« First « Previous Comments 45 - 55 of 55 Search these comments
So maybe a strategy of maintaining some hostility and tension is not really necessary to maintain an ethnic minority distinctness in the long term.
That's not what it is now, it's even worse than what the KKK ended up being - now they are a criminal Jewish mafia. Zionists are parasites on host nations.
How odd of God
To choose the Jews.
Not odd of God.
Goyim annoy ‘im.
But not so odd
As those who choose
A Jewish God
But spurn the Jews.
I think white South Africans are also at enormous risk of genocide by the black majority because they maintain a distance and distinct identity.
Over the weekend, a stadium full of black South Africans chanted about killing white people while making machine-gun sounds
Edward Teach
Jul 31, 2023
It's almost like all this racial hatred isn't about equality or fairness but blood and revenge...
Yep, calls of murder and genocide are on that good ol' right side of history I keep hearing about. Remember, past discrimination must be atoned for with present discrimination!
South African immigrant Elon Musk had thoughts:
Cyril Ramaphosa is the president of South Africa.
Anyway, I'm sure pushing out all educated white citizens by making mass death threats against them will make your nation great.
Good thing they fired all those evil white engineers in the name of "equity"! ...
I could define Marxism as jealousness and vengeance on steroids, and it never works. Good luck, South Africa.
It's Zionists. Zionism is an ideology of Jewish supremacy.
The left is all about weaponized resentments.
Have you read the Tanakh, Mishna and Gemara?
« First « Previous Comments 45 - 55 of 55 Search these comments
If there's too much, that's obviously bad, because genocide.
But on the other hand, if there is too little antisemitism, Jews rapidly assimilate into the mainstream and a distinct Jewish community no longer exists. This has even been openly stated by some groups - that America is "Killing the Jews with kindness." By which they don't mean literal killing, only a removal of all barriers to assimilation.
I think white South Africans are also at enormous risk of genocide by the black majority because they maintain a distance and distinct identity.
The same thing plays out with almost every minority group that is determined not to assimilate. The Armenians were careful to maintain distinctions between themselves and the Turks. Heck, the Amish don't really want to talk to you either, because outside influences are a threat to their identity. But no one hates the Amish because they are so darn peaceful.
Another counterexample would be the Parsis of India. They don't intermarry with non-Parsis and are quite distinct and very rich. Non-Parsis may not even set foot in Parsi fire temples. But they make a point of benevolent public works and are highly regarded in India. So maybe a strategy of maintaining some hostility and tension is not absolutely necessary to maintain an ethnic minority in the long term, and other strategies could work as well.