Comments 1 - 13 of 181 Next » Last » Search these comments
“A patient comes to the hospital often for problem unrelated to COVID-19. They are told they have COVID-19 or ‘COVID pneumonia’. They are immediately separated from their loved ones, and usually declared to be in ICU, even though they are often just placed in room. They are told that the deadly Remdesivir is the only available and safe treatment. They are usually told that if they leave the Hospital against ‘medical advice’ they will void their insurance. They are placed on BiPap machine at high rate, making it difficult for them to breathe. Their hands are often tied down so they can‘t take the BiPap machine off their face. After their hands are tied down, and sometimes before, [a] psychiatrist comes to the room and determines that they are ‘agitated.’ This results in the protocol patient being placed on morphine or something similar. Sedating the patient makes it more difficult for them to communicate and more difficult for them to fight the effects of Remdesivir especially as it rel...
“A patient comes to the hospital often for problem unrelated to COVID-19. They are told they have COVID-19 or ‘COVID pneumonia’. They are immediately separated from their loved ones, and usually declared to be in ICU, even though they are often just placed in room. They are told that the deadly Remdesivir is the only available and safe treatment. They are usually told that if they leave the Hospital against ‘medical advice’ they will void their insurance. They are placed on BiPap machine at high rate, making it difficult for them to breathe. Their hands are often tied down so they can‘t take the BiPap machine off their face. After their hands are tied down, and sometimes before, [a] psychiatrist comes to the room and determines that they are ‘agitated.’ This results in the protocol patient being placed on morphine or something similar. Sedating the patient makes it more difficult for them to communicate and more difficult for them to fight the effects of Remdesivir especially as it rel...
And all this for a virus that has a 99.8% survival rate.
I will bet this is what happened to my father in law. He was sadated/knocked out/put under right before they put him on the vent. He died.
British Nursing Alliance cofounder Kate Shemirani reports that Chancellor Jeremy Hunt announced that he’ll be allowing social services and the government to seize a huge amount of money from the assets of an elderly person when they enter the hospital or a social care setting.
She explains that this is particularly significant in light of a new UK government medical protocol for elderly people in the hospital. It’s called Protocol NG191, and it’s an end-of-life pathway that they’re putting the elderly and disabled on. It replaces NG163.
While NG163 involved morphine and Medazolam, the new one, NG191, includes Remdesivir, benzodiazepines and opioids, including Lorazepam. Kate reports that the British government has just ordered huge amounts of Lorezepam. ...
Protocol NG191 will be used to knock people off in hospitals, the way that Medazolam did in 2020. They are currently putting more and more people on this end-of-life pathway.
Kate suggests looking up the Palliative Care Funding Review, which shows that palliative care is going to increase, and on page 64, shows how much the deaths of the elderly are going to rise, up to 2031, which is when their plan goes up to.
She ties the above in with the Planned Tariff Incentivized Euthanasia Point System, in which 1,642.5 people must be euthanized daily in England alone, in order for hospitals and care homes to get their money. This includes disabled children.
If hospitals go below the target, they lose money, and if they exceed their quota, they get extra money.
Of course, this is still officially illegal.
How do they euthanize? By causing death with Protocol NG191 for the elderly and disabled, of course. ...
Stay away from all those shots, and do your best to stay out of the hospital. This means knowing is advance a doctor with the proper mindset to turn to, if you don’t feel well, and having treatments like ivermectin on hand in case of need. ...
Of course, if someone does need to to go to the hospital, REFUSE remedesivir, and be sure an alert family member or friend is always with the patient.
And all this for a virus that has a 99.8% survival rate.
One year ago today, they tried to get me to agree to put my wife on a ventilator.
posted 15 hours ago by Old_Timer +1954 / -3
They didn’t know we were on FaceTime together, and weren’t talking to her despite her being fully capable of participating in decisions about her own care. They kept insisting that her oxygen saturation levels were low and I (not we) needed to make a decision NOW.
I asked if they had her change positions, and they said no. I told her to “turn over” and she went up to 98% within a minute.
They promptly hung up on me.
They didn’t try the “it’s an emergency - NOW, Now, NOW” nonsense again, but made sure to tell us everyday for a bit she was “probably” going to end up on a ventilator. They wouldn’t give her monoclonal antibodies, regeneron, or even a standard anti-viral because “she was too sick” and “standard antivirals aren’t effective against Covid”.
I was able to smuggle ivermectin in, and her “numbers” improved within 24 hours. They caught her and took it away before she completed the cycle (plus I gave her too little based on her weight - doh!)
She’s fine now. She works too much. I’m a lucky man.
It’s been a year since they tried to kill my beloved, and I’m not over it. I will never trust them again.
Comments 1 - 13 of 181 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,363,889 comments by 15,735 users - HANrongli, HeadSet, RWSGFY, Tenpoundbass online now