by Patrick ➕follow (60) ignore (3)
« First « Previous Comments 43 - 63 of 63 Search these comments
repeal the national childhood vaccine act of 1986
good products do not need universal liability shields, but bad actors are enabled by them
it’s about the liability shield and the subsidies.
and that is a thing we need to fix.
longtime gatopal™ jennifer cabrera has a simple, common sense solution here:
Twitter avatar for @jhaskinscabrera
Jennifer Cabrera 😀
@jhaskinscabrera
If the predicted red wave produces a strong Republican majority in Congress, one of their first acts should be to repeal the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.
No excuses, Republicans. Liability is the only mechanism that can produce safe vaccines.
9:16 PM ∙ Oct 19, 2022
Thus, despite the fact that the CDC’s addition of the covid vaccines to the childhood vaccine schedule will almost certainly cause a considerable amount of harm to children (both directly by vaccine injury/death and indirectly as some kids will have their lives upended as parents seek workarounds or to escape from vaccine mandates), it is a necessary development to sway public sentiment and clarity on the matter.
Conversely, would the CDC have decided not to include the covid vaccines on the vaccine schedule, that would have been a potentially devastating development. Such a decision would make the CDC look responsive to the public, somewhat reasonable, and not hopelessly corrupted to precisely the whom we need to convert to our side.
At this point, the ideal scenario is that the establishment goes max cray-cray. These people must feel the pain, and feel trapped, in order to turn on the establishment. That is the sad but intractable reality.
So yes, I am actually a bit optimistic now that the CDC has decided to go ahead and add the covid vaccines to the schedule.
May a tsunami of VAERS reports bloom!
You can form coalitions, run for school boards, run for state educational offices.
Can someone start a thread/post on how to get started?
The CDC Pushes to Vaccinate Toddlers, Again
Its decision to include Covid-19 shots in children’s schedules is based on far-too-flimsy evidence.
Is the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention trying to give vaccine skeptics a shot in the arm? That’s the message its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices sent last week with its vote to add Covid-19 vaccines to childhood vaccination schedules. ...
Adding the Covid-19 shot to the children’s vaccine schedule based on flimsy evidence risks inciting a backlash against vaccines in general. Haven’t the government scientists learned that every political action has an equal and opposite reaction?
How the Democratic Party became hostage to the worst array of political ideas ever assembled remains a profound mystery. How do they persist supporting a Covid “vaccine” campaign that is now obviously false and dangerous? Is it simply an inability to acknowledge a terrible mistake? Or is it — as things seem — something darker, a deliberate effort to inflict harm on the American people? Kind of looks that way. Several states quickly and loudly opted out of “vaccine” mandates for schools since the CDC’s advisory committee’s bizarre 15 to 0 vote to include the janky mRNA shots on the childhood “schedule.”
Children who are eligible* for VFC vaccines are entitled to receive those vaccines recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).
On February 28, 2024, ACIP recommended that all persons aged ≥65 years receive 1 additional dose of any updated COVID-19 vaccine (i.e., Moderna, Novavax, or Pfizer-BioNTech).† This additional dose should be administered ≥4 months after the previous dose of updated COVID-19 vaccine.
« First « Previous Comments 43 - 63 of 63 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,305,312 comments by 15,515 users - Al_Sharpton_for_President, Tenpoundbass online now