patrick.net

Too many people know of people who got sick, or who died, after being injected.

Thus the story now reaches the mainstream media.

The Telegraph in England printed a piece this past week entitled, euphemistically, ‘Covid jabs may be to blame for increase in excess deaths’.

Note, this is a newspaper who were fully onboard with vaccinating millions ‘for freedom’, who fired staff who questioned the regime.

The piece points out that since 2020, in 47 western countries there had been more than 3 million excess deaths. (It’s probably more, because you can finesse the baseline of expected deaths.)

US Mortality watch has reported that there have been 1.4 million excess deaths in the US since 2020, the bulk of which came 2021 and after. 400k or so in 2022 alone.

Remember, countries like Germany and Ireland recorded little to no excess deaths in early 2020. And there certainly were no excess deaths in 2019 when, in retrospect, samples have shown that PCR tests for covid would have come back positive. A strange virus, this.

The Telegraph is thus being disingenuous when it adds the caveat that these excess deaths occurred “despite the rollout of vaccines and containment measures.”

The mask slips later in the piece when the writer notes that “German researchers have pointed out that the onset of excess mortality in early 2021 in the country coincided with the rollout of the vaccines.”

They admit that Germany had no excess mortality in the throes of a ‘pandemic’. The death only began as the miracle cure was rolled out.

Think about that for a moment.

This is being admitted, without any criminal investigations being launched concomitantly.

The admission is part of the op.

If you know the truth, and it means nothing, affects nothing, then the truth will be lost in a miasma of media.

And it was not just the vaccines, more and more evidence is coming to light that hospitals were murdering patients as they were admitted in 2020.

From Jonathan Engler:

The French changed euthanasia protocols in 2020 by which authority was given to doctors to use euthanasia drugs previously deemed unlawful.

In the UK, massive amounts of midazolam and morphine were ordered, with Health Secretary Hancock revealing in Parliament on 17 April 2020 the existence of ‘a big project’ to order medicines needed to provide ‘a good death’.

The same drugs were used en masse in British nursing homes with prescriptions doubling in 2020. The same thing was happening in Australia, where it seems the threshold for ‘palliative care’ was drastically lowered. The dispensation of such drugs tracks the curve of excess deaths.

Disabled people (including those with ‘learning difficulties’) were secretly given ‘Do Not Resuscitate Orders’ in Scotland. It later emerged in England that 60% of covid deaths were in the disabled.

Finally, Engler points to a New Yorker article describing the death of the first ‘coronavirus victim’ in New York. Before the man was put on a ventilator, this exchange took place:

“They’re going to put you to sleep for a little while, so you can relax your lungs. You’re breathing too fast.”

He seemed dazed.

“I don’t feel sick. Will you be here when I wake up?”

They were apparently putting many people on respirators, even while they could breathe and speak.

Read the entire, haunting piece.

https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/did-testing-and-euthanasia-protocols

This is all in the open now.

This was mass murder. Not only that, but disability reports shot up around the world too, as dementia, heart disease, and paralysis escalated.

Number of arrests? Zero.

The same thing is playing out in the Fauci hearings in the US.

Fauci has admitted to Republican congressmen that he made up social distancing and masking as he went along.

Asked where the 6-foot social distancing rule came from, he replied, “You know, I don't recall. It sort of just appeared.”

He was also “not aware of studies” that supported the social distancing, conceding that such studies “would be very difficult” to do.

He also admitted that he does not recall seeing any studies that supported the masking of children, and admitted he had seen studies that showed the damage masks did to children, although he thinks that is “still up in the air”.

In a rational society, handcuffs (and gallows) would have waited for him after he said these things. Instead, he remains ‘the science’.

This man has been a part of an international ‘public health’ architecture that has killed millions. Millions around the world.

Recall the videos of children being treated like prisoners at schools, on public transport. Screamed at. Abused. Isolated. Families locked up. 400 000 arrests during lockdown in South Africa alone.

If you are not angry, you lack some kind of core virtue.

Thomas Aquinas wrote, “He that is angry without cause, shall be in danger; but he that is angry with cause, shall not be in danger: for without anger, teaching will be useless, judgments unstable, crimes unchecked.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) asked CDC Director Rochelle Walensky about her department's vaccination rates.

Sen Bill Cassidy asks, “What percent of CDC employees are vaccinated”?

Rochelle’s response, “We’re actively encouraging vaccination in all of our employees and doing a lot of education and outreach in order to get our agency fully vaccinated”.

She didn’t have the percentage.

It appears the CDC got the encouraging and education treatment, while the rest of us got the mandates, threat of job and food loss, financial insecurity, fear of covid camps, and humiliation treatment.

Good to know who we can trust moving forward.

This is a short article that is a throwback to Sept and Oct 2021. A time of Government overreach we should NEVER forget, imposed by people we should NEVER forgive. And our experiences then and now, still need explaining for those who still think it’s possible to ‘move on’.



... Tens of thousands - a friend reckons about 36,000 - of personal stories of grief and frustration were deleted because these were uncomfortable truths for the Government obsessed with power. For many of Jacinda’s then-fans, this may have been their first experience of censorship. Because if you don’t get censored, you don’t know it exists. They had likely already been gaslit, censored and defamed, by friends and family, GPs and colleagues - and were desperate to be heard. I screenshot three of these comments at the time (posted below). It breaks my heart to re-read these now and think of those who innocently tried to reach out for help that day, who perhaps genuinely believed the propaganda of the ‘safe and effective’? The image of Jacinda as a ‘caring and kind’ leader was broken. Many were confused or frustrated, some were understandably angry. These were a catalogue of multiple deaths and disabilities from a propagandized public:





At that time we were already watching the data from overseas in horror, which was spelling out how dangerous the injections were. Paradoxically they increased an individual’s chance of getting infections, and yet the Censorship Industrial Complex was systematically silencing any dissent - providing an illusion of consensus.

And as I described in my linked post above, the censorship continues today, in some areas, even more severely than before.

The Fake Fact Checkers that I wrote about here, were quick to get on the profitable band-wagon and reinforce the propaganda of the ‘safe and effective’ and to predictably label any counter-narratives as conspiracy theorists. (A particularly nauseating example is here.)

The following week after this PR disaster, Jacinda announced the ‘Vaccination Passports’ in New Zealand which as she declared proudly, would prevent many from accessing everyday things, like transport, dog parks, hairdressers, libraries, sport events, gyms and restaurants….

Many of us couldn’t believe this lightning-fast fall from our ‘normality’ into full-blown tyranny. And sure enough, one month later, the Vaccination Order was put in place, that mandated the injection for many employees. I have written extensively about that policy and how it impacted New Zealanders in many previous posts, including the challenges and corruption involved in applying for an exemption. One of my most popular articles about this is here:

Nobody embodies the EU’s elite-driven nature better than its incumbent president, Ursula von der Leyen. And no action of hers embodies its warped excesses better than her decision, in April 2021, to single-handedly sign off on a €35-billion deal for the purchase of 1.8 billion doses of the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine. According to one analysis, the price per dose she agreed was 15 times higher than the cost of production — meaning that the EU overpaid the vaccines by tens of billions of euros. Adding fuel to the fire, the New York Times later reported that von der Leyen had personally negotiated the deal via a series of text messages and calls with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla.

Last Straw: NIAID Must Be Shut Down

At a recent roundtable meeting called "Federal Health Agencies and the COVID Cartel: What Are They Hiding?" hosted by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.), Dr. Risch explained more about how the bioweapons industry has been working in secret for at least the past 70 years to unleash hell on the world.

"This work and the WIV (Wuhan Institute of Virology in China) leak was what I consider to be the fruit of our bioweapons industry that has been performing secretive and nefarious biological weapons development for the last 70 years," Dr. Risch stated at the roundtable.

"The recognition of the possible accidental or intentional unleashing of an infectious agent capable of killing large numbers of humanity led to the bioweapons treaty of 1975 that President Ford signed. The treaty prohibits the development of offensive bioweapons however, the one loophole in the treaty is that small quantities of offensive bioweapons are allowed to be developed in order to do research on vaccine countermeasures."

According to Dr. Risch, said loophole was then exploited by the U.S. bioweapons industry, which ultimately led to COVID, then Operation Warp speed, then the rest of the nightmare known as the "pandemic."

"My hypothesis, what I believe, is that both the virus origin cover-up and the forced vaccination of the entire planet were orchestrated to protect the integrity of the bioweapons industry," Dr. Risch stated. ...

"Without a successful vaccine to show for itself in the time of a pandemic crisis, especially one caused by a leak from a bioweapons industry source itself, it would be clear to everyone that the rationale for the industry’s existence was a fraud in the first place," Dr. Risch contends.

"And so, the COVID vaccines themselves supplied the defense against the charge that the bioweapons industry was not actually dual-use, but offensive only, violating the 1975 treaty."

...it is still a hanging crime to mandate the injection of anything, ever.

Hanged and shitting his pants while he jerks around would be enough.

"the reality is that both Fauci and Bourla will retire as free men in taxpayer supporter splendor."

The pharmaceutical kingpin was defending his company over reports that Pfizer’s “best days” are now in the past since the Covid pandemic was over.

“I truly think that the best days of Pfizer are ahead of us, because Covid was for me was like a rehearsal.”

He then continued to boast that Pfizer can now rapidly roll out mRNA shots in response to the next “main disease.”

One of the most prominent law professors in the world has just declared that “everyone involved” in pushing Covid mRNA shots onto the public committed “crimes against humanity.”

During a new interview, Dr. Francis Boyle asserted that the “frankenshots” were part of a plan to conduct “medical experimentation” on humanity.

Boyle, a bioweapons expert, wrote the 1989 Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act which was passed by Congress and signed into U.S. law in 1990 by President H. W. Bush.

He warns that COVID-19 was developed in a lab as “an offensive biological weapon” and argues that those who pushed the mRNA injections “clearly violated the Nuremberg Code.”

Speaking during an interview with Media Blackout’s Maria Zeee, Boyle declared that vax pushers are guilty of “murder” for causing deaths through vaccine injuries.

“Everyone involved in the development of COVID-19 as an offensive biological warfare weapon and also everyone involved in the manufacture of these COVID-19 ‘frankenshots’ clearly violated the Nuremberg Code on medical experimentation,” Boyle said.

“It was a Nuremberg crime and a crime against humanity.”

Boyle also responded to the Kansas lawsuit against Pfizer.

He described the case as “promising.”

However, he laments that the case is a civil lawsuit, not a criminal one.

Boyle believes that the perpetrators are guilty of “murder and conspiracy to commit murder.”

He emphasized that under common law Anglo-American principles of criminal law, which he taught for eight years, those involved are undoubtedly guilty.

Other crimes include “not only murder but also mayhem and assault and battery,” he says.

No politician dares to say “safe and effective” anymore in the UK Parliament. Why? Because it now seems that they can see the writing on the wall.

MP Andrew Bridgen revealed to Liz Gunn that his relentless efforts to highlight excess deaths have shattered the “safe and effective” narrative. Now, vaccine pushers are staring down a grim potential reality: “If they say ‘safe and effective’ now, I think they’re putting five to ten years on their sentence when we get them in court,” Bridgen said.

As a result, politicians have made a dramatic pivot. Instead of claiming the shots are “safe and effective,” they now refer to them as “the best solution.” This shift in language is a clear sign that the reckoning for the jabs is imminent, and officials are now scrambling to evade accountability.

Australian Government Has Been Hiding Deadly Covid Shot Side Effects since 2021

In early 2021, Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) became aware that mRNA lipid nanoparticles from Covid injections would spread to vital organs.

The TGA is Australia’s equivalent of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The agency found traces of the mRNA lipid nanoparticles in the brain, liver, and ovaries of those who had received the shots. ...

However, the agency decided to hide the discovery from the public over fears that informing citizens of the risks would promote vaccine hesitancy.

This information was obtained via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and exposed by a British researcher.

The data, made public by a whistleblower, shows that a TGA report published in January 2021 admitted that vaccine particles do not remain at the injection site as claimed by government health officials around the world.

Instead, the particles disperse throughout the body. ...

These findings were part of the “Nonclinical Evaluation of BNT162b2 [mRNA] COVID-19 vaccine (COMIRNATY)” study. ...

As Slay News has reported, the spread of these nanoparticles around the body has been linked to soaring cases of autoimmune disease, turbo cancers, and other serious illnesses and deaths.

In addition, vaccination expert Dr. John Campbell expressed significant concern about the implications for female reproductive health.

Responding to the findings in Australia, Dr. Campbell warns:

“Of course, the ovaries store and mature the ovum (female reproductive cells), so I’m not gonna pretend I’m not a little concerned about this.

“I’m more than a little concerned actually.” ...

“How could the Australian health authorities know this back in 2021 and still approve this vaccine?” he questioned.

In other words, Bourla waited until right after Biden was “elected” to call Fauci and deliver the news about Pfizer’s “surely rigged” mRNA trial, according to Schachtel.

“In retrospect, the shots were nothing more than junk genetic material,” Schachtel further explained.

“No lives were lost in delaying the distribution of these failed science experiment mRNA injections.”

“Nonetheless, the operation succeeded in taking away a political victory for Trump and delivering it to Biden.

“At the time, the majority of the public was truly terrified of the Wuhan sniffles, with many voters tethering their vote to the candidate who they believed could best defeat a virus.” ...

He writes that Trump’s FDA commissioner Stephen Hahn “made it clear to the Trump administration that in terms of vaccine authorization, he and his agency would not be pressured into taking scientifically incorrect action.”

He adds that the “vaccine approvals would not be rushed just because the White House hoped that they would be approved before the election.”

However, Fauci conveniently fails to mention Hahn’s ties to Big Pharma.

Just one year later, Hahn would join Flagship Pioneering, the company that founded Moderna.

“It sure seems like Albert Bourla, the horse doctor who runs Pfizer, and Stephen Hahn, who remains at Flagship, know something that might be the subject of much-needed congressional hearings and law enforcement investigations,” Schachtel explains.

“It’s not like this would be the first time Pfizer and the gang have lied, committed massive fraud, and deceived the public …”

As it turns out, Pfizer and Moderna raked in a lot more dough after Biden was installed into the White House.

Their jab contracts with the federal government were renegotiated to become much more lucrative.

Trump and his people had previously agreed to pay Pfizer $19.50 per dose under Operation Warp Speed.

After Biden was installed, his administration would agree to $30.48 per dose instead.

This unexplained price hike represents a 56 percent increase.

Dr Ugur Sahin, the CEO of BioNTech, the company that worked with Pfizer to develop the world’s first Covid vaccine, admitted on camera that he also refused the jab.

In near-fully vaccinated New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern’s Ministry of Health granted vaccine exemptions to political elites while hypocritically rolling out the world’s most draconian vaccine mandates and insisting the public be vaccinated.

A Pfizer employee also blew the whistle and admitted the Big Pharma giant provided a “special batch” of the Covid vaccine for senior staff and elite VIPs during the roll out in 2021.

He said that “informed consent” and autonomous decision over one’s own body was the “basic dogma” in medical ethics during the past decades.

The bishop noted that the Congregation (now Dicastery) for the Doctrine of the Faith under Cardinal Luis Ladaria had declared that there must not be forced Covid injections.

“Nevertheless, the Pope imposed [a shot mandate] on all employees in the Vatican as head of state,” Eleganti stated.

“Otherwise, they would have lost their jobs or been given another one.

“So, for me, that was clearly an injustice.”

The real problem is that medical advances have ensured that far too many leadership positions remain clogged up by greybeards in their sixties and seventies—men who ostensibly retain all rational faculties but have grown soft, out of touch, and (most damningly) far too risk averse to lead a dynamic, vital, and agile civilization.

This is obviously why the government felt entitled to ruin everyone’s life for two years during Covid. All of society give undue weight to the interests of old people and it literally didn’t matter how many young folks lost their jobs or suffered from major depression or gained forty pounds, because it was deemed absolutely essential that we shut down civilization to give grandma a few extra years.

New York City Committees on Oversight and Investigations & Civil Service and Labor
Gale A. Brewer, Chair
September 9, 2022
https://councilnyc.viebit.com/player.php?hash=U2mDNKAEkDJA
Source:
https://legistar.council.nyc.gov/Calendar.aspx

LAURA HOFMANN [via Zoom]: First of all, I want to work. In January 2022 I was fired from my job of 10 years following an unpaid involuntary leave of absence due to the covid vaccine mandates and my firmly held religious beliefs.

I was tossed aside like human garbage after being a dedicated worker of ten years. The unfair treatment negated the decades of volunteer community work that I have done alongside my former employer and in the Greenpoint community on multiple environmental waterfront parks and housing issues.

I've testified many, many times before New York City Council regarding those issues. Never would I have ever thought that I would be testifying about my right to work, my freedom of religion, or having control over what to put in my body. But here I am.

My income and my ability to get another job were taken away, and it was needless since I've had natural antibodies since March 2020, following being sick with covid.

Given my community-based knowledge about environmentally linked diseases and knowledge about my own auto-immune diseases, I knew it was a strong possibility that these antibodies would serve to protect me from covid in the future. And now the CDC is finally catching up, acknowledging what many people already knew.

What hurts the most is that I truly loved my job, my coworkers, my clients. And I'm still friends with many of my coworkers and clients who sought me out on social media. I worked as a housing counselor in a respected not-for-profit community organization under contract with HBD [Housing Preservation and Development] as a housing counselor, housing counseling agency.

As an essential worker, I worked both in the office and remotely serving clients during the heart of the pandemic. I made wellness calls to seniors in an effort to prevent them from feeling isolated. The same organization that did this work, that—

MALE VOICE: Your time has expired.

LAURA HOFMANN: —hired me, for who I am, and isolated me, a senior with medical issues.

GALE A. BREWER: If you could wrap up, thank you.

LAURA HOFMANN: Basically, the mandates have severely harmed me and harmed the way that I interact with community. I refuse to even eat out in establishments that did not push back against the mandates.

GALE A. BREWER: Thank you.

LAURA HOFMANN: And it's to the point where I myself, after fighting environmental issues in these communities for decades, I'm thinking about moving out of New York myself.

New York City Committees on Oversight and Investigations & Civil Service and Labor
Gale A. Brewer, Chair
September 9, 2022
https://councilnyc.viebit.com/player.php?hash=U2mDNKAEkDJA
https://legistar.council.nyc.gov/Calendar.aspx

GABRIEL DALMAU: Hi, my name is Gabriel Dalmau. I worked for the Department of Sanitation for about five years. I remember feeling proud when I first got the job. I'm a welder. Welding on garbage trucks is not glamorous at all. A lot of the city jobs that we take and that we do are not glamorous, but we show up every day, even during a pandemic. Nurses, firefighters, teachers, EMTs, police, you name it, we were there, we were good enough then, we should be good enough now.

In April of 2020 my mother Cynthia, God bless her soul, she passed away, I took my four days bereavement, and I went back to work. I went back to work every single day during the pandemic, when my mother passed away, took my four days, I went back to work. It's not because I'm an outstanding employee or anything like that, it's because it's my job, that's what I chose to do, and I said, I'd rather be at work keeping my mind busy and doing something at least for the city in my own little small way to help out rather than be at home going crazy.

We're not where we were before. These things don't make sense. The mandates don't make sense. People are hurting out there, people are losing their jobs, their homes.

All the people that we call on when we're in trouble, police, firefighters, EMTs, nurses, schoolteachers, all those people that were good enough then, but they're not good enough now? How does that make any sense?

All I got to say is that, end the mandates, it's unconstitutional, it's illegal, and it's just downright not human the way that we've been treating people.

We got treated like yesterday's newspaper, we got treated like the trash, that we help to take out all the time. And the same with a whole bunch of other people in this city, this great city that we love that we all signed up to take care of, that we're all a part of, we need to be less divisive and more inclusive and get everybody back to what they do best because you cannot replace the amount of experience that these people have with new hires. It just doesn't work that way.

Democrat President Joe Biden’s former White House COVID-19 Response Coordinator Dr. Ashish Jha has admitted that vaccine mandates were a mistake.

In a new interview with former CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, Dr. Jha confessed that forcing people to take Covid mRNA injections was “harmful” to members of the public and damaged trust in government.

“In the long run [vaccine mandates] bred a lot of distrust and were harmful as well,” said Jha, who now serves as the Dean of the Brown University School of Public Health.

Jha suggested vaccine mandates would be “very, very narrow” if another pandemic were to emerge.

The former top Biden White House official said he often reminds his friends in public health that the track record for mandates in their field “is not a glorious history.”

“In general, you don’t want to use mandates unless you absolutely have to,” Jha stated.

“And, I say that as somebody who supported vaccine mandates early on.

💉🔬 Sometimes, small developments signal massive changes. One such signal unexpectedly appeared last week in a ‘study’ (a “Perspective”) that popped up in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, succinctly titled “Funding Postauthorization Vaccine-Safety Science.”

The Perspective’s unremarkable premise was that governments should not only require minimal safety testing from vaccine manufacturers for initial approval, but agencies should also continue tracking vaccines’ real-life performance after approval. The authors strongly argued we need to figure out the real-world, long-term risks from vaccines, however rare they might (or might not) be, and which for whatever reason might not have shown up in the drugs’ initial approval studies.

In other words, they argued we should keep checking vaccines after authorizing them, instead of drinking a few more espresso martinis and singing “safe and effective” at the karaoke booth until the bar closes.

While you might think that is just common sense, you are not an expert. Experts, unlike you dummies, have no need for common sense. They have grants.

Even though that infuriating admission was ultimately unsurprising, there were two quite remarkable things about the Perspective. The first was that the vaccine-tracking suggestion appeared in a mainstream medical journal at all, causing pharma sales reps to start polishing their resumes. The concept wasn’t new, but it was new that the NEJM agreed to publish what until ten minutes ago was an ugly anti-vaxxer conspiracy theory.

But second, and even more remarkable, is who joined the Perspective. One of the main authors was Dr. Stanley Plotkin, M.D..

Dr. Plotkin has, over the course of his long career, been so influential in expanding the vaccine industry that he is called, and I am not making this up, the “Godfather of Vaccines.” He’ll make you a vaccine offer you can’t refuse.

Like other bureaucratic cockroaches of our acquaintance, Plotkin has worked inside and outside government, won any number of jab awards, published innumerable supportive papers and books on vaccine science, and “pioneered” the use of fetal cells in vaccine development. So.

But now, suddenly and unexpectedly, for the first time in his long and storied career, Dr. Plotkin is calling for more research into vaccine injuries. Why? Why now? You may not be surprised to learn the article offered the pandemic as an explanation:

“The widespread vaccine hesitancy observed during the Covid-19 pandemic suggests that the public is no longer satisfied with the traditional safety goal of simply detecting and quantifying the associated risks after a vaccine has been authorized for use.”

You don’t say. Before we continue, chalk up yet another unpredicted pandemic win for the anti-vaccine movement. Anyway, Plotkin and his co-authors admitted that times have changed:

“The public also wants public health authorities to mitigate and prevent rare but serious adverse events – which no longer seem rare when vaccines are given to millions or billions of people.”
In other words, people are getting completely fed up with the philosophy of “you have to break a few people to make a vaccine omelet.” Saving five million people from “serious covid” (allegedly) cannot justify killing one million people with heart attacks, blood clots, strokes, and turbo cancers.

Doctors like Stanley Plotkin love utilitarian ethics. But sane people reject trading lives for outcomes if you can make the numbers work.

Even more surprising, Dr. Plotkin has apparently had an epiphany: it is now critical to track vaccine injuries and figure out whether and how vaccines are hurting people:

“It is critical to examine adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) that have not been detected in clinical trials, to ascertain whether they are causally or coincidentally related to vaccination. When they are caused by vaccines (vaccine adverse reactions), the risk attributable to vaccination and the biologic mechanism must be ascertained.”
Touching on my PREP Act lawsuit, the authors recognized that people with jab injuries are being gaslit and get no help from anybody. Pushing aside, for the moment, the sacred goal of selling more vaccines, Plotkin and his confederates admitted that injured people need compensation for their injuries.

“Identifying the biologic mechanisms of adverse reactions — how and in whom they occur — is critical for developing safer vaccines, preventing adverse reactions by expanding contraindications, and equitably compensating vaccinees for true adverse reactions.”
It would be hard to understate the importance of achieving true compensation for vaccine injuries. After all, compensation for injuries is the bedrock of our tort system, which does a pretty good job keeping unsafe products off the market, for the simple reason that paying for people’s injuries cuts into profits.

For too long, vaccine manufacturers have hidden behind the “unavoidably unsafe” banner. But if victims start being fairly compensated —even by the government, as Plotkin suggested— we will immediately get vastly improved visibility into vaccine injuries.

If you give people financial incentives to report their injuries, they will do it in droves. And if you give lawyers incentives to prove how vaccines injured their clients, the lawyers will do the work the scientists have been unable to perform. It would amount to a level of visibility into vaccine injuries that we’ve always needed but never had.

In other words, Plotkin’s new Perspective signals a massive schism opening between medical science and big pharma. That growing gulf arose only because of the pandemic’s unaccountable excesses. I guess the vaccine scientists don’t want to be left holding the bag.

Ex-CDC Director: Public health did not want to report side effects because people would not get vaccinated.

The vaccines “don't prevent infection. They do have side effects...they should have never been mandated”.

Ex-CDC Director Redfield: Again, I think Senator, what you're getting at, which I'm 100% agreeing with you, is I think there was not appropriate transparency from the beginning about the potential side effects of these vaccines. And I do think there was inappropriate decisions by some to try to under report any side effects because they argued that would make the public less likely to get vaccinated. I do think one of the greatest mistakes that was made, of course, was mandating these vaccines. They should have never been mandated. It should have been open to personal choice. They don't prevent infection. They do have side effects. I'm going to clinic this afternoon.

Senator Johnson: But again, again, I appreciate your admitting side effects, but you have to admit the people, the agencies, the marks. You know, the Dr. Marks, the Dr. Woodcock, they're still by and large denying this, right? They're saying, well, they're mild, they're rare, and they're mild. They're not rare, and they're severe to death.

Redfield: The FDA should release all of the safety data they have. I was very disappointed to hear that they were planning to hold on to that until 2026. That really creates a sense of total lack of trust in our public health agencies towards vaccination. It's counterproductive.

Senator Johnson: So Mr. Chairman, I'm not getting cooperation out of the Chairman of the Perm Subcommittee Investigation to issue subpoenas to get this information. You have not yet issued a subpoena to get the final 50 pages unredacted. I would suggest we do that. Again, as important as the cover-up of the origin story is, there's a lot more that's being covered up. The public has a right to know. We pay for these agencies. We pay their salaries. We fund these studies. and they're not giving them to us. So again, I would ask you, again, appreciate this here, and this is important, there are many aspects of our miserably failed response to COVID that needs to be uncovered, not the least of which is the sabotage of early treatment, which I didn't have time to get into. ...

Redfield: It has a very strong pro inflammatory response which is problematic. Again, I think Senator, what you're getting at, which I'm 100% agreeing with you is I think there was not appropriate transparency from the beginning about the potential side effects of these vaccines. And I do think there was inappropriate decisions by some to try to under report any side effects because they argued that would make the public less likely to get vaccinated. I do think one of the greatest mistakes that was made, of course, was mandating that these vaccines, they should have never been mandated. It should have been open to personal choice. They don't prevent infection. They do have side effects.

We, dissidents, tried to tell the people all this stuff in 2021, but Public Health agencies hid it from the people and censored those who spoke out:

They knew modRNA would be distributed all over the body, concentrating in the ovaries, and the adrenal glands, and crossing the blood-brain barrier.

Public health did not want to report side effects because people would not get vaccinated.

The vaccines “don't prevent infection. They do have side effects...they should have never been mandated”.

So, who is going to jail for this greatest crime in history with 5+ billion people jabbed with a toxic substance?