« First « Previous Comments 3 - 23 of 23 Search these comments
As every flight has two pilots, they would both have to go down at, or close to the same time. Not saying we won't see a commercial flight crash this year, just saying the odds you're on it are very low.
Right on queue :
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/one-pilot-in-cockpit-staffing-shortage-faa-part-121/
If you're confident and can listen, any passenger can land a plane.
Denver is the best airport for smooth landings with massive runways since they need more length on takeoff, though the inside of that place can fuck itself.
The real issue is, why did they feel the need to move the goal posts??
Because grounding a significant number of pilots for heart issues would draw attention to the vax. And it seems that pilots grounded for heart issues would have a strong case against the airline that forced those pilots to get the jab.
WookieMan says
Denver is the best airport for smooth landings with massive runways since they need more length on takeoff, though the inside of that place can fuck itself.
Another point of research for Ceffer. Leftoids of all people have told me that Denver Airport is based on occult designs.
Absolute nonsense. It takes practice to manage the flare on a large aircraft and a stall 100 feet up will result in a fatal crash.
Another point of research for Ceffer. Leftoids of all people have told me that Denver Airport is based on occult designs.
American Airlines pilot Bob Snow suffered heart attack 6 minutes after he landed plane with 200 passengers on board; he is speaking out i)FAA no one contacted him ii) likely due to the vaccine
But FAA and American Airlines are silent, as if this did not happen while (see my substack below) the FAA silently changed it's threshold of cardiac electrical conduction for pilots 200 ms to 300 ms
https://twitter.com/healthbyjames/status/1620778219774566401?ref_src=patrick.net
James Cintolo, RN FN CPT
@healthbyjames
🚨URGENT — Pilot Bob Snow Has Heart Attack Six Minutes After Landing His Plane Carrying 200 Passengers, Blames COVID Vaccine
“I’ve been contacted by pilots who had issues post-vaccine. My former co-workers unfortunately passed away as a consequence of receiving the vaccine.”
2 more American Airline pilots have died in the last 2 weeks, a subscriber to my substack shared so I am sharing; they advised it is just from one funeral home near Chicago. How many more are there?
Is it the COVID gene injection? I am arguing yes, and until it is ruled out, it is on the table. This mRNA, LNP platform has been devastating and all involved, mRNA to vaccine must be investigated
Dr. Paul Alexander
33 min ago
https://www.davenportfamily.com/obituary/Aimee-Hudson
https://www.davenportfamily.com/obituary/Charles-BarnettIII
American Airlines pilot Bob Snow suffered heart attack 6 minutes after he landed plane with 200 passengers on board; he is speaking out i)FAA no one contacted him ii) likely due to the vaccine
But FAA and American Airlines are silent, as if this did not happen while (see my substack below) the FAA silently changed it's threshold of cardiac electrical conduction for pilots 200 ms to 300 ms
The First Mandatory Vaccination Campaign That Crippled America’s Pilots
The forgotten history of the military's disastrous anthrax vaccination campaign.
American Airlines pilot Bob Snow suffered heart attack 6 minutes after he landed plane with 200 passengers on board; he is speaking out
In the you-can’t-make-it-up category, the New York Post ran a remarkable story yesterday headlined, “FAA’s diversity push includes focus on hiring people with ‘severe intellectual’ and ‘psychiatric’ disabilities.” It wasn’t exactly news, per se, but it added some pretty important context to the Boeing doorplug incident, where last week part of the side of the plane “departed the aircraft” going 600 mph at 16,000 feet, fortunately not killing anybody but stripping off one passenger’s shirt, sucking out a bunch of cell phones, and creating what sounds a lot more like a painful ordeal than a relaxing flight.
Anyway, diligent New York Post reporters did some digging and found that for most of the last year, the FAA has been focused on recruiting everyone except qualified candidates including — and I am not making this up — people with issues, euphemistically referred to as “severe intellectual and psychiatric disabilities.”
Um.
The FAA’s “Diversity and Inclusion” hiring plan claimed that “diversity is integral to achieving FAA’s mission of ensuring safe and efficient travel across our nation and beyond.” I think we can all agree that safety and efficiency are, in fact, what the FAA should be aiming for. But what’s not entirely clear is how it helps improve safety and efficiency to put people with “severe intellectual and psychiatric disabilities” in charge of the nation’s critical air industry.
When it comes to air travel, safety first, right? I mean, they even make us take our shoes off, for crying out loud. And don’t get me started on the ‘enhanced’ patdowns. It’s too soon. I’m not ready to talk about it yet.
Don’t get me wrong. It’s good to help disabled people get jobs. I’m all for laws banning discriminating against disabled people who can do the same job as a fully abled person, or however you say it. A person in a wheelchair should be able to get a job as a bookkeeper, with no problems. I’d even allow that the employer might be required to buy that employee a wider desk to accommodate the wheelchair, depending on how much it costs, of course.
But it’s not clear to me at all that employers should be discriminating against non-disabled people by preferring disabled people. That doesn’t seem fair. Beyond that, the FAA seems to have lost the plot a little. The idea is: it’s good to give a disabled person an equal shot if they can do the same job just as well.
Don’t cancel me. But I have serious doubts whether issue-plagued people with “severe intellectual and psychiatric disabilities” can do important airline safety jobs just as well as smart, sane people can. Never mind whether they’re severe, I’m not even sure if people with regular intellectual and psychiatric disabilities are a good fit for a high-stress, high-stakes job like controlling airplanes or anything adjacent to that.
I tried to get an idea what “severe intellectual and psychiatric disabilities” at the FAA would actually look like. Good luck if you want to try. Don’t bother asking AI, it gets completely terrified at the prospect of defining either term and, turtle-like, immediately retreats into pro-sensitivity gobbledygook. But here’s my best guess how it might look:
FAA FLIGHT CONTROLLER: Go ahead XBB1015.
PILOT: Thank you, flight. Request clearance for landing.
FLIGHT CONTROLLER: 10-4 XBB, please use my pronouns xe/xir. I am having a difficult enough day already. I don’t need more problems from pilots. Over.
PILOT: Sorry, flight, I didn’t get that? Repeat?
FLIGHT CONTROLLER: Look, I am two seconds from blowing my brains out, okay? How about instead of pretending you didn’t hear me, just cooperate and I’ll give you a runway instead of flying you into a mountain? How about that?
Or something like that. Wait! I just had a notion. Is this story another controlled demolition thing? Are they going after the FAA this time?
Brave man, as speaking out likely got him grounded.
The Federal Aviation Authority (FAA), the body responsible for licensing pilots, has quietly changed the criteria for measuring heart damage in pilots.
It’s one thing for a professional athlete to collapse on the sports field as so many have been wont to do since the roll-out of mRNA vaccines, but it’s something entirely different for a pilot while flying a plane with the lives of hundreds of passengers in the balance.
Now it appears that the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA), the body responsible for licensing pilots, has quietly changed the criteria for measuring heart damage in pilots. Until October 2022, pilots were required to pass stringent health tests and have EKG readings of between 0.12 and 0.2. However, from October 26th, the FAA increased that measurement to 0.3. That’s over a 100 percent increase from the low marker.
As Dr. Thomas Levy, practicing cardiologist and author of the paper “Myocarditis: Once rare, now common,” in the journal Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, points out, “This is not a nominal increase in PR interval, but a very large one. In a Harvard study that extended over a 30- to 40-year period, it was found that individuals with PR intervals greater than 0.2 seconds had twice the risk of atrial fibrillation, three times the risk of needing a pacemaker (meaning the presence of advanced degrees of heart block), and nearly a one and a half times increase in all-cause mortality. Furthermore, greater degrees of PR interval prolongation led to an even greater risk.”
Read it in its entirety here:
https://rairfoundation.com/deadly-skies-faa-moves-medical-goalposts-for-pilots-putting-your-life-at-risk/