patrick.net

DemoralizerOfPanicans says

Yeah, Jack is the one who made the final call to ban Trump from Twitter.

And many others before and after that.

Big tech is a giant nasty club of woke leftists. Still true today as it was back then.

@PinoAmericano
Thomas Massie went to a private event with the chairman of a Democrat Socialist Coalition (member org) but he wants us to believe he had no idea who the guy was because congressmen just show up at random peoples homes without doing any research. Sure dude.
https://x.com/PinoAmericano/status/1980098399509836017

Just like Massie is purely by chance aligning with Ro Khanna.

Huh, strange donations from Masimo Corp. Both Ultraleft Squad and Massie both.

Check out Club for Growth which is anti-Tariff, pro-Wide Open Borders

Club for Growth runs "Free Trade Facts" about how outsourcing American Jobs is great for Americans.
https://freetradefacts.org/

I still like Massie.

He's very clear, consistent, and principled.

Trump just doesn't like him because he keeps calling out AIPAC and Trump's questionable moves.

Patrick says

Trump just doesn't like him because he keeps calling out AIPAC and Trump's questionable moves.

And he's for open borders and against e-verify (without any alternative, since he WANTS to be able to hire illegals)

Oh, and he voted on an amendment that would DOUBLE the number of H1B spouses eligible for work permits (7% to 15%)

Massie's campaign site explicitly states: "I support President Trump’s efforts to stop illegal immigration and voted to fund the wall for the full amount requested by the President."

2024: Voted for H.R. 7511 (Laken Riley Act): Massie supported this bill to increase interior enforcement, allowing states to sue the federal government over non-enforcement of immigration laws and abuse of parole for illegal aliens.

2014: Cosponsored H.R. 5014 (Illegal Entry Accountability Act): Massie backed this bill to suspend U.S. foreign aid to Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador until they take action to reduce illegal border crossings, directly targeting Mexico's role in migration flows.

In a 2023 interview, Massie reiterated that E-Verify could be weaponized to monitor citizens, comparing it to a “national ID card” that could track employment and movement beyond immigration enforcement.

On June 8, 2025, he emphasized deporting criminals over E-Verify, saying: “I support a strong border, and agree strongly with deporting criminals,” but rejected E-Verify as a solution.

Massie’s objections are rooted in his libertarian philosophy, emphasizing limited government, individual privacy, and skepticism of federal programs. Massie argues E-Verify’s database, which cross-references Social Security numbers with federal records, could become a “backdoor national ID” system. He fears it might track all workers, not just immigrants, creating a government-controlled employment registry.

He’s noted historical abuses of similar systems (e.g., NSA surveillance), warning E-Verify could expand to monitor citizens’ activities beyond immigration enforcement.

Massie contends E-Verify doesn’t address root causes like illegal border crossings or criminal aliens. In his June 2025 post, he said it “won’t enforce immigration” and prioritized deportations instead.

He points to loopholes (e.g., stolen identities bypassing checks) and argues enforcement should focus on physical barriers and deportations, as seen in his support for H.R. 7511 (Laken Riley Act) and H.R. 5014 (cutting aid to Mexico for lax border control).

Grok:

Did Thomas Massie Vote for an Amendment Doubling H-1B Spouses Eligible for Work Permits (7% to 15%)?

No, there is no evidence that Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) voted for such an amendment. Based on searches of congressional records, voting histories, and his public statements, no matching amendment exists in recent sessions (118th or 119th Congress, 2023–2025) related to H-1B spouse work permits (H-4 EAD program).

The 7% to 15% figure you mentioned appears to refer to unrelated provisions in the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act (H.R. 1044/S. 386), which Massie co-sponsored in 2023. This bill adjusts per-country visa caps for family- and employment-based green cards (increasing family caps from 7% to 15% and eliminating the 7% cap for employment visas to reduce backlogs), but it does not address H-1B spouses' work authorization or double eligibility for permits.

Proposed Change in H.R. 1044 (2023): The bill increases the per-country cap for family-based immigrant visas from 7% to 15% of the total annual allocation (e.g., from ~15,820 to ~33,900 visas per country out of 226,000).

Patrick says

Massie’s objections are rooted in his libertarian philosophy

A main tenant of Libertarians is the free flow of people and capital across borders.

HeadSet says

A main tenant of Libertarians is the free flow of people and capital across borders.

Yet Massie is consistently opposed to open borders.

Patrick says

Yet Massie is consistently opposed to open borders.

Is that true, or is he being disingenuous? Support moderately effective physical methods of deportation, but adamantly oppose E-Verify that would remove the main incentive to illegally enter the US. Massie seems to be for the H1B and related programs, with no provisions to prevent these programs as being used to hire cheaper foreign labor.

Your own post says "This bill adjusts per-country visa caps for family- and employment-based green cards (increasing family caps from 7% to 15% and eliminating the 7% cap for employment visas to reduce backlogs)." That statement "to reduce backlogs" is blatantly hollow, as the desired effect seems to be to increase the supply of cheap foreign labor.

In 2024, Massie endorsed... DeSantis.

JD Vance: "The problem with Thomas isn't one issue, or 2,3,4 issues. It's that every time we need a difficult vote, he was unwilling to provide it."

Epstein-Trump is a wedge op. Massie didn't care until 2024.


https://x.com/i/grok/share/TEZwqqRcinjiPDQKGZf2Az6c0

Just like MTG wanted to Deport them All until a few weeks ago.

Congrats to Massie on his new Bride!

Everyone should be yelling bloody murder about Trump's continued coverup of the Epstein files. It's a yuge failure. So disappointing.

DemoralizerOfPanicans says

every time we need a difficult vote

Sounds like every time they wanted him to violate his principles, he wouldn't.

I love his single-issue bill idea, his opposition to the Fed, and his refusal to obey his AIPAC handler like pretty much all other Congressmen do.

Patrick says

I love his single-issue bill idea,

Can't happen with the Fillibuster. Otherwise no spending bill would move, or would be shaken down for an extra $500B in spending for every bill that passed.

DemoralizerOfPanicans says

Patrick says

I love his single-issue bill idea,

Can't happen with the Fillibuster. Otherwise no spending bill would move, or would be shaken down for an extra $500B in spending for every bill that passed.

Single issue bills would solve a lot of problems. No hidden things, no attachments. Current omnibus bills are pure corruption.

https://x.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1986120515472228783

@RepThomasMassie
Nov 5

To avoid a repeat of last night’s shellacking in the 2026 midterms, Republicans should:

quit covering for pedophiles

put America before Israel

put farmers before corporations

quit funding wars abroad

reduce spending to control inflation

quit attacking independent voices

Dunno what he means with the farmer comment, but I agree 100% on the other issues.

Patrick says

To avoid a repeat of last night’s shellacking in the 2026 midterms, Republicans should:

Stop talking about abortion. Women carried the Dems over the line and from the massively blasted campaign propagandas claiming Republicans would ban abortion, this was women's main issue.

Patrick says

To avoid a repeat of last night’s shellacking in the 2026 midterms, Republicans should:

There was no shellacking. Blue voters in blue states with blue majorities voted blue.

(It's why they're blue states)

All three of the highest office candidates in each state (two govs, one mayoral) were not Trump endorsed or anti-Trump:
Winsome, Jack C., and Sliwa. Jack C. actually performed well, better than Murphy, but the Dems flipped out early and brought Obama out to the campaign and had to spend effort on turnout (if not darker methods) to defend a Blue candidate in a Blue State.

The lesson is don't run boring ass candidates that don't have the MAGA endorsement.

Patrick says

quit covering for pedophiles

put America before Israel

put farmers before corporations

quit funding wars abroad

reduce spending to control inflation

quit attacking independent voices

Where is IMMIGRATION and OPEN BORDERS, Massie?
A large fraction of Democrats rate out-of-control immirgation as a priority, even Matt Yglesias recognizes this:
https://www.slowboring.com/p/democrats-biggest-immigration-dilemma

None of these were the blue majority in blue states' priorities. The only one you might say was "Inflation", but Dem voters DEFINITELY don't want to cut spending to do it.

https://x.com/Megatron_ron/status/1986931723469307923

Ed Gallrein

BONGINO replies to Massie:

Congressman Massie,

When Director Patel and I entered on duty in our leadership positions in the FBI we had our hands full, but we were happy to be part of the President’s team, and we still are.

Despite the multitude of challenges we faced, one of our first initiatives was to aggressively pursue a new strategy to investigate the January 6 pipe bomb, terror attack. We brought in new personnel to take a look at the case, we flew in police officers and detectives working as TFOs (task force officers) to review FBI work, we conducted multiple internal reviews, held countless in person and SVTC meetings with investigative team members, we dramatically increased investigative resources, and we increased the public award for information in the case to utilize crowd-sourcing leads.

This is only a small sample of the work the FBI personnel and leadership team have put into this critical investigation.
When I spoke with you yesterday a little after 8am ET (screenshots attached), I offered you an in-person brief on our work. We spoke for ten minutes.

I called you back a bit after 7:30pm ET to again make that offer. You didn’t answer and have yet to call me back.

Despite this, you continue to imply that the Director and I are targeting investigators in the case. This is disgusting, even by the low standards many have for politicians. You know my number, and you’re free to call me anytime. But it’s easier to tweet and throw BS bombs.

Yes, our leadership team will be meeting with FBI team members today, and we will avail them of all the whistleblower resources they need to disclose ANY evidence of malfeasance in the prior administration. And we will ask about threads that may have gone un-pulled under prior leadership, because we are passionate about solving this case.

But a week of near 24-hour work on RECENT open source leads in the case has yet to produce a break through, and some of the media reporting regarding prior persons of interest is grossly inaccurate and serves only to mislead the public.
I proudly serve in this administration, and I proudly work with Director Patel to reform and advance the crime fighting and national security missions of the FBI. We would love to have you as a partner in this mission, rather than a dog barking behind a fence.

https://x.com/FBIDDBongino/status/1988956947190616397?s=20

Receipts of the two phone calls yesterday to Massie by Bongino provided at the link.

Wtf, nice infighting by the president. Are there recent advisor changes? He’s been off since August, when he declined to prosecute the Epstein files further. Island attendees were a viper’s den of Democrats, a no brainer for a Republican. Protecting mossad? With friendly, flattering advisors to encourage that, weak H1B policy, and this Venezuela boondoggle (which should be against Mexican cartels)?

Nah, Massie's been a problem since he voted against America First, against using already-allocated Dept of Defense money to build the Wall back in 2019 - THREE TIMES!

DemoralizerOfPanicans says

"he always votes against the Republican Party"

Massie votes with Republicans 91% of the time.

Patrick says

"he always votes against the Republican Party"

Massie votes with Republicans 91% of the time.

Well his wife died, but did anybody see the Autopsy?

When did Massie last see his wife alive?

Where was Massie's Dem Wife at the time?

What time and where was the body discovered?

Who did Massie call in the first minutes? Did he call 911 immediately?

How much insurance did Massie have on Rhonda?

I think we should be able to ask Questions of America's leaders.

We need to see the Massie Files!

Patrick says

Massie votes with Republicans 91% of the time.

The Walls, Immigration, Tariffs. Kentucky needs a MAGA, not a RINO.

DemoralizerOfPanicans says

Patrick says

Massie votes with Republicans 91% of the time.

The Walls, Immigration, Tariffs. Kentucky needs a MAGA, not a RINO.

MAGA should mean MAGA. Not Trumps MIGA, not prop up hedge fund buddies real estate investors, not bigger government spend, not supporting Ramswamy who openly hates America, not 50 year loans debt slavery.

Trump isn’t one to complain about remarrying. Bro married someone half his age. Is that why Epstein files are hidden? Let’s not go there…

My point is Trump needs to listen to his base more, and not fight with people who want MAGA.

FortWayneHatesRealtors says

MAGA should mean MAGA. Not Trumps MIGA,

Nope, I'm MAGA, not MIBA (Malicious Israel Blaming Always).

No Tucker Party will ever win. MAGA gets Independents to win.

I will never vote for a SocCon version of BLM: "America Only".

Oil is a priced as an international commodity. Either we control it or somebody else will. China, probably, but it will never be neutral and open to free and fair bidding, that's Glibertarian naive nonsense on one hand, and "Multipolar" propaganda pushed by China and other rivals on the other hand.

Massie refuses to discuss disciplinary action for Plaskett (D-USVI) for colluding with a convicted sex offender, Epstein and asking questions he provided in Congress.

Alison Steinberg @alisonintheknow
of Lindell TV asked Thomas Massie if the house should vote to censure her after it was revealed by the Washington Post that Stacey Plaskett was texting with Jeffrey Epstein to influence her questions during 2019 hearings investigating Trump.

His answer was, “feels like a distraction.”

Massie just gave away the game:

This was never about the truth. This was always about finding an attack vector against Trump and Massie, as well as Marjorie Traitor Brown, either naively or intentionally went along with perpetuating this hoax that Trump is a p*do.

Primary them both.

https://x.com/jacktronprime/status/1990850575534072183?s=20

OK, now I'm getting pissed at Massie.

"Classified" means "fuck you, peasants."