10
0

Taxes


 invite response                
2022 Jul 11, 5:28pm   11,838 views  163 comments

by GreaterNYCDude   ➕follow (2)   💰tip   ignore  

I've been thinking about this off and on lately, and there's been some recent threads related to the topic, so I figure I'll set up a separate thread.

Until the 16th ammendment was passed in the early 1900's, we got by without fedetal income taxes. Tariffs did the trick. Of course, we were not yet the superpower we became, huge millitary and all, and there were not nearly the federally funded social programs we have today.

Frankly, I don't think your average American realizes how heavily they are taxed. Federal. State (with some excaptions) Property. School. Gas. Sales. Etc.

For most in the middle and upper middle class, federal income tax is the biggest share of taxes paid on a percentage basis.

In a modern captalist economy, it makes more sense to me to tax consumption rather than income.

So why not abolish the federal income tax, and instead have a federal tax on goods and services rendered. Better yet, couple it with a balanced budget amment so that the government can't spend money they don't have.

Taxing goods should be straightforward to implement. Buy a bag of rice, clothes, a house, a car, stock, etc. tax it at a nominal rate to raise sufficent revenue to keep the government running. Tax should apply to individuals and corporations alike. I have no idea what the rate would need to be to replace the lost income income revenue, but there must be a way for the been counters to figure that out.

Same holds for services. From your lawyer to your plumber to your accountant.. services rendered should also be taxed... possibly at a different rate than physical goods, since we are a "service based economy".

Just thinking out loud here.. In the 21st century there MUST be a better way to raise revenue than income tax and the various loopholes used to reduce or even avoid ones tax burden.

« First        Comments 157 - 163 of 163        Search these comments

163   NuttBoxer   2024 Jun 25, 7:36pm  

For context, $3,000 back then is equivalent to about $330k today:

"“No one who does not earn more than $3,000 a year will be affected by the tax. If you are single and earn $3,001 a year, you will be required to pay a tax of one percent on that additional dollar. If you are married, however, the income exemption is fixed at $4,000, allowing $1,000 extra exemption for the care of a wife.” 25 June 2024, Armstrong Economics."

- Sioux City Journal, 17 November 1913

« First        Comments 157 - 163 of 163        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions