patrick.net

FDA expands COVID vaccine warning about heart side effect risk for young males
healthwatch

May 21, 2025

Governor DeSantis - Please ban the COVID 19 jab immediately
oldschoolcounselor, December 20, 2023
https://rumble.com/v42cqmp-governor-desantis-please-ban-the-covid-19-jab-immediately.html

TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: This is one of several videos made by citizens urging Florida Governor Ron DeSantis to ban the covid jabs in the state of Florida. For more about the campaign, see https://josephsansone.substack.com/p/open-message-to-governor-ron-desantis. Kevin Kervick blogs as Old School Counselor at https://oldschoolcounselor.substack.com/

KEVIN KERVICK: Hi my name is Kevin Kervick. I'm a licensed marriage and family therapist. I practice primarily in New England, although I work around the country.

I'm calling on Governor Ron DeSantis to ban the jab. I've been following the covid 19 situation extensively, as most of us have, since 2020, and it's clear to me that this, you know, this so-called vaccine is dangerous. It's harming and killing people all over the world. I believe it's killed probably about 17 million people around the world and maybe as much as 700,000 people in the United States alone. And millions of people have been seriously injured by this thing.

It's clear to me that this jab comes from a US bioweapons program, and there was a measure and a countermeasure, the measure somehow was released on the world population and did tremendous damage, and then the countermeasure was released in early 2021, late 2020, early 2021, came from the same soup, it came, you know, the same program. Clearly the thing is dangerous, it does not work, doesn't prevent transmission, it doesn't prevent severe injury or death, it does nothing other than harm people.

I believe it's the greatest medical scandal certainly in my lifetime if not in history, so I have no idea why public officials are allowing this thing to remain on the market.

I think the salient point is this. Since early 2021 the data about harms was in. So Governor DeSantis had to know, his folks in Florida had to know. Certainly folks throughout the federal government knew this thing was harming and killing people. Certainly folks throughout all the public health agencies around the country in the various states had to know. And yet they did nothing to stop it. And they're still doing nothing to stop it. In my opinion that is something akin to, you know, while I'm not a lawyer, that looks like something like negligent homicide.

So this thing needs to be banned immediately.

So we're starting with Governor DeSantis because in our opinion, in my opinion, Governor DeSantis is one of the most successful and influential governors in the United States and he's running for president, and he really needs to step up now to ban this thing to stop the killing, and stop you know, the, the harms that are coming from this, this, this bioweapon.

So please, Governor DeSantis, do the right thing now, ban this job. If you do, I think a lot of people like me will consider voting for you because you'll be showing the kind of leadership that needs to be exhibited right now during this international crisis. So please, Governor DeSantis, ban this jab immediately.

MAHA Movement Flabbergasted COVID-19 Vaccines Remain on Market

Emerald Robinson Asks: Who is Really Giving Orders on Never-Ending Shots?

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
Jun 02, 2025

The recent Senate hearing on COVID-19 vaccine myocarditis and other serious adverse events was a turning point for the MAHA movement in its battle against the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex. No one is saying the COVID-19 vaccines are safe anymore. Everyone knows they can result in serious and fatal vaccine injury syndromes including myocarditis, blood clots, strokes, and acute anaphylaxis ending life in the vaccine center or a few hours later.

Emerald Robinson admitted on the Absolute Truth that she is a “MAHA Mom” who wants to see the COVID-19 vaccines pulled off the market. She pursued Dr. McCullough on this topic several times during the interview. McCullough made these observations:

US FDA new warnings on myocarditis for Pfizer and Moderna harmonized the age range from 16-25 years, which is misleading since it occurs at older ages as well.

US FDA new label fails to list “death” or black box warning for myocarditis, anaphylaxis, or other proven fatal syndromes in the peer-reviewed published literature.

NEJM publication by FDA indicated 31 million Americans should be taking COVID-19 vaccines according to new, narrowed recommendations. This is out of touch with reality which is only 15% of Americans are taking shots dwindling every week.

US FDA greenlighted fall 2025 boosters for a now extinct variant.

No country in the world has removed COVID-19 vaccines from the market and ended the vaccine campaign.

Dr. McCullough pointed out the oddest closing remark by RFK at his joint press release with FDA and NIH staffers Makary and Bhattacharya. He said by restricting use of COVID-19 vaccines the government had taken a big step in making America healthier again! What does that mean? More COVID-19 vaccination was making America unhealthy? Less vaccination is healthier? Would no COVID-19 vaccination be healthiest?

Robinson asked: “who was really giving the orders on vaccines?” McCullough said it appears to be someone above Trump and Biden. If Trump wanted to distinguish himself from Sleepy Joe, the boldest move he could make would be to pull the products of the market. Instead Trump remains in lockstep with Biden and maintains a no interview policy on the topic as the campaign grinds onward. Please enjoy this interview and appreciate Robinson’s frustration.

If Kennedy were as principled as we thought, he would have ordered these treatments to be banned and, if prevented from doing so, he should have resigned very publicly, making it clear why. He already knows how his father and uncle died and that there is a price on his head as well. But he knew the risks of the job when he took it. This is so hard to explain. Is there something that we don’t know about? Are there extraterrestrial aliens in control of this? What gives?

On May 30, 2025, the FDA issued an approval letter1 for Moderna’s new mRNA Covid “vaccine,” and the conditions that go with it. Somehow, many informed people seem unable to grasp what this means. The mRNA slaughter of millions of Americans, in particular the elderly, pregnant women, and their children, will continue. With 38,615 deaths from Covid vaccines reported to the FDA as of today, mostly from the U.S., the FDA on May 30 authorized the continued use of the deadly mRNA vaccines.2 And as we will discuss further on, each of these reported deaths represents more than 100 actual deaths that go unreported.

The FDA approval letter continues to support the mass killing of older people with the jabs and leaves open the mass jab assault on pregnant women and their offspring. The “vaccine” trials had no placebo controls, and the Moderna presentation of its case for approval was considered so perfect that it did not warrant an FDA Review Committee because, believe it or not, it was not “controversial.”

The strategy in the FDA approval letter continues the murder of the elderly, and it will continue to inflict multiple diseases on the population, including sterility, cardiovascular disease, turbo cancers, increased rates and severity of respiratory illnesses, and a general decline in our immune systems.3

To make matters much, much worse, Kennedy has now released a statement on X that reassures people that there is nothing, absolutely nothing, to worry about surrounding the FDA approval of the latest mRNA vaccine. Never mind the lack of a placebo control group or an FDA Vaccine Committee Review. Never mind that there’s no prohibition against giving it to pregnant women. Never mind, there is no restraint whatsoever on continuing the slaughter of old people, who are disproportionately the ones already being killed and most harmed.

"James Grundvig Calls On Governor DeSantis To Ban The Jab!"
Caturano and Ricks, December 20, 2023

https://rumble.com/v42990x-james-grundvig-calls-on-governor-desantis-to-ban-the-jab.html

Hello. My name is James Grundvig. I'm a former New Yorker. I got smart in 2021. I left New York City, I came down to Florida because Governor Ron DeSantis gave me hope. Now he has to take the next step in leadership. It's not enough to ban the masks and give freedom of choice, now he needs to ban the jab.

Ban the jab, Governor DeSantis. Why? Well, it's not a normal jab. It's a clot shot. It's a bioweapon. It's a gene therapy device. It is destroying human beings. And the collateral damage of the shedding, transfecting of spike protein, graphine oxide, and everything else, is destroying the unvaccinated as well. People are getting sick all over. Their blood is getting contaminated.

So you really need to take a step, show governors around the country and leaders around the world, who you're made of, ban the jab, ban the bioweapon, save Floridians from this horrible, horrible bioweapon, and you will do great by me, and great by everyone in the world because this is the leadership we need from you. Ban the jab, be a difference maker, show true leadership, show true love. The bioweapon is not the answer to covid, we know this now. Everything was a set up and a lie.

So Governor Ron DeSantis, as the father of a vaccinated autistic son, I ask you to ban the jab. Thank you.

During the first, chaotic months of the pandemic, Heritage was cautious, and supported limited mitigations. However, by mid-2020, Heritage had pivoted and begun criticizing extended shutdowns, school closures, and the economic wreckage caused by the indefinite exercise of emergency powers. It began promoting reopening plans, emphasizing in-person education, and stressing the constitutional limits on governors and federal agencies. By 2021, it had joined the anti-mandate wars, and filed amicus briefs in some of the biggest pandemic lawsuits, such as the case challenging OSHA’s vaccine-or-repeat-test rules and the CMS mandates.

In its legal briefs, Heritage described vaccine mandates as unconstitutional and an “abuse of executive power.” By 2022, Heritage publications frequently included terms like “public health tyranny,” “bureaucratic overreach,” and “scientific censorship.” It collaborated with governors like Ron DeSantis to craft alternative state health policies to preserve liberty, informed consent, and free choice.

Unquestionably, Heritage helped reshape the post-pandemic conservative agenda into one of dark skepticism toward technocracy and deep distrust of “experts.” It became a central intellectual force behind the anti-mandate movement— focusing on constitutional arguments, economic liberty, and parental control over health decisions.

That’s all terrific, and it is just what you would hope the world’s premier conservative think tank would do. But still, I have a minor gripe. There has long been one missing piece: Heritage has never directly criticized the vaccines. ...

Heritage has consistently and carefully framed its jab position as, “We are not against the vaccine. We are against the government forcing people to take it.” Fair enough. But with all the ‘nudging,’ sly coercive techniques, and censorship, and with vulnerable children, pregnant women, and adults being pressured and propagandized by false government health guidance, the libertarian position relative to the vaccines (keeping them voluntary) falls short of the mark.

Based on what I saw at Heritage on Tuesday, it appears the nation’s most influential think tank is preparing to wade into anti-vaccine waters.

Following the public panel where I spoke (which I’ve linked), Heritage invited about 30 MAHA influencers to a 2-hour private roundtable. About a half-dozen Heritage policy wonks also attended. I’m bound by a confidentiality agreement, but I can say they asked us for suggestions about how the vaccines could be rolled back. They did not take any clear position on the issue; but the fact that they organized the meeting, asked the questions, listened carefully, and engaged dynamically was incredibly encouraging.

I may be overstating the case to a modest degree, but it seems to me that, if Heritage joins the fight, the covid mRNA vaccines’ days are numbered. I was encouraged, and you should be, too.

The bold declaration came during a candid interview with Dr. Campbell, where Malhotra hinted that behind closed doors, top officials are scrambling to distance themselves from what many now view as one of the greatest medical catastrophes in modern history.

Malhotra, a former UK National Health Service (NHS) insider who was once pro-vaccine, has become one of the most credible and outspoken critics of the mRNA rollout.

He is now serving as Chief Medical Advisor to Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s MAHA Committee, a new vaccine safety body.

Malhotra says the writing is on the wall.

“They’re doing their due diligence.

“But when you look at the real data—the excess deaths, the cardiac events—this product has no business being on the market.”

Malhotra acknowledged that President Trump may still need convincing, however.

Trump, RFK, Makary Share Accountability for COVID-19 Vaccines Left on Market

At yesterday's meeting, new ACIP committee members pushed back on several claims made by CDC presenters, including the CDC's methodologies for assessing COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy. ...

ACIP didn’t schedule a vote today on COVID-19 vaccines. The committee only heard data presentations by the work group and engaged in a question-and-answer session.

Today’s meeting was the first since U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired the previous 17 ACIP members and replaced them with eight (now seven) new members. ...

During the first round of questions and answers, ACIP committee co-chair Martin Kulldorff, Ph.D., raised concerns that none of the data presented by the CDC work group came from randomized placebo-controlled trials, and that the observational studies did not use more rigorous case-controlled studies, but instead used test-negative studies, which can introduce more bias. ...

ACIP member Retsef Levi, Ph.D., questioned the CDC’s interpretation of its own efficacy data. He noted that the elderly population hospitalized with COVID-19 had higher vaccination rates than the general population.

He said a different interpretation of the same data could be that the COVID-19 vaccine makes people more vulnerable to multiple viruses. ...

New ACIP member Dr. Robert Malone also called for more transparency in the methods used. He asked for the data on the other safety outcomes the work group had ruled out. He also raised concerns about the long-term presence of the spike protein.

Healthy infants, children and adolescents aged <18 years are not recommended to receive COVID-19 vaccine

COVID-19 vaccine is not recommended for healthy infants, children or adolescents who do not have medical conditions that increase their risk of severe illness. This is because the risk of severe illness was extremely low in this cohort over the course of the pandemic, and benefits of vaccination are not considered to outweigh the potential harms.

Florida’s top health official is calling for a ban on Covid injections, warning that mRNA “vaccines” are not safe for use by “any human beings.”

In a bold and direct challenge to the ongoing push for Covid mRNA shots, Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo has escalated his criticism. ...

FDA stalls decision on petition to suspend mRNA injections, citing ‘other priorities’

The US regulator quietly delays action on a petition calling for the suspension of mRNA injections—despite evidence of regulatory failure, DNA contamination, and a surge in cancers among young people.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has delayed its response to a formal petition demanding the suspension of the mRNA Covid-19 injections, citing “the existence of other FDA priorities.”

In a letter dated 17 July 2025, Dr Vinay Prasad—recently appointed Director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)—acknowledged that the agency had “not yet reached resolution of the issues raised” in the petition.

Filed on 20 January 2025, the petition alleges that Pfizer’s Comirnaty and Moderna’s Spikevax were “unlawfully approved” in violation of federal regulatory requirements.

It calls for an immediate halt to the injections, independent testing of retained vials, and a full investigation into the approval process. ...

Because the DNA is encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles, it can bypass normal immune defences, enter human cells, and in some cases integrate into the genome. The potential consequences, the petition warns, include genomic instability, cancer, and heritable genetic damage.

One of the most serious findings is the presence of SV40 promoter sequences in Pfizer’s injection—elements known to interfere with tumour-suppressing pathways such as p53.

The petition accuses Pfizer of withholding this information from the FDA in breach of disclosure laws. ...

Under federal law, the FDA was required to respond to the petition within 180 days.

Just before the deadline, it issued a standard interim letter—acknowledging the petitioners’ main concerns but offering no timeline for a final decision.

Nor did the agency indicate that any investigation had begun. “We will respond to your petition as soon as we have reached a decision on your request,” wrote Prasad.

The agency’s delay is not uncommon—but critics say it reflects a deeper reluctance to confront the scientific and regulatory implications head-on.

Fully addressing the petition would require a sweeping and uncomfortable re-evaluation of how mRNA technologies were developed, approved, and marketed under the guise of conventional ‘vaccines.’

If the products were unlawfully licensed—mislabelled as vaccines to circumvent gene therapy regulations—the fallout would be unprecedented.

The admission alone could expose governments to extraordinary legal and financial liability—including product withdrawals, class actions, long-term health monitoring, injury compensation, and potential criminal investigations.

Gillespie said the FDA is caught “between a rock and a hard place”—but that doesn’t excuse inaction. He believes the recent surge in cancers among young people demands urgent scrutiny.

“There’s been a tremendous and continuing rise in cancers across the United States commensurate with the rollout of these products,” he said. “Government officials have seen the data… and are refusing to address the elephant in the room.”

A powerful new documentary is pulling back the curtain on the dangers of mRNA “vaccines,” and it features some of the world’s most prominent doctors and scientists whose warnings have been silenced for years.

“Inside mRNA Vaccines: The Movie” delivers a unanimous message as it calls for the use of mRNA technology to be stopped immediately.

For years, the public has been bombarded with the claim that COVID-19 shots were “safe and effective.”

The film presents a starkly different reality, one backed by extensive evidence of widespread adverse reactions, severe injuries, and alarming long-term risks.

Despite mounting proof of harm, Big Pharma is moving at full speed to develop dozens of new mRNA products, with the backing of world leaders who openly promote expanding the technology far beyond COVID.

There are greater than 3400 peer reviewed manuscripts in the medical literature concerning fatal and nonfatal COVID-19 vaccine injuries including those recognized by regulatory agencies around the world such as myocarditis, neurologic injury, thrombosis, and immunologic syndromes. Emerging evidence from diverse global datasets indicates patterns of concerning adverse events and mortality trends associated with COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, raising critical questions about risk-benefit balance and long-term safety. Due to these significant concerns, we reviewed the literature for excess mortality, DNA contamination, and negative efficacy associated with COVID-19 vaccines, along with compiling a comprehensive list of all calls for an immediate moratorium.

Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify as Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits

COVID-19 vaccination campaigns around the globe have failed to meet fundamental standards of safety and efficacy, leading to mounting evidence of significant harm. More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, researchers, and concerned citizens, 240 elected government officials, 17 professional public health and physician organizations, 2 State Republican Parties, 17 Republican Party County Committees, and 6 scientific studies from across the world have called for the market withdrawal of COVID-19 vaccines. As of September 6, 2024, the CDC has documented 19,028 deaths in the United States reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) by healthcare professionals or pharmaceutical companies who believe the product is related to the death. The total number of COVID-19 vaccine deaths reported to VAERS (37,544 among all participating countries) have far exceeded the recall limits of past vaccine withdrawals by up to 375,340%.

ACIP launches sweeping Covid-19 vaccine review under Retsef Levi

Billions of Covid vaccine doses were rolled out on assurances they were safe and effective. Now, ACIP’s new Covid immunisation working group is asking the questions regulators never did. ...

Now, Levi is no longer just a dissenter.

He has been appointed chair of the CDC’s new Covid-19 vaccine working group, and with today’s release of its Terms of Reference, the scale of his task has come into sharp focus.

Under the guidance of Levi and his colleagues, the ACIP working group now has a mandate unlike anything the committee has ever undertaken.

For the first time, federal advisers will investigate the unresolved issues that have dogged the vaccines since their rushed rollout in late 2020.

From DNA contamination in the manufacturing process to the persistence of spike protein and mRNA in the body, from immune class switching following repeated boosting to safety in pregnancy, cardiovascular risks, and long-term disability, the list of questions is as sweeping as it is sensitive.

The Terms of Reference stretch far beyond the narrow remit that characterised ACIP’s early deliberations, when myocarditis was acknowledged as the only confirmed harm and most safety reviews stopped at 42 days.

Levi and his team are now tasked with probing long-term outcomes, mapping vaccine policies around the world, and assessing, to what extent, years of official reassurances about safety and efficacy hold up against emerging data.

It is a striking reversal for the CDC and the FDA.

For years, these agencies dismissed critics who raised concerns about DNA contamination, biodistribution, immune imprinting, or reproductive safety as “alarmists” and spreaders of “misinformation.”

Now, the CDC’s own advisory body has committed to revisiting each of those questions in detail, and to identifying the gaps in evidence that should have been addressed before mass vaccination ever began.

The stakes could not be higher.

Covid-19 vaccines remain one of the most divisive issues in medicine, and the CDC’s credibility has been battered by accusations of selective data presentation. ...

DEMASI: I looked at the terms of reference – there's an extraordinary range of issues, from DNA contamination to pregnancy safety to immune imprinting. What do you see as the most pressing issues?

LEVI: Yes, this is a comprehensive and ambitious agenda we’ll be working on in the coming months and years. The work group will set priorities, and in consultation with the CDC, we will focus on key issues fundamental to understanding the efficacy and safety of the Covid-19 vaccines.

This is new technology, so it raises new questions. For example, unlike traditional vaccines, when a Covid vaccine is administered, we don’t know the actual dose. The vaccine introduces into the body’s cells the mRNA code that is wrapped in nano lipids, and as a result the cells are instructed to produce the spike protein. However, everyone could produce a different amount of spike protein. The initial safety paradigm was that the vaccine contents would only stay in the arm and be cleared after a short duration. Now we know that’s not true – so we need to understand the biodistribution and persistence of the mRNA, the spike protein, and the lipid nanoparticles, and what their respective risks are.

DEMASI: Hearing you say all this feels surreal. Billions of doses have been administered, and we were assured the testing was “rigorous.” Yet now you’re saying there are huge unknowns — about dosage, how long it lingers in the body, even its safety. Were we lied to by public health authorities?

LEVI: I want to be forward-facing. I think that the new ACIP was appointed with a goal of asking more questions and bringing all the available information and knowledge needed to understand the efficacy and the safety of these Covid-19 vaccines. Many of our questions are not fully answered and require further investigation. I believe that only transparent and comprehensive pursuit of the answers will allow us to rebuild trust, and ensure that whatever we recommend is based on the best scientific evidence, and honesty about what we know and what we do not know.

DEMASI: But again, shouldn’t this have been done before we started injecting people?

LEVI: I hear you. I believe that the new ACIP members were appointed to assess and change the way ACIP makes recommendations. We will leave no stone unturned and look at all possible data from the FDA to the CDC, from the published and unpublished literature, and from the experience of clinicians who care for patients as well as from patients themselves. We need to be fully transparent about what we know, and what we don't, and unfortunately that was not always practised consistently in the past. My intention is to be part of changing that. ...

DEMASI: So, would you consider these “gene therapies” or not?

LEVI: I think that this is something very valid to argue because the Covid vaccine delivers genetic material to cells so they make the spike protein. Also, as you know, there is an issue with DNA contamination – high levels of plasmid DNA found in the vaccines – which is not supposed to be there, and the question is, what is that doing to the body? There is evidence that some people may still be producing spike protein more than 700 days after the last vaccination. That's a very concerning finding.

DEMASI: So are you saying that if someone is still making spike protein 700 days after being vaccinated, then some of the contaminating plasmid DNA – which is not supposed to be there - may have integrated into their genome and they are now a spike factory?

LEVI: Well, I think that’s definitely one of the plausible mechanisms that could explain this finding. Yes. There might be others, and this is an example of a major gap in our current knowledge that requires further research, promptly.

DEMASI: There’s so much zealotry surrounding vaccines, I don’t know why it is so hard to imagine that they may cause long-term harms…

LEVI: For some reason, there is a misconception that harms of vaccines primarily show up shortly after vaccination, and long-term harms are assumed to be unlikely and essentially ignored. But remember that the goal of vaccination is to drive a long-term impact on the immune system, so why don’t we acknowledge that it may also cause long-term harm? We also have to look at what repeated exposure does – especially with vaccines that are given every season, like Covid-19. We know already that they create some unique changes in the composition of antibodies – there is what is known as class switching – antibodies switching into IgG4 – which is typically considered to have a role in downregulating the immune response. It is also associated with a lot of autoimmune conditions. Now, do we know for sure what the impact is? No, but this is another important set of questions we have to answer, and that we’ll be examining. ...

DEMASI: One of those gaps in the terms of reference is Covid vaccines in pregnancy. Thoughts?

LEVI: Yes, vaccinating pregnant women is particularly concerning. We tell them not to eat sushi, right? We place many restrictions during this time because pregnancy is a delicate biological process, and any interruption or exposure could have grave implications for the foetus, baby, and mother. Yet with Covid vaccines we gave broad recommendations in pregnancy, with no clinical trials. The original pivotal trials excluded pregnant women, and the only trial ever conducted was very small, underpowered, focused on vaccination in later stages of pregnancy and stopped early. Having researched this topic myself, I can say the literature is mostly retrospective observational studies – methodologically weak for assessing safety. I believe the process we followed failed the principle of ‘first do no harm.’ We need a different approach: be honest about what we know and don’t, and do what it takes to close these gaps, including potentially randomised clinical trials.

DEMASI: The terms of reference make a note that you will compare US policy with policies in other countries… why is that important?

LEVI: In many ways, US vaccination policy is among the most aggressive in the world, including with Covid vaccines until recently. Mapping those differences and understanding the rationale of other countries, and comparing the pros and cons, is part of our job. For example, in the US we give the hepatitis B vaccine on the first day of life. That’s not the case in Sweden, Denmark and other countries. When we even discuss not doing that here, some people scream “it’s a crime”… But Sweden and Denmark have reasonable policies and we could potentially learn from them.

DEMASI: Much of this inquiry will come too late for people who've already been vaccine-injured. What do you say to that? What is in it for them?

LEVI: I'm glad you're asking this, because I want to make sure we don't leave them behind. We have a moral obligation to do whatever we can to document the injuries and care for injured people – not just Covid vaccine injuries, but vaccine injuries more broadly. Not only have we not done this in the US, but often vaccine-injured people have been outrageously gaslighted and accused of being anti-vaxxers…

DEMASI: Right, they took the vaccine and they’re still called anti-vaxxers…

LEVI: That’s flawed and morally wrong. We want to acknowledge and validate them. I hope that a big part of our work will be to understand the vaccine. As part of doing that we're going to engage the physicians who care for these patients, to build an understanding of how these injuries occur, what the typical patterns and mechanisms are, and where the current diagnostic and therapeutic gaps lie. Many vaccine-injured patients go from doctor to doctor, are gaslit, and rarely or wrongly diagnosed. From this process, I hope we will be able to formulate recommendations regarding policies the CDC and other agencies could adopt to create a system that acknowledges injuries, diagnoses them, and invests in the research needed to develop treatments.

DEMASI: At the last meeting, the CDC only admitted to myocarditis as the only real signal. Do you expect that your investigations will uncover more safety signals?

LEVI: When you read through the literature, the statement that the only harm the Covid-19 vaccines cause is myocarditis—seems to me very detached from reality. We need a far more nuanced approach that does not just look narrowly at short-term specific diagnoses but instead looks more broadly at what we know about potential harms. This is the only way we can rebuild and sustain trust in vaccines.

DEMASI: You are on social media occasionally, so surely, you’ve seen people screaming that we already have enough data to recommend no one gets another mRNA shot. Ever. What’s your reaction?

LEVI: I understand the impatience and realise we might receive different criticisms. However, I strongly believe that unless we run a very rigorous and evidence-based process it will be hard to secure broad trust in ACIP recommendations – and this is critical.

It was a classic Trumpian third way. Allow me to summarize. Trump just admitted, for the first time, that the shots might not have been as great as he’s always thought. But not only that. The President just said:

Some people fairly think mRNA stinks.
The fight over mRNA is tearing the CDC apart — so it must be resolved.
It’s not his fault — President Trump relied on Pfizer data.
Pfizer hid the data.

He allowed that Operation Warp Speed might not have been “brilliant,” and if not, he wants answers.

He wants answers NOW.

Trump’s Truth wasn’t just venting or blame-dodging; it was political judo. By demanding immediately Pfizer release its “extraordinary” internal data, he boxed them in. If they produce the data, Kennedy’s team will dissect it. If they don’t, Trump will say, “See, they’re hiding something.” If Pfizer denies that it ever gave Trump secret data, then they open up the court of public opinion, and the trial begins.

Meanwhile, all of it allows for the possibility that Trump might’ve been tricked. He’s tilting in Kennedy’s direction.

Call it throwing down a gauntlet, letting a genie out of a bottle, or crossing the jabby Rubicon— whichever, Trump’s post is a tipping point of no return.

But maybe most importantly, Trump just ripped off the media’s bandaid of pretense that all the CDC hysteria is just about vaccines in general, or firing of directors, or anything else. He just nailed the debate to the church door: it’s about the jabs.

He has, once again, co-opted and occupied the media narrative. Nobody will want to talk about anything else now. ...

But this morning, when Trump essentially said, “Maybe Warp Speed wasn’t brilliant, maybe Pfizer’s hiding data, maybe the jabs themselves are the issue,” he named the unnameable.

That instantly redefined the entire conflict.

Let me be clear: this isn’t a fight to save a shelved vaccine technology. This is an existential fight for Democrats, and Trump picked the fight now, right as primary season is heating up.

Two things happened yesterday following President Trump’s explosive Labor Day vaccine post. First, only second-tier media (CNN, CNBC, USA Today, Axios, etc) covered the story, delicately and tentatively. Second, and much more telling, the nonstop, wall-to-wall coverage of the CDC-Kennedy controversy completely disappeared. Shazam! Trump nuked the narrative. Let’s start with STAT News’s story, headlined, “Trump says CDC is ‘being ripped apart’ over Covid products, calls for drugmakers to prove their benefits.”

The experts are spinning; they haven’t quite yet decided what to say about the President’s vaccine post. Which means nobody’s told them the new narrative yet.

“Experienced observers of the Trump administration were uncertain what to make of the Truth Social post,” STAT reported, “viewing it as being akin to a Rorschach test.” In other words: “the anti-vaxxers love it, they think he’s saying Pfizer lied to him,” an anonymous ‘former official’ explained. “The public health people like it too, they think he’s trying to create daylight with RFK.”

But, “I would not want to be (Pfizer CEO) Al Bourla today,” the former official added. ...

As for the big corporate media players— it’s not fair to say they completely ignored the story. To be sure, they didn’t report Trump’s post, but they dropped the rope on the exploding CDC narrative like they’d just realized they were holding the business end of a coral snake.

And, as we expected, conservative social media was completely consumed by Trump’s post yesterday. ...

Trump flipped the burden.

It’s not Secretary Kennedy’s job, to prove their shots are unsafe. It’s Pfizer and Moderna’s job to prove they’re safe— in public, under the lights, and without the protection of captured regulators. And to “do it NOW.”

Although Trump only named Pfizer (the household name), every other mRNA player heard the message, too, loud and clear. ...

In other words, the debate is no longer about Monarez, the CDC, satanic scientists, HEP-B, or “trust in science.” Trump yanked pharma onto the stage and nailed the issue to the wall: it’s the mRNA jabs themselves. From here on out, every defender and every critic will fight on that ground, where Kennedy is strongest and Pfizer has the most to lose.

The FDA is conducting an “intense investigation” into the deaths of young, healthy children following COVID-19 vaccination, the agency’s commissioner confirmed in a CNN interview last week.

“We’re going to release a report in the coming few weeks,” Dr. Marty Makary, head of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), told CNN’s Jake Tapper. “We’re talking to the primary sources, the family members who lost a child … we’re reviewing the autopsy reports, we’re having physicians do the investigation,” he said. ...

Cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough said the investigation is “very late” and should also examine adult post-vaccination deaths, adding that administration of the COVID-19 vaccines should be halted pending the outcome of such an investigation.

He said:

“Starting with the pediatric deaths is an anemic start, as we expect that he will review all … cases and the dozens of peer-reviewed manuscripts that have analyzed these cases. Any such investigation should be done after any further vaccination is halted, so more deaths do not occur under the new FDA administration.”

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher agreed. He called the investigation “a breath of fresh air” but said it “should have been initiated a long time ago — in 2021.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) vaccine advisory board had its chance.

On Friday, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)—newly reconstituted with members who were supposed to prioritize transparency under HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—could have finally taken action on what’s become impossible to ignore: COVID-19 shots are contaminated with plasmid DNA carrying human gene segments (here) capable of integrating into recipients’ genomes.

COVID shots have been linked to 38,773 deaths and a total of 1,666,646 adverse events, per CDC VAERS data—and since the Harvard Pilgrim study commissioned by HHS found that fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries are ever reported to VAERS, the true numbers are likely far higher.

There are exploding rates of myocarditis and pericarditis, a surge of aggressive “turbo cancers,” widespread reports of menstrual irregularities and fertility concerns, documented immune suppression after repeated doses, and a complete lack of long-term safety testing for cancer, genetic damage, or autoimmune disease.

But ACIP refused to issue any warning.

Ages 6 Months to 64 Years: ‘Individual Decision-Making’

All 12 members voted unanimously that for people ages 6 months through 64 years, COVID vaccination should be based on “individual-based decision making.”

The panel emphasized that the risk-benefit is “most favorable” for people at higher risk of severe COVID and “lowest” for healthy people.

In other words, COVID shots remain recommended as a legitimate option, with no statement advising against them.

Age 65 and Older: ‘Shared Clinical Decision-Making’

For older adults (65 and up), ACIP moved away from its prior blanket recommendation that all seniors should get the vaccine.

Now, the board says decisions should be made through “shared clinical decision-making,” meaning patients are told to consult their healthcare providers on whether to take the shot.

But again—no warning, no reversal, no acknowledgment of the gene-contaminated injections.

COVID Shots Now Easier to Access—No Prescription Required

ACIP also considered whether states should require prescriptions for COVID shots.

That vote split 6–6, with Chair Martin Kulldorff breaking the tie against the measure.

The result?

No prescriptions required.

COVID shots remain open-access, widely available at pharmacies, and—thanks to ACIP’s recommendation—still covered by insurance.

A Hollow Pivot

By softening its language for seniors and shifting younger age groups into “individual choice” framing, ACIP creates the illusion of restraint.

In reality, the panel kept COVID shots on the table for all Americans while burying the growing evidence of risk.

Bottom Line

ACIP had the power to do what the evidence demands—recommend against COVID shots altogether.

Instead, the board doubled down on keeping them in circulation.

CHD Asks FDA to Revoke COVID Vaccine Licenses, Calls on Public to Submit ‘Hundreds of Thousands’ of Comments

Children’s Health Defense filed a Citizen Petition with the FDA, urging the agency to revoke all existing licenses granted to the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.

On Monday, CHD filed a Citizen Petition with the FDA and is urging the public, including healthcare workers, parents and military members, to submit comments on the petition. ...

CHD calls on the public to submit comments on FDA’s website

The FDA is now obligated to review the petition and respond within 180 days, although the agency may extend that timeline.

In the meantime, CHD said it hopes that hundreds of thousands of people will read the petition on the FDA’s website, and express their support — sharing their thoughts and experiences.

We first became suspicious of the safety of the mRNA injections when my wife's co-worker dropped dead shortly after taking it:

https://www.altamesafuneralhome.com/obituary/danielle-carmichael

Then my father-in-law developed tachycardia after taking the mRNA injection. This required surgery to correct.

Then a friend's wife developed myocarditis after taking the mRNA injection. Her doctor admitted that the mRNA was almost certainly the cause, but refused to report the incident on VAERS because he was afraid for his medical license.

Then several more such cases happened to people we know.

I have no doubt that the mRNA injections are extremely dangerous. The continued lies from the medical establishment about this danger have destroyed their credibility.

In addition, it was obviously an outright lie that the mRNA injections were effective at preventing infection or transmission. Everyone I know who got the mRNA also got infected with the virus, yet many who did not get the mRNA remained free of infection. This looks like strong negative efficacy.

These lies and the coercion to inject the dangerous mRNA are perhaps the worst crimes against humanity ever committed, given the global scale of the crimes.

One further comment: your use of the Google ReCaptcha spyware hands over all data on this page to Google, as does every use of 3rd party javascript. This is a gross violation of privacy and blurs the lines between the government and Google.