patrick.net

https://anandamide.substack.com/p/molten-irony

Perhaps the Journal editors should consult a few AI platforms before they gobble down Gates funded fact checker pie. DeepSeek from China doesn’t seem to have drank the mRNA KoolAid. The country largely avoided the scam.

The very first thing it highlights is Oncogenic potential!

Prompt- What are the hazards associated with injection 50-500B SV40 promoters wrapped in LNPs?

DeepSeek-

Injecting SV40 promoters wrapped in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) into a biological system, such as the human body, carries several potential hazards and risks. Here are some key concerns:

### 1. *Oncogenic Potential: - SV40 Promoter:* The SV40 (Simian Virus 40) promoter is a strong viral promoter often used in molecular biology to drive high levels of gene expression. However, SV40 has been associated with oncogenic (cancer-causing) properties in certain contexts. The promoter itself can potentially integrate into the host genome and disrupt normal gene regulation, leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation and cancer.

### 2. *Immune Response: - Immune Activation: The introduction of foreign genetic material, especially viral promoters like SV40, can trigger an immune response. This could lead to inflammation, autoimmune reactions, or other adverse immune responses. - LNP Immunogenicity:* Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) themselves can be immunogenic, potentially causing an inflammatory response or other immune-related side effects.

### 3. *Genomic Integration and Mutagenesis: - Insertional Mutagenesis: If the SV40 promoter integrates into the host genome, it could disrupt essential genes or regulatory elements, leading to mutations that might cause disease, including cancer. - Off-Target Effects:* The SV40 promoter might drive expression of genes in unintended tissues or cell types, leading to off-target effects and potential toxicity.

### 4. *Toxicity and Cellular Stress: - Cellular Stress: High levels of gene expression driven by the SV40 promoter could overwhelm cellular machinery, leading to cellular stress, apoptosis (programmed cell death), or necrosis. - LNP Toxicity:* While LNPs are generally considered safe, high doses or repeated administration could lead to toxicity, including liver damage or other organ-specific toxicity.

### 5. *Biodistribution and Off-Target Effects: - Biodistribution: LNPs can distribute to various tissues beyond the intended target, potentially leading to expression of the SV40 promoter in unintended locations, which could have unpredictable effects. - Off-Target Gene Expression:* The SV40 promoter might drive expression of genes in non-target tissues, leading to unintended biological effects or toxicity.

### 6. *Long-Term Effects: - Persistence: If the SV40 promoter persists in the body, it could lead to long-term expression of genes, which might be undesirable or harmful over time. - Latent Effects:* There could be latent effects that only become apparent after a long period, such as delayed immune responses or late-onset oncogenesis.

### 7. *Ethical and Regulatory Concerns: - Ethical Considerations: The use of viral promoters in humans raises ethical concerns, especially given the potential for long-term and unpredictable effects. - Regulatory Hurdles:* Regulatory agencies may have stringent requirements for the use of viral promoters in therapeutic contexts, given the associated risks.

### 8. *Environmental and Horizontal Gene Transfer Risks: - Environmental Release:* If the LNPs containing SV40 promoters are released into the environment, there is a risk of horizontal gene transfer to other organisms, potentially leading to unintended ecological consequences.

Patrick says

Prompt- What are the hazards associated with injection 50-500B SV40 promoters wrapped in LNPs?

Love the Deepseek SV40 prompt. Good find!

According to the Federal government, SV40 (virus found in monkey kidneys) inadvertently contaminated millions of the early Salk Polio Vaccines.

Salk admitted the vaccines were contaminated.

65 yrs later, injecting altered forms of SV40 into your blood stream is not contamination.
It's safe and effective. Apparently.

Look no further than CDC's retarded Wikipedia page for official information about SV40.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SV40

Horrible:

Environmental Release:* If the LNPs containing SV40 promoters are released into the environment, there is a risk of horizontal gene transfer to other organisms, potentially leading to unintended ecological consequences.

Horrible-er:
Imagine the synergy of SV40 horizontal gene transfer combined with PFAS poisoned food crops and animal feed.

PFAS Bio-sludge:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/mar/12/sewage-us-crop-farming-lawsuit-pfas

Good:
You can now run DeepSeek-R1 on your own local device
(for now)
https://old.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1ic9x8z/you_can_now_run_deepseekr1_on_your_own_local/

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/our-study-confirms-keeping-covid

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

As concluded in our new study, Review of Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify: Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits, we expect that calls for an immediate moratorium on COVID-19 vaccines will continue to increase until a critical mass is reached, and the products are finally removed from the market. Excess mortality, negative efficacy, and widespread DNA contamination associated with COVID-19 vaccines have been sufficiently demonstrated. The FDA's criteria for a Class I recall have been far exceeded. No large-scale, conclusive, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated reduction in infection transmission, hospitalization, or death as primary endpoints. Thus, the COVID-19 vaccines are not proven to be effective in reducing important clinical outcomes. A position supporting COVID-19 vaccination goes against good medical practice and violates the Hippocratic Oath to above all, do no harm. Immediate removal of COVID-19 vaccines from the market is essential to prevent further loss of life and ensure the next steps for accountability are taken. ...

In light of this evidence, failure to immediately remove COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ from the market constitutes mass negligent homicide...

https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/i-just-made-a-late-comment-on-australian

Australian Lawyers, under the banner of PJ O’Brien & Associates, have asked the FDA to “revoke or suspend” the approvals of Moderna and Pfizer mRNA Jabs, based on the failures of the FDA to refer the GMO products to the correct oversight committee - Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee (CTGTAC) and a section of law requiring “Environmental Assessment” which includes the Human Environment.

Patrick says

Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines

Meanwhile:
A new vaccine approach could help combat future coronavirus pandemics (January 2025)

Funded by:
National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
National Institutes of Health
Wellcome Leap
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations

https://news.mit.edu/2025/new-vaccine-approach-could-help-combat-future-coronavirus-pandemics-0123

I'm going to be in the front row at the hangings, with a big bucket of popcorn.

https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-officials-reveal-deaths-soared-among-covid-vaxxed-call-immediate-ban-vaccines/

Government officials in Canada have just published a report confirming that deaths surged among people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The report was commissioned by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith.

The Alberta government’s COVID-19 Response Review officials investigated spikes in deaths of young people, teenagers, and children following the rollout of the injections.

According to Rebel News in Canada, the report has been quietly released but its findings are damning.

The report calls for an “immediate” ban of Covid mRNA “vaccines,” particularly for children.

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/submit-your-comment-to-the-fda

Katie Ashby-Koppens of PJ O’Brien & Associates submitted a Citizen Petition to the FDA on January 21, 2025 on behalf of Julian J. Gillespie, Kevin McKernan, David J. Speicher, Jessica Rose, and L. Maria Gutschi, requesting that the licenses and authorizations for the Pfizer-BionTech and Moderna mRNA products be REVOKED.



... Click on the link below to submit YOUR public comment:

https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FDA-2025-P-0335-0001

Most people choose “Individual Consumer” from the choices in the pulldown menu...

... Click on the link below to read comments that have already been submitted and published.
https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FDA-2025-P-0335/comments

On the web page above, you WILL be able to read other people’s comments, but it will APPEAR that the comments have been closed. THAT IS NOT THE CASE. YOU CAN MAKE A COMMENT.

My own comment:

https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FDA-2025-P-0335-0001

I know at least four cases of severe harm from the mRNA injections such as "Comirnaty":
- wife's co-worker dropped dead in her 30's after taking it: https://www.altamesafuneralhome.com/obituary/danielle-carmichael
- father-in-law developed tachycardia after taking it
- wife of friend developed myocarditis after taking it
- son of friend developed leukemia after taking it

It is immensely damaging to public trust in government agencies to leave the mRNA products on the market when so many millions of people have seen such severe harm from it first hand.

It also a gross abuse of the public to include the Google ReCaptcha spyware on this page, because it gives Google complete visibility into every keystroke users make and allows Google complete control over the page, for example allowing Google to quietly change the text presented to users.

Result:

Your comment has been sent for review. This process is dependent on agency public submission policies/procedures and processing times. Once the agency has posted your comment, you may view it on Regulations.gov using your Comment Tracking Number.

Comment Tracking Number m6o-71a5-aagk

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202406.2062/v1

Results: The CDC/FDA’s safety signals were breached for all 37 AEs following COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy: miscarriage, fetal chromosomal abnormality, fetal malformation, cervical insufficiency, premature rupture of membranes, premature labor, premature delivery, placental calcification, placental infarction, placental thrombosis, placenta accreta, placental abruption, placental insufficiency, placental disorder, fetal maternal hemorrhage, fetal growth restriction, reduced amniotic fluid volume, preeclampsia, fetal heart rate abnormality, fetal cardiac disorder, fetal vascular mal-perfusion, fetal arrhythmia, fetal distress, fetal biophysical profile abnormal, hemorrhage in pregnancy, fetal cardiac arrest, fetal death (stillbirth), premature infant death, neonatal asphyxia, neonatal dyspnea, neonatal infection, neonatal hemorrhage, insufficient breast milk, neonatal pneumonia, neonatal respiratory distress, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, and neonatal seizure. ...

Conclusions: We found unacceptably high breaches in safety signals for 37 AEs after COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women. An immediate global moratorium on COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is warranted. The United States government, medical organizations, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies have misled and/or deceived the public regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. Promotion of these products must be immediately halted.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/achilles-heel-of-mrna-platforms

One of the segments concerned the limitations of mRNA technology. Despite the exuberance over this platform in the biotechnology space, fundamental pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are not understood nor controllable. Blunders made by mRNA inventors, all of whom work inside the behemoth Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex, seem to be universally overlooked as the platform is advanced by companies such as CureVac, Moderna, BioNTech, and many more. mRNA is also pushed heavily by vaccine incubators including CEPI.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-sixth-study-confirms-negative

Sixth Study Confirms Negative Efficacy of COVID-19 mRNA Injections

It’s time for these infection-promoting genetic injections to be immediately removed from global markets.

The study titled, Effectiveness of the 2023-to-2024 XBB.1.5 COVID-19 Vaccines Over Long-Term Follow-up: A Target Trial Emulation, was published today in Annals of Internal Medicine: ...

VE was −3.26% (95% CI, −6.78% to −0.22%) against documented SARS-CoV-2 infection...

Conclusion:

COVID-19 vaccines targeting the XBB.1.5 variant of Omicron were not effective in preventing infection and had relatively low VE against hospitalization and death, which declined rapidly over time. ...

Vaccine effectiveness (VE) against documented SARS-CoV-2 infection was -3.26% (95% CI, -6.78% to -0.22%), indicating a statistically significant higher infection rate in vaccinated individuals compared to the unvaccinated control group. The small reported benefit against COVID-19-associated hospitalization and death is likely due to healthy vaccinee bias, as those who get vaccinated tend to have lower baseline risks.

These findings corroborate FIVE other studies demonstrating negative efficacy:

Nakatani et al - Vaccinated individuals had an 85% increased odds of COVID-19 infection compared to unvaccinated individuals (Adjusted OR = 1.85 - 95% CI: 1.33–2.57).

Eythorsson et al - Among individuals vaccinated, the odds of reinfection are 42% higher for those who received 2 or more doses compared to those with 1 dose or less (95% CI: 1.13–1.78).

Chemaitelly et al - The effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) against symptomatic BA.1 and BA.2 Omicron infections dropped from 46.6% and 51.7% (1–3 months post-dose) to -17.8% and -12.1% (≥7 months). Similarly, Moderna (mRNA-1273) declined from 71.0% and 35.9% to -10.2% and -20.4% over the same period.

Shrestha et al (Cleveland Clinic) - The risk of COVID-19 increased with the number of vaccine doses received. Individuals with one prior dose had a 107% higher risk of COVID-19 (HR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.70–2.52) compared to those with no prior doses. Those with more than three doses faced a 253% higher risk (HR = 3.53, 95% CI: 2.97–4.20).

Feldstein et al (CDC) - Children vaccinated with Pfizer-BioNTech without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection were 159% more likely to get infected (HR = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.27–5.28) and 257% more likely to develop symptomatic COVID-19 (HR = 3.57, 95% CI: 1.10–11.63) compared to unvaccinated children without prior infection.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/us-states-considering-legislation

U.S. States Considering Legislation to Ban mRNA Injections as of February 6, 2025

A critical mass will soon be reached, forcing the federal government to follow suit.

Legislative efforts to BAN the dangerous COVID-19 mRNA injections are now underway across multiple U.S. states, with bills being considered, drafted, and supported at various levels of government:




A critical mass will soon be reached, forcing the federal government to follow suit. If you are aware of any states that are missing from this figure, please let me know in the comments.

The evidence is clear—over 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, 240 elected officials, 17 professional organizations, excess mortality, negative efficacy, and DNA contamination call for the IMMEDIATE removal of COVID-19 "vaccines" from the market. Failure to do so constitutes mass negligent homicide...

Patrick says

U.S. States Considering Legislation to Ban mRNA Injections as of February 6, 2025

The home of Bill Gates, Washington State?
The poster child for mass negligent homicide with vaccines?

Legislation probably introduced by a lone wolf, republican.

https://slaynews.com/news/new-bill-demands-ban-covid-vaccines-due-enormous-numbers-deaths/

New Bill Demands Ban on Covid ‘Vaccines’ Due to ‘Enormous Numbers of Deaths’

Lawmakers in Montana have introduced a new bill to completely ban Covid mRNA “vaccines,” citing the “enormous numbers of deaths, disabilities, and serious adverse events” caused by the injections.

The legislation, proposed in the Montana House of Representatives, highlights multiple issues with the “vaccines,” such as a lack of evidence proving they are safe for widespread public use.

Additionally, the lawmakers suggest that mRNA injections are responsible for a surge in cancers, infertility, and excess deaths.

Further, they argue that the shots are contaminated with cancer-causing DNA fragments and warn that the side effects can be passed on to unvaccinated people through “shedding.”

The lack of transparency regarding the “vaccines” means citizens have been denied their rights to informed consent, the lawmakers note.

Therefore, the “vaccines” must be banned, they assert.

“To my knowledge, Montana is the first state to draft a bill banning mRNA. The first hearing is tomorrow. Support HB371!” Dr. Mary Talley Bowden said.

Montana House Bill 371 states:

WHEREAS, the mRNA vaccines have caused enormous numbers of deaths, disabilities, and serious adverse events; and

WHEREAS, no long-term studies have been completed regarding fertility, teratogenicity, mutagenicity, or oncogenicity; and

WHEREAS, recipients are not given informed consent; and

WHEREAS, the mRNA vaccines may integrate into the human genome and be passed onto the next generation; and

WHEREAS, the mRNA vaccines are contaminated with DNA, metallic particles, and other unknown nanoparticles; and

WHEREAS, the mRNA vaccines may shed to others and cause side effects or harm.
...

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/idaho-looks-to-ban-gene-therapy-based

Idaho Looks to Ban Gene Therapy-Based Vaccines Like COVID-19, Bird Flu Jabs for 10 Years

S1036 is "protecting Idahoans from unnecessary medical harm from contaminated or harmful products," says Idaho State Senator Brandon Shippy.

Idaho State Senator Brandon Shippy (District 9) has introduced legislation that puts a ten-year moratorium on the administration of gene therapy products for infectious diseases, like COVID-19 or bird flu.

A ten year ban is a good start, but it's not enough.

https://slaynews.com/news/another-state-moves-ban-covid-vaccines-surging-deaths/

Lawmakers in Kentucky have just introduced a bill to ban mRNA injections amid reports of surging deaths, deadly diseases, and disabilities among those who received Covid “vaccines.”

Kentucky has now become the ninth U.S. state with legislative efforts to ban the mRNA shots.

The move follows similar legislation from lawmakers in Montana.

As Slay News reported last week, lawmakers in Montana introduced a new bill to completely ban Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

They cite the “enormous numbers of deaths, disabilities, and serious adverse events” caused by the injections.

The legislation, proposed in the Montana House of Representatives, highlights multiple issues with the “vaccines,” such as a lack of evidence proving they are safe for widespread public use.

Additionally, the lawmakers suggest that mRNA injections are responsible for a surge in cancers, infertility, and excess deaths.

Further, they argue that the shots are contaminated with cancer-causing DNA fragments and warn that the side effects can be passed on to unvaccinated people through “shedding.”

The lack of transparency regarding the “vaccines” means citizens have been denied their rights to informed consent, the lawmakers note.

Therefore, the “vaccines” must be banned, they assert.

Meanwhile, a similar push faced a major setback in Tennessee.

In Tennessee, a key Senate testimony for a proposed mRNA ban was abruptly canceled.

Sounds like Pfizer thugs got to someone in TN.

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/want-to-ban-mrna-shots-heres-a-51

Want to Ban mRNA Shots? Here's a 51-Page Bill Template You Can Hand to Your Legislator

Backed by renowned medical experts in the health freedom movement.

But why 51 pages? Makes me suspicious that something is hidden in there.

https://www.sott.net/article/497894-Kentucky-Montana-Idaho-among-states-looking-to-ban-mRNA-vaccines

Kentucky, Montana, Idaho among states looking to ban mRNA vaccines

Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
Children's Health Defense
Fri, 14 Feb 2025

As calls to ban mRNA shots intensify worldwide, a growing number of U.S. states and communities are eyeing laws to prohibit or pause their use.

A bill introduced Tuesday in the Kentucky House of Representatives would ban until July 1, 2035, the administration of "any human gene therapy product for any infectious disease indication, regardless of whether the administration is termed an immunization, vaccine, or any other term."

Lawmakers in Idaho and Montana recently introduced similar bills. Legislative initiatives are in the planning stages or have been passed at the county level in at least four other states, including Iowa, South Carolina, Texas and Washington.

"A critical mass will soon be reached, forcing the federal government to follow suit," said epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher of the McCullough Foundation.

Dr. Kat Lindley, president of the Global Health Project and director of the International Fellowship Program for the Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), said such initiatives are "important in sending the message" to public health agencies "that states recognize the damage mRNA shots have done to U.S. citizens."

Hulscher said the McCullough Foundation "will be actively engaged in legislative efforts to ban mRNA injections" in several states.

The state and local initiatives come as Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) called on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to "immediately revoke approval" of the COVID-19 vaccines, in a post Wednesday on X.

https://prd-tsn-main-api.s3.amazonaws.com/article/091adfc0-310f-4f67-9a5c-f5751e830c4e.pdf

Given the accumulating evidence of concern, on behalf of the Canadian public, we call on you, our
government representatives and public health officials, for:

• An immediate halt to the use of and a recall of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine products.

• An independent and transparent public inquiry into the regulatory processes leading to the
approval of these products and their ongoing use.

• Scientific assessments and analyses of all mRNA products to determine the health risks to
humans from residual plasmid DNA, potential aberrant protein production, and shift to IgG4
antibodies.

• Access to data and funding for independent research to assess the potential link between the
COVID-19 mRNA vaccines and the recent probable increase in cancer rates and mortality,
including any association with the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself.

Our plea for your immediate action is based on many scientifically-supported concerns regarding the
COVID-19 mRNA products, the latest of which are outlined below...

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/south-carolina-bill-would-ban-mrna

South Carolina Bill Would Ban mRNA Shots, Citing DNA Contamination, Shedding, and Fetal Harm: HB 4262

Would include COVID-19 and bird flu jabs.

South Carolina lawmakers have introduced a bill that would ban healthcare professionals from administering synthetic mRNA-based gene therapies, including COVID-19 vaccines, citing contamination, long-term safety concerns, and the risk of genetic damage to future generations.

If you want to ban mRNA- and DNA-based jabs in your state, you can send this bill template—backed by renowned health experts—to your legislators.

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/want-to-ban-mrna-shots-heres-a-51

Find your legislators here.

https://www.usa.gov/elected-officials

https://www.regulations.gov/document/FDA-2025-P-0335-0001

On behalf of the Co-Signatories, the undersigned submit this petition under 21 C.F.R. § 10.30 and other applicable provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) and the Public Health Service Act (PHSA) to request that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Secretary of Health and Human Services take administrative actions outlined below.

We request the Commissioner of the FDA and the Secretary of Health and Human Services revoke or suspend by taking administrative actions in respect of the earlier emergency use authorizations (EUAs), biologics license applications (BLAs), and approvals of BLAs for all the modRNA-LNP based Covid-19 products of Pfizer (Comirnaty) and Moderna (Spikevax) pursuant to sections 501 (21 U.S.C. § 351), 505(e) (21 U.S.C. § 355(e)), and 701(a) (21 U.S.C. § 371(a)) of the FD&C Act and section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. § 262), and any other applicable provisions.

https://x.com/NicHulscher/status/1906351754725192078

Insurance Data Reveals Excess Mortality Crisis Persists—Mass COVID-19 "Vaccination" Likely to Blame

Americans are dying younger:
Life expectancy is now worse than a decade ago as mRNA injection uptake surpassed 80% and cardiac, neurological & cancer deaths skyrocket.

Cardiac deaths up 8-36%:
The largest COVID-19 vaccine safety study ever conducted (99 million vaccinated individuals) found myocarditis risk surges up to 610% post-mRNA injection. Subclinical vaccine-induced myopericarditis may trigger reentrant ventricular tachycardia or spontaneous ventricular fibrillation, leading to sudden cardiac death. Our King County, WA study and CDC data confirm excess sudden cardiac deaths skyrocketed after mass mRNA injection.

Neurological deaths up 16-39%:
mRNA injections linked to Ischemic stroke (+44%), Hemorrhagic stroke (+50%), Transient ischemic attack (+67%), Myelitis (+165%), Myasthenia gravis (+71%), Alzheimer’s (+22.5%), Cognitive impairment (+138%), Depression (+68.3%), Anxiety disorders (+43.9%), Sleep disorders (+93.4%)—the neurological toll is undeniable.

Cancer rates up 10-50%:
CDC data, peer-reviewed studies, and population-level analyses suggest COVID-19 mRNA injections are likely carcinogenic, contributing to rising cancer cases. Ethical Skeptic's analysis of CDC data shows excess cancer mortality up 9% post-mRNA rollout. Studies suggest mRNA injections may impair immune surveillance, hinder DNA repair, and accelerate tumor growth—fulfilling the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis. Case reports link the shots to aggressive cancers, including intravascular large B-cell lymphoma, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. The surge in post-vaccine cancer cases demands urgent investigation.

These data suggest that the mass COVID-19 mRNA injection campaign is a primary driver of the collapse in U.S. life expectancy, preventing its full recovery. Urgent intervention by the federal government is indicated to immediately remove these life-reducing injections from the market and begin steps to reverse these negative trends.

https://jennasside.rocks/p/an-open-letter-to-robert-f-kennedy

Now, we think it’s time to talk about the elephant in the CDC-funded room.

When are you going to pull the disastrous COVID shots off the market and call for an investigation into the nefarious politicians, pundits, philanthropaths, and powerbrokers behind them?
We’ve both read Vax-Unvax. Oh, wait. You wrote it! We’ve scoured the data, heard the whistleblowers, met the devastated families, suffered the relentless media lies, and witnessed the silencing and gaslighting of the COVID vaccine-injured. You know what’s really going on—and more importantly, we know that you know. Which makes allowing the continued pushing of these products feel a little like finding out the fire chief knows your entire neighborhood is engulfed in flames but he’s too busy rescuing kittens trapped in trees (also important!) to put it out. ...

With all due respect, and I do mean that sincerely: people are dying. Babies are being injected with products that you petitioned the FDA in 2021 to “revoke Emergency Use Authorizations for and refrain from approving and licensing.” Parents are being coerced. Children are being damaged and disabled. VAERS numbers are off the literal charts. Every day that these poisons remain on the market is like watching the Titanic take on water while the captain polishes the silverware. ...

We’ve defended you. We fought for you. We trusted you. Please, be the man so many of us believe you to be.

You can do this.

https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-show-bowden

Dr. Bowden calls to ban the fucking murderous mRNA death jab because so many of her patients have been injured by them. See about 47 minutes in.

She points out that Marty Makary could ban the fucking jab right now but has failed to.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/trump-sneezed-monday-april-7-2025/comment/106718820

Jenna’s Side

Good morning Jeff and the C&C army! For regulars who don’t know me (hi! 👋), I co-authored The War on Ivermectin with the inimitable Dr. Pierre Kory, plus a stack of other books and a snarky Substack that refuses to behave.

This weekend I did what any completely normal person would do after several cups of coffee and passing one-too-many ignorant protestors on the roadside: I launched a Change.org petition urging RFK Jr. to immediately and permanently yank the COVID so-called-vaccines off the market and investigate every last criminal involved in their production, promotion, and peddling.

Please sign and share if you think zero liability and billions in profits are NOT the recipe for public health. :)

https://www.change.org/p/urge-robert-f-kennedy-jr-to-immediately-ban-covid-vaccines-and-investigate

https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/for-petes-sake-cdc-to-stop-the-addition

For Pete's Sake! CDC to Stop the Addition of Fluoride in Drinking Water per RFK Jr.

When will RFK Jr. remove the EUA COVID-19 mRNA shots from the childhood schedule and announce an FDA recall committee to pull the FDA-approved mRNA shots off the market completely? ...

Now this is what the media is talking about - the merits of removing fluoride from drinking water - but definitely not the merits of removing the COVID-19 mRNA injections from the market.

When Will RFK Jr. Announce the COVID-19 mRNA Recall?

If RFK Jr. were to announce an order for FDA Commissioner Dr. Martin Adel Makary to organize a Class 1 recall committee for all authorized (EUA) and FDA-approved COVID-19 mRNA injections still on the market (Pfizer and Moderna), there would be dynamic discussions across all media (and sighs of relief from MAHA supporters). ...

It’s Time for the Federal Government to Talk About “The Deadliest Vaccines Ever Made”
Prior to being confirmed as HHS Secretary, Mr. Kennedy openly called the COVID-19 mRNA injections “the deadliest vaccines ever made,” and consistently pointed out the high-risk neurological and physiological dangers that childhood vaccines pose to infants and children.

Now is not the time to go radio silent on the lethal mRNA shots.

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-landmark-study-proves-covid

Landmark Analysis Finds COVID-19 Vaccine Myocarditis More Common and More Severe Than SARS-CoV-2 Infection Myocarditis

Backed by 341 references, the new study calls for immediate withdrawal of COVID-19 mRNA products from the market due to cardiotoxicity concerns. ...

The points above are not exhaustive. We encourage readers to consult the full study for the complete spectrum of evidence.

This analysis confirms that the risks of COVID-19 modified mRNA injections far outweigh any theoretical benefits, and it calls for the immediate market withdrawal of these cardiotoxic products in the interest of public health and safety.

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-minnesota-files-bill-hf

A few hours ago, Minnesota State Representative Shane Mekeland filed bill HF 3152 to prohibit the administration of gene-based vaccines...

This brave effort makes Minnesota the 11th U.S. state with legislative efforts to ban mRNA injections:

It's nice, but unlikely to pass because Minnesota is a Democratic state, and Democrats are all 100% owned and controlled by Pfizer for profit.

https://cardiovascular-research-and-innovation.reseaprojournals.com/Articles/myocarditis-after-sars-cov-2-infection-and-covid-19-vaccination-epidemiology-outcomes-and-new-perspectives

We urge governments to remove the COVID-19 mRNA products from the market due to the well-documented risk of myocardial damage, a risk that is strongest for younger males (<40 years old).

https://cardiovascular-research-and-innovation.reseaprojournals.com/Articles/myocarditis-after-sars-cov-2-infection-and-covid-19-vaccination-epidemiology-outcomes-and-new-perspectives

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/the-joseph-sansone-bioweapons-prevention

The Joseph Sansone mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act of 2025
Representative Shane Mekeland has submitted Dr. Joseph Sansone’s mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act in the Minnesota legislature.

This is the first meaningful legislation proposed that accurately refers to mRNA technology as a biological weapon.

This proposed legislation is the first in the nation that recognizes that mRNA injections are already illegal and violate existing weapons of mass destruction laws.

We need more legislators in other states to introduce this legislation too. The purpose is to get this passed somewhere and get a jurisdiction to recognize mRNA technology as the biological weapons that they obviously are. ...

Below is the text of the bill that was submitted by Representative Shane Mekeland.

A bill for an act relating to public safety; designating mRNA injections and products as weapons of mass destruction; prohibiting mRNA injections and products; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 609.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

Section 1. SHORT TITLE.

This act may be known as the "mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act."

Sec. 2. [609.7121] MRNA BIOWEAPONS PROHIBITION.

Subdivision 1. Legislative intent.

It is the intent of the legislature to designate mRNA injections and products as weapons of mass destruction according to section 609.712 and

to prohibit possession or distribution of the mRNA injections and products in the state.

Subd. 2. Definitions.

(a) For purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given.

(b) "mRNA injections and products" means:

(1) with regards to the COVID injections, mRNA or "modified" messenger RNA as related to the gene altering agents. The structure was altered by substituting two N-methyl-pseudouridine amino acids for the usual uridine components so as to elude immune destruction of the mRNA, which then allows the mRNA that produces the pathogenic Spike protein to exist within cells for a longer period of time;

(2) all injections or products containing mRNA or "modified" messenger RNA;

(3) any human gene therapy product for any infectious disease indication, regardless of whether the administration is termed an immunization, vaccine, or any other term; or

(4) nanotechnology or nanoparticles that alter genes and create a biosynthetic cell replication

For the purposes of this section, mRNA does not mean naturally occurring mRNA defined as messenger ribonucleic acid that is a single-stranded molecule of RNA that corresponds to the genetic sequence of a gene.

(c) "State or local government official" means the governor, attorney general, state attorneys, county sheriffs, and other state and local law enforcement.

Subd. 3. Crime.

Whoever knowingly manufactures, acquires, possesses, or makes readily accessible to another mRNA injections and products is guilty of a crime and may be sentenced as provided under section 609.712.

Subd. 5. State or local government official.

A state or local government official must use all lawful means necessary to enforce this section. A state or local government officialwho does not enforce or investigate a violation under subdivision 3 when provided with reasonable evidence of a violation is guilty of a crime and subject to the same penalties as a person violating that subdivision.

Subd. 6. Civil action. A resident of the state may seek injunctive relief, declaratory relief, and monetary damages from the state or a state and local government official for lackof enforcement of this section.

EFFECTIVE DATE.

This section is effective August 1, 2025, and applies to crimes committed on or after that date.