« First « Previous Comments 1,069 - 1,108 of 1,208 Next » Last » Search these comments
But where is your sympathy for Pfizer's shareholders?
Don't you know that safe, cheap, and effective drugs like ivermectin and HCQ threaten Pfizer's profits from mRNA injections?
Think of the yachts that will never get bought if Pfizer loses its absolute control over the FDA!
Lol.
The Accused
Dr. Anthony Fauci – Former Director, NIAID
Dr. Cliff Lane – Deputy Director, NIAID
Dr. Francis Collins – Former Director, NIH
Dr. Deborah Birx – Former White House COVID Response Coordinator
Dr. Rochelle Walensky – Former Director, CDC
Dr. Stephen Hahn – Former Commissioner, FDA
Dr. Janet Woodcock – Principal Deputy Commissioner, FDA
Dr. Peter Hotez – Dean, National School of Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine
Dr. Robert Redfield – Former Director, CDC
Dr. Peter Daszak – President, EcoHealth Alliance
Dr. Ralph Baric – Professor, University of North Carolina
Dr. Rick Bright – Former Director, BARDA
Administrators of various hospital systems and care facilities.
Applicable Crimes
The Vires Law Group is seeking state criminal investigations into the aforementioned individuals. The charges outlined include:
Terrorism
Under many state laws, terrorism includes committing crimes to coerce or influence government policy or civilian behavior. The attorneys argue that public fear was deliberately manufactured to increase uptake of vaccines, drive compliance, and suppress dissent—via manipulated death counts, relentless fear-based media messaging, and denial of early treatment.
Murder & Involuntary Manslaughter
Patients were knowingly given lethal treatments such as remdesivir—despite it being pulled from an Ebola study for causing over 50% mortality. Families were denied the right to refuse treatment, and ventilators were used despite overwhelming evidence of fatal outcomes.
Aggravated Assault & Lack of Informed Consent
Patients were subjected to medical procedures—ventilators, remdesivir, and even COVID-19 vaccines—against their will or without informed consent. This constitutes unlawful bodily harm under most state statutes.
Racketeering (RICO)
The team alleges this was a coordinated scheme for profit—fueled by CARES Act incentives and PREP Act immunity—where hospital administrations financially benefited by complying with federal protocols at the expense of patient lives.
Abuse of Vulnerable Adults
Victims were elderly or incapacitated, often denied food, water, vitamins, and family visitation—all while being isolated and coerced into fatal treatment pathways.
Scope & Strategy
While the larger COVID response is under scrutiny, the petitions focus specifically on hospital homicides—where the legal case is strongest and where witnesses (survivors and next-of-kin) are actively seeking justice.
By targeting state-level criminal codes, the team bypasses federal hurdles and builds strategic, streamlined cases with clearly defined jurisdiction and causality.
The goal: create a roadmap for local prosecutors to pursue charges, without being overwhelmed or confused by federal overlap or civil legal complexities.
CDC ACIP Set to Recommend More mRNA Shots This Year — Despite Millions of American Casualties
Now hiding behind a “risk-based” framework, ACIP still plans to push deadly COVID-19 mRNA injections on daycare children, healthcare workers, and the elderly — while ignoring grave safety signals. ...
In other words, the CDC ACIP is set to still recommend deadly and contaminated COVID-19 mRNA booster injections to a large subset of the population that could still include young children. While a “risk-based” approach may appear more cautious than blanket recommendations, the reality remains unchanged: the risks of COVID-19 mRNA booster shots still far outweigh any theoretical benefit, even in so-called “high-risk” groups.
The matter of Daniel Andrews’ role in Victoria’s COVID-19 curfew and broader pandemic response will not go away—nor should it. The public’s demand for accountability is growing, fueled by revelations like Document 34, which expose a troubling disregard for public health expertise and democratic transparency. Punishment is necessary, not merely for retribution but to deter future governance failures. As more information emerges about the nature of the pandemic, particularly the contentious debates around its management, the case for holding Andrews accountable strengthens.
“We have killed more people in the last 4 years than we did in any world war we’ve been involved with.”
“That alone should end everything that’s going on with Covid,” he adds.
“60 billion copies of DNA plasmids and SV40 promoter in it.”
According to Kruse, Pfizer intentionally spiked its Covid mRNA “vaccine” with SV40 to trigger a “turbo cancer” epidemic.
However, he warns that Pfizer has been battling to keep the use of SV40 hidden from the public.
Kruse goes on to note that the depopulation effort backfired when young, healthy “vaccinated” people started dying from cancers typically associated with older people.
COVID CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS AND COURT MARTIALS
Should those responsible for harmful mandated experimental injections and lockdowns go unpunished?
We have long passed the “evidence” stage of the Covid saga. ...
There is now palpable anger among a large section of the community who understand what criminal and evil acts have been perpetrated upon us.
We have witnessed pure evil in lying about the safety and efficacy of the gene-based experimental mRNA injections and forcing people to be injected. There has never been anything like this in history. Potentially, millions have been killed and millions more have suffered serious consequential adverse effects, Now that the truth is being revealed the question must be - Should those directly responsible pay a personal price for their actions?
Well, freedom fighter Monica Smit, for one, thinks so. Remember she was jailed for 21 days for opposing the illegal and totalitarian lockdowns of the Andrews State government. She has taken advice that it is possible to personally take action to criminally prosecute Daniel Andrews and she is seeking justice. Monica has received credible legal advice that it is possible to pursue a private prosecution, not a police prosecution, for criminal acts. ...
It is now widely acknowledged that it was illegal to mandate US military to be forced to receive an experimental vaccine under release of the gene-based experimental therapies using Emergency Use Authorisation. The new Pentagon Secretary of Defence, Pete Hegseth has admitted it was wrong. ...
The Gateway Pundit previously reported on military veterans’ concerns about a new Department of Defense reinstatement form, which they claim hides the truth about their forced separations during the COVID-19 vaccine mandate era.
They are being told that if they want back in, they must lie on paper and pretend they left the military of their own free will.
According to the form: “I, [name], attest I voluntarily separated from the (Air) (Space) Force or allowed my service to lapse rather than be vaccinated under the COVID-19 vaccine mandate, which was in effect from 24 August 2021 to 10 January 2023. My decision to separate was made freely and without coercion.”
According to the form: “I, [name], attest I voluntarily separated from the (Air) (Space) Force or allowed my service to lapse rather than be vaccinated under the COVID-19 vaccine mandate, which was in effect from 24 August 2021 to 10 January 2023. My decision to separate was made freely and without coercion.”
It sounds like Trump did approve the false and manipulative language.
Sounds like the same thing to me.
I suspect that the demand that those people sign something saying they "voluntarily" left rather than suffer the mandatory mRNA injection is to deny them legal standing for future lawsuits.
rather than be vaccinated under the COVID-19 vaccine mandate, which was in effect from 24 August 2021 to 10 January 2023. My decision to separate was made freely and without coercion
"rather than be vaccinated" is the very opposite of "freely and without coercion"
I still think it's a deliberate attempt to get people who suffered for doing the right thing to explicitly give up their legal rights, to pre-empt a whole class of extremely well-justified lawsuits.
CHD Funds Lawsuit Against CDC Over Program That Forces Pediatricians to Give COVID Vaccines to Kids on Medicaid
In her first-of-its-kind lawsuit, Cardenas alleges the CDC's Vaccines for Children Program violates the Fifth Amendment's equal protection and due process provisions.
A California pediatrician is suing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) over a federal program that requires doctors in her state who treat children enrolled in Medicaid to give those children all of the vaccines recommended by the CDC.
Children’s Health Defense (CHD) is supporting the lawsuit, filed April 25 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Santa Ana Division.
Dr. Samara Cardenas lost her medical practice after the CDC Vaccines for Children Program kicked her out of the program because she wouldn’t give COVID-19 vaccines to healthy kids.
California, like most states, requires pediatricians who treat Medicaid patients to be enrolled in the Vaccines for Children Program. The program, in turn, requires doctors to strictly follow the CDC’s childhood immunization schedule.
In late 2023, the Vaccines for Children Program informed Cardenas that her vaccine orders “were being scrutinized” for not including COVID-19 shots. She was later expelled from the program. As a result, she lost her Medicaid contract, forcing her to close her practice.
If one were to set out to do intentional, immeasurable and intergenerational harm to a population, there are a number of important strategic elements which one could consider to ensure success. These elements include the following:
· Create a virus in secret which is highly infective. Release it and convince as many as possible that the virus can be deadly to everyone.
· Develop a test which grossly overestimates the number infected. Use the mainstream media to generate fear. Wherever possible, count those dying for any reason as dying from the “virus” to boost the “virus” death statistics.
· Create a novel “countermeasure” to the virus. Sell the “countermeasure” as the only available treatment. Rush it through a lax regulatory approval process and declare the innovative “countermeasure” a “vaccine” (even though it is not) so people would assume it was safe.
· Hide proven cancer-causing genetic sequences in the “vaccine”. If these sequences are uncovered, deny they are a problem even if there is no scientific basis for the denial. Just ignore it.
· Cover all those involved in the development and deployment of the “vaccine” with legal indemity. Even the government should argue it has “no duty of care” for those injured or killed by the “vaccine”. Just stonewall.
· Deny the use of any product which might protect against the virus. Threaten doctors who dared to use alternative effective early treatment with deregistration. Make examples of doctors to dared to fully inform their patients about the dangers of the “vaccine”.
· Hide details of the true number of people killed or injured by the “vaccine” on the basis of confidentiality.
· Ensure mandatory public uptake of the product by coercion. Perhaps make administration of the “vaccine” a condition of employment or travel.
· Despite limited, flawed and poorly conducted clinical trial safety and efficacy data, proclaim it to be morally unacceptable not to be administered the “vaccine”. Children should get the “vaccine” to protect others even though they don’t really need it. With any evidence just say everybody should get the “vaccine” regardless of age, pregnancy status or natural immunity.
· Suppress reports of harm in the media. Demonise anybody who attempts to report cases of death or serious injury. It would assist greatly if there was something like “disinformation and misinformation” legislation to further suppress opposition to the “vaccine”.
· In order to weaken opposition to the use of the “vaccine”, enforce lockdowns to undermine the economy, destabilise society and create more fear. The lockdowns need not be based on any science whatsoever. The use of masks is another instrument of fear which could be used effectively. Make people wear masks.
· Under no circumstances, should the government permit a credible and independent investigation into the harms being recorded by the “vaccine”.
· As a matter of policy, never apologise, never admit wrongdoing and give those people most responsible for the death and destruction national awards so as to gaslight the community into thinking they have not been attacked but rather protected by dedicated individuals.
· Ensure a continual supply of the deadly “vaccine” by building manufacturing plants to produce an endless supply of the “vaccine”. Develop new “vaccines” based on the same platform which could be just as deadly and allow these to be released with a minimum of quality, safety and efficacy data. Maybe testing in as few as 8 mice.
I must have an evil mind to be able to conceive such a scenario for depopulation. I’m sure no government would allow anything like this fictious scenario to occur.
Moderna faces suspension or expulsion from a U.K. trade group for breaking several industry rules, including offering children teddy bears and large payments to participate in COVID-19 trials.
Pharma giant Moderna faces suspension or expulsion from a U.K. trade group for breaking several industry rules, including offering children teddy bears and large payments to participate in COVID-19 trials, The Telegraph reported.
The vaccine maker is facing an audit by the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), an independent, self-regulatory body established by the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, which it joined in 2023.
The CIA hired “Doctor” Terry Adirim (Master’s in Public Health) in December on a five-year renewable contract, as its “Director of the Center for Global Health Services.” Surely, if the blandly-named Center did anything good, the Times would surely have told us all about it. But readers got zero background; it remains a baffling mystery. That probably means the Center does virus-related stuff in other countries whose citizens would intensely dislike it if they knew what CIA was really up to. But whatever.
Dr. Terry holds a Harvard MPH and has a long resume of government service. In particular, and what got her plug pulled, Terry helped design and enforce the Pentagon’s vaccine mandate. Reports suggest she was the loudest and strongest internal DoD advocate for requiring jabs for healthy people in the least-risk cohort: U.S. soldiers.
Perhaps, or probably, seeing the writing on the Old Testament wall, the deep state spirited Dr. Terry out of DoD and into the bowels of the CIA skunkworks. Why? Because according to the Times, Dr. Adirim was only a month away from qualifying for full top-tier federal retirement benefits. But the Trump Administration found out about her new 5-year CIA contract, and she got her notice on April 4th. In other words, they deleted her plush retirement package.
Now, she’s suing.
...the story’s final paragraph got around to admitting that “a clause in her contract allows termination with 30 days’ notice for any reason.” In other words, it doesn’t matter whether Laura Loomer complained to someone about bureaucratic barnacle Dr. Terry. She was an “at will” contractee, who enjoyed no civil service protections.
Unless she can show illegal discrimination or breach of specific terms in her contract, neither of which were mentioned in the story, her lawsuit is going nowhere.
Lest you be tempted to feel any sympathy for poor Dr. Terry, recall that, if the jab critics —particularly the most serious and data-driven among them— are even partly right, then this doctor you never heard of may be the culprit of the most consequential medical policy error in modern U.S. military history.
What the Times did its level best trying to make sound like more ugly Trump retaliation politics was, in fact, great news. Terry Adirim’s firing shows that covid accountability is starting to catch up with the insiders, not just the disposable white-coated morons dumb enough to leap in front of cameras during the virus time. “Doctor” Terry was a strategic-level bureaucrat, an insider who actually pulled Pentagon policy levers. And her firing shows the reckoning is no longer reaching just the media-exposed doctors— it’s catching up to the shadowy technocrats behind the curtains.
Her termination was significant and encouraging because she never said anything controversial in public. Terry stayed safely hidden behind the bureaucratic drapes. But they found her anyway. In other words, the Trump Administration’s focus on covid accountability is not just performative. They really are trying to root these dangerous people out.
A former top U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) vaccine official ignored evidence that COVID-19 vaccines caused serious injuries, and dismissed the pleas of people injured by the vaccines, all while reassuring the public the shots were safe, documents published today on TheRealPeterMarks.com website reveal.
The website hosts public statements by Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., recordings of his calls with vaccine-injured individuals, transcripts and previously unreleased FDA records. ...
Wallskog said he wants to know why Marks “refused” to give Kennedy the vaccine injury data he requested. Dressen said she wants to ask Marks “about the countless lives negatively impacted by the COVID vaccines.”
“We brought the truth front and center to Marks, and he refused to see it,” Dressen said. “His decisions not to disclose highly reported injuries had devastating impacts on the medical community's ability to recognize and treat injuries.” As a result, she said, “countless lives” were lost and people were “permanently harmed.” ...
Documents on TheRealPeterMarks.com site reveal that Marks knew about adverse events following vaccinations as early as October 2020 — less than two months before the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines received emergency use authorization (EUA).
Dressen said she was “astonished” that Marks ignored those warning signs and instead promoted the government’s “safe and effective” narrative.
“He knew very well that there were serious problems with the COVID vaccines,” Dressen said. “What astonished me was how he can say it with such resolve.”
Marks approved COVID vaccines, boosters for kids despite knowledge of risks
The Singapore government has just updated its laws to make it a crime to refuse mandatory “vaccines,” punishable with prison time.
The updates to the nation’s laws open the door to criminal prosecution for members of the public who refuse to submit to government-mandated injections.
Interestingly, the changes have emerged while “vaccine” advocate Bill Gates has been visiting Singapore to meet with the nation’s leadership.
This week, Gates wrapped up his two-day visit in Singapore. ...
During the height of the pandemic, the Singapore government enacted various draconian measures coercing many Singaporeans.
Citizens were presented with two options: Take the “vaccine” or lose their job.”
Despite people suffering injuries from the experimental COVID shots, the Singapore authorities censored and discouraged public discussion.
People who dared question the Singapore government’s narrative were silenced, humiliated, and discredited by the authorities and their allies in the corporate media and sleazy “fact-checking” industry.
The decision-makers in the Trump Administration have been told by the global managers that there will be no further action allowed on the COVID crime.
It appears that President Trump was allowed to win the 2024 election because he agreed to cover-up the Democide.
The chosen new bureaucrats on the federal government health team have been given boundaries they are not allowed to cross, in order to protect the COVID criminals. ...
There are now enough people to form an unbeatable resistance.
The people of the West are poised to consider non-participation and new nation-building as their disillusionment about their corrupted governments increases.
" https://oldschoolcounselor.substack.com/p/the-covid-19-pandemic-was-a-mass ...
It appears that President Trump was allowed to win the 2024 election because he agreed
to cover-up the Democide."

The findings don’t prove the vaccines harm human fertility— but they demolished the idea that there’s no evidence of harm.
There is now conclusive evidence of harm, even if not conclusive proof. And the evidence is strong, consistent, biologically credible, and peer-reviewed.
This study suggests the FDA skipped a critical step: before mass deployment, this kind of reproductive impact should have been studied in depth. Instead, it’s only being belatedly noticed by independent researchers after the needled horse is out of the barn. More research in human women is urgently needed— not to create panic, but to finally take the question seriously.
💉 Global fertility rates have been declining for years, blamed largely on socioeconomic trends like delayed childbearing, urbanization, and falling marriage rates. But what’s grabbed everyone’s attention was the sharp acceleration in the decline during 2021–2023— a period that coincides almost exactly with the worldwide rollout of mRNA covid vaccines.
In some countries, birth rates dropped 7%–15% year-over-year, far beyond typical demographic variation, and without any clear alternative explanation. ...
The study resolved a critical question: is this possible? The next question demanding an answer now is, why aren’t public health authorities urgently conducting large-scale reproductive follow-up studies on women of childbearing age, using easily detectable markers like AMH and antral follicle counts?
On January 27, 2025, the President issued reference (a), concerning the Department of
Defense's since-rescinded coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination mandate, which
was unlawful as implemented, and "an unfair, overbroad, and completely unnecessary burden"
on Service members. The Secretary of Defense has taken decisive action to execute the
President's guidance to correct this injustice:
(1) All former Service members discharged solely for refusing to receive the COVID-19
vaccine may pursue reinstatement in the military, and be considered for eligibility to
receive backpay; and
(2) Former Service members who attest that they voluntarily left the military or allowed
their service to lapse according to appropriate procedures due to the military's
previous COVID-19 vaccination mandate may pursue a return to military service.
The crass emotional blackmail from genocidal criminals like "Take the vaxx out of love" Albert Bourla of Pfizer merits special punishment in itself.
Pfizer CEO calls people who spread misinformation about Covid vaccines 'criminals'
Pandemic Profiteer Moderna Opens 290,000 Sq Ft U.K. Facility After U.S. Gives Company $590 Million for Bird Flu mRNA Vaccine Development
Produces up to 250 million vaccines per year.
Pandemic-zealous vaccine manufacturer Moderna’s new U.K. site in Harwell, Oxfordshire, the Moderna Innovation and Technology Centre (MITC), is now fully operational, according to a BBC report.
Moderna’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccine was recently shown to hijack your immune cells into producing an enzyme that rewrites the shot’s genetic code—doubling its lifespan inside your body and turbocharging spike protein production far beyond what you were told.
Moderna’s own scientists have admitted that avoiding “unacceptable toxicity” from their mRNA vaccines poses serious challenges—confirming their shots come with built-in risks they’ve never fully disclosed to the public. ...
The World Is Orchestrating a Bird Flu Pandemic and Response
The opening comes after the United States earlier this year gave $590 million to Moderna to speed the development of H5N1 avian influenza “bird flu” mRNA vaccines. ...
Just like with COVID, the U.S. is again creating the problem and the solution—both of which American taxpayers are funding—at the same time. ...
Moreover, the CDC and FDA have been actively participating in World Health Organization (WHO) bird flu seminars despite President Donald Trump’s executive order withdrawing the U.S. from the international organization.
« First « Previous Comments 1,069 - 1,108 of 1,208 Next » Last » Search these comments
13 million17 million pointless deaths so far, is the worst crime against humanity ever committed. The vaxx is dangerous and defective, but even if it were not, it would still be a crime against humanity to force mass injections of anything, much less the new Thalidomide.The mRNA mandates are an even worse crime because the virus which was created with Fauci's funding in Wuhan was admitted to have a 99.7% infection survival rate at the time mandates were imposed, and even that has since been proven to be closer to 99.95%, making the disease no worse than a seasonal flu. There was never any good reason for the "vaccine" at all, yet mandates continue even now for foreigners entering the US, at many universities, many US companies, and in the US military.
For children, the death rate from the virus is statistically indistinguishable from 0%, making it a yet more heinous crime to inject that garbage into children.
The crass emotional blackmail from genocidal criminals like "Take the vaxx out of love" Albert Bourla of Pfizer merits special punishment in itself. Pfizer alone made $92 billion from the dangerous and defective jabs which have killed so many.
Note that I'm not talking about lynch mobs. There should be trials for those who forced the unknown effects of this toxic slime on billions of people, perhaps the way the Nuremberg trials were run. Sure, they will claim they did nothing illegal. The point is that those who mandated mRNA injections were violating fundamental human rights on a global scale.
One of the conclusions of the first Nuremberg trials was that it is a crime against humanity to force people to participate in medical experiments, and that no one should be allowed to even voluntarily participate in a medical experiment without informed consent. No one had informed consent to be part of this dangerous experiment, because there was and still is literally zero long-term safety data.
There are never any circumstances whatsoever that give anyone the right to mandate any medical product. It is always a crime against humanity.
Everyone who abused his or her power to demand injections via threat of job loss, or being expelled from school or the military, or being denied transplants - all of them must be tried and hanged as soon as possible. This is not the time for leniency. When people are kind to evil, they are evil to the kind.
Everyone who participated in the creation of the virus, like Fauci and Daszak, must also be hanged.
We are now told that no one was forced to submit to the death jabs, but being threatened with firing and expulsion and death from lack of medical care is obviously raw force. To be fired is normally a punishment for a serious offense, so to claim firing is not force is a bald lie.
This is a matter of basic human rights. Until we have justice, they will do it again and again and again - they will inject you with whatever they feel like, whenever they feel like it.
Even the mere widespread discussion of hangings will help to protect the world from similar injection mandates, as the genocidal criminals become aware that getting hanged for their crimes against humanity is a real possibility. We must all publicly speak continuously of hangings until justice is served.
Lower-level criminals who mandated the deadly injections should have their sentences commuted to life in prison if they help to convict their superiors in this crime. In this way, we may trace the crime all the way to the top.
We need Constitutional amendments around the world to prohibit any forced medical treatment, and early childhood education on how to revolt against any government which attempts to mandate any injection to anyone, ever. If you don't have control over your own bloodstream, you can be murdered at the whim of some unelected bureaucrat at any time.