patrick.net

Our buddy Benjamin Fulford said the Khazarian Mafia killed the Queen with a close range EMP weapon because she was disentangling the royal family from the Rothschilds. This put MI6 back on their heels. The Queen has been an avatar for a while now, the timing of her funeral was strategic, but strategic for exactly what is the question.

Even better than the Nigerian Prince scams.

stereotomy says

Even better than the Nigerian Prince scams.

I heard Charles just won an Ugly Queen contest, with a lantern jaw Habsburg a distant second.

Ceffer says

Our buddy Benjamin Fulford said the Khazarian Mafia killed the Queen with a close range EMP weapon because she was disentangling the royal family from the Rothschilds. This put MI6 back on their heels. The Queen has been an avatar for a while now, the timing of her funeral was strategic, but strategic for exactly what is the question.

Dude how you keep up with all the Schizo posting?

Three legged crow society, WTF even is that? hahaha

Fulford should have gotten on the weed strain train and planted whatever he's smoking for sale.

Fulford is pretty disorienting. The rumor is he agrees to about 10 percent programmed and purposeful disinformation to present 90 percent 'good stuff'. He does this at the behest of his various sources, which are alleged to come from within white hat CIA, Mossad, etc. etc. although a lot of the 'good stuff' can be fairly indecipherable gossip girl stuff all the way to the (100,000 mile view big picture). He seems to be pretty spot on about the Royals and their shadow dances, the Vatican, the P2/P3 Masons, Illuminati etc., very much in line with Leo Zagami, another correspondent from the Woo.

However, he has an uncanny knack of bringing out propositions that appear absurd, but turn out to be 'conspiracy theory' correct and has some interesting predictions under his belt. He also has an exotic view on the more arcane political and world relationships that turn out to be more truth than fiction. He does seem to think there are more avatars, clones, imposters, body doubles etc. than there actually are, but there are quite a few of them that he has pointed out.

He presumes that what he presents should always be subject to research and confirmation. Separating the chaff from the wheat is always the obligation of the viewer ultimately. I operate on the premise that almost all information has disinformation. If I always threw out the baby with the bath water, I wouldn't have half of my homework cut out for me. At worst, its another form of speculative entertainment.