patrick.net

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/do-governments-track-the-injury-and

My guess is that the response from the agencies will be that they do not track data on bioweapon deployment because those are prohibited by international laws, and the US Government would never do such a thing as to lie to the public about biochemical weapons, “pandemic” and “vaccines”, you silly conspiracists!

However, some governments appear to maintain excellent data tracking “the kill”. Here is an example sent to me by a colleague form Australia, of an online database with beautiful graphing tools (this is for New South Wales). NSW includes Sydney, it’s population is ~8 million (of Australia’s total of about 25M) and was founded by the British as a penal colony. Perhaps that last factoid is why they are so unabashedly clear in reporting the results of their mass injury/murder campaign? Or maybe they simply have good database skills available.

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/draft-freedom-of-information-act

Prepared for a FOIA coordination call today:

Signed, dated copies of reports to Congress, prepared and submitted by DOD and HHS, under 50 USC 1512, 50 USC 1513, 50 USC 1518, 50 USC 1523, and 50 USC 1528, and/or any other applicable Congressional notice and/or reporting law, quantifying the mortality and morbidity data collected from any and all government databases (VAERS, V-Safe, VA, DMED, etc), contract manufacturer and subcontractor databases (ATI, Pfizer, Moderna, Ventavia, ICON, etc.), and private health insurance databases (Kaiser, Blue Cross, etc.), assessing the effectiveness of the mRNA/LNP class of bioweapons for incapacitating, sterilizing and killing adults and children, from the start of the events known as “Covid-19 vaccine clinical trials” in Spring 2020 to the present.

DOD and HHS will likely reject these requests on national security grounds, because it’s a military campaign, so data about military weapons and their demonstrated effectiveness is probably classified as non-available outside of a very small Congressional oversight committee, assuming there’s even a small group of Congress members kept in the loop. Which there may not be.

I didn't watch all this, but it's Sasha Latypova documenting DoD involvement in the scamdemic.


original link

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/toxic-by-design-researcher-explains-why-us-defense-depts-covid-vax-operation-shows-intent-to-harm/

‘Toxic by design’: Researcher explains why US defense dept’s COVID vax operation shows intent to harm

... Latypova worked more than 25 years in the pharmaceutical industry specializing in research and development, including data analysis, clinical trials, and technologies, while also co-founding multiple research organizations before retiring at a relatively young age. ...

As Latypova has explained, the DoD managed to classify these “vaccines,” not as medicines or pharmaceuticals but as “COVID countermeasures” under the authority of the military, which means they are not required to comply with U.S. law governing the manufacturing quality, testing, effectiveness, safety, and labeling of medical products.

Yet while such laws did not apply to these “COVID-19 vaccines,” the government advanced an orchestrated public relations façade that standard testing, monitoring and approval processes were being strictly observed by the CDC and FDA, even as many thousands of injuries and deaths had been steadily documented and independent medical experts and media sounded alarms only to be canceled my legacy and social media corporations.

In an early December video lecture, the former pharma executive laid out evidence for how the DoD, HHS, and other U.S. government agencies, along with other governments and pharmaceutical companies, were involved in “a conspiracy to commit mass murder through bioterrorism and informational warfare operations worldwide.”

“The evidence is overwhelming that there is an intent to harm people by the COVID 19 injections, so-called ‘vaccines,’ and other nonsensical COVID response measures implemented in lockstep by governments all over the world,” she explained.

Refusal to intervene despite high injury rates ‘points to an intentional act’ to inflict harm
First, such intent is indicated by the fact that “these injections are toxic by design,” Latypova said. “We know this. There has been an extensive body of literature, studies, scientific discussions, [and] evidence published on this matter.”

“There are numerous mechanisms of injury built into the COVID 19 injections. The most important one being that these shots are designed to make your cells attack themselves, make your cells express antigens that are toxic spike proteins, and then create antibodies to attack the cells. So, it trains your body to destroy itself,” she explained.

Therefore, “there is definitely no safety in these shots,” the analyst said, referring to the well-known death and injury reports from VAERS and other data sources that show “millions of reports of injury, deaths, [and] permanent disabilities,” including these harms being inflicted on many children and young people.

In an earlier presentation to the Corona Investigative Committee (CIC), Latypova called these reports “absolutely alarming,” emphasizing that the safety signals were “obvious from the start.” And the fact that “no health authority ever noticed it” or intervened “points to an intentional act” to inflict harm.

She also highlighted one incident on January 18, 2021 when California health officials “paused” the use of one large lot of the injections from Moderna due to its “higher-than-usual number of possible allergic reactions.” However, just three days later, health authorities said it was “safe to resume” the use of the lot and these products continued to be injected in thousands of people across the U.S.

This batch of biological agents went on to generate “about 1,000 serious adverse events and close to 60 deaths,” Latypova explained. And thus, “all of those [deaths and injuries] should be deemed intentional because the authorities did flag it. They did find that it was generating abnormal adverse events, yet nobody did anything to stop it and they continued pushing it into people.” ...

In addition, “there is no efficacy in these shots,” Latypova explained in December. “In fact, we know there is negative efficacy, meaning that these shots make you more likely to get sick and die.” ...

“There is obviously malignant policy from the government. We know that they’re lying. We know that they’re covering up. They’re gaslighting the families of those killed and injured by these shots,” Latypova summarized. And thus, this demonstrates a “very clear intent to harm through all these actions. And at this point, everything should be deemed intentional. All of the injury and death toll, should be deemed completely intentional.”

“We found that these products are dirty, contaminated, do not conform at all to what the label says. And they’re hugely toxic by design,” she said.

“They should all be stopped immediately, and this should be investigated properly. And we should bring those responsible to justice, to accountability. Until that happens, we cannot move on from this,” Latypova said. “We have to focus on this more and focus especially on prosecution and bringing those responsible to justice.”

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/my-talk-from-lakaruppropet-conference

https://rumble.com/v288sjf-covid-19-countermeasures-evidence-for-an-intent-to-harm-full.html


original link

https://palexander.substack.com/p/covid-vaccine-mandates-and-how-we

Historically, vaccination laws in the U.S. are passed and monitored at the state level, not mandated or enforced at the federal level. While the groundwork to change all that actually began in the 1940s, on January 28, 2003, during President George W. Bush’s State of the Union address, the creation of Project BioShield was revealed. This new legislation was a comprehensive effort to develop and make available “modern, effective drugs and vaccines to protect against possible attacks by biological and chemical weapons.” The initial stage of the program was estimated to cost $5.6 billion over ten years.

Project BioShield established three major components:

1. The creation of a permanent, ‘indefinite funding authority’ to spur the development of medical countermeasures that enabled the government to purchase vaccines and other therapies as soon as experts believed that they could pass the mantra ‘safe and effective.’ Note: The vaccines were not going to be approved for use after extensive study and testing; they could be put to use with a wink, a wet thumb to the air, and a nod that they were good to go.

2. Grant new authority to the NIH [think NIAID - Fauci] to speed research and development of drugs and vaccines to counter bioterrorism threats and,

3. Develop ‘fast track’ provisions such as the declaration of emergency use authorizations [EUA] for the release of treatments, drugs, and vaccines that were still under FDA consideration. [REF: Office of the Press Secretary. “President Details Project BioShield,” The White House, 3 February 2003.} ...

As sweeping as the provisions were at the time, the legislation failed to include the key provisions sought by the drug companies—complete liability protection for all bioterrorism products.

Throughout 2003, 2004, and 2005, many bills were introduced by both the House and the Senate; in fact, 13 bills were introduced in 2005 alone to achieve this desired goal. But it wasn’t until October 17, 2005, when The Biodefense and Pandemic Vaccine and Drug Development Act of 2005 (known as BioShield II) was put on the front burner to ‘make good’ on the promise of protection to drug makers. ...

This legislation was designed to give unprecedented advantages to the industry and would remove or severely weaken all safeguards that had long been in place to prevent dangerous or unapproved vaccines, drugs, and medical devices from reaching consumers. The bill also introduced the creation of a new agency within HHS, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Agency (BARDA), which would be given the responsibility for handling the $5.6B initiative.

BARDA was officially created in 2006 as part of the Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness Act (PAHPA). To this day, BARDA manages and funds the research, development, and stockpiling of vaccines and treatments that the government could use during public health emergencies such as chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear (CBRN) attacks. For FY2023, BARDA’s budget is $7.345B, a 13% increase over FY2022.

Public outrage against BioShield II began almost immediately. Patriot websites, conservative news outlets, and nationwide talk radio hosts began to decry the unbelievable benefits that the passage of S. 1873 would convey to drug companies. Dozens of activist groups representing thousands of constituents rallied and mounted campaigns to notify Congress of their dissatisfaction with the bill. Faxes, emails, and phone calls to congressional offices conveyed message after angry message, opposing the carte blanche promises about to be handed to the drug makers. Because the outcry against S.1873 was so strong, the possibility of its passage appeared to be difficult at best, impossible at worst.

Successful Sneak Attack; Americans Lose, Forever

To circumvent the public outrage, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist contrived the idea to attach a shortened version of the bill to the 2006 Department of Defense Appropriations Bill. It was literally railroaded through at the eleventh hour, giving sweeping, unprecedented immunity to drug companies.

Called Division E, ‘The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act,’ - or PREP Act for short - Senator Frist added the 40-page addendum to an existing 423-page Defense bill at 11:20 pm on Saturday night, December 17, 2005, well after the House Appropriation Committee members had reached final agreement on the defense bill, had signed off, and most had headed home for the holidays.

Appalled, Representative Dave Obey (D-WI), Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Committee, made the following statement on the floor of the House on December 22, 2005: [NOTE: As far as I can tell, Obey’s response (below) has been completely scrubbed from the Internet]

“When the President requested $7 billion to begin a much-belated crash program to develop a new generation of vaccines and antiviral drugs to combat a potential flu pandemic, the Republican Majority responded by cutting [that request] in half. When I asked Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK) in Conference why we shouldn’t fund the rest of the Administration’s request . . . he responded that because liability protection language for manufacturers had not been adopted, long-range funding should be withheld.

“The Conference Committee [on the Defense Appropriations Bill] ended its work with an understanding, both verbal and in writing, that there would be no—I repeat no—legislative liability protection language inserted in this bill. And because the Majority told us it did not want any compensation program for victims to come out of the discretionary portion of the budget, no funding was provided for that either.

“But after the [Committee] finished at 6 p.m., Senator Frist marched over to the House side of the Capitol, about four hours later, and insisted 40 pages of legislation—which I have in my hand— 40 pages of legislation that had never been seen by Conferees be attached to the bill.

“Speaker [Dennis Hastert R-IL] joined Frist’s insistence, and without a vote of the Conferees, the legislation was unilaterally and arrogantly inserted into the bill, after the Conference was over. [This was] a blatantly abusive power play by two of the most powerful men in Congress.

“We then discovered that this language provided all sorts of insulation for pharmaceutical companies and that this insulation applied not just to drugs developed to deal with the [bird] flu, but in fact applied to a far broader range of products.”

After itemizing the problems associated with the “Division E” language, Representative Obey went on to say:

“Mr. Speaker, the Committee system was created years ago to protect the public interest, so legislation would be carefully reviewed before it was placed before the body for consideration. But that protection was arbitrarily bypassed by the Leadership in both Houses.

“This is the second time that this Congress has supinely done the bidding of the pharmaceutical industry in the dead of night. The first time, a vote was held open for three hours while the Republican Majority twisted arms to create the complex and ridiculously confusing prescription drug bill that our seniors are now so desperately trying to understand—a bill that was ushered through this institution by over 600 lobbyists and that protected [drug] companies by preventing the government from even attempting to negotiate lower drug prices.

“If I thought that denying unanimous consent on this bill would force the Majority to eliminate that language I would object. But, Mr. Speaker, it has also been made quite clear to me that the Majority will not relent on the language that insulates drug companies. [Emphasis added.]

“So Mr. Speaker, I want it to be clear that the action to insert this special interest language in the bill is, in my view, a corruption of the legislative practices of the House. When Congress returns in January, I intend to raise a question about the privileges of the House, highlighted by this action, because it has brought discredit to the House and should disturb every Member who serves here. [Note: An objection was never raised…]

“No Member of Congress, no matter how powerful, should be able to unilaterally insist that provisions that were never discussed and never debated in the Conference. [It] should not be slipped into that Conference report without a vote of that same Conference.

“This is what happens when there are no checks and balances, when one party controls the White House, the Senate, and the House and respects no limits on its own use of power. We have been placed in this position because the House Republican Leadership has sent Members home for the Christmas holidays with the message to the Senate that we would not be here [to review the changes]. That was irresponsible and the country will pay the price. This institution will pay a price as well, in terms of diminished respect from the people we were elected to represent. Members on both sides know it and it is time to have a modicum of respect for the way we do the people’s business.

“This is a shameful and shabby way to end the worst session of Congress I’ve experienced in 36 years in Congress. I most reluctantly withdraw my reservation because lodging an objection at this point would simply delay the shameful inevitable.”

The nefarious language that Congressman Obey was objecting to in the “Division E” addendum deserved every bit of his tirade. Even Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) commented,

“Generally around here we measure who the winners and losers are, and we have seen over the period of the last year, year and a half, how the drug companies come out [winners] time and time again, but never, never, ever, ever like they have with this sweetheart deal.”

Senator Frist handed the drug companies more immunity than any bill ever passed by Congress. He has been awarded well for his performance...

What They Won

In case you missed the link above, you can read Division E here.

The PREP Act provided at least four sweeping provisions:

Immunity from liability for ALL drugs, vaccines, and biological products deemed as a “covered countermeasure” in the event of an outbreak of any kind. The proposal is not limited to only new drugs or vaccines developed under the umbrella of “bioterrorism” or “pandemic” protection. The proposal is so broad that it could include drugs like Tylenol, Advil . . . and would have applied to Vioxx, an anti-inflammatory drug that lead to an estimated 88,000 heart attacks in Americans alone, with 38,000 deaths before it was pulled from the market in 2007.

Immunity for Any and ALL products used for any public health emergency declared by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). As explained below, the authority to declare an emergency now rests completely in the hands of the Secretary of HHS—an appointed, often non-medical person who has no accountability to the general public. The president’s person, hand-picked to be part of his inner circle, will have the power to mandate vaccines and other medications be given to the American people. In the event of a declared medical emergency, the Secretary of HHS is the most powerful person in America.

Who is that person today?

The current head of HHS is Xavier Beccera. Going into a pandemic, did he have decades of medical or even public health experience? Not at all. ...

Immunity from accountability, no matter what a drug company did wrong. Even if the company’s dirty facility created a batch of contaminated vaccines that resulted in death or injury to thousands of people, the drug company will not be held accountable.

Immunity from lawsuits. A person who suffers any type of loss will be legally prohibited from suing the drug companies; they now had immunity from almost everything, perhaps even murder. The bill’s provisions provided a mechanism for filing a lawsuit, but the language explicitly protects against frivolous suits by setting a standard for liability, so high that lawsuits would essentially be impossible.

Even the American Trial Lawyers Association stated the bill contained language never before seen in any proposal. In simple terms, if a claim is filed by an injured party, it can only go forward if the injured party can prove that the manufacturer, hospital, or medical professional performed an act of willful misconduct that resulted in injury or death. In other words, the injured party would have to prove the drug company or the doctor/nurse had administered the product with the intent to cause harm.

Unbelievably, even then, the defendant would be immune from accountability UNLESS the plaintiff could convince the U.S. Attorney General (AG) that the person or the drug manufacturer had intentionally harmed them AND, being convinced, the AG takes action against the drug company.

This means the U.S. government would have to go to bat for the plaintiff against the drug company for the lawsuit to move forward…..

Keep in mind that the person who rammed this bill through - Senator Bill Frist - was a medical doctor who at one time in his life took an oath to “do no harm.”

Medical Countermeasures

At about the same time that BARDA was created and massive expansion within the government for bioterrorism events, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR) was greatly expanded within the Public Health Service. The agency has various roles and responsibilities dating back to at least 1955.

In 2002, ASPR was promoted to be an independent office, headed by an Assistant Secretary of HHS. In 2006, it was expanded and renamed the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response. In July 2022, the scope of duties was again expanded and renamed the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response. ASPR has a $40 billion budget and today is managed by Dawn Myers O'Connell, an attorney who worked as a health advisor within the Obama Administration.

Ever heard of her? She’s one of the most important and powerful unelected persons in our government.

In 2017, O'Connell joined the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), where she served as director of its U.S. office. As the director, she was responsible for managing CEPI's U.S. and North American interests. CEPI was formally launched in 2017 at Davos, Switzerland by the World Economic Forum with initial funding of US$460 million from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, The Welcome Trust, and several governments. In January 2022, an additional $300M was pledged by The Wellcome Trust and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to help CEPI fast-track vaccines within 100 days - or less.

BARDA works directly with the Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise (PHEMCE). Housed within HHS, decisions are made by the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Dr. Robert Kadlec, another unelected official who is one of the most powerful people in all of government. PHEMCE decides what countermeasures are needed and then BARDA procures the funds through public-private partnerships. ...

Since that time…

That was a recap from 2005.

The concept of mandatory vaccination has only recently gone from a worrisome possibility to a reality. ...

And, 20 years later, here we are.

If we look back and connect the dots, we see that Project BioShield, the PREP Act, the creation of BARDA, ASPR, PHEMCE, and most recently CEPI, have all been part of the long-term plan that the WEF, UN, WHO, BIS, and our own government put together for the current global takedown, including the decimation of America: One Nation, under God, with Liberty and Justice for all.’ ...

From an email list I'm on:

The planedmic was it now appears a biodefense drill that was a trial run for responding to a biological attack.

wired magazine, 1996
Wake-up call! Some of the world's farthest-out, cutting-edge, and high-technodazzle biotech thinking is now being done not by scientists and academics, but by the military.
And then, suddenly, I could see the whole picture: the conference, titled Biotechnology Workshop 2020, would focus on battles to be fought in the future. These battles would not be limited to the hand grenades, assault rifles, and land mines of the 20th century - they would feature entirely new categories of weapons, munitions based on the biotech advances that would occur in the interim. The army, I concluded, was looking to produce fleets of attack microbes - maybe even a race of supersoldiers - by tinkering with DNA, the molecular basis of all life. And they wanted my far-seeing, penetrating, and all-knowing advice and counsel.
https://www.wired.com/1996/11/es-biowar/

The 2006 Origins of the Lockdown Idea

https://www.aier.org/article/the-2006-origins-of-the-lockdown-idea/

It required the key proponents — Dr. Mecher, a Department of Veterans Affairs physician, and Dr. Hatchett, an oncologist turned White House adviser — to overcome intense initial opposition. It brought their work together with that of a Defense Department team assigned to a similar task.

Was the Pandemic Orchestrated as a Trial Run for Responding to a Biological Attack?

https://brownstone.org/articles/was-the-pandemic-orchestrated/

US Plans to Lockdown and Wait for a Vaccine Date from 2007

https://brownstone.org/articles/us-plans-lockdown-vaccine-2007/

The Early Career of Covid Czar Robert Kadlec
biodefense connections of covid czar Kadlec
https://brownstone.org/articles/early-career-covid-czar-robert-kadlec/

A Manhattan Project for the Biomedical Security State

Gates is the promoter, facilitator and profiteer-in-chief of the great vaccine Manhattan Project but he certainly isn’t the originator of it. The call for a biosecurity Manhattan Project dates back to the George W Bush administration. On July 11, 2019, a think tank called the Biodefence Commission held a panel discussion entitled A Manhattan Project for Biodefence: Taking Biological Threats off the Table. The objective was to ‘create a national, public-private research and development undertaking to defend the United States against biological threats.’

https://brownstone.org/articles/manhattan-project-biomedical-security-state-part-1/

Birx hired by DoD
https://brownstone.org/articles/how-did-deborah-birx-get-the-job/

Lockdowns Were Counterterrorism, Not Public Health

The national security pandemic response plans, devised under the rubric of biodefense, are aimed at countering bioterrorism attacks.

https://brownstone.org/articles/lockdowns-counterterrorism-not-public-health/

Government’s National Security Arm Took Charge During the Covid Response

https://brownstone.org/articles/governments-national-security-arm-led-the-covid-response/

The Pandemic Crisis Action Plan – Adapted (PanCAP-A) dated March 13, 2020. In this plan, the National Security Council is designated as solely responsible for Covid response policy. The document states in a footnote that the “Strategic Objectives” of the response plan “were directed by the NSC Resilience DRG PCC on February 24, 2020.” ... Could this be because they were responding to a potential bioweapon – a genetically engineered virus that they themselves might have been involved in developing?

https://brownstone.org/articles/was-there-a-covid-response-plan-if-so-where-is-it/

Was the Pandemic Orchestrated as a Trial Run for Responding to a Biological Attack?

https://brownstone.org/articles/was-the-pandemic-orchestrated/

US Plans to Lockdown and Wait for a Vaccine Date from 2007

https://brownstone.org/articles/us-plans-lockdown-vaccine-2007/

Patrick says

At this point, Pfizer was not part of BioNTech’s C-19 vaccine project. As narrated in The Vaccine, the small German company, which had never had any product on the market, only succeeded in recruiting the American multinational as partner three months later (p. 156).

Isn't that the company Bill Gates invested $50M in in 2019? And then sold his share for $500M in 2022?

These people are not near as smart as they think they are. Unfortunately they are smart enough to fool most people.

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/april-4-2003-rep-henry-waxman-questioning

Rep. Waxman question to FDA Commissioner McClellan: "...the BioShield proposal would allow the Secretary of Health and Human Services to waive virtually all of the consumer protections in the Federal Food and Drug Cosmetic Act in case of an emergency. Moreover, the proposal would then severely curtail judicial review of the Secretary’s decision...What is the rationale for severely limiting oversight of these extraordinary powers?"

Emerging research is showing that the entire thing was run by the DoD and the outbreak, lockdowns, and vaccines were all parts of the overall plan. Purpose was apparently a drill, to test the biowarfare response capability. There may be more to it than that as we learn more.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-defense-dept-s-covid-vax-operation-pushed-unregulated-shots-deceived-public-researcher/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-defense-dept-secretly-controls-covid-vaccine-production-process-that-cannot-be-traced-researcher/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/toxic-by-design-researcher-explains-why-us-defense-depts-covid-vax-operation-shows-intent-to-harm/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/how-the-us-govt-built-a-shadow-structure-that-enabled-covid-vax-bioterrorism/

Trump didn’t know shit. they were constantly removing people from his inner circle, and replacing cabinet members with cia/fbi hacks who sabotaged the administration from inside.

4th branch will sacrifice america to steal elections, i truly believe they think we are their sheep and they are our masters by the way how they treat us.

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/breaking-moderna-ceo-admits-company

Moderna CEO Admits Company Produced Covid Vaccine BEFORE The Pandemic
In 2019 Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel knew that " there is gonna be a pandemic".

Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel Admits Company Produced 100,000 COVID-19 Vaccine Doses In 2019 Before The Pandemic Started. Stéphane Bancel also admitted that in 2019 he knew that “there is gonna be a pandemic".

https://rumble.com/v28obuy-moderna-ceo-admits-company-produced-vax-before-the-pandemic.html


original link


Moderna strategic alliances: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

https://expose-news.com/2023/02/06/us-dod-is-running-the-vaccine-fraud/

US Department of Defence has been running the “covid vaccine” fraud worldwide

“[Pfizer] did not defraud the government. We delivered the fraud that the government ordered.” Sasha Latypova used these words to describe the basis on which Pfizer has requested the dismissal of a False Claims Act case brought against them for their covid “vaccines.”

The US Department of Defence ordered “demonstrations” from pharmaceutical companies using the same secretive framework they use to order weapons. While telling us they were pharmaceutical products, for legal reasons they described them as emergency use authorised “countermeasures.” No pharmaceutical regulation applies to countermeasures.

“They were claiming that they’re producing pharmaceutical products to the good manufacturing standards when they perfectly well knew, I assure you, they were all aware of this. They perfectly well knew that no pharmaceutical regulations apply to these things, countermeasures … They’re just lying to you that these are pharmaceuticals. They’re actually not,” Latypova explained. ...

Below is a slide from the presentation where the organisational structure of Operation Warp Speed was discussed. “The chief operating officer is the Department of Defence. We were told, ‘oh, they’re just doing logistics’. No, they’re not just doing logistics. They’re running the whole thing,” Latypova said.

As proof of this, Latypova cited the case where Pfizer or the FDA was refusing to release clinical trial data in less than 75 years.

“Who was arguing in court on behalf of Pfizer? Pfizer lawyers were not even in the room. It was the Department of Justice. So why is the US government defending presumably a private commercial interest of a pharmaceutical company?

“[In the slide above] you can see that the pharmaceutical companies are a third level down. They are not in charge, but they’re getting tremendous amounts of money to shut up and follow the orders and do as they’re told. [ ] The whole operation is run by the Department of Defence and the US government. I’m not absolving Pharma … of any responsibility. They are criminals in this cartel, and they’re collaborating, and they’re co-conspirators, and should be prosecuted together.” ...

They spent $47 billion on research and development contracts – $33 billion was spent on “vaccines.” All the contracts are publicly available HERE. All of them say the Department of Defence contracted these companies. And they’re managed through Advanced Technologies International, a long-standing contracts manager for the Department of Defence.

They exempt everyone who participates in this, regardless of where they’re working, as long as they’re following the orders, they’re exempt from liability under the Prep Act clause. That same Prep Act clause states that this is a dual-use civil and military application product. How they exempted themselves internationally is by Pfizer forcing countries to sign predatory contract clauses where the national governments had to lift good manufacturing practice requirements or any drug importation requirements and look the other way. Clauses that if, for example, Swedish citizens get injured and sue Pfizer, then the Swedish government has to indemnify Pfizer and put state assets such as military bases, embassies, and other state assets as collateral. “That’s because it’s the US government who wants that base, not the private commercial manufacturer,” Latypova explained.

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/note-for-legal-cases-in-europe-on

Legal structures were created in the European Union echoing the US structures as evidence of the global pre-planned "plandemic" event.

So it is entirely possible that the DOD, for numerous reasons, including a ratcheting up of tensions between Russia and China, caused by US policies, wanted to have countermeasures to biowarfare attacks by these, and other powers, like Iran, for example.

Remember the anthrax panic.

So now was the Wuhan coronavirus a biowarfare attack by Chy-Nah, or a dry run to test US responsiveness to a future attack? And were gubberment higher ups including Fraudci, Walensky, Trump, told in no uncertain terms that this is a matter of utmost national security. America will be wiped of the map if we don't execute on the COVID-19 countermeasure, because if we don't, we are inviting another or a real attack.

https://drpanda.substack.com/p/who-manufactured-your-vaccine

Who Manufactured Your Vaccine?
Robert Kennedy Jr - Pfizer and Moderna don't really own those vaccines. They slap their labels on them, but it was a Pentagon project. ...

The Vigilant Fox
@VigilantFox

@RobertKennedyJr: The Pentagon and the National Security Agency Ran the Entire Pandemic Response

There were 138 companies that were involved in manufacturing and distributing the vaccine. They’re all military contractors. The Pentagon and the National Security Agency ran the entire pandemic response. Pfizer and Moderna don’t really own those vaccines. They slap their labels on them, but it was a Pentagon project.



He might be right…

The Congressional Research Service confirms Operation Warp Speed involved the Department of Health, Department of Human Services, Department of Defense to “accelerate the development, acquisition, and distribution of COVID-19 medical countermeasures.”



... The official reason they did it this way is to produce enough vaccines to vaccinate the entire population in the least time. It makes more sense when you consider the fact they knew what was in the Wuhan lab well before it was ‘released’. ...

https://mycovidbubble.substack.com/

MyCovidBubble
Writes MyCovidBubble’s Newsletter
2 hr ago
In the beginning I thought that maybe the virus was accidentally released. I no longer believe that. Everything was so expertly rolled out and coordinated worldwide, a near impossible feat and a certain impossible feat if trying to pull it off at the last minute. Then there was event 201.

SimulationCommander
Writes Screaming into the Void
2 hr ago
I'm pretty sure it was bad cat himself who convinced me with the paperwork showing how quickly the OG 'vax' was ready -- yet it took like two years to nail down an Omi variant...

DOD was also to provide more liability shield for vaccines as 'weapons development'. However, there is the slight detail that if the vaccines were classified as weapons developed under auspices of DOD, why were they deployed against the American people?

That is a great question. Some possible answers:

1. DOD incompetence. Just wanting to try out the toxxine without realizing how dangerous and ineffective it is.
2. Someone actually wants to kill off a lot of the world's population including Americans. Maybe Bill Gates.
3. Pfizer is actually in control of the DOD and did it for the money, not caring that they were killing Americans too.

No one will ever know the full truth of any part of the plandemic.

Patrick says

1. DOD incompetence.

See Robert Malone's story regarding the disastrous anthrax vaccine rollout.

https://open.substack.com/pub/rwmalonemd/p/the-first-mandatory-vaccination-campaign

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/responding-to-criticism-regarding

Available DOD contracts for covid countermeasures. Sorted alphabetically by manufacturer name.

https://www.keionline.org/covid-contracts

While I believe Trump is responsible for what occurred on his watch, I don’t think he is to blame for the design and development of these biowarfare agents, despite his bombastic claims to the contrary. They had been designed and developed by many parties including DARPA, NIH, other gov agencies, academia and private companies long before he was elected, as pre-planning and practice runs for “the pandemic” had gone on for years.

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/you-cannot-contract-for-a-crime-but

I agree that pharmas are very bad, corrupt, and are in the criminal cartel that’s committing worldwide murder. The head of the cartel is not the pharma, however, and I believe that a proper investigation and prosecution strategy must take this view. Note that I also do not think that the US DOD is the ultimate head of the operation - they are the executor, the global military enforcement structure. They are the Chief Operating Officer and the CEO is someplace else. The head of the snake is located somewhere towards the global banking area.

https://rumble.com/v3086te-sasha-latypovas-presentation-and-q-and-a.html


original link

Patrick says

I knew it! Janssen was removed from the market, because it was the safest, not most dangerous.

richwicks says

I knew it! Janssen was removed from the market, because it was the safest, not most dangerous.

But does it cure the cold?

https://sashastone.substack.com/p/tucker-carlson-episode-16-with-rfk

Ask RFK Jr. points out in this interview, every bioweapon is a threat to your own soldiers, so you need a vaccine for your weapon.

Now from this, it follows that Sasha Latypova is probably correct in arguing that the virus AND the toxxine were creations of the DoD because they wanted a mass test of their mRNA technology for quickly creating an antidote both to their own bioweapons and to foreign bioweapons.

So they paid Fauci to create the virus in Wuhan, which Kennedy explains was moved to Wuhan from the US because it's illegal. Fauci got a massive raise to do that work for the DoD. And then Fauci got some vast amount more in "royalties" to push the toxxine on the sheeple.

The DoD doesn't really care if half a million Americans die from the mRNA. It's just a way of working out the kinks in their technology!

https://twitter.com/DrLoupis/status/1692389998719308156

Onvacation says

richwicks says

I knew it! Janssen was removed from the market, because it was the safest, not most dangerous.

But does it cure the cold?

No. Nothing does.

It's a respiratory virus. There are NO vaccines currently that work against a respiratory virus. You need to develop mucosal immunity to get immunity from a respiratory virus, and the only way to get that is through an inhaler, not an injection. The best an injection can do is reduce symptoms if you get sick, but I will never take a flu "vaccine".

Patrick says

The DoD doesn't really care if half a million Americans die from the mRNA. It's just a way of working out the kinks in their technology!

Kinks? The vaccine didn't work at all!

They know this for god sakes. There's no vaccine against a respiratory virus of any sort. You can't take an injection for it.

Lol, I know. It was kind of a joke.

But I do think that the DoD was experimenting on the public with all this.

richwicks says

No. Nothing does.

I suspect that ivermectin may cure colds. It would be good if someone tested this.

Patrick says

I suspect that ivermectin may cure colds.

Yes, ivermectin is effective against RNA virus like flu and covid.

From the National Library of Medicine:

From 2012 onwards, there have multiple reports that ivermectin has antiviral properties [4,5,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17] towards a growing number of RNA viruses, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1, influenza, flaviruses such as dengue virus (DENV) and Zika virus (ZIKV) and, most notably, SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) [17]. Evidence for activity against DNA viruses is more limited, but encompasses Pseudorabies, polyoma and adenoviruses [18,19,20]. The basis of ivermectin’s broadspectrum antiviral activity appears to relate to the fact that ivermectin binds to, and inhibits, the nuclear transport role of the host importin α (IMPα) protein [11,18,20], which is known to mediate nuclear import of various viral proteins and key host factors, but other possible antiviral actions of ivermectin have been proposed (e.g., [12]), including in the case of SARS-CoV-2 (e.g., [21,22]). This mini-review will summarise the weight of evidence for ivermectin’s broad-spectrum antiviral activity and the basis of its IMPα-directed activity in light of the possibility that ivermectin could be a critically useful antiviral in the current SARS-CoV-2 crisis [6,17].

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7564151/

Patrick says

I suspect that ivermectin may cure colds. It would be good if someone tested this.

Ivermectin inhibits viral replication. If you feel like you're coming down with a cold, start taking ivermectin at 0.4 mg/Kg daily. After 2-3 days, all your symptoms will disappear. This doesn't mean that you're cured; rather, ivermectin has kept the virus essentially in stasis, so that your immune system can catch up and do mop up. This means take it for the full 7-10 days over the course of a regular infection.

I have personally experienced the ability of ivermectin to inhibit cold sores. I was already taking it for another viral infection, and then noticed that I had a cluster of tiny scabs on my lip. This would normally have been a major outbreak, but it was completely nipped in the bud. It did take about a week to finally disappear, but this was so much better than a big honking canker.

Just last week, I felt another outbreak, and hit the 'mectin. Sure enough, the outbreak was stopped in its tracks. I continue to be amazed by the versatility and effectiveness of this drug.

Thanks @sterotomy where did you buy it?

Patrick says

Thanks sterotomy where did you buy it?

You can get it on Amazon for veterinarian purposes, but you must recalculate dosage for your weight. Easy and relatively cheap.

Any online pharmacy getting their drugs from India or Asia usually has it, quality has been good so far. You need to take it at the onset though or better even before if you know someone in close contact is infected. Many viruses reach their max replication within days.

Patrick says

richwicks says

No. Nothing does.

I suspect that ivermectin may cure colds. It would be good if someone tested this.

I think it might be able to prevent them. The data indicates that Ivermectin prevents replication of a virus. That would mean you can stop the replication and avoid the disease, if you detect it early enough. But once you're sick, you're sick.

Bd6r says

Patrick says

Thanks sterotomy where did you buy it?

You can get it on Amazon for veterinarian purposes, but you must recalculate dosage for your weight. Easy and relatively cheap.

I want to point out that medicine is medicine.

First drugs go through animal trials, and they progress to human trials. There's nearly NO DRUGS available for animals that aren't available for humans, although a FEW exist.

So Ivermectin for horses, fine for you, unless they intentionally adulterate it to be dangerous to humans. Be careful with dosage. Check, double check, take a few hours off, and check again. Ivermectin is a very safe drug, but you still don't want to fuck it up.

Bd6r says

You can get it on Amazon for veterinarian purposes, but you must recalculate dosage for your weight. Easy and relatively cheap.

I'm not sure where I found it but there was at least one website that helped people calculate the dosage. I still have half a tube in the refrigerator. Probably time to replace it.