patrick.net

A little before 2PM June 27, 2024, I arrived at the Capitol building of Connecticut in Hartford. ...

Early in 2024, I obtained all the 2015-2023 death records from Connecticut for the purpose of studying the Seasonality Profile as outlined in my book, The Real CdC. ...

While investigating causes, the health data auditing system I created, Automated Learning in Public Health Analysis (ALPHA), again produced anomalous death statistics for Connecticut as it did for Massachusetts and Minnesota. Given the alarming results for Connecticut, I was morally and perhaps legally compelled to alert the governor, public health commissioner, and attorney general of Connecticut regarding the epidemic of acute renal failure (ARF), also known as acute kidney injury (AKI), that killed thousands of Connecticut citizens more than expected since 2020.

I drafted a brief to serve them, drove to Hartford, and attempted to deliver the brief in-hand to any agent of the three aforementioned state officials.

Upon asking the officers at the security checkpoint where the governor’s office was, I was told that because I am not a law enforcement official (not a constable or sheriff or other official process server), I would have to bring the document to the mail room. ...

The security personnel behind the plexiglass in the lobby of the state office building called upstairs to try to get anyone to come down and sign for the document. After no one wanted to come down, the security person then tried the mail room for the state office building, but no one was there. Finally, she did get someone from the AG’s office to come down to the lobby. The gentleman who came down said he’d take the document. I asked him to sign for it. He told me that he was told not to sign anything, turned, and walked away. So I left the building without leaving the document there. ...

Everyone at the front desk seemed confused about my desire to drop off a document for the AG’s office. It was as if no one from the public has every delivered papers there before. There were a couple sheriffs behind me who were delivering something and were allowed in. It is likely normal that sheriffs deliver court filings all the time. I just wanted someone to receive and sign for having received one 22-page document. ...

The most interesting encounter was at the building a half mile away at the Connecticut Department of Public Health (CDPH), where is located the Commissioner’s office. ...

The CDPH is locked up tighter than the Capitol building or the state offices housing the Attorney General, both of which had open doors to their lobbies. I pushed the button. Someone answered from the lobby. The woman wanted to know my name, why I was there, what the document included, and had other questions. After a few brief interchanges, she said someone would come out and talk to me. At one point, the intercom woman told me that we were not allowed to video there. Two gentlemen were with me in all three buildings. They were video taping me walking around the offices and interacting. I told her to cite the Connecticut code or law that says we do not have a right to video record. There was no response regarding video recording after that.

After 20 minutes or so, I told the camera guys that no one was going to come and that they would just wait us out hoping that we would leave. I was wrong. Seconds after I said that, two people entered the lobby and proceeded out the doors to greet me. One introduced herself as an attorney for CDPH. The other introduced himself as the “comms director.”

While he seemed genial, the woman made it perfectly clear that she was snippy and annoyed that someone from the public wanted to deliver a document. Eventually and reluctantly, she received in-hand the document. As she departed, my last words to them were, “I suggest you take this seriously.”

There is a noticeable difference in engagement between the elected officials with whom I’ve interacted and the permanent bureaucrats. Elected officials such as state senators, state house members, and executive branch elected officials generally approach conversation with a smile and warm greeting. Even in Massachusetts and even knowing that a constituent doesn’t like them, state senators and reps will often be genial, regardless of the genuineness of the smile. On the other hand, the bureaucrats who park themselves in a career job supposedly working for The People often have disdain and contempt for The People. ...

I envisage CDPH bureaucrats to believe in the absurdities of NIH, CDC, and FDA covid narratives so much that they refuse to question the mantra that becomes their dogma. And because they believe these absurdities, they feel justified in the atrocities of thousands of fatalities resulting from their refusal to challenge a single sentence from the NIH. The NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines are still killing hundreds of thousands of U.S. citizens while state health departments blindly recommend their continuance. The CDPH has had in their possession records that can end all debate in one man-week of work. If they allow me into their system to perform an audit, debate would end and both sides would know facts and TRUTH from which to make informed decisions. Currently, decisions are coerced by mandate, threat, or disinformation that creates fear in the public.

The brief delivered to the state offices will be released to the public the week of July 8, 2024. The title is THE CONNECTICUT MEMORANDA SERIES - NOTICE OF HOSPITAL HOMICIDE & ACUTE RENAL FAILURE DEATHS - Vol. I. ...

Yet the governments seem to have missed this “worst epidemic in 100 years” event.

THE HOPE ACCORD
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS, SCIENTISTS AND CONCERNED MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, CALL FOR:
1. THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE COVID-19 mRNA VACCINE PRODUCTS ...

19,396
TOTAL SUPPORTERS
608
MEDICAL DOCTORS
1567
OTHER HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS
652
SCIENTISTS & ACADEMICS
16569
CONCERNED CITIZENS

https://thehopeaccord.org/

A whopping 2000 plus doctors, scientists, and academics have signed a declaration demanding governments around the world order an “immediate” ban on Covid mRNA shots.

The unprecedented statement, called “The Hope Accord,” has also been signed by over 2700 other healthcare professionals.

In total, the document has now gained over 33,000 signatories.

The plane reached 10,000ft. I took out my laptop, planning to peruse the internet and maybe do a little work if I got really desperate.

I connected to the in-flight wi-fi and opened my browser. The network login page demanded credit card details. I fumbled for my card, which I eventually discovered had hidden itself inside my passport. As I searched I noticed that the login page was encouraging me to sign in to my airmiles account, free of charge, even though I hadn’t paid for anything yet. A hole in the firewall, I thought. It’s a long way from London to San Francisco so I decided to peer through it.

I logged in to my JetStreamers Diamond Altitude account and started clicking. I went to my profile page, where I saw an edit button. It looked like a normal button: drop shadow, rounded corners, nothing special. I was supposed to use it to update my name, address, and so on. ...

But suddenly I realised that this was no ordinary button. This clickable rascal would allow me to access the entire internet through my airmiles account. This would be slow. It would be unbelievably stupid. But it would work. ...

Before I could access the entire internet through my airmiles account I’d need to write a few prototypes. At first I thought that I’d write them using Go, but then I realised that if I used Python then I could call the final tool PySkyWiFi. Obviously I did that instead. ...

Here’s the basic idea: suppose that I logged into my airmiles account and updated my name. If you were also logged in to my account then you could read my new name, from the ground. You could update it again, and I could read your new value. If we kept doing this then the name field of my airmiles account could serve as a tunnel through the airplane’s wi-fi firewall to the real world.

This tunnel could support a simple instant messaging protocol. I could update my name to “Hello how are you.” You could read my message and then send me a reply by updating my name again to “Im fine how are you.” I could read that, and we could have a stilted conversation. This might not sound like much, but it would be the first step on the road to full internet access. ...

Counter-Subversion with Yuri Bezmenov

In today’s call I speak with the inimitable Yuri Bezmenov, who writes here on Substack at How To Subvert Subversion about how the right can withstand and triumph against the many nefarious tactics of left wing memetic warfare.

It was fantastic to finally speak with Yuri directly; it seems clear that his community-building efforts have a ton of synergy with my own job-stacking organization, so I envision lots of collaboration going forward between his Comrades and my BisBucs.

Topics include…

How the bottom-up social ostracism tactics and stochastic terrorism of the Modern Left resemble the “struggle sessions” of Mao’s Cultural Revolution

When authoritarians rely on a snitch / bullying culture to seize power they’re either devoured by their own mob or need to Long Knives them

The “Current Thing” and how the vax narrative was supplanted by Ukraine

Liberals never admit when they’re wrong—they simply pivot the news cycle

The difficulty of holding the Left accountable when they constantly gaslight us and how this contributes to a right wing culture of conspiracy theories

Whenever we encounter left wing linguistic tyranny (e.g. “marriage equality”) we need to fight fire with fire (e.g. “child castration” or “civilian disarmament”)

Charles’ main point is that we are not (yet) in power, and should therefore avail ourselves of whatever tactical opportunities present themselves. He responds to the argument that we should ignore easy targets, obese middle-aged cashiers for example, in favour of high-value targets such as, say, Harvard presidents, for the simple reason that we do not (yet) have the power to go after the latter. To insist we limit ourselves to sniping at generals who remain well behind the front lines, while holding our fire on the cannon fodder, is in essence to argue that we do nothing at all. Now, one could point out that we did, in fact, take down the president of Harvard ... but Claudine Gay is still a professor at Harvard, and getting paid nearly a million dollars a year, no less: her humiliation is purely cosmetic. As Haywood notes, despite the Bud Light boycott absolutely wrecking the sales of Anheuser-Busch’s former flagship beverage, so far as we know not a single person has actually been fired over the debacle. Since we cannot (yet) impose corrective action on the elite, we must, for now, focus our opprobrium on the vicious little goblins that form the main body of the leftoid horde, making examples wherever and whenever we can, pour encourager les autres. ...

Vagrant of Rhodes thinks we should win the fight, and not worry about how we win the fight.

The left has littered the field of battle with weapons of mass societal destruction, and they’ve fundamentally changed the rules of engagement. We can either keep getting cut down or pick some of those weapons up and fight back to establish parity. If you tell someone that their actions have consequences, and then refuse to enforce the consequences when you have the chance, then the rules don't matter. That's why we are here.

Vagrant suggests that conservatives are trapped in a permanent nostalgia for the 1950s, imagining that we are still playing by the Marquess of Queensbury rules, while the left is throwing molotovs. Conservatives, he says, have the complacent and cowardly mindset of civilians, when what our historical moment calls for are warriors. Unfortunately, the comfortable conditions created by technology tend to encourage the civilian personality type. ...

As to the Red Scare, it’s probably worth pointing out that McCarthy was actually right: there really were communists trying to infiltrate the Western social order; tragically for us, the communists succeeded, which is a large part of the reason why we are where we are now. ...

As to the unpopularity of the left, I do not think this is only because of their po-faced censoriousness, although there is no question that that contributes. It probably also has something to do with their vicious racial and sexual hatred, their contemptuous hostility towards Western civilization, and their propensity to emotionally abuse children to the point that those children demand that they be allowed to mutilate their genitalia, amongst a great number of other horrors.

Finally, as to Alexander’s first point, that cancellation does not teach anyone anything. Au contraire. Look around at how society has changed in just the last decade. Sure, if you’re an autistic rationalist, a contrarian ideologue, or a Bohemian free spirit, cancel culture has only made you hate the left more. But this is a fairly small fraction of the population. What about the normies? In a remarkably short period of time, they went from opposing gay marriage, to supporting it. Why? Because examples were made of a few people who opposed it, and the rest got into line. Most people are basically NPCs: they don’t follow a praxis emerging from carefully thought out philosophical systems, but simply go along with whatever they perceive the prevailing morality to be. They are not rational, nor are they principled. They simply respond to incentives, which is to say, to rewards and to punishments. Put a few heads on pikes to demarcate new social boundaries, and the normies will in general respect them. ...

This is something I wish I’d emphasized more in my own post. The left’s egregious impositions over the last generations, and its crescendo of tyrannical obscenity in the last decade, has generated an absolutely volcanic emotional charge. There are huge numbers of people who are absolutely boiling with pent-up fury. They want blood, hopefully figuratively. There is a cthonic hunger for vengeance, and as the woke left stumbles and shows weakness for the first time in a generation, that hunger will demand satiation. Whether you like it or not, things like this are going to happen a fair bit in the coming years. All that emotional energy is going to need to go somewhere.

My Youtube is being flooded by Kamala ads.

So I don't just block them but also report them for hate speech.

I put in the comments for the report "Why am I seeing ads on my YouTube from this unborn baby killing commie bitch?"

Hopefully a human being will eventually get this and shut off political ads in general for me. :)

https://genesiustimes.com/thomas-matthew-crooks-headlines-white-dudes-for-harris-zoom-call-from-his-room-in-hell/