« First « Previous Comments 391 - 397 of 397 Search these comments
Karl Denninger:
Our solution to inflation in the 1970s - which was mostly Nixon and Ford, but Carter got the blame for it - the solution to that was to force women out of the house and into the workforce. And when that started…you had the whole generation that was called latchkey kids. You came home from school and basically you’re in the house until mom got home, right? Well, then we ratcheted that down to the point that now you need daycares for infants. Well, okay. That for a couple of kids is, what, 30 grand a year? $30,000 a year. Thousand dollar a month per kid, something like this, right? You can’t make that work unless you’ve got a $150,000 income between the two of you. Your wife goes to work, or you go to work, and when neither of you stays home, you both go to work. Basically, none of that second salary ends up going to the improvement in your standard of living because it all gets sucked up by the health care and the child care costs if you have children.
So, what happens? People decide not to have any kids. How do they get away from it? Well, that’s one way. That’s a veto you can’t overrule. And you see it in the data. It’s very clear. It takes 20 years to decide to have a child and grow that child to adulthood from the time you make the decision. You don’t get the kid in the workforce being productive for 20 years. Like it or not, that’s the way it works. If we continue to do this in another 10 or 20 years, you’re not going to have to worry about house prices. You’re not going to have to worry about asset prices, because you’re not going to have any people who are going to be able to wipe the old people’s ass. And there aren’t going to be any young people that want to buy your house when you don’t need the large house anymore.
Booger says
Nicaragua is a 53 and has not much excuse compared to Somalia which has been under constant civil war for at least 30 years
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/average-iq-by-country
.
That for a couple of kids is, what, 30 grand a year? $30,000 a year. Thousand dollar a month per kid, something like this, right? You can’t make that work unless you’ve got a $150,000 income between the two of you. Your wife goes to work, or you go to work, and when neither of you stays home, you both go to work. Basically, none of that second salary ends up going to the improvement in your standard of living because it all gets sucked up by the health care and the child care costs if you have children.
Meta‑style reviews and classic studies suggest an average drop of about 2.5–3.5 IQ points for children of first cousins (about 0.15–0.25 standard deviations).
Some individual studies in highly inbred populations report larger differences (up to 8–10 points), but those settings often combine multiple generations of consanguinity and other risk factors, so they are not typical for a one‑off first‑cousin marriage.
More important than the small shift in average IQ is the increased risk at the low end:
A classic analysis estimated the risk of “mental retardation” (IQ <70 in older terminology) rising from about 1.2% with unrelated parents to about 6.2% for children of first cousins.
This is thought to be due to recessive disease alleles becoming homozygous more often when parents share ancestry at many loci.
« First « Previous Comments 391 - 397 of 397 Search these comments
Leftism is self-exterminating, but it will take a while, and they will continuously try to convert the children of conservatives to replenish their numbers.