« First « Previous Comments 1,126 - 1,151 of 1,151 Search these comments
we really need to take a look at how we got to here.
here is my model. it also explains why marxism and collectivism has near perfect overlap with DEI and ideologies of gender confusion ideology to the point where it frequently gets derided as “gay race communism.”
it all has the same center: externalized identity. a lack of sense of self and a subsumation of the individual to the collective.
you don’t just wind up in the street one day protesting for something you neither understand nor even have the basic facts about.
this does not happen to healthy people.
it happens to people whose identities are not contained within themselves, who derive their sense of self from membership and participation in ideologies.
these are not “people with ideas” they are “people who are their ideas” and that’s a VERY different kettle of fish. (or in this case, more like a bag of weasels)
people who have ideas can change their minds. they can say “oh, hey, that’s new information, i should revise my view.” this does not challenge their self-conception.
but people who are their ideas cannot. they experience all disagreement and contradiction as a form of personal attack because the lines between the idea and the self are absent. they, quite literally, experience having to change their mind as erasure.
and no human wants to be erased. so the mind throws up all manner of tricks to prevent it. it discredits the source, it denies the data. given sifficient committment to belief, the power of the distortion field can become near infinite. a mind refuses to see a semi-truck bearing right down on it because “that truck cannot be there, it must be a lie from the reactionary running dogs.”
this is exactly why this externalized identity state is the end goal of cultists and political movements who want captured, mindwiped adherents. it’s why it has always been the center of marxism: not family, not country, not self, and certainly not religion: the party and its tenets of the “new man” and the “soviet woman” that deny ethics, biology, and sense.
not individualism, collectivism. the idea above the self. see now why this is such a dangerous idea? in full flower it at once enables and excuses atrocity and twists the sort of being beastly to others that the unindoctrinated would immediately recognize as hideous and inhuman into something that seems like virtue. it’s how school kids turn in their parents to the secret police.
and these sorts of ideas and indoctrination are far easier among people with poor mental boundries or history of trauma. if you want to ask a question that will really keep you up at night, ask this:
“if your goal was a marxist global collective and inculcating children into such was easier to the extent the children were traumatized and concussed with mood and mind altering drugs, how would you change the school system to bend them to alliance or, at least, to submission?
might you mire them in impossible struggle sessions led by the most marginal among them as one long episode of “how many fingers am i holding up winston?” until disavowing the evidence of your own eyes and ears is the only means to survive unassaulted?
yeah. not pretty, is it?
Using a drone to put a cover on a surveillance camera:
Paris ~ Someone threw the 'migrant' off the Metro for littering!

That litterer was "profoundly negrous" as Curtis Yarvin recently put it.
If the guy who picked up the litter was the same guy who threw the litterer off, then both were black.
I had a contract job once in which the manager, a Chinese woman, told me to come in on the weekend to work extra hours, unpaid.
I just said no, that's not in my contract. It was great. Nothing happened, job continued.
Key is you have to be willing to walk away.
The cruelty of nature!
Kieser College fucked me out of about $40K, I went to a lawyer. I had to write up all the dissertation, and outlay everything for him. Because he took my retainer fee, and promised to write up the case, but weeks and weeks passed and he did nothing. Kept asking me about the details again every time I called for an update. But he kept telling me it was a slam dunk case. Finally he met with their legal team, to discuss a settlement. He wasn't about to go against a Liberal institution owned by Washington Post(Bezos) who had recently acquired Keiser college. Their Indian staff were the ones that terminated my contract and refused to pay for about 30 days of work I had already performed. Because they wanted me to help them integrate what I did for Keiser into their own systems, without getting more money, and the Indians were too stupid to understand it.
He came back from the meeting and told me, that I had no case against them, and they were willing to settle for 7K. He still wanted his 40% cut. Which in our early discussions he said he was going to sue them for over 100K which is why I agreed to it.
I have a feeling the next two elections isn't going to be decided by Democrat voters vs Republican voters. But Ugly people vs Beautiful people.
https://x.com/JaimeeUSA/status/2009038433843302665
« First « Previous Comments 1,126 - 1,151 of 1,151 Search these comments
What else?