patrick.net

There is no sane way to spin "You must take this jab or you will be fired, or expelled from school, or discharged from the military" as "No one was forced to take the jab."

Patrick says

There is no sane way to spin "You must take this jab or you will be fired, or expelled from school, or discharged from the military" as "No one was forced to take the jab."

Agreed, but this is courts we are talking about. Reality is 2nd place to "saying it makes it true." Transwomen are real women, for example.

Right, reality is simply ignored lately.

There is no sane way to spin "You must take this jab or you will be fired, or expelled from school, or discharged from the military" as "No one was forced to take the jab."

You can believe that 2 + 2 = 5 if you are insane though.

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

They are still gaslighting people. Every day I see or hear ads hawking mor jabs.

OUR PURPOSE
Our purpose manifold:

First, to reveal to you, the public, the criminal organization that is seeking to coercively extort and obtain complete control over the global population. The primary instruments of the organization’s criminal conduct include the creation of patented bioweapons marketed as novel viruses and injections.

Second, to remove the protective anonymity of the criminal syndicate’s participants, including individuals, business entities, and government organizations who are pursuing a 21st century, 100-year program, called “The Century of the Vaccine.”

Finally, to expose and detail the specific crimes this organization has committed to extort commercial gain from, and raw political power over citizens of the United States of America and the world through the creation and use of bioweapons and engaging in bio-terrorism.

We all know that they released the Wuhan bioweapon right after the Trump impeachment failed.

I was as shocked as anyone. It comes much too late and the very large majority of their students and faculty complied with COVID-19 vaccine mandates, but incoming freshman and newly hired faculty will no longer be subject to this unethical and unscientific policy, and for that, we are grateful.

Stanford announced in April 2021 that students would be required to take the COVID-19 primary series prior to the fall 2021 semester. A few months later, in July 2021, we learned that the husband of a Stanford professor of law and medicine had a stroke a few days after his receiving his second COVID-19 shot, but doctors assured the family that the vaccine he took “hasn’t been associated with stroke”. When Professor Michelle Mello asked her husband’s medical team to file a VAERS report, the staff “shifted uncomfortably”, but she knew why.

Cathy Jones - National Citizens Inquiry PSA
https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/
Canada's National Citizens Inquiry https://www.youtube.com/@citizensinquiry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuwt00Pi25I
March 11, 2023

We lost our voice. We were censored, we were canceled, and what people had to say about their experience fell on deaf ears. That's why the National Citizens Inquiry is so important.

Make sure you take the time to hear what Canadians have endured over the last three years. The National Citizens Inquiry, NCI, a cross-country initiative wants to give those who are harmed or damaged by the government's response to the pandemic a voice and a safe space to share their experience, along with support of expert witnesses who will share their insight and knowledge to the lawyer-led hearing of testimonies.

The National Citizens Inquiry launched March 16th to 18th in Truro Nova, Scotia to register for more information see the link provided with this post. See you there!

TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:

* See https://www.cbc.ca/22minutes/

What more subtle minds are asking these days is: when does this insanity tip over into evil? Especially the insanity evinced in our authority figures. How about when someone positively refutes reality in the act of doing harm, for instance Rochelle Walensky, Director of the CDC. Ms. Walensky is, to this moment, still proffering mRNA Covid-19 “vaccines” for children despite the reality that reams of evidence exist showing these products to be harmful, even deadly — and, in particular, by the previously exacting standards of the CDC’s sister agency, the FDA, which hold that just a few demonstrated injuries will lead to a drug being withdrawn from medical practice. (Ms. Walensky is a medical doctor, by the way.)

Is it possible that Ms. Walensky is unacquainted with the genuine news all over the Internet about mRNA injury and death? Rate that hard-to-believe… that is, at odds with reality. If, for some reason, it escaped her attention, do you suppose that somebody among her ten-thousand-plus CDC employees might have alerted the director about all this? I would suppose so. The unappetizing conclusion is that Rochelle Walensky, in her very important role as a national public health officer, has tripped over the line from insane to evil.

Stanford announced in April 2021 that students would be required to take the COVID-19 primary series prior to the fall 2021 semester. A few months later, in July 2021, we learned that the husband of a Stanford professor of law and medicine had a stroke a few days after his receiving his second COVID-19 shot, but doctors assured the family that the vaccine he took “hasn’t been associated with stroke”. When Professor Michelle Mello asked her husband’s medical team to file a VAERS report, the staff “shifted uncomfortably”, but she knew why.

Hmm, you think Stanford would be the last place they would run out of Soros bucks.

Sheldon Yakiwchuk
@YakkStack
When you started vaccinating children, I'd warned you that you would spend the rest of your lives looking over your shoulders and hoping to never meet with the parents of an injured child.

I was right.

Again.

Don't worry about us unvaccinated...we're not the ones you harmed. Worry about those people who you'd lied to...who you ignored when they were injured...those parents who've lost children...

These are the people you need to now be afraid of.

The rubber is meeting the road...chickens coming home to roost...

I do not condone violence, vengeance nor vigilantism...and will be watching this from the sidelines...and all I have to left to say about this is...

You were warned.

Don't worry about us unvaccinated...we're not the ones you harmed. Worry about those people who you'd lied to...who you ignored when they were injured...those parents who've lost children..

Patrick says

Don't worry about us unvaccinated...we're not the ones you harmed. Worry about those people who you'd lied to...who you ignored when they were injured...those parents who've lost children..

I would be very surprised to see any retaliation by parents of vaxxed injured kids, as the parents would have to admit they sacrificed their kid on the alter of politics. Maybe if they could sue and win, however.

Not widely reported was the news that the FDA recently removed approval for the original shots.

the FDA is raising the white flag on the mRNA Covid shots.
Unvaccinated adults will no longer be offered more than a single mRNA dose. (Tell that to the 230 million Americans who already took two.) And almost no one under 65 is eligible for a second booster.

GNL It's trivial to find proof of this, even on crazy leftist sites like Google.

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/very-urgent-the-fda-is-raising-the

the FDA is raising the white flag on the mRNA Covid shots.
Unvaccinated adults will no longer be offered more than a single mRNA dose. (Tell that to the 230 million Americans who already took two.) And almost no one under 65 is eligible for a second booster.

The monovalent

clambo says

The monovalent

What the hell is that? This is the first time I've seen the word "monovalent".

In this case series of 23 male patients, including 22 previously healthy military members, myocarditis was identified within 4 days of receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine. For most patients (n = 20), the diagnosis was made after the second dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine; these episodes occurred against the backdrop of 2.8 million doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines administered.

Fabien - Pfizer - Pericarditis Diagnosed 6th December 2021
https://rumble.com/vqqyom-fabien-pfizer-pericarditis-diagnosed-6th-december-2021.html

TRANSCRIPT

FABIEN: Dear Doctor [?] I am just recording that I'm just getting out of Revelstoke hospital right now, twice in a few days I get there. I got pericarditis. I'm 40 years old. I'm a hiking guide, I'm a back country cook. I'm healthy. I eat organic, I grow my food. I don't do any drugs. I'm ski touring, I'm going hiking. I'm in a good shape. I got the vaccine a bit more than a week ago. I didn't want to get this vaccine. Under pressure, under [?], I did not have the choice. I got this amazing job I should do in the mountain as a back country cook. And now I have pericarditis and I'm not able to go do my job. You did not let me the choice, I had to do it, and now I'm sick. I'm going to eat anti-inflammatory for months, heavy doses of inflammatory for months, and you're putting my health in danger. I understand you have to do things as a doctor and as a health officer, but not leaving the choice to people and people are in trouble for that? I'm freaking pissed right now. I'm not happy. I'm really not happy. Have a good day.

...

TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:

The text accompanying the video on rumble:
"Fabien
Pfizer 26th November 2021
Severe Adverse Reaction: Pericarditis Diagnosed 6th December 2021
Fabien has two children that he cares for on his own. He was told he must be vaccinated to be employed as a backcountry chef, but has just lost his ability to work due to a vaccine injury. He is now trying to recover from pericarditis, which he has been diagnosed with on December 6th.
Written 10th December 2021 by Fabien and a Video Message:
Since the 26/11/2021 first Pfizer shot:
Thursday 2/12 afternoon start of short breath /chest pain
Friday the 3/12. First visit at emergency room.
Week end in bed. Few hours of moderate activity Sunday afternoon, it was already too much.
Monday (second break, had a nap) I had to go in Emergency Room for a second time, that's when i got diagnose after 5h with Pericarditis
I am in pain, I am so tired and also scared.
I don't know what's happening next.
The Pericarditis should be 3/4 weeks for recovery/healing.
I've got diagnose by Dr Brown and a cardiologist on Monday the 6/12/2021.
They have told me it 100% sure the first shot of vaccine and the cause of the Pericarditis.
I have done the first shot only my province made it mandatory for people working with guests. My job as a cook in the back country was important for my mental health. After 2 years of depression. I've taken care of myself alone, now I am afraid my condition can trigger it again. I've finally found peace for the last year.
I had people arguing with me for the vaccine those last few days, with my condition arguing is dangerous. I try to stay emotionally neutral as it is too hard to laugh, cry, speak, argue.
But I need to speak, this is not ok to push people to put their health in danger for a medication i didn't need
Revelstoke, BC, CANADA"

💉 On Monday, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced on his website that he is opening an investigation into “Gain of Function” and “Misrepresentations by Covid-19 Vaccine Manufacturers.”

At last!

Paxton, the first Attorney General to officially delve into the jabs, said he’s investigating whether the companies misrepresented the efficacy of their shots, and the whether they misrepresented the likelihood of transmitting the virus after being jabbed, potentially violating of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Florida has a similar law, the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA). In early 2022, I was convinced I had the pharma companies in my sights under Florida’s FDUTPA law, a way to beat all their liability protection, and I did quite a bit of work on the case until a generous allied attorney helping with the project discovered a small, unnoticed provision deep in the act completely exempting pharmaceutical companies, and I was dead in the water.

(If Florida medical freedom activists want a good cause, getting rid of THAT stinky provision would change everything. Everything.)

Presumably Texas’ act lacks a pharma carve-out. I took a quick look at the Texas law this morning (it’s long) and couldn’t see anything problematic or find any pharma carve-out with a search. So Texas’ law could be the way.

Paxton says he’s going to investigate the following questions, whether:

— Pfizer, Moderna, or J&J engaged in gain of function research and misled the public;

— the vaxx makers lied about jab efficacy in reducing transmission;

— they manipulated vaxx trial data; or

— it was deceptive to use “relative risk reduction” instead of “absolute risk reduction” in describing the prophylactic effects.

Paxton’s announcement used strong language describing the investigation:

Texas’s investigation will force these companies to turn over documents the public otherwise could not access. Attorney General Paxton is committed to discovering the full scope of decision-making behind pandemic interventions forced on the public, especially when a profit motive or political pressure may have compromised Americans’ health and safety. Efforts by the federal government to coerce compliance with unjust and illegal pandemic interventions, even at the cost of citizens’ employment, means this investigation into the scientific and ethical basis on which public health decisions were made is of major significance.

So there are now TWO states and TWO attorneys general investigating the vaccines: Florida and Texas. (I noticed a comment the other day impatiently suggesting Florida’s Covid Grand Jury must have fizzled out, since we haven’t heard anything, but be patient — grand juries operate in secret. It would be bad if we did hear anything.)

Attorneys general are the way. Folks contacted me as far back as late 2021 asking how can we get criminal prosecutions for jab crimes going? The answer is it will take attorneys general or district attorneys. That’s something we really need to focus on for the upcoming election cycle if we really want accountability.

We need to be recruiting candidates to run for district attorney right now.

Not by accident, Florida and Texas are also the two states leading the country’s swelling conservative political movement. I’ll suggest that Paxton’s announcement confirms my theory that covid accountability is a popular political position, and we will soon see more action in this area.

Paxton’s investigation is another great start.