patrick.net

Why all of the hating on QE and the Monarchy of England?

She wasn't responsible for all of the British Empire expansion, in fact She returned many of their colonies back to their own State. And most of those still followed British Customs, and Laws in their constitution. In her time, the British Monarch has become more and more irrelevant, practically only hanging on as a "Royal Watcher" cottage industry.

Now in this time of her passing, the incoming Royals and what the Monarch will become, will be warranted. As I fear the British Royals will become the Global World Order NGO enabler to destabilize and takedown countries that resist the new world order. As the current Monarchy they could not do. But they will if they just become some Society Charity that claims to be doing good deeds around the world. Like poisoning children with killer vaccines. They will be Bill Gates, George Soros and Klaus on steroids as a non profit and not an actual monarch. Blacks and other POCs will fill their honorary ranks. Their titles will mean nothing more than the context of corporate Presidents and Vice Presidents of any of Charity for Profit Org.

Don't forget She was hoisted into Queenhood, it wasn't something she was even considered or conditioned for. Nobody ever expected her Uncle would abdicate the Throne.
It's like getting a call in the middle of the night, from someone desperately telling you have to pitch in the World Series, as ever professional NLB Pitcher has fallen ill from the Clot Shot. It would have been nothing on your radar, when you went to sleep before being awaken.

Monarchy is history's original psyops, and the various reactions to Queeny's staged death is a great reflection of the success of the predator classes in promulgating it.
It isn't a question of what bad people mock the poor deceased queen, it's a question of how did the architects of Royalty manage to generate that much psyops penetration to foist it off on an ongoing basis to begin with? Gobsmacked by Royalty, pomp and pretense? Sucker. Gobsmacked by royal plots against the populace? Maybe you're on to something.

No wonder it's a high overhead business requiring monopolization of criminal enterprise all over the world.

Heard she died a year ago. Hasn't been seen in public in forever, including missing key events she never missed her entire reign.

The predators compete for subscriber vassal populations, whether they be by religions or royals.

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/of-what-did-queen-elizabeth-just

Good point. What exactly did she die of?

https://barsoom.substack.com/p/lament-for-the-hollow-crown

Elizabeth sat placidly by as, one by one, the ancient rights of Englishmen were stripped from them. No longer may they bear arms, or even defend themselves should they be assaulted or their homes invaded. No longer may they speak their minds, for should they speak too plainly they risk a visit from the police, who may either arrest and charge them with hate speech for saying unflattering things about any of the myriad protected groups, or simply be hassled over ‘non-crime hate incidents’ should their blaspheming not quite cross the deliberately fuzzy legal boundary between that which is permitted and mandatory, and everything else.

Worse, and possibly irreparable, has been the violent demographic shift that has taken place. The United Kingdom was 99.5% white when Elizabeth became Elizabeth II; now, it is around 87% white, and rapidly declining. The Church having fallen into apostasy, its pews empty, its support of the family gone, the birth rate of the indigenous population has cratered to far below replacement. Meanwhile, the trickle of immigrants from Commonwealth countries – Jamaica, India, Pakistan, and so on – that began when Elizabeth was crowned, has over the last two decades become a relentless flood. London is no longer a recognizably English city, and the same is true across much of the rest of the land. ...

The Crown’s formal political power may be limited, it is true, but it is not non-existent. Further, the Crown’s social power is immense. What should have been the reaction, one wonders, had Elizabeth II spoken publicly about the unfortunate events in Rotherham? To ask the question is to answer it: public opinion would have united behind her, and the authorities would have scrambled to set things right. Better: what might have happened if, decades ago, Elizabeth had voiced even a mild criticism of the replacement immigration policies of Tony Blair?

She could have publicly spoken out, like Victoria could have publicly spoken out about the mass export of food from Ireland during the famine.

Ceffer says

Monarchy is history's original psyops, and the various reactions to Queeny's staged death is a great reflection of the success of the predator classes in promulgating it.
It isn't a question of what bad people mock the poor deceased queen, it's a question of how did the architects of Royalty manage to generate that much psyops penetration to foist it off on an ongoing basis to begin with? Gobsmacked by Royalty, pomp and pretense? Sucker. Gobsmacked by royal plots against the populace? Maybe you're on to something.

The Palace has nothing to do with Britain's troubles and problems. Those issues all come from Downing street. and Parliament.

Yep, Monarchy hasn't had any substantial powers since the mid 19th Century

They could SPEAK.

They fail to SPEAK.

I do wonder how long Chuckie will last on the throne. Rumor is the puppet masters don't want him, want things to trickle down somewhere else in the lineages.

Last monarch standing from the three cousin kings during the Great War...

"A passage from Nostradamus
"Queen Elizabeth II will die, circa 2022"

Page 98. Published in 2006.

In Nostradamus' written works, Century 8 Quatrain 97, he spoke of "great powers" changing and a "Kingdom growing no more"."
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/73245

Five minutes of Tucker Carlson loving on the Queen and the UK of yesteryear.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_OzymdJ03c

Predator dynastic cockroaches are even harder to eliminate than the kitchen type. I don't know if it's a strong argument that the plebs will just loft some other group of prating, preening fools in their place due to the demands of popular culture.

Another bizarre inversion is feeling sorry for the depraved lot as if they are actually entitled to their excesses. It's like feeling sorry for Hollywood celebrities when they are down to their last 20 million, the poor babies don't deserve such deprivation.

One more manifestation of dictatorship and imperial atrocities is finally in Hell.

GreaterNYCDude says

Has just passed.... end of an era.

More ritualistic lunacy shit:

Booger says

Celtic supporters also wave banners and wear badges with Che Guevara and Chavez on them.






The Rangers of course, a bit different:

Booger says

I heard Brits brought in lots of Irish folks as workers to NYC back then. Most of them settled there and still have a great presence. Once I saw her in Australia passing through and waving hand from a middle car not sure what was the event. Good that now she is officially dead. It’s a time for many to celebrate.

Irish in the Che woodshed? Can't say it was something to be proud of, since Che was a cold blooded murdering sociopath.

https://m.facebook.com/teleSUREnglish/photos/a.492297374247003/2738170072993044/

Sorry for Zuck Book, Pat.

Ceffer says

"A passage from Nostradamus
"Queen Elizabeth II will die, circa 2022"

Page 98. Published in 2006.

In Nostradamus' written works, Century 8 Quatrain 97, he spoke of "great powers" changing and a "Kingdom growing no more"."
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/73245

Pretty interesting.

My cursory understanding is the original text from hundreds of years ago is exceedingly vague and thus can be applied to almost anything.

But, this person who wrote a book in 2005 which was his personal interpretation of the orig text predicted a 2022 death. 2022 wasnt in the orig Nostradamus text, but it may have been vaguely implied or encoded.

Still, predicting a death 17 years in advance is kinda spooky. I suppose one could study a person, and armed with some actuarial data, make a decent prediction as to how many years they have left. Maybe by doing that... one could maybe get to a 1 in 5 chance or so of being right. Still, its impressive they nailed it.

I bet the orig text was vague about who would die. Maybe they just said "a ruler" or something, and so the interpreter gets to scour the world for a person who would be likely to die around the appropriate time, and I bet there's plenty who fit enough of the constraints to make it seem magical.

It reminds me of that probability musing where people look at some event, and say "the odds of this specific crazy event happening today right here are a zillion to 1, therefore the divine must be involved". But, they forget to consider that the probability of "some crazy event occurring some time some where" is much much higher, and thus no longer an astounding probability when you look at it from that angle. No matter where the event happens, some people will be near it and will say the probability that it happened to them is crazy small. But, it has to happen to somebody. I suspect similar happens with Nostradamus predictions.

Well, the Queen coulda stiffed a while ago and been on ice waiting for the proper timing for London Bridge Is Down, or whatever it is, and all of those Satanic royals like to keep their numbers on the Masonic/Illuminati hopscotch pad, so maybe it was just a bit of educated numerology.

Ceffer says

"A passage from Nostradamus
"Queen Elizabeth II will die, circa 2022"

Page 98. Published in 2006.

In Nostradamus' written works, Century 8 Quatrain 97, he spoke of "great powers" changing and a "Kingdom growing no more"."
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/73245

How many predictions out there got her year of death wrong?

Interesting take on the Canadian constitution:

Queen's death does not make Charles the King of Canada

The Constitution Act of 1867, in its current form, vests dominion over Canada in the Queen herself — not the Crown, and not the King.

Of course, the pukes in charge have ignored written law for many years now, so not like this will make any difference.

AmericanKulak says

Celtic supporters also wave banners and wear badges with Che Guevara and Chavez on them.

Think Mi6 doesn't have glowies?

Royal families are nothing more than mafias. We escaped them, and the French murdered them for a reason. There's constant propaganda to defend them, but they are nothing but the product of criminal syndicate families over the ages.

The new king of england was best friends of the pedophile rapist and necrophiliac Jimmy Saville, who was knighted by the recently deceased queen.

These are criminal scum families, and birds of a feather flock together.

richwicks says

Royal families are nothing more than mafias.

Well yes, of course. Henry VIII was the worst mass murderer in English history, for example, having had more than 30,000 English people killed. It was particularly dangerous to be at Henry's court.

But that's how governments have always originated. A group of men depose the corrupt and dying previous government, and then seek legitimacy through art, education, religion, anything that gives them high status. But it's always essentially a mafia willing to kill all opposition to maintain their profitable positions.

I think the US government was pretty good at first, motivated largely by idealism. But now we have massive election fraud, mandated injections, a screamingly corrupt pedo in the White House, and no real freedom of speech if you want to remain employed.

BayArea says

"A passage from Nostradamus
"Queen Elizabeth II will die, circa 2022"

Page 98. Published in 2006.

In Nostradamus' written works, Century 8 Quatrain 97, he spoke of "great powers" changing and a "Kingdom growing no more"."

Here's the Quatrains - Century VIII:

https://www.crystalinks.com/quatrainscentury8.html

I did a cursory look for 2022 and "elizabeth" and found nothing.

This is 97:

At the end of the Var the great powers change;
near the bank three beautiful children are born.
Ruin to the people when they are of age;

I fucking hate mainstream "news" - it just wastes your time with bullshit.

We have never had a time to make research and verification easier.

Hircus says

My cursory understanding is the original text from hundreds of years ago is exceedingly vague and thus can be applied to almost anything.

^^^^ This ^^^^

Anything that is older than 100 years old, is trivial to find online. I just looked it up:

https://www.crystalinks.com/quatrainscentury8.html

I'll entertain any claim nearly, but most of it is debunking. Look up section (? is that what it's called, maybe paragraph, stanza?) 97.