlnywlqoSiHHVQ/featured?source=patrick.net
X-KGB. Only limited access to info which is not widely available,
Saves a lot of time: you can use him as a digest for public yet little known data.
He probably spends more time every day reading and analyzing than you spend posting, and he has much better talent for what he does than you for what you do.
We both know that you won't be following either of them, and that your interest is less than genuine
For that you will be spanked in due time.
But it raises a question: why do you ask? Explain.
I'd say no, but according to the US Federal government it is - which is why Julian Assange is certain to die in custody.I'm reacting to YOUR statement, not to that of US Federal Government. I'm asking YOU, not US Federal Government.
Sure, why not? Give me a link to my post.
So you reference a whole TWO sources.
Another intelligence asshole. great.
Depends on how accurate the youtube translation is.
Why do I ask for several sources?
When people are telling lies, they contradict one another...
Another weekend, another false flag massacre by the Ukrainians, repeated by western corporate media propagandists to manufacture outrage for more weapons, more war, more dead Ukrainian civilians until Russia is bogged down in Ukraine forever and there are no Ukrainians even left to die for the western bloodthirsty empire.
This might be the last one of these posts. It’s just so lazy, obvious, and pathetic now. They want us to believe that Russia wrote “for the children” on the side of a missile and intentionally launched it into a train station packed with women and children fleeing the city of Kramatorsk, in Eastern Ukraine near Donetsk?
That fits the exact M.O. of Russia since the start of the war. Move fast, carelessly, slaughter women and children in the east where ethnic Russians are, write slogans on missiles to make the bereaved angry, and hope they’ll one day forgive the Russian government when a referendum is held there to join Russia. Completely makes logical sense.
There’s only one major problem with this story other than the laziness of the narrative, the writing on the side of the missile, and the entire western media propaganda complex screaming about how evil Russia and Putin are, and that is...drumroll please…the serial number on the missile that shows it’s probably Ukrainian and the fact that it was fired from territory still controlled by Ukrainian forces.
VeBee🇺🇸✝️
@VeBo1991
Like it or not she has a point ! A powerful one ! : MEP Clare Daley calls out the hypocrisy of the EU ! ( and NATO )
PS: Behind close doors EU still deals with Russian defence businesses !
There’s only one major problem with this story other than the laziness of the narrative, the writing on the side of the missile, and the entire western media propaganda complex screaming about how evil Russia and Putin are, and that is...drumroll please…the serial number on the missile that shows it’s probably Ukrainian and the fact that it was fired from territory still controlled by Ukrainian forces.
MEP Clare Daley
Here's a bit of news for you, Einstein. Most people whose opinions matter are a product of some specialized training. Because - guess what? - THEY HAD THE TRAINING.
Former CIA chief of staff-turned MSNBC pundit Jeremy Bash, CIA director-turned MSNBC pundit John Brennan and ex-director of national intelligence-turned-CNN pundit James Clapper are among the retired intelligence operatives who insisted the laptop revealing Hunter Biden’s shady overseas business dealings, along with a cache of damning emails and photos, was the result of a "Russian disinformation" campaign designed to help keep then-President Trump in office.
It's not enough for you to get spanked for not following one source. You really want to get spanked for not following two (because I know you won't be following either). Here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb2oej0JtxlnywlqoSiHHVQ/featured?source=patrick.net
X-KGB. Only limited access to info which is not widely available, but well informed in public domain and with mad analytical skills. Saves a lot of time: you can use him as a digest for public yet little known data. He probably spends more time every day reading and analyzing than you spend posting, and he has much better talent for what he does than you for what you do.
Shall we start with the one in which you pressed me to release materials which may have hurt other people, but then ran like a bitch when I suggested that you put some skin in the game?
I've heard (take with a grain of salt) that Ukrainians are being "encouraged" to wear armbands. White to indicate support for Russia, Blue to indicate support for the Ukrainian government and none at all for neutral.I've heard that richwicks is a pedophile, a locker room surfer, and a bum bottom sniffer. But take with a grain of salt.
Dude, I think you're full of crap.
Not in English. I checked both the CC and to see if he had videos in English. Nope. All the videos are in Cyrillic, so I can't even suss out the topic.And neither you should. The comment was meant for the "mostly writer". HE was the one who insisted that translation is not a problem, but then backpedaled.
richwicks saysI've heard (take with a grain of salt) that Ukrainians are being "encouraged" to wear armbands. White to indicate support for Russia, Blue to indicate support for the Ukrainian government and none at all for neutral.I've heard that richwicks is a pedophile, a locker room surfer, and a bum bottom sniffer. No definite proof, take with a grain of salt.
richwicks saysDude, I think you're full of crap.
If you could think then we wouldn't be having this enlightening conversation
I actually want to dig into this. Where did you hear about the armbands and about those who got shot?
> richwicks
Give the exact times, will you? 1h 44min is a bit excessive.
Even better yet: cut to the chase, where did HE got that info?
BTW, logic 101 for you: "the only people worth listening to are people who are censored" (even if true which it isn't) WOULD NOT imply "all people who are censored are worth listening to"
Notice I'm not demanding you to accept what you hear at face value. For all I know, this guest is full of shit.He is. He's parroting the narrative of kp.ru, the Kremlin propaganda outlet. Word-by-word. This is MH17 all over again, I'm waiting for dispatcher Carlos who saw it all to weigh in.
I don't need to be told that if A is in B doesn't imply B is in A.
richwicks saysNotice I'm not demanding you to accept what you hear at face value. For all I know, this guest is full of shit.He is. He's parroting the narrative of kp.ru, the Kremlin propaganda outlet.
When Kremlin craps it's pants, it resorts to the usual tactics: friendly media sources that parrot lines which originate within it's walls. Who says that you can't buy friends?
Even an imbecile should suspect that something is fishy with a story which relies on PEOPLE WEARING ARMBANDS AKIN PAINTING TARGET ON THEIR BACKS!
There's only one bit to this story that has basis in the truth: Rashists made people wear bands. Rashists, not Ukrainians. The rest is the product of imagination of kp.ru and it's trumpets (you amongst them apparently, through yet another medium)
richwicks saysI don't need to be told that if A is in B doesn't imply B is in A.
Oh, you do. Demonstrable lack of logic and critical judgement is exactly the reason why anyone who feels like it can use you to wipe the floor.
Possibly but at this point, "Russian propaganda" is a synonym for the unvarnished truth.Only in your disturbed imagination. "Russian propaganda" is not even a data point. They are not even trying to go "gray", which is when you have a grain of truth and use it to build up a lie (something that I found you do quite often). They just make shit up. Demonstrably. Over and over again. When someone hints that they are more truthful than US MSM (which is a low bar) I suspect that the person is a propaganda troll. When someone says what you said I don't suspect it, I know it.
I have no idea what kp.ru is and I don't know what you mean by "trumpets".
Perhaps it's untrue. Again, I'll find out in time.
I listen and bide my time. There's no reason to chose sides in this. It wouldn't matter if I did.
I know...
CIA Admits Feeding Americans False Info About Ukraine
written by ron paul
monday april 11, 2022
Late last year, a Gallup poll showed that Americans’ trust in the mainstream media has fallen to its second lowest level on record. Only seven percent of Americans responded that they have a “great deal” of trust in the media.
That loss of trust has been well-earned by the mainstream media, and it explains the massive growth of independent media and alternative voices on social media. The response to the rise of independent media voices has been a rush to “cancel” any voice outside the accepted mainstream narrative.
Citizens of the Soviet Union would read manipulated media like Pravda not because the regime reported facts, but because truth was hidden between the lines of what was reported and what was not reported. That seems to be where we are in the US today.
Last week an extraordinary article appeared in, of all places, NBC News, reporting that the US intelligence community is knowingly feeding information it does not believe accurate to the US mainstream media for the American audience to consume.
In other words, the article reports that the US “deep state” admits to being actively engaged in lying to the American people in the hopes that it can manipulate public opinion
According to the NBC News article, “multiple US officials acknowledged that the US has used information as a weapon even when confidence in the accuracy of the information wasn’t high. Sometimes it has used low-confidence intelligence for deterrent effect…”
Readers will recall the shocking headlines that Russia was prepared to use chemical weapons in Ukraine, that China would be providing military equipment to Russia, that Russian President Putin was being fed misinformation by his advisors, and more.
All of these were churned out by the CIA to be repeated in the American media even though they were known to be false. It was all about, as one intelligence officer said in the article, “trying to get inside Putin’s head.”
That may have been the goal, but what the CIA actually did was get inside America’s head with false information meant to shape public perception of the conflict. They lied to propagandize us in favor of the Biden Administration’s narrative.
Those pushing the “Russiagate” hoax through the Trump years claimed that the goal of “Russian disinformation” was to undermine Americans’ trust in our government, media, and other institutions. Isn’t it ironic that the CIA itself has done more than the Russians to undermine Americans’ faith in the media by feeding false stories to establish a particular narrative among the American people?
After the Bay of Pigs disaster, President Kennedy has been quoted as wanting “to splinter the CIA in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.” That didn’t work out too well for him. As Senate Majority Chuck Schumer famously told Rachel Maddow in 2020, responding to the-President Trump’s criticism of the CIA, “let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.”
As more information about the activities of the US Intelligence Community in trying to bring down Trump come out, it appears that, for once, Schumer was right.
It’s time to revisit President Kennedy’s post-Bay of Pigs wish. The CIA using lies to propagandize the American people toward war with Russia is just one of thousands of reasons to scatter a million pieces of that agency to the wind.
To the unified chorus of the coach experts who claim that "his expertise is obsolete" regarding that X-KGB guy. I was talking specifically about his ability to process data. It's a skill, an acquired one. It's based no a number of rules which don't go obsolete, and it itself doesn't go obsolete.
richwicks saysPossibly but at this point, "Russian propaganda" is a synonym for the unvarnished truth.Only in your disturbed imagination. "Russian propaganda" is not even a data point.
They are not even trying to go "gray", which is when you have a grain of truth and use it to build up a lie (something that I found you do quite often).
They just make shit up. Demonstrably. Over and over again.
When someone hints that they are more truthful than US MSM (which is a low bar) I suspect that the person is a propaganda troll. When someone says what you said I don't suspect it, I know it.
richwicks saysI have no idea what kp.ru is and I don't know what you mean by "trumpets".
kp.ru - it's a source which creates BS that you are spreading (one of them). Their trumpet - it's what you are, knowingly or not. Glad to be of help.
richwicks saysPerhaps it's untrue. Again, I'll find out in time.
You don't need more data to rule out certain options if you are not an imbecile. Since you haven't ruled them out, and you are actively spreading them... well, you get the picture. Oh, wait, may be you don't!
richwicks saysI listen and bide my time. There's no reason to chose sides in this. It wouldn't matter if I did.
False. False. False.
- You don't just "listen and bide your time". You are actively engaged in propaganda, and lying about not choosing sides.
richwicks saysI know...
My first reaction was to paraphrase Ronald Regan - "The trouble with you is not that you are ignorant; it's just that you know so much that isn't so".
Show me where I have. Quote me.
The Russians do? Point out specific examples.Let's take JUST ONE event, MH17.
richwicks saysShow me where I have. Quote me.
I have. Repeatedly. At some point I dedicated a post to your use of gray propaganda: https://patrick.net/post/1344073/?comment_id=1826473 Are you having memory lapses,
Nuland: Good. I don't think Klitsch should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary, I don't think it's a good idea.
Nuland: [Breaks in] I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience.
richwicks saysThe Russians do? Point out specific examples.Let's take JUST ONE event, MH17.
A French journalist and senior international correspondent for mainstream publication Le Figaro, Georges Malbrunot, claims that Americans are “in charge” of the Ukrainian war effort on the ground.
Malbrunot, who returned from Ukraine, after he accompanied French volunteer fighters on the battlefield, said that he was surprised to find out that Americans are “commanding” efforts on the ground. The journalist made his remarks to French global news channel CNEWS, the second most-watched news network in the country.
“I had the surprise, and so did they, to discover that to be able to enter the Ukrainian army, well it’s the Americans who are in charge,” said Malbrunot.
French reporter returning from Ukraine "Americans are directly in charge of the war on the ground." pic.twitter.com/m5yr7far6N
— no one (@antiwar_soldier) April 11, 2022
Malbrunot asserted that he and the volunteers he was accompanying were “almost arrested” by the Americans, whom he said were in charge. Malbrunot claims that the volunteers were forced to sign a contract agreeing to fight “until the end of the war.”
“And who is in charge? It’s the Americans, I saw it with my own eyes,” claimed Malbrunot. “I thought I was with the international brigades, and I found myself facing the Pentagon.”
Malbrunot pointed out that America has been providing Ukraine with armed switchblade suicide drones, as previously reported by Rebel News.
On April 10, U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin shared a photograph of himself speaking to Ukrainian soldiers training on how to use the cutting edge weapons on a video conference call.
U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin speaks to Ukrainian soldiers training on switchblade drones in Biloxi, Mississippi before they return today to defend their country pic.twitter.com/awUaoySgeH
— Lucas Tomlinson (@LucasFoxNews) April 10, 2022
Following the interview, Malbrunot tweeted that British SAS units “have been present in Ukraine since the beginning of the war, as have the American Deltas.” The journalist cited a French intelligence source for his claim.
“The Russians don’t ignore it, they know what the secret war is,” his source purportedly told him.
La visite de Boris Johnson à Kiev confirme la place de Londres comme premier allié de l'Ukraine. "Les unités d'élite des forces spéciales SAS sont présentes en Ukraine depuis le début de la guerre, de même que les Delta américaines", confie une source française du renseignement. pic.twitter.com/6ziTj4Dpst
— Georges Malbrunot (@Malbrunot) April 9, 2022
The claim that British and American special forces units are operating on the ground in Ukraine runs contrary to public statements by both the U.S State Department and the British Foreign Office, which asserted that there would not be any “boots on the ground” in Ukraine.
Look, if you deny that the US overthrew Ukraine after you have the audio recordings of Victoria Nuland at first saying that Vitaly Klitschko shouldn't be the next leaderI explained point by point how you went from fact from fiction - that's what "gray" does. I further asked a question: now that we know that her line was compromised, why is it the worst that they could produced? Why are there no other recordings? Crickets.
Who cares about MH17? It's to no advantage of either the Ukrainians or the Russians to shoot down a commercial airliner. It was an accident, and then it was nothing more than fodder for propaganda. It doesn't matter who shot them down, it was an accident.Bullshit. There is a reason why Rashists denied it with such vigor. If they admitted that, then they would also have to admit sending BUK and the crew to Ukraine, something that they viciously denied. Accident? Sure. "Doesn't matter?" Oh, sure it does. It pulls the ground from the likes of you who claim "civil war" lead by "farmers and coal miners" against evil Kyiv.
I explained point by point how you went from fact from fiction
Again, your reasoning is, well, obviously fallacious to me.Your opinion is irrelevant. Just focus on the "Now that we know that her line was compromised, why are there no other recording?" question.
richwicks saysAgain, your reasoning is, well, obviously fallacious to me.Your opinion is irrelevant.
I wouldn't consider it an opinion, it's a regrettable conclusion.Your conclusions are like your opinions: subject to be ignored. They are irrelevant for the lack of merit and general lunacy of the carrier.
« First « Previous Comments 741 - 780 of 4,272 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://twitter.com/HinchaPenta/status/1496700652084473857?s=20&t=T1inEM5Hv6ahmrL4nzNirQ&source=patrick.net