patrick.net

Patrick says

So both Birmingham's (England and Alabama) have a lot of hood rats and Section 8 gremlins.

.

https://www.rt.com/news/615888-chihuahua-that-thinks-its-lion/

The_Deplorable says

https://www.rt.com/news/615888-chihuahua-that-thinks-its-lion/

I wouldn't underestimate them, in spite of the standard Kommie wringer and foreign invasions they are putting the island part under.

With the Commonwealth, they are still arguably the largest country in the world by influence.

They are also the center of the corporate frauds and impersonations that have been robbing and vitiating our country, and Tavistock, of course, is central to spinning out the psyops, demoralization, propagandas, lies, and undermining psychologic terrorisms we are now experiencing.

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/uk-doubling-down-wind-energy

The_Deplorable says

The "Get out of Jail Free" card has a picture of a Muslim on it.

https://barsoom.substack.com/p/the-left-turns-right

The Left Turns Right

What are we to make of the Anglosphere political leadership’s abrupt narrative reversal towards immigration restrictionism and rhetorical nativism? ...

So has Dark Starmer had a change of heart? Did he see the black light of the sonnenrad after being getting radicalized by frog memes in a parliamentary group chat? Is he, dare I say it fam, /ourguy/?

No, he obviously is not. Before entering politics Starmer worked as a barrister, with extensive involvement in immigration and asylum cases. He literally wrote the book on how to leverage European human rights law in order to prevent the deportation of asylum seekers and ensure that they received the full menu of government benefits. His career is inseparably intertwined with the emotional manipulation of white empathy and the leveraging of European human rights law in order to facilitate the replacement of European peoples with illiterate chancers from the third world. When the natives got restless after one of the Yookaydians butchered a room full of little British girls, a Yookaydian who Starmer’s ilk had helped shield from consequences for previous danger signs no less, Starmer’s first instinct as the man wielding the whip hand of the state was to turn it on the natives. It is extremely difficult to believe that this man has turned over a new leaf.

Carney strikes me as an equally unlikely nationalist. The man has spent most of his career as a central banker. He is a Davos man through and through, a self-described globalist and elitist. It is extremely unlikely that he has any genuine, deep feeling for the Canadian nations.

So what is happening, here?

One theory is that the Trans-Atlantic Anglo elite has quietly concluded that mass immigration has not, in fact, yielded the economic benefits that they had hoped it would bring, and furthermore that the immense social friction that it has engendered is not worth the hassle of staying the course. They just watched a populist insurgency claim the throne of the imperial capital, succeeding despite everything the elite threw at the upstarts – legal warfare, media warfare, election rigging, it all failed. For now, the left-liberal globalist establishment holds onto power in Canada and Britain, but Carney’s victory in the recent Canadian election risks Alberta quitting confederation in disgust, while in Great Britain the populist, anti-immmigration Reform party – which has only four seats in parliament – swept the recent local council elections, annihilating the Conservative Party (whom they took 8 councils from), and even infringing on Labour territory (who lost 2 councils to Reform).

Meanwhile, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police have been quietly sounding the alarm about the growing disillusion of Canada’s youth with the established order, and the resultant potential for radicalization and possibly even violent revolt. In the UK, war studies professor David Betz has been making the rounds with his warnings that Britain – and Western countries more generally, but especially Britain – has ticked so many of the boxes for ‘imminent civil war’ with such gormless enthusiasm that elites ought to be responding to the giant blinking red alarm sirens.

So, it might be that the political elites of the Anglosphere have determined that continued mass immigration is a clear and present threat to their power: it is alienating their citizens, who increasingly regard their elites as a hostile foreign tribe at best and as the foulest species of rank traitor at worst; it is not yielding the promised economic growth, but to the contrary is placing an unsustainable strain on social welfare systems which, should they break, will put the already restive natives in an even worse mood; it is motivating the rise of a homegrown rival elite in the form of populist political leaders; and it is leading to the rise of an imported rival elite, primarily in the form of relatively unprincipled subcontinentals whose clannishness and cunning makes them more formidable competitors for the top layers of the compost pile than had been originally suspected. Since our political elites don’t really have any principle other than hanging onto power at any cost, they’ve stuck their fingers in the wind and decided to tack in a new direction. ...

Another possibility – and I think this is actually more likely – is that the Anglo-American elite have simply realized that the old message, that if you oppose immigration you’re an awful racist, isn’t working anymore. White people have stopped responding to that. So instead, out of pure political necessity, they’re presenting themselves as immigration hardliners, hoping that the rubes are so easily fooled by cheap verbiage that they won’t notice what’s actually happening.

The American uniparty did the same thing for years, by the way: endless promises to control the border, which somehow never translated to action. Well, that’s not quite true: immigrating to the US legally is an extremely difficult process. The uniparty strategy was essentially to make legal immigration as painful and Byzantine as possible, in order to distract attention from the porous border and the rampant abuse of the H1-B system. The result was that people continued pouring into the country, while the average American was reassured that the government wasn’t just letting people pour into the country. It worked really well until Trump kicked over the game board, and actually did something about border control. Now that America’s southern border is locked down and deportations are proceeding (albeit in the face of intense resistance from activist judges), the political conversation is moving on to the question of legal immigration. ...

Oh, you are saying that immigration is too high? Well let us debate how low it should be, now that you have admitted there are no economic benefits. And what of those people who were let in - who were given residency and citizenship - while you insisted that immigration was good for us? Something which you now tacitly admit was a betrayal? What precisely is your argument for letting them stay?




By adopting the rhetoric of nativism and nationalism, they’ve implicitly accepted the moral frame that the ‘far right’ has been advocating for years ... a frame that they’ve spent their careers doing everything in their power to malign and suppress. Now they are trying to pass themselves off as the very monsters they fought against. We’ve successfully jerked the Overton window well to the right of where it was only a few short years ago, and they’re having to fight on our turf now. So press that home field advantage.

https://www.frontnieuws.com/nieuwe-burgemeester-van-engelse-stad-verbaast-publiek-door-tijdens-inauguratie-te-onthullen-dat-ze-geen-engels-spreekt/

New mayor of English city stuns crowd by revealing she doesn't speak English at inauguration
May 22, 202523

DThe recent appointment of Rukhsana Ismail as mayor of Rotherham, England, has sparked public outrage after it was revealed that she does not speak English – a basic skill that most people would consider essential for someone to be mayor of an English city.
Despite her inability to understand the national language, Pakistani-born Ismail stated through her interpreter that she will represent all voters, not just the Pakistani community, writes Baxter Dmitry .

Her appointment is also controversial because she did not receive a single vote from voters. Instead, she was appointed by a local council vote rather than a general election, highlighting systemic problems with representation, inclusion and transparency in British politics.