« First « Previous Comments 140 - 155 of 155 Search these comments
Then when this clown Karl tried to make JD seem like a dreamer and a dictator for his deportation plan, JD calmly smacked him back.
I think this is the wrong attitude towards it, right? There's 20 million people here illegally. You start with what's achievable, you do that, and then you go on to what's achievable from there.
I think that if you deport a lot of violent criminals and frankly if you make it harder to hire illegal labor, which undercuts the wages of American workers, I think you go a lot of the way to solving the illegal immigration problem ...
President Trump is absolutely right, you cannot have a border unless you're wiling to deport some people. I think it's interesting that people focus on, 'well, how do you deport 18 million people?' Let's start with 1 million. That's where Kamala Harris has failed, and then we can go from there.
No one in Washington seems to know how much we’re spending on illegal aliens. JD Vance plans to find out.
(0:10) Meet Atlas
(1:14) JD Vance’s Predictions About the Election
(5:30) The Left’s Plan to Beat Trump
(12:04) How Much Is the US Spending on Illegal Immigration?
(23:04) The Polls Aren’t Real
(30:37) Kamala Harris
(34:19) Why Don’t We Know Anything About the Trump Shooter?
One never got antwhere near war and the other one went as a jorno
With important and life-influencing policies hopefully deciding the outcome of the upcoming US election (little things like cost of living and national security), mainstream news outlet Politico draws our attention to no doubt the most important aspect of the election: facial hair. After the vice presidential debate Politico reports: “One of the first bits of nonverbal communication to appear in the debate was on JD Vance’s face: his beard. As POLITICO Magazine has noted before, Vance is the first White House wannabe to wear facial hair in 80 years. Our appearance is fundamental to our body language, and research indicates that voters see beards as (surprise, surprise) more masculine. That can be positive to some, reading as strength and competence. But to others, especially women, it can be negative, conveying aggression and opposition to feminist ideals.”
« First « Previous Comments 140 - 155 of 155 Search these comments
_congressman