patrick.net

https://reclaimthenet.org/2000-mules-confirmed-as-a-huge-hit-for-rumble-and-locals/

Patrick says

Woah, I don't think you got the point. Phone geolocation data shows that thousands of people were stuffing ballot boxes.

In battleground states, using ballots trafficked from “non-profits.” Any guess as to whose name was on those ballots for President? And what impact did this have on down ticket and local races as well?

Bottom line, this was the most insecure and fraudulent/fake election in American history.

Patrick says

Phone geolocation data shows that thousands of people were stuffing ballot boxes.

Not to mention the videos of people stuffing ballot boxes matching the timestamps of the mule's geolocations.

Remember when they dragged the boxes of ballots out from under the desks after they closed the polls in Georgia? Uninvestigated and unprosecuted as far as I know.

The election was stolen by a desperate kleptocratic gerontocracy. Hopefully we'll get our liberty back and justice will be served but I don't see it happening.

I am seeing some cognitive dissonance kicking in with some people, but there is still a lot of rabid antiMAGAers out there.

Onvacation says

but there is still a lot of rabid antiMAGAers out there.

Regardless of how people feel about Trump, how can anyone feel good that hundreds of thousands of ballots were trafficked in battleground states? More than enough to negate the votes of legitimate voters who followed the election rules.

I thought the video of the ballot box stuffers looked weak. It sure didn't look like they were putting 100s of ballots in at a time. Don't get me wrong, I believe the election was stolen but I also believe Trump was complicit. Really? I have no clue anymore about what's what any longer. Anybody could be lying about anything.

The US is about whatever you can get away with.

PeopleUnited says

Onvacation says

but there is still a lot of rabid antiMAGAers out there.

Regardless of how people feel about Trump, how can anyone feel good that hundreds of thousands of ballots were trafficked in battleground states? More than enough to negate the votes of legitimate voters who followed the election rules.

Most libs could care less if they win by hook or crook. They don't care one bit what is destroyed as long as they think they're right.

PeopleUnited says

In battleground states, using ballots trafficked from “non-profits.”

If a shitlib ever complains about religious tax exemptions, talk about pulling it for Planned Parenthood, ACLU, OpenSociety, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, etc.

"THAT's different. That's progress towards a better world, without superstition, run by Experts(tm)"

The smoking gun of election fraud I thought was how they stopped the count in the middle of the night when Trump was winning and then magically discovered enough Biden votes to push him over when counting resumed. We’ve all seen the suspicious looking graph. This 2000 Mules thing sheds absolutely no light on that, since the mules’ ballots all would have been submitted together with the legitimate ones in normal ballot boxes.

I believe that they used many forms of cheating.

Undoctored says

This 2000 Mules thing sheds absolutely no light on that, since the mules’ ballots all would have been submitted together with the legitimate ones in normal ballot boxes.

And it still wasn't enough to put Biden over the top. They probably had boxes of ballots for Biden just in case in all of the battleground districts.

Onvacation says

Undoctored says

This 2000 Mules thing sheds absolutely no light on that, since the mules’ ballots all would have been submitted together with the legitimate ones in normal ballot boxes.

And it still wasn't enough to put Biden over the top. They probably had boxes of ballots for Biden just in case in all of the battleground districts.

Righ it does shed quite some light on it. The muled ballots were just necessary base ballots. Later that night they just unearthed additional necesssary suitcases full of ballots for the win. Plus they knew some ballot drop boxes would not be counted until days later, which then was used for the narrative that the lead "widened" and recounts were just unnecessary taxpayer costing sore loser antics.

IHLlary was a failed stolen election, so they clearly have studied the process from the ground up and scaled up the fraud on many fronts. If the fake voter rolls didn't do it, add mail in voting. If the ballot stuffing doesn't do it, then add reams of manufactured ballots. If all of that doesn't work, deploy the death star Dominion and voting machines.

Corrupt secretaries of state were given Soros checks since 2004, when the process was field tested in Nevada, then California. Nothing is enforced in a situation where public executions of government officials are now warranted.

However, the fact that they think the sham theater of elections is still necessary points to the frailty of their dictatorial fantasies. The people need to rend them limb from limb.

They did the same shit they do in Democrat Primaries in Big Cities.

Eric Holder says

Would be perfectly legal in CA, btw.

One of the many reasons I'm moving but perhaps the main one. There is no hope for this place.

PeopleUnited says

And what impact did this have on down ticket and local races as well?

In Pennsylvania, thousands of those after 3AM ballots only had "Biden" filled out, the down races were left blank.

WineHorror1 says

I thought the video of the ballot box stuffers looked weak.

It is pretty obvious that the mules knew what they were doing is illegal. And their handlers did too. So to avoid being caught on camera doing obviously illegal shit, they seem to have kept the ballot count in the “family size” numbers.

Undoctored says

The smoking gun of election fraud I thought was how they stopped the count in the middle of the night when Trump was winning and then magically discovered enough Biden votes to push him over when counting resumed. We’ve all seen the suspicious looking graph. This 2000 Mules thing sheds absolutely no light on that, since the mules’ ballots all would have been submitted together with the legitimate ones in normal ballot boxes.

There are a ton of smoking guns. There was no single strategy employed, it was media blackout of the Hunter laptop, it was Biden hiding in his basement for months to avoid gaffes and senior moments, it was mail in vote fraud. It was deliberately lost Trump ballots. It was secret stashes of ballots run though counting machines after the election monitors left, it was trafficked ballots including across state lines, it was counting machine “errors.” After all, they put together “ the most extensive voter fraud organization in history!”

PeopleUnited says

it was mail in vote fraud

Yeah, it was the Stacey Abrams machine at work. Notice how Biden barely won in states like Georgia, Arizona and Wisconsin. The total vote margin of victory in those states was less than 50,000 votes for Biden. If Trump won those 3 states, then he'd get 270 electoral votes and would have won.

https://reclaimthenet.org/2000-mules-confirmed-as-a-huge-hit-for-rumble-and-locals/

May 14, 2022
2000 Mules confirmed as a “huge hit” for Rumble and Locals, reported biggest political documentary in a decade
A win for alternatives to Big Tech platforms.

PeopleUnited says

There are a ton of smoking guns. There was no single strategy employed, it was media blackout of the Hunter laptop, it was Biden hiding in his basement for months to avoid gaffes and senior moments, it was mail in vote fraud. It was deliberately lost Trump ballots. It was secret stashes of ballots run though counting machines after the election monitors left, it was trafficked ballots including across state lines, it was counting machine “errors.” After all, they put together “ the most extensive voter fraud organization in history!”

In the End, I firmly believe the pre-loaded ballots and machine rigging wasn't enough. They had to do old fashioned ballot stuffing in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania.

Same shit they do in the Dem Primaries.

https://www.truethevote.org/ttv-2000mules-faqs/

https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/bending-benford-part-1

The other day, the 2000 Mules documentary came out (no, I haven't watched it, yet) and there is renewed interest in examining election fraud. I honestly do not know whether or not I'm the first to make all the observations I present here, but after a few dozen conversations with mathematicians, I think that some of my techniques are original. I was working on a paper prior to being sucked into vaccine statistics work. Really, I don't care whether this gets "published" beyond this substack. I just want to get the idea out there so that somebody (anybody) can make use of it. ...

https://rumble.com/v154v42-exclusive-2000-mules-director-dinesh-dsouza-says-our-film-proves-joe-biden-.html

2000 Mules Director Dinesh D’Souza says 'Our Film Proves Joe Biden is Not the President'

https://nitter.net/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1527259162668826626#m

Rasmussen Reports
@Rasmussen_Poll
18h
Good Morning !

Twitter search is now suppressing hashtags about a certain movie.

True The Vote has the phone number for this person and the location for all local 501(c)(3) 'non-profit' organizations that they visited.

Night after night. Trip after trip.

WHO PAID THE MULES?

https://vid8.poal.co/user/AOU/EPxYZOJ

Ben Shapiro - controlled opposition?

DooDahMan says

Shapiro argued more than cell phone data is needed to prove that “mules” were passing on fraudulent ballots in favor of Biden. He admitted his opinion might make “nobody happy,” considering his conservative audience.

What the movie proved is that the election was not secure, that thousands of people broke election laws in battleground states. And the video evidence is pretty compelling as to which side the mules And mules handlers were on.

Shapiro is on the border of Fox News and MAGA. He can't quite assimilate all the information available now is to assume the worst, and stop being over cautious.

AmericanKulak says

Shapiro is on the border of Fox News and MAGA. He can't quite assimilate all the information available now is to assume the worst, and stop being over cautious.

Yeah it's not "controlled opposition" he is simply hedging his bet, I despise that in the face of such flagrant fraud, and I think he will fare worse as the current climate does not support cucks. However it's at least understandable, def moreso than "men can get pregnant you bigot! Reeeee!"

https://patriots.win/p/15HvUX9zhE/breaking-walmart-agrees-to-sell-/c/

Walmart Agrees to Sell 2000 Mules DVD. "They're going to be going up shortly on Walmart."--Dinesh D'Souza

Patrick says

https://patriots.win/p/15HvUX9zhE/breaking-walmart-agrees-to-sell-/c/

Walmart Agrees to Sell 2000 Mules DVD. "They're going to be going up shortly on Walmart."--Dinesh D'Souza

Now I await the angry bluehairs accusing walmart of being racist/sexist/etc... for supporting "trump election fraud disinfo".

mell says

Yeah it's not "controlled opposition" he is simply hedging his bet, I despise that in the face of such flagrant fraud, and I think he will fare worse as the current climate does not support cucks. However it's at least understandable, def moreso than "men can get pregnant you bigot! Reeeee!"

As far back as I can recall, shapiro always walked a careful line on trump. He supported trump wherever he could do it via solid principal, and did a faux opposition of trump on some of the issues he couldnt be certain of, or felt were more likely to bite him later. He even just made fun of trump and mocked his voice sometimes to give himself some material to point back to later, if needed, so he could say he was always leery of trump and against him on some stuff. Hedging is a really good word for his behavior IMO, as he wants to play both positions.

Ben cares mostly about his media business imo, and doesnt want to take unnecessary risks. I liked him better in the "ben shapiro thug life" era.