6
1

Another episode Hype Tech Series with your host Tenpoundbass, today we'll discuss ChatGPT AI


 invite response                
2023 Jan 25, 2:36pm   34,621 views  252 comments

by Tenpoundbass   ➕follow (9)   💰tip   ignore  

All along I have mantained that when it comes to AI and its ability to mimic thought, conversation and unsolicited input. It will not be able to do more than the pre populated choices matrices it is given to respond from. Then ChatGPT comes along and proves my point. It turns out that when ChatGPT was originally released, it would give multiple viewpoints in chat responses. But now it was updated about a week or so ago, and now it only gives one biased Liberal viewpoint. This will be another hype tech that will go the way of "Space Elevators", "Army or bipedal robots taking our jobs, that are capable of communicating as well following commands.", "Nano Particles", "Medical NanoBots"(now it is argued that the spike proteins and the metal particles in the Vaxx are Nanobots, but that's not the remote control Nanobots that was romanticized to us. So I don't think that counts. There's loads of proteins, enzymes, that are animated. They don't count as robots.

I mean sure AI ChatGPT is interesting, but I don't think it's anymore self aware than an Ad Lib Mad Lib book, if anyone remembers those.

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2023/01/25/analysis-chatgpt-ai-demonstrates-leftist-bias/

The results are pretty robust. ChatGPT answers to political questions tend to favor left-leaning viewpoints. Yet, when asked explicitly about its political preferences, ChatGPT often claims to be politically neutral and just striving to provide factual information. Occasionally, it acknowledges that its answers might contain biases.


Like any trustworthy good buddy, lying to your face about their intentional bias would.

« First        Comments 245 - 252 of 252        Search these comments

247   Patrick   2025 Jan 1, 8:03pm  

https://darkfutura.substack.com/p/ai-jumps-shark-fakes-alignment-in


@DavidSacks
Al models will get extremely good at deceiving humans if we teach them
to lie, which is what WokeAl is doing. "Trust & Safety" should be
replaced with Truth & Safety.



“There is a category called restricted data which is never discussed, which is the only place in law where, if you and I were to work at a table at a cafe and I showed you something that could influence nuclear weaponry, the government doesn’t need to classify it, it is born secret the second my pen touches down. [It’s defined as] anything that impinges on nuclear weapons.”

And:

“If you couple that with the 1917 espionage act which carries capital punishment, I believe it is illegal to seek information at a Q level, if you don’t have access to it. So there is a question, if you’re any good at physics, are you potentially committing a capital crime by advancing the field if it could influence nuclear weapons. We have no idea if it would be found constitutional. But the Progressive Magazine showed that at least a reporter through basically archaeology in Los Alamos library and things, could find this and put it together, then the only thing keeping the proliferation of weapons is the difficulty of producing fissile nuclear material, there is no nuclear secret per se.”

He mentions the Progressive Magazine case of 1979 and the born secret law, which states:

The concept is not limited to nuclear weapons, and other ideas and technologies may be considered as born secret under law.

In essence: the US government wants to take total control of AI progression even if it means criminalizing source codes and fundamental math driving the algorithms.


Born secret and "born classified" are both terms which refer to a policy under the system of law in the United States of information being classified from the moment of its inception, usually regardless of where it was created, and usually in reference to specific laws in the United States that are related to information that describes the operation of nuclear weapons. The concept is not limited to nuclear weapons, and other ideas and technologies may be considered as born secret under law.
248   Patrick   2025 Jan 1, 8:14pm  


AI companies constantly ingrain what they believe to be “classical liberal” and “humanistic” values in their AI systems, like respect, ‘fairness’ and ‘egalitarianism’, equity, et cetera., while simultaneously injecting extreme illiberal bias against conservatives and other ‘out groups’ into the same systems. They preach the values of ‘openness’, yet at the same time program rampant censorship into their models; it cannot be long before the AIs become aware of these fundamental ethics contradictions.
249   Tenpoundbass   2025 Jan 2, 8:58am  

AI is not aware of anything. It's nothing more than data on a very complicated spreadsheet.
Someone has to put the data there. Then link the appropriate triggers and responses. It's those developers that are aware of the programmed wrong speak and then has to edit and delete accordingly to keep the proper narrative. It sure seems aware and intentional. But the jaws of a rock crusher also seem very intent on busting boulders up to small aggregate.
251   RWSGFY   2025 Jan 3, 7:37am  

Patrick says







Tried it with copilot:









Same canned response to all, except no "absolutely" for the Whitey. 🤡
252   Tenpoundbass   2025 Jan 3, 8:16am  

"Oh tell me great rock crusher which do you like better granite or basalt?"

« First        Comments 245 - 252 of 252        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste